SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bauer, S., Wyszomirski, T., Berger, U., Hildenbrandt, H. & Grimm, V. (2004) Asymmetric competition as a natural outcome of neighbourhood interactions among plants: results from the field-of-neighbourhood modelling approach. Plant Ecology, 170, 135145.
  • Baumann, D.T., Kropff, M.J. & Bastiaans, L. (2000) Intercropping leeks to suppress weeds. Weed Research, 40, 359374.
  • Benjamin, L.R. (1999) A comparison of different rules of partitioning crop growth between individual plants. Ecological Modelling, 115, 111118.
  • Berger, U. & Hildenbrandt, H. (2000) A new approach to spatially explicit modelling of forest dynamics: spacing, ageing and neighbourhood competition of mangrove trees. Ecological Modelling, 132, 287302.
  • Bolker, B.M., Pacala, S.W. & Neuhauser, C. (2003) Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: what do we really know? American Naturalist, 162, 135148.
  • Busing, R.T. & Mailly, D. (2004) Advances in spatial, individual-based modelling of forest dynamics. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 831842.
  • Chib, S. & Greenberg, E. (1995) Understanding the Metropolis Hastings algorithm. American Statistician, 49, 327335.
  • Clark, J.S., LaDeau, S. & Ibáñez, I. (2004) Fecundity of trees and the colonization-competition hypothesis. Ecological Monographs, 74, 415442.
  • Coomes, D.A., Rees, M., Turnbull, L. & Ratcliffe, S. (2002) On mechanisms of coexistence among annual-plant species, using neighbourhood techniques and simulation models. Plant Ecology, 163, 2338.
  • Ellison, A.M. (2004) Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecology Letters, 7, 509520.
  • Fowler, N.L. (1984) The role of germination date, spatial arrangement, and neighbourhood effects in competitive interactions in Linum. Journal of Ecology, 72, 307318.
  • Freckleton, R.P. & Watkinson, A.R. (2001) Asymmetric competition between plant species. Functional Ecology, 15, 615623.
  • García-Barrios, L., Mayer-Foulkes, D., Franco, M., Urquijo-Vásquez, G. & Franco-Pérez, J. (2001) Development and validation of a spatially explicit individual-based mixed crop growth model. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 63, 507526.
  • Gelfand, A.E. Schmidt, A.M. Wu, S. Silander, J.A. Latimer, A. & Rebelo, A.G. (2005) Modelling species diversity through species level hierarchical modelling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, 54, 120.
  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S. & Rubin, D.B. (2004) Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
  • Gilks, W.R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D.J. (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
  • Hubbell, S.P., Ahumada, J.A., Con Dit, R. & Foster, R.B. (2001) Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest. Ecological Research, 16, 859875.
  • Hunt, R. (1982) Plant Growth Curves: the Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis. Arnold, London.
  • Jones, C.G. & Lawton, J.H. (1995) Linking Species and Ecosystems. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Kira, T. Ogawa, H. & Sakazaki, N. (1953) Intraspecific competition among higher plants. I. Competition-yield-density interrelationship in regularly dispersed populations. Journal of the Institute Polytechnic Osaka City University Series D, 4, 116.
  • Larocque, G.R. (2002) Examining different concepts for the development of a distance-dependent competition model for red pine diameter growth using long-term stand data differing in initial stand density. Forest Science, 48, 2434.
  • Law, R. & Dieckmann, U. (2000) A dynamical system for neighborhoods in plant communities. Ecology, 81, 21372148.
  • Lindquist, J.L., Rhode, D., Puettmann, K.J. & Maxwell, B.D. (1994) The influence of plant population spatial arrangement on individual plant yield. Ecologocal Applications, 4, 518524.
  • Lorimer, C.G. (1983) Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 6, 343360.
  • Martin, G.L. & Ek, A.R. (1984) A comparison of competition measures and growth models for predicting plantation red pine diameter and height growth. Forest Science, 30, 731743.
  • Mitchell-Olds, T. (1987) Analysis of local variation in plant size. Ecology, 68, 8287.
  • Mithen, R., Harper, J.L. & Weiner, J. (1984) Growth and mortality of individual plants as a function of ‘available area’. Oecologia, 62, 5760.
  • Murrell, D.J. & Law, R. (2003) Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors. Ecology Letters, 6, 4859.
  • Nagashima, H. (1999) The processes of height-rank determination among individuals and neighbourhood effects in Chenopodium album L. stands. Annals of Botany, 83, 501507.
  • Nagashima, H., Terashima, I. & Katoh, S. (1995) Effects of plant density on frequency distributions of plant height in Chenopodium album stands: analyses based on continuous monitoring of height-growth of individual plants. Annals of Botany, 75, 173180.
  • Opie, J.E. (1968) Predictability of individual tree growth using various definitions of competing basal area. Forest Science, 14, 314323.
  • Pacala, S.W. & Silander, J.A. (1990) Field tests of neighborhood population dynamic models of two annual weed species. Ecological Monographs, 60, 113134.
  • Purves, D.W. & Law, R. (2002) Experimental derivation of functions relating growth of Arabidopsis thaliana to neighbour size and distance. Journal of Ecology, 90, 882894.
  • Ross, M.A. & Harper, J.L. (1972) Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology, 60, 7788.
  • Schwinning, S. & Weiner, J. (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia, 113, 447455.
  • Seber, G.A.F. & Wild, C.J. (1989) Nonlinear Regression. Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Silander, J.A. & Pacala, S.W. (1985) Neighborhood predictors of plant performance. Oecologia, 66, 256263.
  • Smith, B.J. (2004) Bayesian Output Analysis Program (BOA), Version 1.1. User's Manual. http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/boa/BOA.pdf .
  • Soares, P. & Tomé, M. (1999) Distance-dependent competition measures for eucalyptus plantations in Portugal. Annals of Forestry Science, 56, 307319.
  • Stoll, P. & Bergius, E. (2005) Pattern and process: competition causes regular spacing of individuals within plant populations. Journal of Ecology, 93, 395403.
  • Stoll, P., Weiner, J. & Schmid, B. (1994) Growth variation in a naturally established population of Pinus sylvestris. Ecology, 75, 660670.
  • Stoyan, D. & Penttinen, A. (2000) Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Statistical Science, 15, 6178.
  • Vandermeer, J. (1989) The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Weiner, J. (1984) Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals. Journal of Ecology, 72, 183195.
  • Weiner, J., Griepentrog, H.-W. & Kristensen, L. (2001) Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum aestivum increases with crop density. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 784790.
  • Weiner, J., Stoll, P., Muller-Landau, H. & Jasentuliyana, A. (2001) The effects of density, spatial pattern, and competitive symmetry on size variation in simulated plant populations. American Naturalist, 158, 438450.
  • Wimberly, M.C. & Bare, B.B. (1996) Distance-dependent and distance-independent models of Douglas-fir and western hemlock basal area growth following silvicultural treatment. Forest Ecology and Management, 89, 111.
  • Yokozawa, M. & Hara, T. (1999) Global versus local coupling models and theoretical stability analysis of size-structure dynamics in plant populations. Ecological Modelling, 118, 6172.