Summary
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
1. Pathogens can have strong effects on their hosts and can be important determinants of biological invasions. In natural systems, host–pathogen interactions may be mediated by direct environmental effects on pathogen communities and host fitness.
2. While environmental mediation of host–pathogen interactions has been investigated experimentally and at single sites, there have been few studies tracking pathogen effects on lifetime host fecundity across large naturally occurring environmental gradients.
3. If environmental factors directly mediate both pathogen transmission and host fecundity, laboratory and local-scale studies may not predict pathogen effects across large spatial scales.
4. Here we investigate the relationship between host fecundity and infection by a suite of RNA viral pathogens, by surveying two invasive annual grasses at 18 locations along a 1200-km latitudinal gradient on the west coast of North America.
5. Infected hosts of both species had 28–30% lower fecundity than uninfected hosts in our field surveys. However, the correlation of reduced fecundity to infection arose from indirect effects of the environment on both host fecundity and pathogen prevalence, rather than direct effects of the pathogen on the host. Pathogen prevalence was highest at sites where uninfected hosts had lowest fecundity.
6. Synthesis. In past experimental inoculations, virus infection reduced fecundity of these host species. Against this background, the results of our geographic-scale survey demonstrate the challenges not only of inferring cause from correlation, but also of extrapolating from local studies and experimental inoculations to larger spatial scales. Our results highlight a need for experimentally manipulating infection across environmental gradients. Such an integrated approach would allow quantification of the fitness impacts of infection, even when the environment directly affects both prevalence and host fecundity.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
Pathogens can have strong effects on the composition of natural communities. Determining the effects of pathogens on hosts is of particular relevance for invasive species, as pathogens can mediate biological invasions (Anderson & May 1986; Dobson & Crawley 1994; Tompkins, White & Boots 2003; Torchin & Mitchell 2004; Mitchell et al. 2006; Borer et al. 2007b). However, pathogen effects on hosts occur within a larger abiotic and biotic environmental context. Environmental gradients in resources, competitors and consumers all directly alter host vital rates, independent of pathogens (Mitchell et al. 2006). In addition, environmental factors can alter pathogen prevalence by changing pathogen transmission (Gregory 1973; Agrios 1978; Fitt, McCartney & Walklate 1989; Madden, Yang & Wilson 1996; Aylor 1999), vector communities (Cumming & Guegan 2006), resource supply rates (Mitchell et al. 2006), host community composition (Power & Mitchell 2004; Keesing, Holt & Ostfeld 2006) and abundance of natural enemies (Packer et al. 2003; Malmstrom et al. 2006). As a result, pathogen and environmental effects on host fitness are potentially confounded (Hassell et al. 1982; Holmes 1982; Thrusfield 2005).
There are at least two types of effects on host fecundity that could be obscured by such environmental confounding. Environmental conditions can modulate pathogen effects on host fecundity. This phenomenon of environmental modulation is well studied using experimental inoculations or natural infections in the laboratory or single field sites (Park 1948; Malmstrom et al. 2006). Conversely, pathogens may mediate environmental effects on host fecundity. This phenomenon occurs when infected and uninfected hosts respond differently to abiotic gradients (Malmstrom et al. 2006), competition (Park 1948; Malmstrom et al. 2006; Borer et al. 2007b) or consumer effects (Packer et al. 2003; Malmstrom et al. 2006).
However, few studies have attempted to separate these effects on large-scale, naturally occurring environmental gradients. This may be because of the difficulty of assembling a data set in which the infection status and lifetime fate and fecundity of individual hosts are known for a spatially extensive set of sites with known environmental conditions. While there are many large-scale studies of pathogen prevalence (Berger et al. 1998; Smith et al. 2002), these rarely measure host fecundity or fitness (but see Pioz et al. 2008). As a result, it remains unclear whether local-scale studies of pathogen effects can be scaled up to mesh with larger-scale observations of disease prevalence. Scaling up can lead to incorrect conclusions when the environmental conditions at a local study site are not representative of environmental conditions across the region. It also remains unclear how large-scale surveys can be used to predict pathogen impacts on local host populations. Scaling down can lead to incorrect conclusions when local sites vary environmentally, and there is either environmental confounding of host fecundity and infection, or environmental modulation of the fitness impacts of infection.
The disconnect between studies of pathogens in the laboratory or at single sites and large-scale epidemics is particularly relevant to studies of the role of pathogens in biological invasions, because of the need to forecast pathogen impacts at large spatial scales and in novel environments. The invasion of exotic annual grasses into grasslands of western North America presents a unique opportunity to examine pathogen–environment interactions within a system of great relevance to conservation biology. The invasion of these grasslands by exotic annual grasses from the Mediterranean region is one of the most dramatic invasions world-wide, including over 9 million ha in California alone (Heady 1977). Invasion of annual grasses into native perennial grass communities may have been facilitated by a suite of phloem-limited pathogens, collectively referred to as barley and cereal yellow dwarf viruses (B/CYDVs) (Malmstrom et al. 2005b; Borer et al. 2007b).
