SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Cahill, J.F. (2002) Interactions between root and shoot competition vary among species. Oikos, 99, 101112.
  • Carmi, A. & Heuer, B. (1981) The role of roots in control of bean shoot growth. Annals of Botany, 48, 519528.
  • Counce, P.A., Keisling, T.C. & Mitchell, A.J. (2000) A uniform, objective, and adaptive system for expressing rice development. Crop Science, 40, 436443.
  • Falik, O., De Kroon, H. & Novoplansky, A. (2006) Physiologically-mediated self/non-self root discrimination in Trifolium repens has mixed effects on plant performance. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 1, 116121.
  • Falik, O., Reides, P., Gersani, M. & Novoplansky, A. (2003) Self/non-self discrimination in roots. Journal of Ecology, 91, 525531.
  • Falik, O., Reides, P., Gersani, M. & Novoplansky, A. (2005) Root navigation by self inhibition. Plant, Cell and Environment, 28, 562569.
  • Fiès, J.C., De Louvigny, N. & Chanzy, A. (2002) The role of stones in soil water retention. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 95104.
  • Gersani, M., Brown, J.S., O’Brien, E.E., Maina, G.M. & Abramsky, Z. (2001) Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. Journal of Ecology, 89, 660669.
  • Gruntman, M. & Novoplansky, A. (2004) Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in roots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 38633867.
  • Gurevitch, J., Wilson, P., Stone, J.L., Teese, P. & Stoutenburgh, R.J. (1990) Competition among old-field perennials at different levels of soil fertility and available space. Journal of Ecology, 78, 727744.
  • Hameed, M.A., Reid, J.B. & Rowe, R.N. (1987) Root confinement and its effects on the water relations, growth and assimilate partitioning of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Annals of Botany, 59, 685692.
  • Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 12431248.
  • Hess, L. & De Kroon, H. (2007) Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as an alternative explanation for root self/non-self discrimination. Journal of Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01204.x
  • Holzapfel, C. & Alpert, P. (2003) Root cooperation in a clonal plant: connected strawberries segregate roots. Oecologia, 134, 7277.
  • Hutchings, M.J., John, E.A. & Wijesinghe, D.K. (2003) Toward understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities. Ecology, 84, 23222334.
  • Kharkina, T.G., Ottosen, C.-O. & Rosenqvist, E. (1999) Effects of root restriction on the growth and physiology of cucumber plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 105, 434441.
  • De Kroon, H., Mommer, L. & Nishiwaki, A. (2003) Root competition: towards a mechanistic understanding. Root Ecology, Volume 168 (eds H.De Kroon & E.J.W.Visser), pp. 215234. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Laird, R.A. & Aarssen, L.W. (2005) Size inequality and the tragedy of the commons phenomenon in plant competition. Plant Ecology, 179, 127131.
  • Mahall, B.E. & Callaway, R.M. (1992) Root communication mechanisms and intracommunity distributions of two Mojave Desert shrubs. Ecology, 73, 21452151.
  • Mahall, B.E. & Callaway, R.M. (1996) Effects of regional origin and genotype on intraspecific root communication in the desert shrub Ambrosia dumosa (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany, 83, 9398.
  • Maina, G.M., Brown, J.S. & Gersani, M. (2002) Intra-plant versus inter-plant root competition in beans: avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commons. Plant Ecology, 160, 235247.
  • McConnaughay, K.D.M. & Bazzaz, F.A. (1991) Is physical space a soil resource? Ecology, 72, 94103.
  • McConnaughay, K.D.M. & Bazzaz, F.A. (1992) The occupation and fragmentation of space: consequences of neighbouring roots. Functional Ecology, 6, 704710.
  • McPhee, C.S. & Aarssen, L.W. (2001) The separation of above- and below-ground competition in plants – a review and critique of methodology. Plant Ecology, 152, 119136.
  • NeSmith, D.S. & Duval, J.R. (1998) The effect of container size. Horttechnology, 8, 495498.
  • O’Brien, E.E., Gersani, M. & Brown, J.S. (2005) Root proliferation and seed yield in response to spatial heterogeneity of below-ground competition. New Phytologist, 168, 401412.
  • Ridenour, W.M. & Callaway, R.M. (2001) The relative importance of allelopathy in interference: the effects of an invasive weed on a native bunchgrass. Oecologia, 126, 444450.
  • Ryel, R.J. & Caldwell, M.M. (1998) Nutrient acquisition from soils with patchy nutrient distributions as assessed with simulation models. Ecology, 79, 27352744.
  • Schenk, H.J. (2006) Root competition: beyond resource depletion. Journal of Ecology, 94, 725739.
  • Schenk, H.J., Callaway, R.M. & Mahall, B.E. (1999) Spatial root segregation: are plants territorial? Advances in Ecological Research, 28, 145180.
  • Schwinning, S. & Weiner, J. (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia, 113, 447455.
  • Semchenko, M. & Zobel, K. (2005) The effect of breeding on allometry and phenotypic plasticity in four varieties of oat (Avena sativa L.). Field Crops Research, 93, 151168.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J.H. (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Stephens, D.B., Hsu, K.-C., Prieksat, M.A., Ankeny, M.D., Blandford, N., Roth, T.L. et al. (1998) A comparison of estimated and calculated effective porosity. Hydrogeology Journal, 6, 156165.
  • Taylor, D.R. & Aarssen, L.W. (1989) On the density dependence of replacement-series competition experiments. Journal of Ecology, 77, 975988.
  • Weiner, J. (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 360364.
  • Wijesinghe, D.K., John, E.A., Beurskens, S. & Hutchings, M.J. (2001) Root system size and precision in nutrient foraging: responses to spatial pattern of nutrient supply in six herbaceous species. Journal of Ecology, 89, 972983.
  • Zhang, D.-Y., Sun, G.-J. & Jiang, X.-H. (1999) Donald's ideotype and growth redundancy: a game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61, 179187.