SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allan, H.H. (1961) Flora of New Zealand. Volume I. R. E. Owen, Government Printer, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Blackburn, T.M., Cassey, P. & Gaston, K.J. (2006) Variations on a theme: sources of heterogeneity in the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 14261439.
  • Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Greenwood, J.D. & Gregory, R.D. (1998) The anatomy of the interspecific abundance-range size relationship for the British avifauna II. Temporal dynamics. Ecology Letters, 1, 4755.
  • Brown, J.H. (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
  • Collins, S.L. & Glenn, S.M. (1997) Effects of organismal and distance scaling on analysis of species distribution and abundance. Ecological Applications, 7, 543551.
  • Cornelissen, J.H.C., Lavorel, S., Garnier, E., Diaz, S., Buchmann, N., Gurvich, D.E., Reich, P.B., Ter Steege, H., Morgan, H.D., Van Der Heijden, M.G.A., Pausas, J.G. & Poorter, H. (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51, 335380.
  • Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Roy, D.B., Wilson, R.J., León-Cortés, J.L., Gutiérrez, D., Bulman, C.R., Quinn, R.M., Moss, D. & Gaston, K.J. (2001) Density–distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70, 410425.
  • Edgar, E. & Connor, H. (2000) Flora of New Zealand Volume V: Gramineae. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand.
  • Fenner, M., Lee, W.G. & Pinn, E.H. (2001) Reproductive features of Celmisia species (Asteraceae) in relation to altitude and geographical range in New Zealand. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 74, 5158.
  • Fisher, R.A. (1937) The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Annals of Eugenics (London), 7, 355369.
    Direct Link:
  • Fisher, J.A.D. & Frank, K.T. (2004) Abundance–distribution relationships and conservation of exploited marine fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 279, 201213.
  • Fisher, J.A.D., Frank, K.T. & Leggett, W.C. (2010) Dynamic macroecology on ecological time-scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 115.
  • Freckleton, R.P. (2009) The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 22, 13671375.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Noble, D. & Webb, T.J. (2006) Distributions of habitat suitability and the abundance–occupancy relationship. American Naturalist, 167, 260275.
  • Freckleton, R.P. & Watkinson, A.R. (2000) On detecting and measuring competition in spatially structured plant communities. Ecology Letters, 3, 423432.
  • Freckleton, R.P. & Watkinson, A.R. (2001) Predicting competition coefficients for plant mixtures: reciprocity, transitivity and correlations with life-history traits. Ecology Letters, 4, 348357.
  • Freckleton, R.P. & Watkinson, A.R. (2002) The large scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles and patchy populations. Journal of Ecology, 90, 419434.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Gill, J.A., Noble, D. & Watkinson, A.R. (2005) Large-scale population dynamics, abundance–occupancy relationships and the scaling from local to regional population size. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 353364.
  • Frost, M.T., Attrill, M.J., Rowden, A.A. & Foggo, A. (2004) Abundance-occupancy relationships in macrofauna on exposed sandy beaches: patterns and mechanisms. Ecography, 27, 643649.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1994a) Rarity. Population and community biology series 13. Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1994b) Measuring geographic range sizes. Ecography, 17, 198205.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1996) The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance–distribution relationship. Oikos, 75, 211220.
  • Gaston, K.J. (2003) The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Gaston, K.J. & Blackburn, T.M. (2003) Dispersal and the interspecific abundance-occupancy relationship in British birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 373379.
  • Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Lawton, J.H. (1997) Interspecific abundance–range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 579601.
  • Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M., Gregory, R.D. & Greenwood, J.J.D. (1998) The anatomy of the interspecific abundance-range size relationship for the British avifauna: I. Spatial patterns. Ecology Letters, 1, 3846.
  • Goldberg, D.E. & Landa, K. (1991) Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. Journal of Ecology, 79, 10131030.
  • Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. (1988) Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species. Unwin Hyman, London.
  • Hanski, I. (2000) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hanski, I., Kouki, J. & Halkka, A. (1993) Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. Species diversity in Ecological Communities (eds R.E.Ricklefs & D.Schluter), pp. 108116. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Harcourt, A.H., Coppeto, S.A. & Parks, S.A. (2005) The distribution–abundance (density) relationship: its form and causes in a tropical mammal order. Primates Journal of Biogeography, 32, 565579.
  • Hartley, S. (1998) A positive relationship between local abundance and regional occupancy is almost inevitable (but not all positive relationships are the same). Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 992994.
  • Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Healy, A.J. & Edgar, E. (1980) Flora of New Zealand, Volume III: Adventive Cyperaceous, Petalous & Spathaceous Monocotyledons. Botany Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Zealand.
  • Heino, J. (2008) Temporally stable abundance–occupancy relationships and occupancy frequency patterns in stream insects. Oecologia, 157, 337347.
  • Heino, J. & Virtanen, R. (2006) Relationships between distribution and abundance vary with spatial scale and ecological group in stream bryophytes. Freshwater Biology, 51, 18791889.
