• Betula;
  • dispersal;
  • ecology;
  • fungi;
  • heathland;
  • invasion;
  • mycorrhizas;
  • Pinus


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

1. In England, the loss of lowland heathland, a habitat of global conservation importance, is primarily due to the invasion of birch and pine. This encroachment has been researched in depth from a plant perspective but little is known about the role of mycorrhizal fungi. In lowland heathlands the resident dwarf shrubs form ericoid mycorrhizas whereas invading trees form ectomycorrhizas. Therefore, tree encroachment into heathlands can be regarded as the replacement of a resident mycorrhizal community by an invading one.

2. This study examined how fungi form mycorrhizas with Betula and Pinus in lowland heathlands. We addressed the question of whether there are mycorrhizal fungi that mediate invasion using a molecular ecology approach to compare the mycorrhizal inoculum potential of soil at three levels of invasion (uninvaded heathland, invaded heathland and woodland) and the fungi forming mycorrhizas on tree seedlings and trees across diverse sites.

3. We show that in lowland heathlands: (i) seedlings have severely limited access to ectomycorrhizal fungi relative to woodlands, (ii) there are few keystone spore-dispersed ectomycorrhizal fungi that can mediate tree invasion, (iii) tree seedlings can remain non-mycorrhizal for at least one year when no inoculum is present, even near saplings, and (iv) mycorrhizal seedlings achieve greater biomass than non-mycorrhizal seedlings. Within uninvaded heathland we detected only Rhizopogon luteolus, Suillus variegatus, S. bovinus (Pinus symbionts) and Laccaria proxima (primarily a Betula symbiont).

4.Synthesis. Overall, ectomycorrhizal inoculum in lowland heathlands is rare; most tree seedlings growing in heathland soil are not mycorrhizal due to limited spore dispersal, poorly developed spore banks and weak common mycorrhizal networks. These seedlings can persist awaiting mycorrhization to boost their growth.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Worldwide, native ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees invade highly valued conservation areas and eventually replace them with woodlands (Crawley 1997; Andersen & Baker 2006; Thiet & Boerner 2007). For example, lowland heathland is a priority habitat of the United Kingdom Biodiversity Action Plan threatened primarily by the native ectomycorrhizal trees Betula pendula Roth., B. pubescens Ehrh. (birch) and/or Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) (Gimingham 1992; Mitchell et al. 1997; Richardson & Higgins 1998). Nutrient acquisition for mycorrhizal plants is carried out by horizontally transmitted and obligately biotrophic fungi in exchange for c. 15% of the plants’ photosynthate (Smith & Read 2008). In the case of Betula and Pinus, ectomycorrhizas are formed with Basidiomycete and Ascomycete fungi. In contrast, heathlands are dominated by dwarf Ericaceae shrubs associated with ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (predominately Helotiales, Ascomycota) growing in exceptionally nutrient-poor soils (Specht 1981; Rundel 1988; Read 1989). Thus, the widespread tree invasions of heathlands are also ectomycorrhizal invasions of ericoid mycorrhizal communities.

Unfortunately, even simple criteria such as rates and thresholds for fungal invasions of natural environments are largely unknown (Otten, Bailey & Gilligan 2004). Consequently, the potentially key role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in plant invasions remains essentially a matter of speculation (Richardson et al. 2000; Simberloff, Relva & Nuñez 2002), even though both the study of positive biotic interactions such as facilitation and mutualism (Bruno, Stachowicz & Bertness 2003) and ectomycorrhizal ecology (Peay, Kennedy & Bruns 2008) are burgeoning fields of research. To date, we lack the most basic information concerning the early symbiotic events involved in the successful establishment of ectomycorrhizal trees and early plant–fungal symbiotic events leading to successional dynamics (Read 1998; Horton & van der Heijden 2008; Smith & Read 2008), except in the case of primary succession thanks to the landmark work of Nara and colleagues at Mount Fuji in Japan (Nara, Nakaya & Hogetsu 2003a; Nara et al. 2003b; Nara & Hogetsu 2004; Nara 2006a,b, 2008) and post-fire succession due to the work by Bruns and colleagues at Point Reyes in California, USA (Gardes & Bruns 1996; Baar et al. 1999; Grogan, Baar & Bruns 2000; Bruns et al. 2002; Kennedy et al. 2007). Ectomycorrhizal tree invasion into arbuscular mycorrhizal habitats dominated by grasses is beginning to be examined (e.g. Dickie & Reich 2005; Thiet & Boerner 2007). However, primary successional habitats bear little similarity to lowland heathlands both in terms of vegetation and geographic proximity (the closest site to the present study area is over 3500 miles away). This raises the possibility that the mycorrhizal fungi involved and the dependence of seedlings upon mycorrhizal fungi may differ in the lowland heathlands of England compared to the habitats analysed so far. Studies have also indicated that ectomycorrhizal inoculum potential (i.e. wind- and/or animal-dispersed ectomycorrhizal fungal propagules) outside, but adjacent to, woodland areas can be restricted both in spatial distribution and species composition (Boerner, DeMars & Leicht 1996; Bidartondo, Baar & Bruns 2001; Dickie & Reich 2005; Haskins & Gehring 2005). As far as we are aware, this is the first study on the role of ectomycorrhizas in any tree invasion in Britain.

Tree encroachment into British heathlands has not escaped the attention of ecologists and consequently it is relatively well characterized from a plant perspective (Gimingham 1978; Miles & Kinnaird 1979). Factors known to determine susceptibility to tree invasion within heathlands include seed availability (Hester, Gimingham & Miles 1991a; Mitchell et al. 1997; Manning, Putwain & Webb 2004, 2005), soil nutrients (Hester, Miles & Gimingham 1991b; Mitchell et al. 2000; Manning, Putwain & Webb 2004, 2005), disturbance (Manning, Putwain & Webb 2004, 2005), gap formation (Marrs 1987) and heath successional stage (Khoon & Gimingham 1984). Preventing heath-to-woodland succession and encouraging heath regeneration have emerged as primary management goals (Marrs 1987). Controlled prescribed burning combined with livestock grazing may achieve these goals effectively in larger northern upland heathlands (Khoon & Gimingham 1984), but this form of management is often impractical in the fragmented lowland heathlands of densely populated southern England. In fact, controlling invasions of lowland heaths by Betula (which re-sprouts from stumps) is rarely cost-effective (Mitchell et al. 2000). As a consequence, lowland heathlands provide a uniquely relevant ecosystem to unravel the pathways and mechanisms of a largely unchecked native ectomycorrhizal invasion. As far back as 1979, Miles & Kinnaird hypothesized that a lack of ectomycorrhizal inoculum in heathlands slows invasion by birch and pine and that there are ectomycorrhizal fungal species-specific effects on the establishment of tree seedlings that invade heathlands. Here, we will test four related, but more specific, hypotheses:

  • 1
    Ectomycorrhizal inoculum in heathlands is less abundant and diverse than in woodlands.
  • 2
    Pioneer, spore-dispersed, ectomycorrhizal fungi are predominant on heathland seedlings.
  • 3
    Where saplings or trees are present, seedlings are colonized via vegetative fungal growth rather than spore colonisation.
  • 4
    Mycorrhizal seedlings achieve greater biomass than non-mycorrhizal seedlings.

So far, the greatest array of studies of any ectomycorrhizal fungal succession (i.e. dispersal, establishment, persistence and replacement) was carried out in the 1980s using a young B. pendula plantation at the Bush Estate in Scotland as a model system (Ford, Mason & Pelham 1980; Deacon, Donaldson & Last 1983; Fleming 1983, 1984, 1985; Fox 1983; Last et al. 1983, 1984; Mason et al. 1983; Dighton & Mason 1984; Mason, Wilson & Last 1984; Fleming, Deacon & Last 1986; Last, Dighton & Mason 1987; Gibson & Deacon 1988; Deacon & Fleming 1992). These studies established the successional dynamics of ‘early’ through to ‘late’ stage fungi forming ectomycorrhizas with Betula. However, these studies were conducted on agricultural soil and relied mainly on fungal fruiting body surveys which can poorly represent a site’s ectomycorrhizal diversity (Taylor & Alexander 1990; Gardes & Bruns 1996; Jonsson et al. 1999; Horton & Bruns 2001; Taylor 2002; Nara et al. 2003b) and to a lesser extent on morphological identification of fungi from ectomycorrhizal roots, which is a low-resolution and low-throughput approach compared to today’s DNA-based identification (Peay, Kennedy & Bruns 2008). In addition, it is possible that other fungi may form mycorrhizas with invading tree seedlings. Some studies have suggested that there are shared ectomycorrhizal-ericoid fungi in P. sylvestris forest habitats with an ericaceous understorey, leading Vrålstad, Fossheim & Schumacher (2000) to hypothesize that members of the ericoid mycorrhizal clade Rhizoscyphus ericae can form both ecto- and ericoid mycorrhizas. This is yet to be tested under field conditions, where it may explain P. sylvestris encroachment into heathlands without the need for, or in addition to, strictly ectomycorrhizal fungi. Similarly, arbuscular mycorrhizas have been reported in B. pubescens (Haigh 2001) and in Pinus muricata (Horton, Cazares & Bruns 1998), albeit in areas dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants.

