SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agrawal, A.A. & Fordyce, J.A. (2000) Induced indirect defence in a lycaenid–ant association: the regulation of a resource in a mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267, 18571861.
  • Agrawal, A.A. & Rutter, M.T. (1998) Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant–plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos, 83, 227236.
  • Agrawal, A.A., Janssen, A., Bruin, J., Posthumus, M.A. & Sabelis, M.W. (2002) An ecological cost of plant defence: attractiveness of bitter cucumber plants to natural enemies of herbivores. Ecology Letters, 5, 377385.
  • Bronstein, J.L. (1998) The contribution of ant–plant protection studies to our understanding of mutualism. Biotropica, 30, 150161.
  • Bronstein, J.L. (2001a) The costs of mutualism. American Zoologist, 41, 825839.
  • Bronstein, J.L. (2001b) Mutualisms. Evolutionary Ecology (eds C.Fox, D.Fairbairn & D.Roff), pp. 315330. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Bronstein, J.L., Alarcon, R. & Geber, M. (2006) The evolution of plant–insect interactions. New Phytologist, 172, 412428.
  • Chamberlain, S.A. & Holland, J.N. (2008) Density-mediated, context-dependent consumer–resource interactions between ants and extrafloral nectar plants. Ecology, 89, 13641374.
  • Choh, Y., Kugimiya, S. & Takabayashi, J. (2006) Induced production of extrafloral nectar in intact lima bean plants in response to volatiles from spider mite-infested conspecific plants as a possible indirect defense against spider mites. Oecologia, 147, 455460.
  • Creelman, R.A. & Mullet J.E. (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 48, 355381.
  • Dyer, L.A., Dodson, C.D., Beihoffer, J. & Letourneau, D.K. (2001) Trade-offs in antiherbivore defenses in Piper cenocladum: ant mutualists versus plant secondary metabolites. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 581592.
  • Edwards, D.P., Hassall, M., Sutherland, W.J. & Yu, D.W. (2006) Assembling a mutualism: ant symbionts locate their host plants by detecting volatile chemicals. Insectes Sociaux, 53, 172176.
  • Galen, C. (2005) Catching ants with honey: an experimental test of distraction and satiation as alternative modes of escape from flower-damaging ants. Oecologia, 144, 8087.
  • Gibson, A.C. & Nobel, P.S. (1986) The Cactus Primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Heil, M. & Kost, C. (2006) Priming of indirect defences. Ecology Letters, 9, 813817.
  • Heil, M. & McKey, D. (2003) Protective ant–plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 425453.
  • Heil, M. & Silva Bueno, J.C. (2007) Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 54675472.
  • Heil, M., Fiala, B., Baumann, B. & Linsenmair, K.E. (2000) Temporal, spatial and biotic variations in extrafloral nectar secretion by Macaranga tanarius. Functional Ecology, 14, 749757.
  • Heil, M., Greiner, S., Meimberg, H., Kruger, R., Noyer, J.L., Heubl, G., Linsenmair, K.E. & Boland, W. (2004) Evolutionary change from induced to constitutive expression of an indirect plant resistance. Nature, 430, 205208.
  • Heil, M., Hilpert, A., Fiala, B. & Linsenmair, K.E. (2001a) Nutrient availability and indirect (biotic) defence in a Malaysian ant–plant. Oecologia, 126, 404408.
  • Heil, M., Koch, T., Hilpert, A., Fiala, B., Boland, W. & Linsenmair, K.E. (2001b) Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 10831088.
  • Holland, J.N. (2002) Benefits and costs of mutualism: demographic consequences in a pollinating seed–consumer interaction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 14051412.
  • Holland, J.N. & Chamberlain, S.A. (2007) Ecological and evolutionary mechanisms for low seed: ovule ratios: Need for a pluralistic approach? Ecology, 88, 706715.
  • Holland, J.N. & Fleming, T.H. (1999) Mutualistic interactions between Upiga virescens (Pyralidae), a pollinating seed–consumer, and Lophocereus schottii (Cactaceae). Ecology, 80, 20742084.
  • Holland, J.N. & Fleming, T.H. (2002) Co-pollinators and specialization in the pollinating seed-consumer mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths. Oecologia, 133, 534540.
  • Holland, J.N., Bronstein, J.L. & DeAngelis, D.L. (2004) Testing hypotheses for excess flower production and low fruit-to-flower ratios in a pollinating seed–consuming mutualism. Oikos, 105, 633640.
  • Holland, J.N., Ness, J.H., Boyle, A.L. & Bronstein, J.L. (2005) Mutualisms as consumer–resource interactions. Ecology of Predator–Prey Interactions (edS P. Barbosa & I. Castellanos), pp. 1733. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Huntzinger, M., Karban, R., Young, T.P. & Palmer, T.M. (2004) Relaxation of induced indirect defenses of acacias following exclusion of mammalian herbivores. Ecology, 85, 609614.
