Box 1. Chesson theoretical framework
Plant invasions and the niche
Article first published online: 5 MAY 2009
© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 British Ecological Society
Journal of Ecology
Volume 97, Issue 4, pages 609–615, July 2009
How to Cite
MacDougall, A. S., Gilbert, B. and Levine, J. M. (2009), Plant invasions and the niche. Journal of Ecology, 97: 609–615. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01514.x
In Chesson's theoretical framework, niche differences (more formally called stabilizing processes) and fitness differences are quantified by their contributions to population growth rates when a species is rare. In many mathematical models of competing species, the number of individuals produced per individual (logged) when the invader is rare and the resident community is at its stochastic equilibrium can be expressed as follows:
- r = s[FitnessDifference + Niche Difference](eqn 1)
where r is the per capita growth rate and s is a scaling term that converts the units of the niche and fitness differences to per capita growth rate units. The fitness difference term can be positive or negative, depending on whether the invader or the resident community has the greater average fitness. The niche difference term is always positive, because it describes advantages due to the resident community limiting itself more than the invader. See Chesson & Kuang (2008) for a specific model decomposed into niche and fitness differences.
Successful invasion requires that the invader has a positive growth rate when rare, which in turn requires the term in bracket to be positive. Invasion can thus result from a fitness advantage (a positive fitness difference term) or a niche difference strong enough to exceed the fitness disadvantage. These two scenarios form the basis of the ‘niche opportunities’ in Shea & Chesson (2002).
Equation 1 can be used to understand impact by treating the invader as the abundant resident and evaluating native species growth when rare. If positive, the latter persist. If the invader has greater average fitness, native persistence rests on the niche difference term being sufficiently positive. More generally, the native residents and exotic invader will coexist if both can increase when rare, which depends on a positive niche difference term.
- Issue published online: 16 JUN 2009
- Article first published online: 5 MAY 2009
- Received: 30 December 2008; accepted: 6 April 2009Handling Editor: David Gibson
- equalizing mechanisms;
- exotic species;
- invasive species;
- niche theory;
- stabilizing mechanisms
- 1For plant invaders, being different is often equated with being successful, yet the mechanistic connection remains unclear.
- 2Classic niche theory predicts that invaders with niches distinct from the native flora should coexist with little interaction with native species, yet such invaders often have substantial impacts. Meanwhile, invaders that overlap in niche space with native species should either be repelled or dominate, yet these invaders often naturalize with little effect. Such discrepancies between theory and observation raise questions about how species differences influence invader establishment and impact.
- 3Here, we review these issues in light of recent work on coexistence theory, which shows how niche and fitness differences between natives and invaders interact to determine invasion outcomes. We show how successful invader establishment depends on either a fitness advantage or niche difference from resident species, but that only the former allows invaders to become dominant.
- 4By identifying the role of niche and fitness differences in leading invasion hypotheses, we unify their predictions for invasion success while highlighting new approaches for evaluating the importance of species differences for invasion.
- 5Synthesis. Situating the invasion process within a recent coexistence framework broadens our understanding of invasion mechanisms and more tightly links problems in invasion ecology with our more general understanding of community dynamics.