In this study, we used seedling bioassays to determine whether the inoculum potential of ectomycorrhizal fungi varies within lowland heathlands with respect to the level of tree invasion within different sites. We complemented our data by sampling tree roots at six sites, naturally established tree seedlings at five sites and outplanted tree seedlings at one site. The sampling of seedlings in situ provides us with the opportunity to assess whether bioassays are selective for fungi that colonize seedlings via spores (Newton 1991). Mycorrhizal fungi cannot usually be identified by the morphology of their mycorrhizas alone; therefore, we sequenced fungal DNA from single ectomycorrhizas (i.e. a DNA barcoding approach), which is a more accurate and precise approach than using pooled roots and/or screening with restriction enzymes. The study aims to determine whether ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum is homogeneously distributed in heathland soils and to identify which mycorrhizal fungi are involved in tree invasion of heathlands. Specifically, we predicted that ectomycorrhizal diversity differs between uninvaded heathland, invaded heathland and woodland soils (see Materials and methods for definitions).

Materials and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Study sites

Seven lowland heathlands in England (abbreviated Cd, Gd, Hw, Kw, Sw, Td, Tw, see Table 1 for details) were surveyed for mycorrhizal fungi. All of these sites are National Nature Reserves (NNR). Five of the sites (Hw, Kw, Sw, Td and Tw) are being invaded by Betula spp. and P. sylvestris, one (Cd) only by Betula spp. and one (Gd) only by P. sylvestris. All main types of lowland heathland were surveyed: wet, dry, dune and Breck (a mosaic of grasses and heathers). In field studies, we did not differentiate between Bpendula and Bpubescens due to their high morphological, ecological and physiological similarities and their overlapping distribution. However, drier areas are generally invaded by Bpendula and wetter areas by Bpubescens (Atkinson 1992). The sites closest to each other are Tw and Td at c. 1.2 km apart and the greatest distance between sites is 250 km between Cd and Sw.

Table 1.   Description of the seven lowland heathland sites sampled. Abbr., Abbreviated name. NA indicates that sampling did not take place
Abbr.SiteCountyUK National Grid ReferenceTypeTrees Date* Date†
  1. *The date of sampling for naturally occurring seedlings is shown as Date.

  2. †The date of sampling for bioassays and tree roots is shown as Date.

  3. ‡Naturally occurring seedlings were collected from Td at various dates from May 2005 to October 2006.

CdCavenham HeathSuffolkTL 753 724Breck, dryBetulaNA18/6/07
GdStudland and Godlingston HeathDorsetSZ 014 826Dune, dryPinusNA29/6/07
HwHolt HeathDorsetSU 065 045WetBetula, Pinus13/6/0514/6/07
KwKingston Great CommonHampshireSU 186 035WetBetula, Pinus24/5/0529/5/07
SwStoborough HeathDorsetSY 936 849WetBetula, Pinus14/7/0526/6/07
TdThursleySurreySU 909 406DryBetula, PinusVarious‡NA
TwThursleySurreySU 907 418WetBetula, Pinus7/7/059/7/07

Mycorrhizal inoculum potential bioassays

To assess mycorrhizal inoculum potential six square 1.5 m2 plots, two in each of three levels of invasion, were selected at six sites (Cd, Gd, Hw, Kw, Sw and Tw). Levels of invasion were defined as: uninvaded heathland, an area without Betula or Pinus trees or saplings; invaded heathland, an area with young isolated Betula and/or Pinus saplings (typically 0.5–1 m tall); and woodland, an area with trees (over 1.5 m tall) and a heath understorey. Plots were set up away from footpaths to avoid disturbance and they were sampled between 29 May and 9 July 2007. Plots were between 5 and 45 m apart (average = 20 m) in uninvaded heathland, 4.5 and 92 m apart (average = 35 m) in invaded heathland and 7.5 and 25 m apart (average = 14 m) in woodland. The variation is due to our goal of finding areas with appropriate levels of invasion and similar vegetation across all sites.

From within each plot, five soil cores (c. 2.5 cm diameter × 20 cm depth) were removed from arbitrary positions. The soil corer was cleaned with household bleach between sampling each plot. At each site, the uninvaded plots were sampled first to further minimize the risk of contamination from the woodland plots, which were presumed to contain a higher diversity and density of fungi. Soil samples were stored in sealed plastic bags at 4 °C until use. Bioassays were set-up within 6 days of soil collection (average of 2 days). Each soil core was manually homogenized in a sterile plastic bag and no material such as roots or small stones was removed. The soil from each core was divided between two bioassay tubes (RLC-3UV Ray Leach Cone-tainer; Stuewe & Sons Inc., Corvallis, OR, USA), each containing c. 45 cm3 of soil. Control bioassays were set-up using autoclave-sterilized soil originating from a mix of soil cores; the soil was sterilized twice, 48 h apart. A small amount of porous non-organic cloth was placed at the bottom of each bioassay tube to prevent the soil from pouring out and to allow excess water to drain. For each soil core, one bioassay tube was planted with B. pendula seeds and one with P. sylvestris seeds. Seeds were surface-sterilized in diluted bleach (0.25%) and rinsed with deionized water. If seeds did not germinate, additional seeds were added on subsequent days. A cutting of Calluna vulgaris was planted in each bioassay tube to more closely reproduce the heathland environment. The cutting used was from the site where the soil was obtained. On occasions when the cutting died, it was replaced with a cutting from the same heathland where possible, otherwise it was replaced with a cutting from the nearest available heathland. Seedlings were grown in a controlled environment (18 °C for 16 h at 270–290 μmol m−2 s−1 photon flux density, 16 °C for 8 h in dark, at 60% relative humidity) in ventilated 5 × 23 cm plastic bags to prevent cross-contamination, and they were watered as necessary to retain soil moisture. After 4 months, seedlings were removed from the bioassay tubes, rinsed and their roots were manually disentangled from the soil and ericoid hair root mass and examined using a dissecting microscope. Bioassays were recorded as mycorrhizal if an ectomycorrhiza was present on at least one seedling within the bioassay or as non-mycorrhizal if no ectomycorrhizas were detected on any seedlings in the bioassay. Some seedlings had roots that were not ectomycorrhizal but had morphological features that indicated the root may be at an early stage of mycorrhization such as a lack of root hairs. Bioassays that contained seedlings within this category and contained no developed ectomycorrhizas were initially recorded as potentially mycorrhizal, and following DNA sequence analysis the bioassay was placed within the mycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal category. A sample of each mycorrhizal or potentially ectomycorrhizal morphotype present in each individual bioassay tube was obtained and its DNA was extracted immediately. If other roots of the same morphotype were present, representatives were placed in deionized water, frozen to −80 °C and lyophilized. Seedlings were then lyophilized and weighed. DNA was extracted using Extract-N-Amp (Sigma, Dorset, UK); each root was placed in 10 μL of extraction solution in a 96-well plate, heated to 95 °C for 10 min, allowed to cool to room temperature, and then 10 μL of dilution solution were added and mixed.

In situ mycorrhizas

When collecting soil cores for bioassays, an additional five cores were removed per woodland plot to examine ectomycorrhizas. The contents of these cores were individually washed through a series of sieves of decreasing pore size, and sieves of at least 500 μm mesh size were viewed under a dissecting microscope. The DNA of one root per morphotype was extracted immediately using the method described above. The roots of Betula sp. and P. sylvestris were not distinguished when sampling from mixed woodlands. Remaining samples of each morphotype were stored in deionized water at −80 °C and lyophilized.

Naturally occurring seedlings were sampled from different levels of invasion and from different sites to identify the fungi forming ectomycorrhizas with naturally occurring seedlings and to establish whether mycorrhizal seedlings have a greater biomass than non-mycorrhizal seedlings. From the beginning of germination (18 May 2005) until 27 June 2005 (by which date all seedlings had died or been removed) naturally occurring seedlings in their first year of growth were sampled from six 75 × 75 cm grids (three in woodland and three in invaded heathland) every 10 days at Td. Additional seedlings in their first year of growth were sampled on eleven dates from Td between the 6 June 2005 and 17 October 2005 from outside of the sampling grids at Td, and seedlings estimated to be under 3 years old were opportunistically sampled from four sites (Hw, Kw, Sw and Tw) in 2005 and 2006 and from Td in 2006. The location of these additional seedlings was recorded with regard to level of invasion. Seedlings and surrounding soil were cut out with a soil knife. Then the entire root system of each seedling was thoroughly extricated from the dense mass of ericoid hair roots characteristic of heathland soils using water and tweezers. Samples of mycorrhizas were removed and their DNA was extracted following Gardes & Bruns’s (1993) protocol modified for silica binding and purification (Gene-Clean, Q-Biogene). Both the shoot and root of all seedlings sampled from Td in 2005 were then freeze-dried before weighing.