  • Junker, R., Chung, A.Y.C. & Blüthgen, N. (2006) Interactions between flowers, ants and pollinators: additional evidence for floral repellence against ants. Ecological Research, 22, 665670.
  • Karban, R. & Baldwin, I.T. (1997) Induced Responses to Herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Karban, R. & Myers, J.H. (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 331348.
  • Knops, J.M.H., Koenig, W.D. & Carmen, W.J. (2007) Negative correlation does not imply a tradeoff between growth and reproduction in California oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 1598216985.
  • Koptur, S. (1992) Extrafloral nectary-mediated interactions between insects and plants. Insect–Plant Interactions (ed. E.Bernays), pp. 81129. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Kost, C. & Heil, M. (2006) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles induce an indirect defence in neighbouring plants. Journal of Ecology, 94, 619628.
  • McKey, D. (1979) The distribution of secondary compounds within plants. Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites (edS G.A. Rosenthal & D.H. Janzen), pp. 56134. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
  • Mondor, E.B. & Addicott, J.F. (2003) Conspicuous extra-floral nectaries are inducible in Vicia faba. Ecology Letters, 6, 495497.
  • Morris, W.F., Traw, M.B. & Bergelson, J. (2006) On testing for a tradeoff between constitutive and induced resistance. Oikos, 112, 102110.
  • Ness, J.H. (2003) Catalpa bignonioides alters extrafloral nectar production after herbivory and attracts ant bodyguards. Oecologia, 134, 210218.
  • Ness, J.H. (2006) A mutualism's indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators. Oikos, 113, 506514.
  • Nicklen, E.F. & Wagner, D. (2006) Conflict resolution in an ant–plant interaction: Acacia constricta traits reduce ant costs to reproduction. Oecologia, 148, 8187.
  • Oliveira, P.S., Rico-Gray, V., Diaz-Castelazo, C. & Castillo-Guevara, C. (1999) Interaction between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical coastal sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology, 13, 623631.
  • Radhika, V., Kost, C., Bartram, S., Heil, M. & Boland, W. (2008) Testing the optimal defence hypothesis for two indirect defences: extrafloral nectar and volatile organic compounds. Planta, 228, 449457.
  • Rhoades, D.F. (1979) Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites (eds G.A.Rosenthal & D.H.Janzen), pp. 455. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
  • Rostás, M. & Eggert, K. (2008) Ontogenetic and spatio-temporal patterns of induced volatiles in Glycine max in the light of the optimal defence hypothesis. Chemoecology, 18, 2938.
  • Rudgers, J.A. & Strauss, S.Y. (2004) A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 271, 24812488.
  • Rutter, M.T. & Rausher, M.D. (2004) Natural selection on extrafloral nectar production in Chamaecrista fasciculata: the costs and benefits of a mutualism trait. Evolution, 58, 26572668.
  • Simms, E.L. (1992) Costs of plant resistance to herbivores. Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens. Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics (edS R.S. Fritz & E.L. Simms), pp. 392425. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Stephenson, A.G. (1982) The role of the extrafloral nectaries of Catalpa speciosa In limiting herbivory and increasing fruit production. Ecology, 63, 663669.
  • Strauss, S.Y., Rudgers, J.A., Lau, J.A. & Irwin, R.E. (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 278285.
  • Swift, S. & Lanza, J. (1993) How do Passiflora vines produce more extrafloral nectar after simulated herbivory? Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 74, 451.
  • Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M.E., Rand, T.A., Resh, V.H. & Krauss, J. (2007) Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5, e18.
  • Wäckers, F.L. & Bonifay, C. (2004) How to be sweet? Extrafloral nectar allocation by Gossypium hirsutum fits optimal defense theory predictions. Ecology, 85, 15121518.
  • Wagner, D. & Kay, A. (2002) Do extrafloral nectaries distract ants from visiting flowers? An experimental test of an overlooked hypothesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 4, 293305.
  • Willmer, P.G. & Stone, G.N. (1997) How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature, 388, 165167.
  • Wooley, S.C., Donaldson, J.R., Gusse, A.C., Lindroth, R.L. & Stevens, M.T. (2007) Extrafloral nectaries in aspen (Populus tremuloides): heritable genetic variation and herbivore-induced expression. Annals of Botany, 100, 13371346.
  • Young, T.P., Stubblefield, C.H. & Isbell, L.A. (1997) Ants on swollen thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia, 109, 98107.
  • Zangerl, A.R. & Rutledge, C.E. (1996) The probability of attack and patterns of constitutive and induced defense: a test of optimal defense theory. American Naturalist, 147, 599604.