B/CYDVs in their exotic annual hosts are well suited for large-scale surveys and assessment of lifetime fecundity effects of pathogens in natural systems. Many exotic annual grass species have quite extensive latitudinal distributions. Experimental inoculation by these viruses in laboratory and field trials can significantly reduce annual grass biomass and fecundity (D’Arcy 1995; Malmstrom et al. 2005a). For example, greenhouse inoculations with BYDV-PAV decreased total biomass (above- and below-ground) of two widespread and common annual grass hosts that are the focus of the current study, Avena fatua and Bromus hordeaceus (41% and 39% respectively; J.P. Cronin, M.E. Welsh, M. Dekkers, C.E. Mitchell, unpublished data). We surveyed populations of these two invasive annual grass species at 18 grassland sites spanning a threefold gradient in rainfall (434–1448 mm year−1) and 1200 km of latitude along the west coast of North America. We screened each of the 568 individual host plants for four common RNA viral pathogen species (barley and cereal yellow dwarf viruses, B/CYDVs). In addition, the lifetime fecundity of annual grasses is easily measurable in the field as the seed production at the end of a growing season, so we could directly measure lifetime fecundity and infection status in naturally occurring individuals.
We use these data to investigate the following three questions to clarify the roles of the environment and pathogen infection on host fecundity:
- 1
What is the relationship between infection status and host fecundity? To answer this question, we first compare the fecundity of infected and uninfected hosts across all sites. We then compare fecundity of infected and uninfected hosts after controlling for among-site variability (i.e. we determine the effect of pathogen nested within a site) to test whether infection status explains any residual variation in host fecundity.
- 2
What is the direct effect of the environment on host fecundity? To answer this question, we use regression to find environmental determinants of fecundity independent of the pathogen (i.e. fecundity in uninfected hosts across all sites).
- 3
What is the relationship between environmental quality and pathogen prevalence? To answer this question, we compare our pathogen-independent measure of site quality (fecundity of uninfected hosts) with site-level pathogen prevalence.
Discussion
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
Taken as a whole, we found that invasive annual grass hosts infected by BYDV-SGV had 42–45% lower fecundity than did uninfected hosts. To a lesser degree, infection by other B/CYDV viruses followed a similar pattern (28–30% reduction in host fecundity). However, the fecundity effects in the field surveys were due to site-level variability in environmental conditions rather than direct pathogen effects. There were no residual differences between the fecundity of infected and uninfected hosts after accounting for site-level variation in fecundity. Similarly, a non-manipulative study at a local site also did not find a consistent negative correlation between B/CYDV infection and host fecundity across three host species including B. hordeaceus (Remold 2002). In contrast, laboratory and field experiments conducted at single sites have demonstrated strong effects of B/CYDV inoculation on fecundity of our two focal host species (Griesbach et al. 1990; Malmstrom et al. 2005a). The lack of coupling between experimental manipulations of pathogens at single sites and both local and large-scale surveys demonstrates that results of large-scale pathogen surveys must be considered within an environmental context. If the environment drives prevalence and host fecundity, then population-level impacts in natural epidemics may not be detectable without experimental inoculations.
Individual host fecundity was strongly correlated with both the abiotic and biotic environment. In particular, high-quality sites, where uninfected B. hordeaceus and A. fatua plants had highest fecundity, had high rainfall and high numbers of grass species. This may have arisen from the sites being favourable for grasses generally as indicated by the more diverse grass flora. Given the observational nature of these data, we are not fully able to assign causation to any environmental covariates. For example, host richness and precipitation are positively correlated, as sites with higher rainfall were also located further north and had higher overall grass diversity. Fecundity of our focal species was not correlated with total biomass, soil nutrient levels or abundance of competitive dominant hosts (perennial grasses; Seabloom et al. 2003).
Several limitations of large-scale surveys limit the ability of this study to establish direct causal links between specific environmental factors and the fecundity of infected and uninfected hosts. Ultimately, host fecundity and pathogen prevalence may be driven by factors not included in our model, such as the presence of irrigated agricultural fields (Griesbach et al. 1990; Hewings & Eastman 1995). Furthermore, our data present a single snapshot in time, while B/CYDV prevalence and impacts can vary widely from year to year (Hewings & Eastman 1995; Seabloom et al. 2009). Because of these limitations, we focus the current work on the more limited goal of examining the correlation between infection status, environment and host fecundity along a gradient in site quality, measured by fecundity of uninfected hosts.