Outplanted seedlings

In August 2006, two transects were laid out radiating away from each of four Betula and ten P. sylvestris focal saplings at Tw. Transects were located so that they were at least 4 m away from any other sapling. On 31 August, 15 September and 25 September 2006, five seedlings (either P. sylvestris or B. pendula to match the sapling) were planted at each of four points along each transect. The outplanted non-mycorrhizal seedlings originated from seeds sown on a pasteurized peat:sand (2 : 1 by volume) mix in 576-cell plug trays (LBS Group, Lancashire, UK) lined with porous non-organic cloth. The trays were placed in a growth chamber for 23 days and then transferred to a cold frame for 5 days. For seedling outplanting, the height of each focal sapling was recorded (between 0.4 and 0.76 m tall) and points set-up at this distance away from the sapling (point 1, within estimated rooting zone), twice the distance (point 2, edge of estimated rooting zone), three and four times the distance (points 3 and 4, outside estimated rooting zone). Estimates of the rooting zone of Betula and Pinus were obtained after a wildfire exposed root systems at Td and Tw; post-fire, the length of seven exposed roots from four Betula and 14 exposed roots from 13 Pinus trees were measured along with the height of the corresponding individual. Using these values, regression analysis indicated that the root systems extended up to at least 1.8 and 1.1 times the height of Betula and Pinus trees, respectively. Additionally, three control transects were set-up for each species with no focal sapling, the points along these three transects were 0.5 m apart. On 31 October 2006, one or two seedlings were harvested from each point. Seedling survival was recorded at the date of the first harvest in October 2006, after snowfall on 4 February 2007 and on 14 April 2007. After 5 months, on 16 April 2007, all remaining seedlings were harvested.

Endomycorrhizal assessment

Following a bioassay study conducted in 2006 at six sites (Cd, Gd, Hw, Kw, Sw and Td) at three invasion levels, Bpendula, Psylvestris and Calluna vulgaris root samples from 169 bioassays (representing all sites and invasion levels) were stained with acid fuchsin following the method in Appendix A of Peterson & Massicotte (2004). Stained roots were viewed under a light microscope to detect endomycorrhizal structures (i.e. arbuscules, coils).

Fungal identification

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the internal transcribed spacer region using primers ITS1F (Gardes & Bruns 1993) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) was attempted for all samples. An aliquot of 2 μl of extracted DNA was combined with 8 μl of 2x Extract-N-Amp solution or PicoMaxx reaction mix (Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX, USA). Amplifications were performed with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 55 s and 72 °C for 50 s, with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel with ethidium bromide. If bands of the PCR products were barely visible, a nested PCR of the sample was performed using ITS1 (White et al. 1990) and ITS4 from a 1 : 100 H2O dilution including the original negative control. After amplification, the PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, OH, USA) and cycle-sequenced using BigDye v3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cycle-sequenced products were separated by electrophoresis using an ABI3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The DNA sequences were edited in Sequence Navigator (Applied Biosystems) or Sequencher (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Preliminary identification was achieved by conducting a BLASTn search on GenBank ( DNA sequences were then aligned using Clustal X (Jeanmougin et al. 1998), visually corrected, and a neighbour-joining tree was generated using paup* v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). Samples of the same fungal genus or within the same terminal clade of the neighbour-joining tree were then re-aligned with congeners from GenBank using Muscle (Edgar 2004) and visually corrected using MacClade (Maddison & Maddison 2003). Identifications were confirmed using a combination of producing a neighbour-joining tree using paup and analysis with dotur (Schloss & Handelsman 2005). Representative DNA sequences have been submitted to GenBank under accession numbers FJ876156 to FJ876189.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise stated, all statistical analyses were conducted using R version 2.7.2 (R Development Core Team 2008) and all models reported are the minimum adequate models; models were tested for potential simplification by testing for significant differences between models with anova. Differences and interactions between sites and invasion level in the proportion of bioassays within a plot that were mycorrhizal versus non-mycorrhizal were tested by applying a generalized linear model (GLM) with binomial errors or quasi-binomial errors if needed, to account for over-dispersion. This analysis was conducted separately for B. pendula bioassays and P. sylvestris bioassays. Richness and diversity indices calculations omitted the two samples of fungi that could not be unambiguously assigned to a taxon, due to a lack of significant similarity with any samples in GenBank. Fungal richness estimators and diversity indices were calculated using the number of soil cores containing each fungus in order to compare seedling bioassay and mature tree root data. The number of fungi was pooled among sites within the same level of invasion to compare richness and diversity between levels of invasion and mature tree roots. The Shannon index (H′) takes into account the number and evenness of species using the equation:

  • image

where pi = relative abundance of each fungus, calculated as the proportion of samples of a given fungus to the total number of samples in the same level of invasion.

Simpson’s index (D) measures the probability that two fungi randomly selected from a sample will be identical, taking into account the diversity and the relative abundance of each fungus. We report Simpson’s reciprocal index (1/D). Simpson’s Index (D) is calculated as:

  • image

where n = the total number of soil cores containing a particular fungus within the same invasion level, and N = the total number of soil cores containing all fungi within the same invasion level. Fungal richness estimates – first-order Chao (Chao1), second-order Chao (Chao2), first-order Jackknife (Jack1) and second-order Jackknife (Jack2) – were calculated using EstimateS (Colwell 2005) with a soil core as sample unit to allow for comparisons between bioassays and mature tree roots. Each estimate was based on 50 randomizations of sample order without replacement. Ectomycorrhizal fungal accumulation curves were calculated in EstimateS using the same data set. Using data describing the presence and absence of ectomycorrhizal fungi at each site where bioassays were conducted, we conducted a non-metric multi-dimensional scaling analysis to assess differences in the ectomycorrhizal community among sites.

To test for an effect of site, level of invasion, mycorrhizal status and any interactions on the number of seedlings in a bioassay, we conducted a GLM with a Poisson error distribution. The effect of site, level of invasion, mycorrhizal status and any interactions on average seedling mass in bioassays was tested with a three-way anova. This analysis was conducted separately for Psylvestris bioassays containing two seedlings, Bpendula bioassays containing two seedlings and Bpendula bioassays containing three seedlings. The analysis was not conducted for Bpendula or Psylvestris bioassays containing any other number of seedlings at harvest. Nearly, all Psylvestris bioassays contained two seedlings (n = 163), and the majority of Bpendula bioassays contained two (n = 41) or three seedlings (n = 62). We transformed birch mass data using the natural log to normalize the residuals. Fungal-specific effects on bioassay seedling mass were tested using Minitab (Minitab Inc. 2000) using Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric tests or t-tests depending upon the distribution of the data by comparing the mass of seedlings with a specific fungus to all other mycorrhizal seedlings, but only when the bioassays contained the same number of mycorrhizal seedlings at harvest and the number of bioassays containing an individual fungus was greater than five. We tested for an effect of mycorrhizal status on the biomass of naturally occurring seedlings at Td using a Kruskal–Wallis test. We also tested for an effect of the level of invasion on the proportion of seedlings which were mycorrhizal versus non-mycorrhizal using a GLM with quasi-binomial errors with data from naturally occurring seedlings under 1 year old sampled from five sites.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Mycorrhizal inoculum potential bioassays

In total, 360 experimental and 10 control bioassays were set up. Of the 359 experimental bioassays with live seedlings at harvest, 404 root samples were used for DNA sequencing. The proportion of bioassays containing mycorrhizal seedlings was lowest in uninvaded heathland soil bioassays (7.5%, n = 9) and highest in the woodland soil bioassays (48%, n = 58). All control bioassays yielded non-mycorrhizal seedlings. The level of invasion (uninvaded heath, invaded heath or woodland) and site had a highly significant effect on the proportion of Bpendula bioassays containing non-mycorrhizal seedlings (GLM with binomial errors; invasion level, F = 65.32,28, P < 0.001; site, F = 27.95,30, P < 0.001, Fig. 1a). There was no significant effect of site on the overall proportion of non-mycorrhizal Pinus bioassays, but level of invasion had a weak effect on the overall proportion of non-mycorrhizal bioassays (GLM with quasi-binomial errors, F = 3.112,33, P = 0.058, Fig. 1b). There were site-dependent differences in the proportion of B. pendula and P. sylvestris seedlings becoming mycorrhizal. Cd is invaded solely by Betula resulting in nine of the ten B. pendula bioassays and one of the ten P. sylvestris bioassays grown in woodland soil being mycorrhizal at harvest. The reverse occurred at Gd, which is invaded by P. sylvestris only. The C.  vulgaris cuttings survived in 83% of the experimental bioassays, but only 20% of the control bioassays. Bioassays varied in the number of live seedlings they contained at harvest (between one and three P. sylvestris seedlings or between one and eight Bpendula seedlings). To eliminate any effects of competition only bioassays containing the same number of seedlings were analysed for effect of mycorrhizal status on biomass (two seedlings for Psylvestris bioassays, Bpendula bioassays containing two seedlings and three seedlings were analysed independently). The number of Bpendula seedlings in a bioassay was not significantly affected by mycorrhizal status of the bioassay or the level of invasion. Site had a significant effect on the number of Bpendula seedlings in a bioassay (χ2 = 14.55,172, P < 0.05), the number of seedlings per bioassay was lowest at Hw and highest at Tw (average of 2.4 and 3.9 seedlings per bioassay, respectively). The number of seedlings in a Psylvestris bioassay was not affected by site, level of invasion or mycorrhizal status. For Bpendula bioassays containing two seedlings, site and mycorrhizal status had significant effects on average seedling biomass (site F = 8.35,34, P < 0.001; mycorrhizal status F = 13.21,34, P < 0.001). At the four sites where Bpendula mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal bioassays were present, the average biomass of seedlings in mycorrhizal bioassays was greater than that of seedlings in non-mycorrhizal bioassays. For Bpendula bioassays containing three seedlings, the site, level of invasion and mycorrhizal status had significant effects on seedling biomass (site F = 13.55,53, P < 0.001; level of invasion F = 9.52,53, P < 0.001; mycorrhizal status F = 5.51,53, P < 0.05; Fig. 2). On four out of five occasions when mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal bioassays were present at the same level of invasion at the same site, the average mass of Bpendula seedlings in mycorrhizal bioassays was greater than that in non-mycorrhizal bioassays.


