SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, M.D. (1992) Fire and the development of oak forests. Bioscience, 42, 346353.
  • Austin, M.P. & Gaywood, M.J. (1994) Current populations on environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 473487.
  • Austin, M.P. & Smith, T.M. (1989) A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio, 83, 3547.
  • Bazzaz, F.A. (1991) Habitat selection in plants. American Naturalist, 137, S116S130.
  • Bazzaz, F.A. (1996) Plants in Changing Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Brown, J.H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist, 124, 255279.
  • Burgman, M.A. (1989) The habitat volumes of scarce and ubiquitous plants: a test of the model of environmental control. American Naturalist, 133, 228239.
  • Burns, R.M. & Honkala, B.H. (Technical Coordinators) (1990) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. US Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Washington, DC. http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual.
  • Chabot, B.F. & Hicks, D.J. (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 229259.
  • Colwell, R.K. & Futuyma, D.J. (1971) On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52, 567576.
  • Crawley, M.J. (1997) The structure of plant communities. Plant Ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Ellenberg, H. (1974) Zeigwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleeuropas. Scripta Geobotanica, 9. Goeltze, Gottingen.
  • Fridley, J.D., Peet, R.K., White, P.S. & Wentworth, T.R. (2005) Connecting fine- and broad-scale patterns of species diversity: species–area relationships of Southeastern US flora. Ecology, 86, 11721177.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1996) The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance–distribution relationship. Oikos, 75, 211220.
  • Geiger, R. (1965) The Climate Near the Ground. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Grime, J.P. (1974) Vegetation classification by reference to strategies. Nature, 250, 2631.
  • Grime, J.P. (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 86, 902910.
  • Herbold, B. & Moyle, P.B. (1986) Introduced species and vacant niches. American Naturalist, 128, 751760.
  • Hochberg, Y. (1988) A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800802.
  • Horn, H.S. (1966) The measurement of ‘overlap’ in comparative ecological studies. American Naturalist, 100, 419424.
  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415457.
  • Kartesz, J.T. (1999) A Synonymized Checklist and Atlas with Biological Attributes for the Vascular Flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 1st edn. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0 (ed. by J.T.Kartesz & C.A.Meacham). North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Keddy, P.A. (1990) Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. Perspectives on Plant Competition (ed. by J.B.Grace & D.Tilman), pp. 265289. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
  • Koleff, P., Gaston, K.J. & Lennon, J.J. (2003) Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 367382.
  • Lande, R. (1996) Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76, 513.
  • Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, New York.
  • Levins, R. (1968) Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Levins, R. & Lewontin, R.C. (1985) The Dialectical Biologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Loreau, M. (2000) Are communities saturated? On the relationship between alpha, beta and gamma diversity. Ecology Letters, 3, 7376.
  • Minchin, P. (1987) Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio, 71, 145156.
  • Morin, X. & Chuine, I. (2006) Niche breadth, competitive strength and range size of tree species: a trade-off based framework to understand species distribution. Ecology Letters, 9, 185195.
  • Newell, C.L., Peet, R.K. & Harrod, J.C. (1997) Vegetation of Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Wilderness, North Carolina. Report to US Forest Service. Department of Agriculture, National Forests of North Carolina. Biology Department, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Ozinga, W.A., Schaminee, J.H.J., Bekker, R.M., Bonn, S., Poschlod, P., Tackenberg, O., Bakker, J. & Van Groenendael, J.M. (2005) Predictability of plant species composition from environmental conditions is constrained by dispersal limitation. Oikos, 108, 555561.
  • Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R. & White, P.S. (1998) A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea, 63, 262274.
  • Prasad, A.M. & Iverson, L.R. (1999ongoing) A Climate Change Atlas for 80 Forest Tree Species of the Eastern United States.[Database]. Northeastern Research Station, USDA. Forest Service, Delaware. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/delaware/atlas/index.html.
  • R Development Core Team (2005) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org .
  • Schamp, B.S., Aarssen, L.W. & Lee, H. (2003) Local plant species richness increases with regional habitat commonness across a gradient of forest productivity. Folia Geobotanica, 38, 273280.
  • Shimda, A. & Ellner, S. (1984) Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio, 58, 2955.
  • Stebbins, G.L. (1942) The genetic approach to problems of rare and endemic species. Madrono, 6, 241258.
  • Stebbins, G.L. (1980) Rarity of plant species: a synthetic viewpoint. Rhodora, 82, 7786.
  • Thompson, R.S., Anderson, K.H. & Bartlein, P.J. (1999) Distributions of Important Trees and Shrubs in North America. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1650 A&B, online, Version 1.0, 14 December 1999, http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1650-a/index.html.
  • Thompson, K., Hodgson, J.G. & Gaston, K.J. (1998) Abundance–range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England. Journal of Ecology, 86, 439448.
  • US EPA (2002) Level III Ecoregions of the United States, August 2002 revision. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • USDA & NRCS (2004) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
  • Vazquez, D.P. & Stevens, R.D. (2004) The latitudinal gradient in niche breadth: concepts and evidence. American Naturalist, 164, E1E19.
  • Veech, J.A., Summerville, K.S., Crist, T.O. & Gering, J.C. (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos, 99, 39.
  • Vellend, M. (2001) Do commonly used indices of β-diversity measure species turnover? Journal of Vegetation Science, 12, 545552.
  • Weakley, A.S. (2005) Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of March 2005. North Carolina Botanical Garden. http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/flora.htm.
  • Whittaker, R.H. (1956) Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs, 26, 180.
  • Whittaker, R.H. (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30, 279338.
  • Witkowski, E.T.F. & Lamont, B.B. (1997) Does the rare Banksia goodii have inferior vegetative, reproductive or ecological attributes compared with its widespread co-occurring relative B. gardneri? Journal of Biogeography, 24, 469482.
  • Wuenscher, J.E. (1969) Niche specification and competition modeling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 25, 436443.