SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aarssen, L.W. (2005) Why don't bigger plants have proportionately bigger seeds? Oikos, 111, 199207.
  • Aarssen, L.W. & Jordan, C.Y. (2001) Between-species patterns of covariation in plant size, seed size and fecundity in monocarpic herbs. Ecoscience, 8, 471477.
  • Aarssen, L.W., Schamp, B. & Pither, J. (2006) Why are there so many small plants? Implications for species coexistence. Journal of Ecology, 94, 569580.
  • Ackerly, D.D. & Donoghue, M.J. (1998) Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). American Naturalist, 152, 459470.
  • Ackerly, D.D., Knight, C.A., Weiss, S.B., Barton, K. & Starmer, K.P. (2002) Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia, 130, 449457.
  • Ackerly, D.D. & Reich, P.B. (1999) Convergence and correlation among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. American Journal of Botany, 86, 12721281.
  • Bond, W.J. & Midgley, J. (1988) Allometry and sexual differences in leaf size. American Naturalist, 131, 901910.
  • Bonser, S.P. & Aarssen, L.W. (1994) Plastic allometry in young sugar maple: adaptive responses to light availability. American Journal of Botany, 81, 400406.
  • Bonser, S.P. & Aarssen, L.W. (1996) Meristem allocation: a new classification theory for adaptive strategies in herbaceous plants. Oikos, 77, 347352.
  • Bragg, J.G. & Westoby, M. (2002) Leaf size and foraging for light in a sclerophyll woodland. Functional Ecology, 16, 633639.
  • Brouat, C., Giberneau, M., Amsellem, L. & McKey, D. (1998) Corner's rules revisited: ontogenetic and interspecifc patterns in leaf-stem allometry. New Phytologist, 139, 459470.
  • Brown, V.K. & Lawton, J.H. (1991) Herbivory and the evolution of leaf size and shape. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 333, 265272.
  • Cornelissen, J.H.C. (1999) A triangular relationship between leaf size and seed size among woody species: allometry, ontogeny, ecology and taxonomy. Oecologia, 118, 248255.
  • Corner, E.J.H. (1949) The durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Annals of Botany, 13, 367414.
  • Dudley, S.A. (1996) Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution, 50, 92102.
  • Falster, D.S. & Westoby, M. (2003) Leaf size and angle very widely across species: what consequences for light interception? New Phytologist, 158, 509525.
  • Farrar, J.L. (1995) Trees in Canada. Fitzhenry and Whiteside Ltd and the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, in cooperation with Public Works and Government Services Canada, Markham and Ottawa.
  • Gates, D.M. (1980) Biophysical Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Givnish, T.J. (1978) Ecological aspects of plant morphology: leaf form in relation to environment. Theoretical Plant Morphology (ed. R.Sattler), pp. 83142. Leiden University Press, Leiden.
  • Givnish, T.J. (1979) On the adaptive significance of leaf form. Topics in Plant Population Biology (eds O.T.Solbrig, S.Jain, G.B.Johnson & P.H.Raven), pp. 375407. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Givnish, T.J. & Vermeij, G.J. (1976) Sizes and shapes of liane leaves. American Naturalist, 110, 743778.
  • Gleason, H.A. & Cronquist, A. (1991) Manual of the Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.
  • Halle, F., Oldeman, R.A.A. & Tomlinson, P.B. (1978) Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Henery, M.L. & Westoby, M. (2001) Seed mass and seed nutrient content as predictors of seed output variation between species. Oikos, 92, 479490.
  • Holmgren, N.H. (1998) Illustrated Companion to Gleason and Conquist's Manual: Illustrations of the Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.
  • Horn, H.S. (1971) The Adaptive Geometry of Trees. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Jakobsson, A. & Eriksson, O. (2000) A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size, and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos, 88, 494502.
  • King, D.A. (1998) Influence of leaf size on tree architechture: first branch height and crown dimensions in tropical rain forest trees. Trees, 12, 438445.
  • Kuppers, M. (1989) Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: a question of cost-benefit relationships. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 375379.
  • MacDonald, P.G., Fonseca, C.R., McCoverton, J. & Westoby, M. (2003) Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades? Functional Ecology, 17, 5057.
  • Moles, A.T., Falster, D.S., Leishman, M.R. & Westoby, M. (2004) Small-seeded species produce more seeds per square meter of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime. Journal of Ecology, 92, 384396.
  • Moles, A.T. & Westoby, M. (2000) Do small leaves expand faster than large leaves, and do shorter expansion times reduce herbivore damage? Oikos, 90, 71524.
  • Niinemets, U., Portsmuth, A. & Tobias, M. (2006) Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. New Phytologist, 171, 91104.
  • Parkhurst, D.F. & Loucks, O.L. (1972) Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. Journal of Ecology, 60, 505537.
  • Pickup, M., Westoby, M. & Basten, A. (2005) Dry mass cost of deploying leaf area in relation to leaf size. Functional Ecology, 19, 8897.
  • Shipley, B. (1995) Structured interspecific determinants of specific leaf area in 34 species of herbaceous angiosperms. Functional Ecology, 9, 312319.
  • Shipley, B. & Dion, J. (1992) The allometry of seed production in herbaceous angiosperms. American Naturalist, 139, 467483.
  • Sun, S., Jin, D. & Shi, P. (2006) The leaf size–twig size spectrum of temperate woody species along an altitudinal gradient: an invariant allometric scaling relationhip. Annals of Botany, 97, 97107.
  • Vesk, P.A. & Westoby, M. (2004) Funding the bud bank: a review of the costs of buds. Oikos, 106, 200208.
  • Westoby, M., Falster, D.S., Moles, A.T., Vesk, P.A. & Wright, I.J. (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics, 33, 125159.
  • Westoby, M. & Wright, I.J. (2003) The leaf size – twig size spectrum and its relationship to other important spectra of variation among species. Oecologia, 135, 621628.
  • White, P.S. (1983a) Corner's rules in eastern deciduous trees: allometry and its implications for the adaptive architecture of trees. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 110, 203212.
  • White, P.S. (1983b) Evidence that temperate east North American evergreen woody plants follow Corner's rules. New Phytologist, 95, 139145.
  • Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Falster, D.S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K. et al. (2005) Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytologist, 166, 485496.
  • Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.