Figure 1.  The number of mycorrhizal (black) and non-mycorrhizal (open) Betula pendula bioassays (a) and Pinus sylvestris bioassays (b) at each of six lowland heathlands (see Table 1 for site abbreviations).

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 2.  Cumulative number of (a) Betula pendula and (b) Pinus sylvestris soil bioassays from each level of lowland heathland tree invasion for each identified ectomycorrhizal fungus across six sites. Black bars indicate woodland, grey bars invaded heath and open bars uninvaded heath. Numbers above bars indicate the number of sites at which the fungus was detected.

Download figure to PowerPoint

For P. sylvestris bioassays, site and mycorrhizal status independently influenced biomass and there were multiple significant interactions. Mycorrhizal status and site showed significant effects (F = 8.92,131, P < 0.01, F = 2.65,131, P < 0.05, respectively), and there were significant two-way interactions between site and mycorrhizal status, level of invasion and site (F = 4.35,131, P < 0.01, F = 2.410,131, P < 0.05, respectively) and the three-way interaction between site, level of invasion and mycorrhizal status was also significant (F = 2.36,131, P < 0.05). On ten out of fourteen occasions when P. sylvestris mycorrhizal bioassays and non-mycorrhizal bioassays co-occurred within the same level of invasion at the same site, the average mass of mycorrhizal bioassay seedlings was heavier than non-mycorrhizal bioassay seedlings. Although the study was not designed to address fungal species-specific effects on seedling biomass, tests indicated there was no significant difference in the mass of P. sylvestris seedlings colonized by either Lactarius hepaticus, Rhizopogon luteolus, Suillus bovinus or S. variegatus compared to other mycorrhizal bioassays. The mass of B. pendula bioassay seedlings mycorrhizal with Lactarius hepaticus or Laccaria proxima was not significantly different to all other mycorrhizal Bpendula bioassay seedlings.

Overall, mycorrhizal fungal diversity increased from uninvaded to invaded heathland to woodland (Table 2). Mature trees supported a more diverse mycorrhizal community than that detected on seedlings in bioassays at all sites. Estimated fungal richness also increased with the level of tree invasion. Only Laccaria proxima, Rhizopogon luteolus, Suillus bovinus and S. variegatus formed mycorrhizas with seedlings grown on soil from uninvaded heathland (Fig. 2a,b). The only mycorrhizal B. pendula bioassay from uninvaded heathland soil was colonized by Laccaria proxima, this fungus was prevalent in Cd bioassays (forming mycorrhizas on thirteen of the seventeen mycorrhizal B. pendula bioassays). In contrast, Laccaria proxima only colonized one of the P. sylvestris bioassays at Cd. The proportion of mycorrhizal P. sylvestris bioassays grown on uninvaded heathland soil from Kw was high compared to the other uninvaded heathland soil bioassays. The diversity of fungi in uninvaded heath at Kw was also relatively high, comprising three fungi (Rhizopogon luteolus, Suillus bovinus and S. variegatus). These closely related fungi are specific to Pinaceae and accordingly, all B. pendula bioassays from the same plots were non-mycorrhizal (Fig. 1a,b). The most prevalent fungus forming mycorrhizas in P. sylvestris bioassays was Rhizopogon luteolus (Fig. 2b). Laccaria proxima, Thelephora terrestris and Lactarius hepaticus were the most prevalent fungi in B. pendula bioassays (Fig. 2a). Most fungi identified in the bioassays were only detected at one or two field sites except for three of the more prevalent species, which were at three sites (Rhizopogon luteolus and S. variegatus) or four sites (T. terrestris). Suillus bovinus was less abundant but it was also present at three sites. The identity of the fungi forming mycorrhizas on two bioassays remains unconfirmed, e.g. neither they nor their closest relatives are currently represented in GenBank. Non-metric multidimensional scaling generally clusters plots by heathland site rather than by invasion level (Fig. S1).

Table 2.   Ectomycorrhizal fungal richness and diversity in uninvaded and invaded heathland and neighbouring woodland detected from seedling bioassays and in situ mature tree root ectomycorrhizas
Level of invasionNumber of fungiDiversity indicesEstimated richness
Shannon (H′)Simpson’s reciprocal (1/D)Chao1Chao2Jack1Jack2
Tree roots221.2315.0623.2023.1825.9326.00

In situ mycorhizas

In total 219 DNA sequences were obtained from tree root samples of 48 soil cores. Some of these samples yielded sequences of non-mycorrhizal fungi but the ectomycorrhizal status of those roots based on morphology was ambiguous. There were also some duplicates of fungi sampled from a single soil core more than once. This is likely to have occurred when the morphology of the ectomycorrhizas varied due to differences in age. Ninety-three DNA sequences (40 soil cores) were used for analysis. The data were analysed as the number of fungi within each soil core and duplicates were removed. The soil cores from Gd and Sw yielded no ectomycorrhizas and the total number of roots at these two sites was exceptionally low (only three cores from Gd and five from Sw contained any roots). In contrast, ectomycorrhizas were found in every soil core (total ten cores per site) from Cd, Hw, Kw and Tw.

More fungi were detected on tree roots than on the woodland bioassays (22 and 13, respectively, Fig. 3). Lactarius hepaticus was the most prevalent fungus on mature tree roots. Three of the fungi that formed ectomycorrhizas on bioassay seedlings did not occur on any of the mature tree roots sampled (Laccaria proxima, Leccinum holopus and Suillus bovinus). One of these, Leccinum holopus only occurred on soil bioassays from Sw where no mature tree ectomycorrhizas were obtained. Additionally, neither of the unidentified fungi from the bioassays was detected on mature tree roots; however, these fungi originated from sites where no tree root ectomycorrhizas could be obtained from soil cores. Nine of the 22 fungi on mature tree roots also formed ectomycorrhizas with bioassay seedlings; these included the five most common tree root symbionts. In addition to well-known ectomycorrhizal fungi, a Ceratobasidium sp. was detected forming ectomycorrhizas in two soil cores from Kw. We know of only one previous report of Ceratobasidium ectomycorrhizas (Yagame et al. 2008). The majority of fungi within each level of invasion were detected as indicated by the near saturation of fungal accumulation curves (Fig. 4).


Figure 3.  Cumulative number of soil cores containing each ectomycorrhizal fungus detected on in situ tree roots in woodland soil at six lowland heathlands. The number above each bar indicates the number of sites where each fungus was detected.

Download figure to PowerPoint


Figure 4.  Fungal accumulation curves for mature tree roots and bioassays from six sites.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The number of naturally occurring seedlings less than 1 year old sampled from each site varied from two (Hw) to 1,020 (Td; Table 3). An additional 61 seedlings aged between 1 and 3 years were also sampled from four sites (Hw, Kw, Td and Tw) and 26 of these seedlings were non-ectomycorrhizal. The 1088 naturally occurring seedlings less than 1 year old and analysed for mycorrhizal status show a similar trend as bioassay seedlings in that the proportion of mycorrhizal seedlings increases as the level of invasion increases (Table 3).

Table 3.   Number of naturally occurring Betula and Pinus sylvestris field seedlings less than 1 year old that were mycorrhizal (myc.) versus non-mycorrhizal (non-myc.) at five sites in uninvaded heathland (uninv.), invaded heathland (inv.) and woodland (wood.) and the ectomycorrhizal fungi detected. We did not find seedlings from each level of invasion at all sites. ND, no data
SeedlingSiteLevel of invasionNumber myc.Number non-myc.Ectomycorrhizal fungi detected
BetulaTdinv.83334Laccaria laccata, Leccinum holopus, Paxillus involutus, Scleroderma citrinum, Tomentella bryophila, Tomentella sublilacina
BetulaKwwood.412Lactarius hepaticus, Leccinum holopus, Paxillus involutus
PinusKwwood.411Lactarius tabidus, Tomentella sublilacina, Tomentella sp.
BetulaTdwood.283143Cenococcum geophilum, Laccaria laccata, Paxillus involutus, Russula ochroleuca, Tomentella sublilacina
BetulaTwwood.40Amanita fulva, Cenococcum geophilum
PinusTwwood.50Cenococcum geophilum, Russula emetica, Xerocomus sp.

