SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aerts, R. (1999) Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant-soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50, 2937.
  • Bazzaz, F.A. (1996) Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Berendse, F., Elberse, W.T. & Geerts, R.H.M.E. (1992) Competition and nitrogen loss from plants in grassland ecosystems. Ecology, 73, 4653.
  • Brooker, R., Kikvidze, Z., Pugnaire, F.I., Callaway, R.M., Choler, P., Lortie, C.J. & Michalet, R. (2005) The importance of importance. Oikos, 109, 6370.
  • Buckland, S.M. & Grime, J.P. (2000) The effects of trophic structure and soil fertility on the assembly of plant communities: a microcosm experiment. Oikos, 91, 336352.
  • Burt-Smith, G.S., Grime, J.P. & Tilman, D. (2003) Seedling resistance to herbivory as a predictor of relative abundance in a synthesised prairie community. Oikos, 101, 345353.
  • Callaway, R.M. & Aschehoug, E.T. (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science, 290, 521523.
  • Clarkson, D.T. (1965) Calcium-uptake by calcicole and calcifuge species in the genus Agrostis-L. Journal of Ecology, 53, 427435.
  • Coomes, D.A. & Grubb, P.J. (2000) Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs, 70, 171207.
  • Craine, J.M., Fargione, J. & Sugita, S. (2005) Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients. New Phytologist, 166, 933940.
  • Craine, J.M. & Reich, P.B. (2005) Leaf-level light compensation points are lower in shade-tolerant woody seedlings: evidence from a synthesis of 115 species. New Phytologist, 166, 710713.
  • Craine, J.M., Tilman, D.G., Wedin, D.A., Reich, P.B., Tjoelker, M.J. & Knops, J.M.H. (2002) Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species. Functional Ecology, 16, 563574.
  • Craine, J.M., Wedin, D.A., Chapin, F.S. III & Reich, P.B. (2003) Relationship between the structure of root systems and resource use for 11 North American grassland plants. Plant Ecology, 165, 85100.
  • Fahey, T.J., Battles, J.J. & Wilson, G.F. (1998) Responses of early successional northern hardwood forests to changes in nutrient availability. Ecological Monographs, 68, 183212.
  • Fynn, R.W.S., Morris, C.D. & Kirkman, K.P. (2005) Plant strategies and trait trade-offs influence trends in competitive ability along gradients of soil fertility and disturbance. Journal of Ecology, 93, 384394.
  • Gleeson, S.K. & Tilman, D. (1990) Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils. Ecology, 71, 11441155.
  • Gleeson, S.K. & Tilman, D. (1994) Plant allocation, growth rate and successional status. Functional Ecology, 8, 543550.
  • Goldberg, D.E. (1996) Competitive ability: definitions, contingency and correlated traits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biology Sciences, 351, 13771385.
  • Goldberg, D.E., Rajaniemi, T., Gurevitch, J. & Stewart-Oaten, A. (1999) Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology, 80, 11181131.
  • Grace, J.B. (1990) On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. Perspectives on Plant Competition (eds J.B.Grace & D.Tilman), pp. 5166. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Grace, J.B. (1995) On the measurement of plant competition intensity. Ecology, 76, 305308.
  • Greeney, W.J., Bella, D.A. & Curl, H.C. (1973) A theoretical approach to interspecific competition in phytoplankton communities. American Naturalist, 107, 405425.
  • Grime, J.P. (1963) Factors determining the occurrence of calcifuge species on shallow soils over calcareous substrata. Journal of Ecology, 51, 375390.
  • Grime, J.P. (1965) Shade tolerance in flowering plants. Nature, 208, 161163.
  • Grime, J.P. (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 242, 344347.
  • Grime, J.P. (1977) Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 11691194.
  • Grime, J.P. (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
  • Grime, J.P. (2001) Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.
  • Grime, J.P. & MacPherson-Stewart, S.F. & Dearman, R.S. (1968) An Investigation of leaf palatability using snail Cepaea nemoralis L. Journal of Ecology, 56, 405420.
  • Groves, R.H., Austin, M.P. & Kaye, P.E. (2003) Competition between Australian native and introduced grasses along a nutrient gradient. Austral Ecology, 28, 491498.
  • Haag, J.J., Coupe, M.D. & Cahill, J.F. (2004) Antagonistic interactions between competition and insect herbivory on plant growth. Journal of Ecology, 92, 156167.
  • Hille Ris Lambers, J., Harpole, W.S., Tilman, D., Knops, J. & Reich, P.B. (2004) Mechanisms responsible for the positive diversity-productivity relationship in Minnesota grasslands. Ecology Letters, 7, 661668.
  • Hodge, A., Robinson, D. & Fitter, A. (2000) Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen? Trends in Plant Science, 5, 304308.
  • Hodge, A., Robinson, D., Griffiths, B.S. & Fitter, A.H. (1999) Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 811820.
  • Inouye, R.S. & Tilman, D. (1995) Convergence and divergence of old-field vegetation after 11 yr of nitrogen addition. Ecology, 76, 18721887.
  • Keddy, P., Gaudet, C. & Fraser, L.H. (2000) Effects of low and high nutrients on the competitive hierarchy of 26 shoreline plants. Journal of Ecology, 88, 413423.