  • Holt, A.R. & Gaston, K.J. (2003) Interspecific abundance–occupancy relationships of British mammals and birds: is it possible to explain the residual variation? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 3746.
  • Holt, R.D., Gaston, K.J. & Lawton, J.H. (1997) On the relationship between range size and local abundance: back to basics. Oikos, 78, 183190.
  • Howell, C. (2008) Consolidated List of Environmental Weeds in New Zealand. New Zealand Department of Conservation Research and Development Series 292, Wellington.
  • Kolb, A., Barsch, F. & Diekmann, M. (2006) Determinants of local abundance and range size in forest vascular plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 237247.
  • Lawton, J.H. (1993) Range, population abundance and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 409413.
  • Lawton, J.H. (1996) Population abundances, geographic ranges and conservation: 1994 Witherby Lecture. Bird Study, 43, 319.
  • Liu, K., Eastwood, R.J., Flynn, S., Turner, R.M. & Stuppy, W.H. (2008) Seed Information Database (release 7.1, May 2008) http://www.kew.org/data/sid, MacMillan 1991.
  • McCune, B. & Grace, J.B. (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
  • McCune, B. & Mefford, M.J. (2006) pc-ord. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 5. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
  • Molloy, B.P.J. & Webb, C.J. (1994) Taxonomy and typification of New Zealand Geum (Rosaceae). New Zealand Journal of Botany, 32, 423428.
  • Moore, L.B. & Edgar, E. (1970) Flora of New Zealand. Volume II: Indigenous Tracheophyta – Monocotyledons except Graminae. Botany Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Okubo, A. & Levin, S.A. (1989) A theoretical framework for data analysis of wind dispersal of seeds and pollen. Ecology, 70, 329338.
  • Pocock, M.J., Hartley, S., Telfer, M.G., Preston, C.D. & Kunin, W.E. (2006) Ecological correlates of range structure in rare and scarce British plants. Journal of Ecology, 94, 581596.
  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org .
  • Riis, T. & Sand-Jensen, K. (2002) Abundance-range size relationships in stream vegetation in Denmark. Plant Ecology, 161, 175183.
  • Russell, L.K., Evans, S.J., Smith, L., Bevers, C.M., Luxford, A.P., Stubbs, W.J. & Wilson, J.B. (2005) Distribution/abundance relations in a New Zealand grassland landscape. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 29, 6168.
  • Stephens, P.A., Buskirk, S.W., Hayward, G.D. & Martinez Del Rio, C. (2005) Information theory and hypothesis testing: a call for pluralism. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 412.
  • Thompson, K., Hodgson, J.G. & Gaston, K.J. (1998) Abundance-range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of Central England. Journal of Ecology, 86, 439448.
  • Tilman, D., May, R.M., Lehman, C.L. & Nowak, M.A. (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 6566.
  • Warren, P. & Gaston, K.J. (1997) Interspecific abundance-occupancy relationships: a test of mechanisms using microcosms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 730742.
  • Watkinson, A.R., Gill, J.A. & Freckleton, R.P. (2003) Macroecology and microecology: linking large scale abundance to population processes. Macroecology: Reconciling Divergent Perspectives on Large Scale Ecological Processes (eds K.J.Gaston & T.M.Blackburn), pp. 256273. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Webb, T.J., Noble, D. & Freckleton, R.P. (2007) Abundance-occupancy dynamics in a human dominated environment: linking interspecific and intraspecific trends in British farmland and woodland birds. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 123134.
  • Webb, C.J. & Simpson, M.J.A. (2001) Seeds of New Zealand – Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons. Manuka Press, Cromwell, New Zealand.
  • Webb, C.J., Sykes, W.R. & Garnock-Jones, P.J. (1988) Flora of New Zealand. Volume IV: Naturalised Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms, Dicotyledons. Botany Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Webb, T.J., Tyler, E.H.M. & Somerfield, P.J. (2009) Life history mediates large-scale population ecology in marine benthic taxa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 396, 293306.
  • Westoby, M. (1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil, 199, 213227.
  • Williamson, M. & Gaston, K.J. (1999) A simple transformation for sets of range sizes. Ecography, 22, 674680.
  • Wilson, H. (1996) Wild Plants of Mount Cook National Park. Manuka Press, Cromwell, New Zealand.
  • Wilson, P. (2008) The pervasive influence of sampling and methodological artefacts on a macroecological pattern: the abundance–occupancy relationship. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17, 457464.
  • Wilson, R.J., Thomas, C.D., Fox, R., Roy, D.B. & Kunin, W.E. (2004) Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change. Nature, 432, 393396.
  • Wright, D.H. (1991) Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. Journal of Biogeography, 18, 463466.
  • Zuckerberg, B., Porter, W.F. & Corwin, K. (2009) The consistency and stability of abundance–occupancy relationships in large-scale population dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 178182.