In total, 242 seedlings were sampled from invaded heathland grids and no mycorrhizas were detected on any seedling. In contrast, of the seedlings sampled from woodland grids, 275 out of 388 were mycorrhizal. Outside of the grids at Td 49% of seedlings sampled from invaded heathland were mycorrhizal (n = 83) and none of the 192 seedlings sampled from otherwise uninvaded heathland were mycorrhizal. We weighed 983 Betula seedlings collected from Td in 2005. Naturally occurring mycorrhizal seedlings were significantly heavier than non-mycorrhizal seedlings (median mass = 8.7 × 10−4 g and 1.16 × 10−3 g, respectively, Kruskal–Wallis H = 6.38, d.f. = 1, P < 0.05) and the difference in mass increased over time (Fig. 5).


Figure 5.  Average mass of mycorrhizal (closed squares) and non-mycorrhizal (open squares) naturally occurring Betula seedlings collected from Thursley Common (Td) between 18 May 2005 (cotyledon stage) and 17 October 2005 (senescence). Error bars correspond to standard errors, error bars are not available for all dates because on some dates seedlings were weighed collectively and the mass averaged.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Based on five sites (Hw, Kw, Sw, Td and Tw) the level of invasion had a significant effect on the proportion of seedlings less than 1 year old which were mycorrhizal versus non-mycorrhizal (F = 47.22,8, P < 0.001, Table 3). The list of fungi found on naturally occurring seedlings indicates that richness increases as the level of invasion increases from invaded heathland to woodland (Table 3). Some fungi detected on naturally occurring seedlings were not detected on bioassay seedlings or tree roots. Two of these, Scleroderma citrinum and Tomentella bryophila, were from a site (Td) that could not be used in the bioassays or mature tree analysis because of a wildfire that occurred in July 2006 devastating our sampling area. Overall, thirty ectomycorrhizal fungi were detected using bioassays and surveys of naturally occurring seedlings and mature tree roots (Fig. 6). Twenty-eight were detected in woodlands, eleven in invaded heathland and five in uninvaded heathland.


Figure 6.  The ectomycorrhizal fungi of birch and pine in English lowland heathlands detected across six sites in bioassay and/or in situ surveys. B, P or BP (in bold) after a fungus name indicates whether it was detected with birch, pine, or birch and pine. B, P or BP (not in bold) after a fungus name indicates uncertainty, these fungi were detected on mature tree roots in mixed woodlands where the identity of the tree was not recorded when roots were sampled. Lactarius hepaticus is considered a pine specialist, but it was repeatedly detected in birch bioassays. The proportion of mycorrhizal seedlings is generally >50% in woodland, c. 25% in invaded heathland and <10% in uninvaded heathland.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Outplanted seedlings

On 31 October 2006, 144 experimental and 22 control P. sylvestris, 54 experimental and 24 control Bpendula surviving seedlings were harvested from transects at Tw. Two P. sylvestris seedlings were mycorrhizal with Suillus variegatus (Table 4). A DNA sequence was not obtained from one mycorrhizal Bpendula seedling. After the first harvest, 304 seedlings (225 P. sylvestris and 79 B. pendula) were left over winter. By February 2007, 113 seedlings were alive (96 P. sylvestris and 17 Bpendula). On 14 April 2007, the remaining 65 experimental and nine control P. sylvestris, and three experimental and two control Bpendula surviving seedlings were harvested. All Bpendula seedlings and control seedlings of both species were non-mycorrhizal, and four P. sylvestris seedlings were mycorrhizal with S. variegatus (Table 4). The four mycorrhizal P. sylvestris seedlings were located within the estimated rooting zone of their corresponding saplings.

Table 4.   Number of outplanted Pinus sylvestris and Betula pendula seedlings mycorrhizal (myc.) or non-mycorrhizal (non-myc) at harvest in October 2006 and April 2007. Seedlings outplanted along transects radiating away from Pinus sylvestris and Betula saplings (experimental) and control transects with no focal sapling at Thursley (Tw)
Date of harvestTransect typeOutplanted seedlingNumber myc.Number non-myc.

Endomycorrhizal assessment

On no occasion did any members of the Rhizoscyphus ericae aggregate form ectomycorrhizas in our study. In addition, we found no evidence of endomycorrhizal colonisation in B. pendula and P. sylvestris roots from bioassays. Nonetheless, members of the R. ericae clade were detected via PCR from roots of seven naturally occurring seedlings, 13 bioassay seedlings (four B. pendula, nine P. sylvestris), one tree root and 27 outplanted seedlings. Other clades (predominantly Meliniomyces variabilis) within the R. ericae aggregates were detected in roots from three woodland cores, 29 bioassays (17 B. pendula, 12 P. sylvestris), one naturally occurring seedling and two outplanted seedlings. Of 67 Calluna hair root samples, nine samples did not contain ericoid mycorrhizal structures, seven samples had ericoid mycorrhizal structures, but the staining was too faint to approximate how many cells were colonized, 19 had ≥50% of cells colonized and the remainder had <50% of cells colonized.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Overall, ectomycorrhizal inoculum in lowland heathlands is severely limited so that tree seedlings growing in heathland soil are predominantly non-mycorrhizal. There is an increase in mycorrhization and fungal diversity as the level of tree encroachment into heathlands increases and a higher fungal diversity on tree roots than on seedlings, thus supporting our first hypothesis. Lowland heathland sites differ in their ectomycorrhizal inoculum availability and diversity. Most of the rarely detected fungi were at only one or two sites, but some of the most abundant fungi occurred at three or four sites. Our results are congruent with those from bioassays similarly conducted at a subset of sites in 2005 and 2006 (Collier 2009) and studies demonstrating interannual stability of ectomycorrhizal communities (Izzo, Agbowo & Bruns 2005; Smith, Douhan & Rizzo 2007).

Fungi within the R. ericae species aggregate do not form ectomycorrhizas on Betula or P. sylvestris seedlings invading the lowland heathlands sampled; this is despite the ectomycorrhizal morphotype Piceirhiza bicolorata being placed within the same clade as the ericoid mycorrhizal fungus Rhizoscyphus ericae (=Hymenoscyphus ericae; Vrålstad, Fossheim & Schumacher 2000) and laboratory support for Vrålstad, Fossheim & Schumacher (2000) hypothesis of dual ericoid-ectomycorrhizal fungi (Vrålstad, Myhre & Schumacher 2002; Villarreal-Ruiz, Anderson & Alexander 2004). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were not observed either.

Based on earlier work performed on primary or secondary successional sites (the Bush Estate studies; Newton 1992; Bowen 1994 and references therein; Jumpponen, Trappe & Cazares 2002; Nara et al. 2003b) our second hypothesis was that relatively fast-growing and putatively spore-dispersed ectomycorrhizal fungi (pioneer or ‘r-selected’) such as Hebeloma, Inocybe, Laccaria, Paxillus and Thelephora should dominate tree seedlings. However, of these fungi only Laccaria proxima is present in uninvaded heathland, where it has the potential to colonize primary invader seedlings. Neither Inocybe lacera, a common and widespread species fruiting in heathlands in the UK (Legon & Henrici 2005), nor Hebeloma, a dominant early-stage genus reported from the Bush Estate, were ever detected on our bioassays seedlings, tree roots, naturally occurring or outplanted seedlings at any of our sites. The lack of congruence with the Bush Estate studies may be due to one of the studies’ caveats; the Bush Estate’s agricultural soil was an ecologically unrealistic setting (Molina, Massicotte & Trappe 1992) and the rare linked studies that were carried out in native forest settings contradicted them (Fleming, Deacon & Last 1986; unpublished data mentioned in Deacon & Fleming 1992 and Fleming 1983). Additional reports show that Paxillus ectomycorrhizas dominate Betula seedlings outplanted within Betula woodland (Newton 1991; Newton & Pigott 1991); this fungus was rarely detected in bioassays (two bioassays from Tw), and it was present at two sites on tree roots (Hw and Cd) where it was far from dominant. On the other hand, we detected seven fungi not previously reported with Betula in Britain (Atkinson 1992) including a new genus (Elaphomyces). Taken together, these results give further credit to the idea that the geographic distributions of ectomycorrhizas merit investigation (Lilleskov & Parrent 2007).

One caveat of using bioassays is that taxa which specialize in forming mycorrhizas on established trees such as Russulaceae (Lactarius and Russula) (Termorshuizen 1991; Ryan & Alexander 1992; Nara, Nakaya & Hogetsu 2003a; Twieg, Durall & Simard 2007) and Amanita (Fox 1986) may not form mycorrhizas on the seedlings used in bioassays due to either host age preference or their inability to form mycorrhizas from the spores that are presumed to constitute the majority of the inoculum. The presence of certain fungal taxa in birch seedling bioassays indicates this study was not completely selective; Amanita sp. have been reported to not develop mycorrhizas on seedlings in bioassay conditions (Deacon, Donaldson & Last 1983; Taylor & Bruns 1999) but Amanita formed mycorrhizas, although rarely, in this study. Russulaceae were infrequent but not excluded from bioassays; particular exceptions are Lactarius hepaticus and Lrufus, which were the third and fourth most common fungi detected in B. pendula bioassays. Some Russulaceae can maintain mycorrhizas on seedlings in primary successional habitats when artificially inoculated (Nara 2006a) but do not occur naturally until vegetation patches containing plant hosts are c. 5 m2 large (Nara, Nakaya & Hogetsu 2003a). Leccinum is not a common primary colonizing fungus (Nara, Nakaya & Hogetsu 2003a) and it has been reported not to form mycorrhizas on birch under glasshouse conditions (Deacon, Donaldson & Last 1983) being dependent upon connections to living plants (Fleming 1984); Leccinum was detected in only six bioassays in our study. The rarity of Leccinum and Paxillus in bioassays may be indeed due to their reliance on rhizomorphs (root-like aggregations of hyphae), rather than spores, to colonize new roots (Newton 1992). The presence of these fungi, presumed to colonize vegetatively, indicates at least some viable ectomycorrhizas and/or mycelia, as well as spores, were present in bioassays.