Pathogen prevalence, particularly BYDV-SGV, declined strongly with site quality. For both host species, prevalence of BYDV-SGV declined similarly with increasing precipitation, host abundance and fecundity of uninfected hosts. The observed negative relationship between pathogen prevalence and site quality could arise from either host or vector responses. From the perspective of the host, weakened hosts with low fecundity may also be less able to mount successful countermeasures against pathogen infections or vector attacks. This is unlikely in the case of the B/CYDVs as there has been little evidence of general host resistance in grasses (Wang, Abbott & Waterhouse 2000). However, this is a well-known phenomenon in other plant and animal systems (Lochmiller, Vestey & Boren 1993; Saino, Calza & Moller 1997; Klasing 1998; Fargallo et al. 2002; Kidd 2004; Cunningham-Rundles, McNeeley & Moon 2005; Smith, Jones & Smith 2005).
Vector responses also could control this pattern, if vector movement rates change with host quality (Kilpatrick et al. 2006). In our system, plant chemistry, particularly free amino acid content, is extremely important for foraging aphid preference, host selection and movement among individuals (Powell, Tosh & Hardie 2006). Stressed plants tend to accumulate relatively high levels of free amino acids (Barnett & Naylor 1966; White 1984), the primary source of dietary nitrogen for aphids (Terra 1988). Thus plants at lower quality sites (e.g. drought-stressed) are likely to have phloem with relatively high free amino acid content which could lead to increased preference by foraging aphid vectors (Powell, Tosh & Hardie 2006; Borer et al. 2009), elevated aphid reproductive output, and ultimately higher aphid densities at poor quality sites (Huberty & Denno 2004; Borer et al. 2009). High densities of aphids tend to increase both short and long-distance aphid movement (Mueller, Williams & Hardie 2001), a primary determinant of transmission rates among hosts (Power & Gray 1995; Borer et al. 2009). Thus, abiotic drivers such as precipitation may have indirectly increased pathogen prevalence by increasing host stress, which would also decrease host fecundity.
We acknowledge that there are limitations inherent in the inferences that are possible from observational data on pathogen prevalence. Ultimately, determining the role of vectors would require surveys of aphid density and fecundity on multiple host species at each site. While this can be accomplished at single sites or in a laboratory setting (Malmstrom et al. 2005b; Borer et al. 2009), it is intractable in a survey of this spatial scale given the irruptive nature of aphid populations. Furthermore, our prevalence data do not account for pre-sampling mortality. As with all prevalence data, it is important to consider potential biases created by pre-sampling mortality. While the scale of this work precluded tracking the mortality of each host throughout the season, our outplant study suggests that roughly 80% of hosts survive the period during which B/CYDVs can be transmitted. More importantly, there was relative little variability in survival among sites. The high survival and low among-site variability make it unlikely that pre-sampling mortality created substantial biases in our analyses.
While not the case in the data presented here, it is also possible to find positive correlations between pathogen prevalence and host fecundity. For example, vectors may preferentially select or reproduce more quickly on larger, fitter hosts (Remold 2002). Infection by a mild pathogen may also alter host susceptibility to secondary attack by other enemies, creating a positive correlation between fecundity and primary infection (i.e. systemic acquired resistance Agrios 1978; Durrant & Dong 2004; Apriyanto & Potter 1990; Gibbs 1980). If these processes occurred within each site, this would contribute to masking any negative effects of the virus on host fecundity, perhaps explaining the lack of correlation after controlling for site-level variation.
Environmental mediation of pathogen impacts is a well-known principle in epidemiology and is well studied in crop, human and domestic animal systems (Hassell et al. 1982; Holmes 1982; Thrusfield 2005). While studies of pathogens in natural systems have proliferated, studies rarely measure pathogen impacts on host fecundity across large-scale environmental gradients. Large surveys of pathogen prevalence exist, yet it remains unclear how to relate local-scale studies of pathogen impacts with larger-scale studies of prevalence. Our results demonstrate that environmental effects on host fecundity and pathogen prevalence can confound measures of pathogen impacts across environmental gradients. Thus, using measurements of pathogen impacts from laboratory and single-site studies to predict large-scale impacts requires integration with the study of large-scale drivers of infection rates and fecundity in natural systems. Similarly, observational surveys are improved when coupled with manipulative experiments. Given our growing awareness of the impacts of pathogens on the fate of invasive and imperilled species (Torchin & Mitchell 2004), a clearer understanding of pathogen impacts spanning entire host species’ ranges is increasingly pressing.
Supporting Information
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
Table S1. Collection site locations, viral prevalence, and mean seed mass in uninfected hosts for Bromus hordeaceus and Avena fatua. Precipitation runs from August 2005 to July 2006.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.