SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bonan, G.B. (1991) Density effects on the size structure of annual plant populations: an indication of neighbourhood competition. Annals of Botany, 68, 341347.
  • Brooker, R.W., Maestre, F.T., Callaway, R.M., Lortie, C.L., Cavieres, L.A., Kunstler, G. et al. (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology, 96, 1834.
  • Callaway, R. (2007) Positive Interactions and Interdependence in Plant Communities. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Chu, C.J., Masetre, F., Xiao, S., Weiner, J., Wang, Y.S., Duan, Z.H. & Wang, G. (2008) Balance between facilitation and resource competition determines biomass–density relationships in plant populations. Ecology Letters, 11, 11891197.
  • Deng, J.M., Wang, G.X., Morris, E.C., Wei, X.P., Li, D.X., Chen, B.M. et al. (2006) Plant mass-density relationship along a moisture gradient in north-west China. Journal of Ecology, 94, 953958.
  • Dickie, I.A., Schnitzer, S.A., Reich, P.B. & Hobbie, S.E. (2005) Spatially disjunct effects of co-occurring competition and facilitation. Ecology Letters, 8, 11911200.
  • Du, G.Z. & Wang, G. (1992) A study on size hierarchies of individuals of Elymus nutans population under different densities. Acta Botanica Sinica, 34, 937944.
  • Enquist, B.J., Brown, J.H. & West, G.B. (1998) Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density. Nature, 395, 163165.
  • Gong, Z.T. (1999) Chinese Soil Taxonomy: Theories, Methods and Applications. Science Press, Beijing.
  • Grimm, V. & Railsback, S.F. (2005) Individual-based Modeling and Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
  • Gross, K. (2008) Positive interactions among competitors can produce species-rich communities. Ecology Letters, 11, 929936.
  • Harper, J.L. (1977) Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.
  • Kikvidze, Z., Pugnaire, F.I., Brooker, R.W., Choler, P., Lortie, C.J., Michalet, R. & Callaway, R.M. (2005) Linking patterns and processes in alpine plant communities: A global study. Ecology, 86, 13951400.
  • Leslie, H.M. (2005) Positive intraspecific effects trump negative effects in high-density barnacle aggregations. Ecology, 86, 27162725.
  • Liu, J., Wei, L., Wang, C.M., Wang, G.X. & Wei, X.P. (2006) Effect of water Deficit on self-thinning line in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 48, 415419.
  • Michalet, R., Brooker, R.W., Cavieres, L.A., Kikvidze, Z., Lortie, C.J., Pugnaire, F.I., Valiente-Banuet, A. & Callaway, R.M. (2006) Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecology Letters, 9, 767773.
  • Molofsky, J. & Bever, J.D. (2002) A novel theory to explain species diversity in landscapes: positive frequency dependence and habitat suitability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 23892393.
  • Pan, X.Y., Wang, G.X., Yang, H.M. & Wei, X.P. (2003) Effect of water deficits on within-plot variability in growth and grain yield of spring wheat in northwest China. Field Crops Research, 80, 195205.
  • Scrosati, R. (2000) The interspecific biomass-density relationship for terrestrial plants: where do clonal red seaweeds stand and why? Ecology Letters, 3, 191197.
  • Shumway, D.L. & Koide, R.T. (1995) Size and reproductive inequality in mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal populations of Abutilon theophrasti. Journal of Ecology, 83, 613620.
  • Stoll, P., Weiner, J., Muller-Landau, H., Muller, E. & Hara, T. (2002) Size symmetry of competition alters biomass-density relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 21912195.
  • Sumanta, B. (2007) Relationship between size hierarchy and density of trees in a tropical dry forest of western India. Journal of Vegetation Science, 18, 389394.
  • Tirado, R. & Pugnaire, F.I. (2003) Shrub spatial aggregation and consequences for reproductive success. Oecologia, 136, 296301.
  • Wang, Y.S., Chu, C.J., Maestre, F.T. & Wang, G. (2008) On the relevance of facilitation in alpine meadow communities: an experimental assessment with multiple species differing in their ecological optimum. Acta Oecologica, 33, 108113.
  • Weiner, J. & Damgaard, C. (2006) Size-asymmetric competition and size-asymmetric growth in a spatially explicit zone-of-influence model of plant competition. Ecological Research, 21, 707712.
  • Weiner, J. & Thomas, S.C. (1986) Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos, 47, 211222.
  • Weiner, J., Stoll, P., Muller-Landau, H. & Jasentuliyana, A. (2001) The effects of density, spatial pattern and competitive symmetry on size variation in simulated plant population. American Naturalist, 158, 438450.
  • Weller, D.E. (1987) Self-thinning exponent correlated with allometric measures of plant geometry. Ecology, 68, 813821.
  • Wilensky, U. (1999) NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Northwestern University.
  • Wyszomirski, T., Wyszomirska, I. & Jarzyna, I. (1999) Simple mechanisms of size distribution dynamics in crowded and uncrowded virtual monocultures. Ecological Modelling, 115, 253273.
  • Xiao, S., Chen, S.Y., Zhao, L.Q. & Wang, G. (2006) Density effects on plant height growth and inequality in sunflower populations. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 48, 513519.
  • Xin, X.P., Wang, G. & Zhao, S.L. (1998) Size hierarchy and its genetic analysis in spring wheat population under different water conditions. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 22, 157163.