Our Shannon’s H’ and Simpson’s 1/D values were similar to those reported for individual tree species by Ishida, Nara & Hogetsu (2007). Twieg, Durall & Simard (2007) reported a Shannon diversity index near 2 for Betula papyrifera that did not increase significantly after trees had reached 5 years of age. The low tree diversity at lowland heathland sites is probably the reason for our overall diversity indices being much lower than in mixed woodlands elsewhere (Richard et al. 2005; Walker, Miller & Horton 2005; Tedersoo et al. 2006; Ishida, Nara & Hogetsu 2007). As expected, there is a higher mycorrhizal diversity in mature trees compared to seedlings, and the same holds true for invaded heath and woodland soil bioassay seedlings compared to uninvaded heathland soil bioassay seedlings. These findings corroborate those of Nara et al. (2003b) who found that the number of ectomycorrhizal fungal species increased as plant size increased at a volcanic desert, and Ashkannejhad & Horton (2006) who reported a higher diversity of fungi in more heavily forested sites on sand dunes. There can be higher fungal richness and diversity on seedlings near trees due to the formation of common mycelial networks (CMNs) in which growing ectomycorrhizal fungi connect the root systems of trees with those of establishing seedlings (Brownlee et al. 1983; Cline, Ammirati & Edmonds 2005; Dickie & Reich 2005; Lian et al. 2006) and can thereby control seedling survival, growth and nutrient uptake during primary succession (Nara & Hogetsu 2004; Nara 2006a,b).

Fungal life history and mycorrhization strategy largely determines ectomycorrhizal distribution and diversity within lowland heathlands. Common mycorrhizal networks can allow fungi that do not readily colonize seedlings via spores to proliferate and potentially participate in tree invasion secondarily within heathlands. Unexpectedly, CMN formation appeared to be weak for seedlings outplanted near Betula and Pinus saplings, contrary to our third hypothesis. However, two fungi that form rhizomorphs, Scleroderma citrinum and Paxillus involutus, were detected in some naturally occurring heathland seedlings. The complete or near absence of these two fungi from bioassays can be assigned to their reliance on CMNs rather than spores to colonize new roots (Newton 1992). In contrast, Suillus and Rhizopogon use a mixed colonization strategy with both rhizomorphs and spores being effective at colonizing seedling roots. Rhizopogon and Suillus are the main genera to form ectomycorrhizas on pine seedlings in uninvaded areas (Horton, Cazares & Bruns 1998; Ashkannejhad & Horton 2006) including lowland heathlands. These Pinaceae-specific fungi are also prevalent in deer faeces suggesting a specialized method of dispersal and potential for formation of a spore bank; thus, these fungi are uniquely adapted for dispersal and survival in treeless areas (Ashkannejhad & Horton 2006). In woodland soils, Rhizopogon species can dominate the spore bank while being absent on mature tree roots, where they are considered poor competitors (Baar et al. 1999; Taylor & Bruns 1999; Twieg, Durall & Simard 2007). Although a generalist, T. terrestris is another ruderal fungus that actively colonizes seedlings in tree nurseries and saplings (Colpaert 1999); accordingly, it was common in invaded lowland heathland bioassays, but curiously it was absent from uninvaded heathland. In contrast, Russula and Lactarius (Russulaceae) were diverse and prevalent on mature tree roots (nine Russulaceae occurred in 37 soil cores) compared to bioassay seedlings (three Russulaceae occurred in 20 bioassays), further supporting evidence that Russulaceae are late-successional (Deacon & Fleming 1992; Ryan & Alexander 1992; Nara, Nakaya & Hogetsu 2003a; Twieg, Durall & Simard 2007).

These colonization strategies agree well with results from a pilot study conducted between April and September 2007 at uninvaded heathland in Tw where we placed woodland-collected fresh sporocarps of Paxillus, Lactarius, Amanita, Thelephora and Suillus spp. – all abundant fruiters in woodland – next to outplanted Betula and Pinus seedlings. At harvest, we obtained ectomycorrhizas of only T. terrestris and Suillus bovinus in 73% of pines and of T. terrestris in 36% of birches (Collier 2009). This observation makes widespread ectomycorrhizal suppression (e.g. competitive or allelopathic, Robinson 1972; Genney, Alexander & Hartley 2000) in heathland soil appear unlikely. It is worth stressing that lack of mycorrhization in heathland bioassays and the field is due to a lack of inoculum, rather than to the design of our experiments or to suppression, because: (i) soils from both heathland and woodland in pine and birch bioassays were co-cultivated with Calluna, (ii) seedlings in the pilot sporocarp addition study became mycorrhizal within 3 months and (iii) outplanting experiments such as Fleming’s (1984) conducted over shorter time periods resulted in all seedlings undergoing mycorrhization. Furthermore, the separation of fungi by their pioneer or non-pioneer abilities agrees with some surveys of naturally occurring and outplanted Betula and conifer seedlings in conifer forests and plantations (Thomas, Rogers & Jackson 1983; Blasius & Oberwinkler 1989; Deacon & Fleming 1992).

This study demonstrates that a limited suite of fungi is only rarely present to form mycorrhizas with tree seedlings in lowland heathlands. Under field conditions, the relatively rare mycorrhizal seedlings are significantly heavier than non-mycorrhizal seedlings; this supports our fourth hypothesis and concurs with a meta-analysis of 36 – mostly laboratory – studies (Karst et al. 2008). Under laboratory conditions, biomass was also affected by site and level of invasion, but generally, mycorrhizal seedlings were heavier than non-mycorrhizal seedlings. However, we detected weak survival effects of mycorrhization in the field – and no fungal species-specific effects in bioassays – compared to the absolute survival and strongly species-specific effects demonstrated for Salix under the harsher abiotic conditions of primary succession (Nara 2008) and suggested earlier for Betula in northern upland heathlands (Miles 1973; Miles & Kinnaird 1979). We observed no growth depression in mycorrhizal seedlings as an initial cost of mycorrhization, even though mycorrhization was observed in some cases as soon as seedlings had emerged above-ground. In most of England, secondary succession from heathland to woodland occurs under relatively, and increasingly, mild abiotic conditions and in the context of a history of soil eutrophication. Both factors may contribute to non-mycorrhizal survival in otherwise extremely nutrient-poor heather-dominated soils and they merit investigation. With limited mycorrhizal spore dispersal from adjacent woodland, poorly developed mycorrhizal spore banks and weak common mycorrhizal networks, a ‘sit-and-wait’ strategy by tree seedlings is feasible in English lowland heathlands. In conclusion, this study has achieved its main objectives: determining the distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum in lowland heathland soils and identifying the ectomycorrhizal fungi involved in tree encroachment upon lowland heathlands. This knowledge framework provides the stepping stones required for future ecologically relevant modelling and targeted experimentation aimed at understanding tree invasions.


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

We thank the Natural Environment Research Council (grant NE/C510291/1 to M.I.B.) and the eight anonymous referees of the application for their comments, Rose Strickland-Constable, Richard Waterman and Ellen Fry for assistance in the field, Peter Manning and David Read for comments on a draft of this manuscript, Drs. Tim Barraclough and Fabiana Gordon for statistical advice, the editor and referees for their comments on the manuscript, and the following for facilitating site access: Michael Taylor (Cavenham Heath NNR), Ian Nicol (Holt Heath NNR), Bob Lord (Kingston Great Common NNR), Tim Brodie-James (Stoborough Heath NNR), Angela Peters (Studland & Godlingston Heath NNR), Simon Nobes and James Giles (Thursley NNR) and Isabel Alonso (Natural England).


