Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant

Authors

  • Wei Huang,

    1. Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Institute/Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Evan Siemann,

    1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gregory S. Wheeler,

    1. Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 3225 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jianwen Zou,

    1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Juli Carrillo,

    1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jianqing Ding

    Corresponding author
    1. Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Institute/Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence author. E-mail: dingjianqing@yahoo.com

Summary

1. Invasive plants often have novel biotic interactions in their introduced ranges. These interactions, including less frequent herbivore attacks, may convey a competitive advantage over native plants. Invasive plants may vary in defence strategies (resistance vs. tolerance) or in response to the type of herbivore (generalists vs. specialists), but no study to date has examined this broad set of traits simultaneously.

2. Here, we examined resistance and tolerance of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) populations from the introduced and native ranges to generalist (Cnidocampa flavescens) and specialist herbivores (Gadirtha inexacta) in the native range.

3. In a field common-garden test of resistance, caterpillars of each species were raised on plants from native and invasive populations. We found the specialist grew larger on and consumed more mass of invasive plant populations than native populations, while the generalist showed the same performance between them. The results were consistent with our laboratory bioassay using excised leaves. Chemical analyses showed that the invasive plants had lower tannin content and higher ratio of carbohydrate to protein than those of their native counterparts, suggesting that plants from invasive populations have altered chemistry that has a larger impact on specialist than on generalist resistance.

4. To test for differences in herbivore tolerance, plants were first defoliated by specialist or generalist herbivory and then allowed to regrow for 100 days in a field common garden. We found that plants from invasive populations had greater herbivore tolerance than native populations, especially for tolerance to generalists. They also grew more rapidly than native counterparts in the absence of herbivory.

5.Synthesis. The results of these experiments indicate that differences in selective pressures between ranges have caused dramatic reductions in resistance to specialist herbivores and those changes in plant secondary chemistry likely underlie these differences. The greater tolerance of invasive populations to herbivory appears to at least partly reflect an increase in growth rate in the introduced range. The greater tolerance to generalist herbivores suggests the intriguing possibility of selection for traits that allow plants to tolerate generalist herbivores more than specialist herbivores.

Ancillary