  • Lusk, C.H. (2002) Leaf area accumulation helps juvenile evergreen trees tolerate shade in a temperate rainforest. Oecologia, 132, 188196.
  • Mahmoud, A. & Grime, J.P. (1976) Analysis of competitive ability in 3 perennial grasses. New Phytologist, 77, 431435.
  • Monod, J. (1950) La technique de culture continue; théorie et applications. Ann Institute Pasteur, 79, 390410.
  • Peterson, C.J. & Pickett, S.T.A. (1995) Forest reorganization – a case-study in an old-growth forest catastrophic blowdown. Ecology, 76, 763774.
  • Poorter, H. (1989) Interspecific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of Higher Plants (eds H.Lambers, M.L.Cambridge, H.Konings & T.L.Pons), pp. 4568. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
  • Putz, F.E. & Canham, C.D. (1992) Mechanisms of arrested succession in shrublands – root and shoot competition between shrubs and tree seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 49, 267275.
  • Rajaniemi, T.K., Allison, V.J. & Goldberg, D.E. (2003) Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity. Journal of Ecology, 91, 407416.
  • Raynaud, X. & Leadley, P.W. (2004) Soil characteristics play a key role in modeling nutrient competition in plant communities. Ecology, 85, 22002214.
  • Reich, P.B., Knops, J.M.H., Tilman, D., Craine, J., Ellsworth, D., Tjoelker, M., Lee, T., Wedin, D., Naeem, S., Bahauddin, D., Hendrey, G., Jose, S., Wrage, K., Goth, J. & Bengston, W. (2001) Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature, 410, 809812.
  • Reich, P., Wright, I., Cavender-Bares, J., Craine, J., Oleksyn, J., Westoby, M. & Walters, M. (2003) The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164, S143S164.
  • Schimel, J.P. & Bennett, J. (2004) Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology, 85, 591602.
  • Schwinning, S. & Weiner, J. (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia, 113, 447455.
  • Shipley, B. & Peters, R.H. (1990) A test of the Tilman model of plant strategies – relative growth-rate and biomass partitioning. American Naturalist, 136, 139153.
  • Shipley, B. & Peters, R.H. (1991) The seduction by mechanism – a reply to Tilman. American Naturalist, 138, 12761282.
  • Smethurst, P.J. & Comerford, N.B. (1993) Simulating nutrient uptake by single or competing and contrasting root systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 57, 13611367.
  • Suding, K.N., Larson, J.R., Thorsos, E., Steltzer, H. & Bowman, W.D. (2004) Species effects on resource supply rates: do they influence competitive interactions? Plant Ecology, 175, 4758.
  • Thompson, K. (1987) The resource ratio hypothesis and the meaning of competition. Functional Ecology, 1, 297303.
  • Tilman, D. (1977) Resource competition between planktonic algae: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology, 58, 338348.
  • Tilman, D. (1980) Resources: a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. American Naturalist, 116, 362393.
  • Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tilman, D. (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. American Naturalist, 125, 827852.
  • Tilman, D. (1986a) Nitrogen-limited growth in plants from different successional stages. Ecology, 67, 555563.
  • Tilman, D. (1986b) Resources, competition, and the dynamics of plant communities. Plant Ecology (ed. M.Crawley), pp. 5175. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  • Tilman, D. (1987a) On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority. Functional Ecology, 1, 304315.
  • Tilman, D. (1987b) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecological Monographs, 57, 189214.
  • Tilman, D. (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Function of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Tilman, D. (1990) Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients the elements of a predictive theory of competition. Perspectives on Plant Competition (eds J.B.Grace & D.Tilman), pp. 484. Academic Press, New York.
  • Tilman, D. (1991a) Relative growth-rates and plant allocation patterns. American Naturalist, 138, 12691275.
  • Tilman, D. (1991b) The schism between theory and ardent empiricism – a reply to Shipley and Peters. American Naturalist, 138, 12831286.
  • Tilman, D. & Cowan, M.L. (1989) Growth of old field herbs on a nitrogen gradient. Functional Ecology, 3, 425438.
  • Tilman, D. & Wedin, D. (1991) Dynamics of nitrogen competition between successional grasses. Ecology, 72, 10381049.
  • Tinker, P.B. & Nye, P.H. (2000) Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Titman, D. (1976) Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource-based competition theory. Science, 192, 463465.
  • Walters, M.B. & Reich, P.B. (1999) Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? New Phytologist, 143, 143154.
  • Weaver, J.E. (1968) Prairie Plants and Their Environment: a Fifty Year Study in the Midwest. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NB.
  • Weaver, J.E. & Zink, E. (1945) Extent and longevity of seminal roots of certain grasses. Plant Physiology, 21, 201217.
  • Wedin, D.A. & Tilman, D. (1990) Species effects on nitrogen cycling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia, 84, 433441.
  • Wedin, D.A. & Tilman, D.G. (1993) Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecological Monographs, 63, 199229.
  • Wedin, D.A. & Tilman, D. (1996) Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science, 274, 17201723.
  • Welden, C.W. & Slauson, W.L. (1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance – an overlooked distinction and some implications. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 2344.