  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information
  • Andersen, M.D. & Baker, W.L. (2006) Reconstructing landscape-scale tree invasion using survey notes in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming, USA. Landscape Ecology, 21, 243258.
  • Ashkannejhad, S. & Horton, T.R. (2006) Ectomycorrhizal ecology under primary succession on coastal sand dunes: interactions involving Pinus contorta, suilloid fungi and deer. New Phytologist, 169, 345354.
  • Atkinson, M.D. (1992) Betula pendula Roth, B. verrucosa Ehrh and B. pubescens Ehrh. Journal of Ecology, 80, 837870.
  • Baar, J., Horton, T.R., Kretzer, A.M. & Bruns, T.D. (1999) Mycorrhizal colonization of Pinus muricata from resistant propagules after a stand-replacing wildfire. New Phytologist, 143, 409418.
  • Bidartondo, M.I., Baar, J. & Bruns, T.D. (2001) Low ectomycorrhizal inoculum potential and diversity from soils in and near ancient forests of bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva). Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique, 79, 293299.
  • Blasius, D. & Oberwinkler, F. (1989) Succession of mycorrhizae – a matter of tree age or stand age. Annales Des Sciences Forestieres, 46, S758S761.
  • Boerner, R.E.J., DeMars, B.G. & Leicht, P.N. (1996) Spatial patterns of mycorrhizal infectiveness of soils long a successional chronosequence. Mycorrhiza, 6, 7990.
  • Bowen, G.D. (1994) The ecology of ectomycorrhiza formation and functioning. Plant and Soil, 159, 6167.
  • Brownlee, C., Duddridge, J.A., Malibari, A. & Read, D.J. (1983) The structure and function of mycelial systems of ectomycorrhizal roots with special reference to their role in forming inter-plant connections and providing pathways for assimilate and water transport. Plant and Soil, 71, 433443.
  • Bruno, J.F., Stachowicz, J.J. & Bertness, M.D. (2003) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 119125.
  • Bruns, T., Tan, J., Bidartondo, M., Szaro, T. & Redecker, D. (2002) Survival of Suillus pungens and Amanita francheti ectomycorrhizal genets was rare or absent after a stand-replacing wildfire. New Phytologist, 155, 517523.
  • Cline, E.T., Ammirati, J.F. & Edmonds, R.L. (2005) Does proximity to mature trees influence ectomycorrhizal fungus communities of Douglas-fir seedlings? New Phytologist, 166, 9931009.
  • Collier, F.A. (2009). The Mycorrhizal Fungi Involved in the Tree Invasion of Lowland Heathlands. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London.
  • Colpaert, J.V. (1999) Thelephora. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Key Genera in Profile (eds J.W.G.Cairney & S.M.Chambers), pp. 325345, Springer, Berlin.
  • Colwell, R.K. (2005) EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. User’s guide and application published at:
  • Crawley, M.J. (1997) Plant Ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Deacon, J.W., Donaldson, S.J. & Last, F.T. (1983) Sequences and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi on birch. Plant and Soil, 71, 257262.
  • Deacon, J.W. & Fleming, L.V. (1992) Interactions of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhizal Functioning (ed. M.F.Allen), 249300, Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Dickie, I.A. & Reich, P.B. (2005) Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities at forest edges. Journal of Ecology, 93, 244255.
  • Dighton, J. & Mason, P.A. (1984) Mycorrhizal dynamics during forest tree development. Developmental Biology of Higher Fungi. British Mycological Society Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Manchester.
  • Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: muscle sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, 17921797.
  • Fleming, L.V. (1983) Succession of mycorrhizal fungi on birch – infection of seedlings planted around mature trees. Plant and Soil, 71, 263267.
  • Fleming, L.V. (1984) Effects of soil trenching and coring on the formation of ectomycorrhizas on birch seedlings grown around mature trees. New Phytologist, 98, 143153.
  • Fleming, L.V. (1985) Experimental-study of sequences of ectomycorrhizal fungi on birch (Betula sp) seedling root systems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 17, 591600.
  • Fleming, L.V., Deacon, J.W. & Last, F.T. (1986) Ectomycorrhizal succession in a Scottish birch wood. Mycorrhizae: physiology and genetics (eds V.Gianinazzi-Pearson & S.Gianinazzi), pp. 259264. INRA, Paris.
  • Ford, E.D., Mason, P.A. & Pelham, J. (1980) Spatial patterns of sporophore distribution around a young birch tree in 3 successive years. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 75, 287296.
  • Fox, F.M. (1983) Role of basidiospores as inocula of mycorrhizal fungi of birch. Plant and Soil, 71, 269273.
  • Fox, F.M. (1986) Grouping of ectomycorrhizal fungi of birch and pine, based on establishment of mycorrhizas on seedlings from spores in unsterile soils. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 87, 371380.
  • Gardes, M. & Bruns, T.D. (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology, 2, 113118.
  • Gardes, M. & Bruns, T.D. (1996) Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: above- and below-ground views. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique, 74, 15721583.
  • Genney, D.R., Alexander, I.J. & Hartley, S.E. (2000) Exclusion of grass roots from soil organic layers by Calluna: the role of ericoid mycorrhizas. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 11171125.
  • Gibson, F. & Deacon, J.W. (1988) Experimental-study of establishment of ectomycorrhizas in different regions of birch root systems. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 91, 239251.
  • Gimingham, C.H. (1978) Calluna and its associated species – some aspects of coexistence in communities. Vegetatio, 36, 179186.
  • Gimingham, C.H. (1992) The Lowland Heathland Management Book. English Nature, Peterborough.
  • Grogan, P., Baar, J. & Bruns, T.D. (2000) Below-ground ectomycorrhizal community structure in a recently burned bishop pine forest. Journal of Ecology, 88, 10511062.
  • Haigh, J.M. (2001) Dual mycorrhizal symbiosis in Salix: the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an ectomycorrhizal genus. PhD thesis, University of York, York.
  • Haskins, K.E. & Gehring, C.A. (2005) Evidence for mutualist limitation: the impacts of conspecific density on the mycorrhizal inoculum potential of woodland soils. Oecologia, 145, 123131.
  • Hester, A.J., Gimingham, C.H. & Miles, J. (1991a) Succession from heather moorland to birch woodland .3. Seed availability, germination and early growth. Journal of Ecology, 79, 329344.
  • Hester, A.J., Miles, J. & Gimingham, C.H. (1991b) Succession from heather moorland to birch woodland .1. Experimental alteration of specific environmental-conditions in the field. Journal of Ecology, 79, 303315.
  • Horton, T.R. & Bruns, T.D. (2001) The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Molecular Ecology, 10, 18551871.
  • Horton, T.R., Cazares, E. & Bruns, T.D. (1998) Ectomycorrhizal, vesicular-arbuscular and dark septate fungal colonization of bishop pine (Pinus muricata) seedlings in the first 5 months of growth after wildfire. Mycorrhiza, 8, 1118.
  • Horton, T.R. & Van Der Heijden, M.G.A. (2008) The role of symbioses in seedling establishment and survival. Seedling Ecology & Evolution (eds M.A.Leck, V.T.Parker & R.L.Simpson), pp. 189213, Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ishida, T.A., Nara, K. & Hogetsu, T. (2007) Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: insight from eight host species in mixed conifer-broadleaf forests. New Phytologist, 174, 430440.
  • Izzo, A., Agbowo, J. & Bruns, T.D. (2005) Detection of plot-level changes in ectomycorrhizal communities across years in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest. New Phytologist, 166, 619630.
  • Jeanmougin, F., Thompson, J.D., Gouy, M., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1998) Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 23, 403405.
  • Jonsson, L., Dahlberg, A., Nilsson, M.-C., Kårén, O. & Zackrisson, O. (1999) Continuity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in self-regenerating boreal Pinus sylvestris forests studied by comparing mycobiont diversity on seedlings and mature trees. New Phytologist, 142, 151162.
  • Jumpponen, A., Trappe, J.M. & Cazares, E. (2002) Occurrence of ectomycorrhizal fungi on the forefront of retreating Lyman Glacier (Washington, USA) in relation to time since deglaciation. Mycorrhiza, 12, 4349.
  • Karst, J., Marczak, L., Jones, M.D. & Turkington, R. (2008) The mutualism–parasitism continuum in ectomycorrhizas: A quantitative assessment using meta-analysis. Ecology, 89, 10321042.
  • Kennedy, P.G., Bergemann, S.E., Hortal, S. & Bruns, T.D. (2007) Determining the outcome of field-based competition between two Rhizopogon species using real-time PCR. Molecular Ecology, 16, 881890.
  • Khoon, G.W. & Gimingham, C.H. (1984) Birch regeneration in heath vegetation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B-Biological Sciences, 85, 7381.
  • Last, F.T., Dighton, J. & Mason, P.A. (1987) Successions of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2, 157161.
  • Last, F.T., Mason, P.A., Wilson, J. & Deacon, J.W. (1983) Fine roots and sheathing mycorrhizas – their formation, function and dynamics. Plant and Soil, 71, 921.
  • Last, F.T., Mason, P.A., Ingleby, K. & Fleming, L.V. (1984) Succession of fruitbodies of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi associated with Betula pendula. Forest Ecology and Management, 9, 229234.
  • Legon, N.W. & Henrici, A. (2005) Checklist of the British & Irish Basidiomycota. Kew, London.
  • Lian, C.L., Narimatsu, M., Nara, K. & Hogetsu, T. (2006) Tricholoma matsutake in a natural Pinus densiflora forest: correspondence between above- and below-ground genets, association with multiple host trees and alteration of existing ectomycorrhizal communities. New Phytologist, 171, 825836.
  • Lilleskov, E.A. & Parrent, J.L. (2007) Can we develop general predictive models of mycorrhizal fungal community-environment relationships? New Phytologist, 174, 250256.
  • Maddison, D.R. & Maddison, W.P. (2003) MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 4.06. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Manning, P., Putwain, P.D. & Webb, N.R. (2004) Identifying and modelling the determinants of woody plant invasion of lowland heath. Journal of Ecology, 92, 868881.
  • Manning, P., Putwain, P.D. & Webb, N.R. (2005) Formulating a general statistical model for Betula spp. invasion of lowland heath ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 10311041.
  • Marrs, R.H. (1987) Studies on the conservation of lowland Calluna heaths .1. Control of birch and bracken and its effect on heath vegetation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 163175.
  • Mason, P.A., Wilson, J. & Last, F.T. (1984) Mycorrhizal fungi of Betula spp – factors affecting their cccurrence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B-Biological Sciences, 85, 141151.
  • Mason, P.A., Wilson, J., Last, F.T. & Walker, C. (1983) The concept of succession in relation to the spread of sheathing mycorrhizal fungi on inoculated tree seedlings growing in unsterile soils. Plant and Soil, 71, 247256.
  • Miles, J. (1973) Early mortality and survival of self-sown seedlings in Glenfeshie, Inverness-shire. Journal of Ecology, 61, 9398.
  • Miles, J. & Kinnaird, J.W. (1979) The establishment and regeneration of birch Juniper and Scotch pine in the Scottish Highlands UK. Scottish Forestry, 33, 102119.
  • Minitab Inc. (2000) Minitab Statistical Software 13.1.
  • Mitchell, R.J., Marrs, R.H., Le Duc, M.G. & Auld, M.H.D. (1997) A study of succession on lowland heaths in Dorset, southern England: Changes in vegetation and soil chemical properties. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 14261444.
  • Mitchell, R.J., Auld, M.H.D., Hughes, J.M. & Marrs, R.H. (2000) Estimates of nutrient removal during heathland restoration on successional sites in Dorset, southern England. Biological Conservation, 95, 233246.
  • Molina, R., Massicotte, H. & Trappe, J.M. (1992) Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community-ecological consequences and practical implications. Mycorrhizal functioning: an integrative plant-fungal process (ed. M.F.Allen), pp. 357423, Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Nara, K. (2006a) Ectomycorrhizal networks and seedling establishment during early primary succession. New Phytologist, 169, 169178.
  • Nara, K. (2006b) Pioneer dwarf willow may facilitate tree succession by providing late colonizers with compatible ectomycorrhizal fungi in a primary successional volcanic desert. New Phytologist, 171, 187198.
  • Nara, K. (2008) Community developmental patterns and ecological functions of ectomycorrhizal fungi: Implications from primary succession. Mycorrhiza: State of the Art, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Eco-function, Biotechnology, Eco-physiology, Structure and Systematics (ed. A.Varma), pp. 581599, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Nara, K. & Hogetsu, T. (2004) Ectomycorrhizal fungi on established shrubs facilitate subsequent seedling establishment of successional plant species. Ecology, 85, 17001707.
  • Nara, K., Nakaya, H. & Hogetsu, T. (2003a) Ectomycorrhizal sporocarp succession and production during early primary succession on Mount Fuji. New Phytologist, 158, 193206.
  • Nara, K., Nakaya, H., Wu, B.Y., Zhou, Z.H. & Hogetsu, T. (2003b) Underground primary succession of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a volcanic desert on Mount Fuji. New Phytologist, 159, 743756.
  • Newton, A.C. (1991) Mineral nutrition and mycorrhizal infection of seedling oak and birch. III. Epidemiological aspects of ectomycorrhizal infection and the relationship to seedling growth. New Phytologist, 117, 5360.
  • Newton, A.C. (1992) Towards a functional classification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza, 2, 7579.
  • Newton, A.C. & Pigott, C.D. (1991) Mineral-nutrition and mycorrhizal infection of seedling oak and birch .1. Nutrient-uptake and the development of mycorrhizal infection during seedling establishment. New Phytologist, 117, 3744.
  • Otten, W., Bailey, D.J. & Gilligan, C.A. (2004) Empirical evidence of spatial thresholds to control invasion of fungal parasites and saprotrophs. New Phytologist, 163, 125132.
  • Peay, K.G., Kennedy, P.G. & Bruns, T.D. (2008) Fungal community ecology: A hybrid beast with a molecular master. BioScience, 58, 799810.
  • Peterson, R.L. & Massicotte, H. (2004) Mycorrhizas: Anatomy and Cell Biology. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL (downloaded 13 October 2008).
  • Read, D.J. (1989) The nitrogen nutrition of mycorrhizal fungi and their host plants. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sulphur Utilisation by Fungi (eds L.L.Boddy, R.Marchant & D.J.Read), pp. 181204, University Press, Cambridge.
  • Read, D.J. (1998) The mycorrhizal status of Pinus. Ecology & Biogeography of Pinus (ed. D.M.Richardson), pp. 324340, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Richard, F., Millot, S., Gardes, M. & Selosse, M.A. (2005) Diversity and specificity of ectomycorrhizal fungi retrieved from an old-growth Mediterranean forest dominated by Quercus ilex. New Phytologist, 166, 10111023.
  • Richardson, D.M. & Higgins, S.I. (1998) Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (ed. D.M.Richardson), pp. 450473, University Press, Cambridge.
  • Richardson, D.M., Allsopp, N., D’Antonio, C.M., Milton, S.J. & Rejmanek, M. (2000) Plant invasions – the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews, 75, 6593.
  • Robinson, R.K. (1972) The production by roots of Calluna vulgaris of a factor inhibitory to growth of some mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of Ecology, 60, 219224.
  • Rundel, P.W. (1988) Leaf structure and nutrition in Mediterranean-climate sclerophylss. Mediterranean-type ecosystems (ed. R.L.Specht), pp. 157167, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
  • Ryan, E.A. & Alexander, I.J. (1992) Mycorrhizal aspects of improved growth of spruce when grown in mixed stands on heathlands. Mycorrhizas in Ecosystems (eds D.J.Read, D.H.Lewis & I.J.Alexander), pp. 237245, CABI, Oxfordshire.
  • Schloss, P.D. & Handelsman, J. (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 15011506.
  • Simberloff, D., Relva, M.A. & Nuñez, M. (2002) Gringos en el bosque: Introduced tree invasion in a native Nothofagus/Austrocedrus forest. Biological Invasions, 4, 3553.
  • Smith, M.E., Douhan, G.W. & Rizzo, D.M. (2007) Ectomycorrhizal community structure in a xeric Quercus woodland based on rDNA sequence analysis of sporocarps and pooled roots. New Phytologist, 174, 847863.
  • Smith, S.E. & Read, D.J. (2008) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.
  • Specht, R.L. (1981) Mallee ecosystems in southern Australia. Ecosystems of the World, vol. 9A Heathlands and related shrublands. Descriptive studies (ed. R.L.Specht), pp. 118. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Taylor, A.F.S. (2002) Fungal diversity in ectomycorrhizal communities: sampling effort and species detection. Plant and Soil, 244, 1928.
  • Taylor, A.F.S. & Alexander, I.J. (1990) Demography and population-dynamics of ectomycorrhizas of Sitka spruce fertilized with N. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 28, 493496.
  • Taylor, D.L. & Bruns, T.D. (1999) Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Molecular Ecology, 8, 18371850.
  • Tedersoo, L., Suva, T., Larsson, E. & Koljalg, U. (2006) Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a wooded meadow. Mycological Research, 110, 734748.
  • Termorshuizen, A.J. (1991) Succession of mycorrhizal fungi in stands of Pinus sylvestris in the Netherlands. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 555564.
  • Thiet, R.K. & Boerner, R.E.J. (2007) Spatial patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum in arbuscular mycorrhizal barrens communities: implications for controlling invasion by Pinus virginiana. Mycorrhiza, 17, 507517.
  • Thomas, G.W., Rogers, D. & Jackson, R.M. (1983) Changes in the mycorrhizal status of Sitka spruce following outplanting. Plant and Soil, 71, 319323.
  • Twieg, B.D., Durall, D.M. & Simard, S.W. (2007) Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in mixed temperate forests. New Phytologist, 176, 437447.
  • Villarreal-Ruiz, L., Anderson, I.C. & Alexander, I.J. (2004) Interaction between an isolate from the Hymenoscyphus ericae aggregate and roots of Pinus and Vaccinium. New Phytologist, 164, 183192.
  • Vrålstad, T., Fossheim, T. & Schumacher, T. (2000) Piceirhiza bicolorata – the ectomycorrhizal expression of the Hymenoscyphus ericae aggregate? New Phytologist, 145, 549563.
  • Vrålstad, T., Myhre, E. & Schumacher, T. (2002) Molecular diversity and phylogenetic affinities of symbiotic root-associated ascomycetes of the Helotiales in burnt and metal polluted habitats. New Phytologist, 155, 131148.
  • Walker, J.F., Miller, O.K. & Horton, J.L. (2005) Hyperdiversity of ectomycorrhizal fungus assemblages on oak seedlings in mixed forests in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Molecular Ecology, 14, 829838.
  • White, T.J., Burns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds. A.M.Innis, D.H.Gelford, J.J.Sninsky, J.F.White), pp. 315322. Academic Press, New York, USA.
  • Yagame, T., Yamato, M., Suzuki, A. & Iwase, K. (2008) Ceratobasidiaceae mycorrhizal fungi isolated from nonphotosynthetic orchid Chamaegastrodia sikokiana. Mycorrhiza, 18, 97101.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  9. Supporting Information

Figure S1. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (a non-parametric method) was used to test for grouping of sites by level of invasion on the basis of the presence and absence of ectomycorrhizal fungi (binary data) with R version 2.7.2.

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

JEC_1544_sm_figureS1.doc499KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.