You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Litter feedbacks, evolutionary change and exotic plant invasion

  1. Maarten B. Eppinga1,2,*,
  2. Matthew A. Kaproth1,
  3. Alexandra R. Collins1,3,
  4. Jane Molofsky1

Article first published online: 19 JAN 2011

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01781.x

Issue

Journal of Ecology

Journal of Ecology

Volume 99, Issue 2, pages 503–514, March 2011

Additional Information

How to Cite

Eppinga, M. B., Kaproth, M. A., Collins, A. R. and Molofsky, J. (2011), Litter feedbacks, evolutionary change and exotic plant invasion. Journal of Ecology, 99: 503–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01781.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

  2. 2

    Department of Environmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands

  3. 3

    Department of Biology, Unit of Ecology & Evolution, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Musée 10, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland

* Correspondence author. E-mail: m.eppinga@geo.uu.nl

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 15 FEB 2011
  2. Article first published online: 19 JAN 2011
  3. Received 27 April 2010; accepted 24 November 2010 Handling Editor: Susan Schwinning

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (419K)

References

  • Aerts, R. & De Caluwe, H. (1995) Interspecific and intraspecific differences in shoot and lifespan of four Carex species which differ in maximum dry matter production. Oecologia, 102, 467–477.
  • Belyea, L.R. & Clymo, R.S. (2001) Feedback control on the rate of peat formation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 1315–1321.
  • Blumenthal, D.M. (2006) Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecology Letters, 9, 887–895.
    Direct Link:
  • Boyd, C.E. (1970) Chemical analyses of some vascular aquatic plants. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 67, 78–85.
  • Brinson, M.M. (1981) Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 12, 123–161.
  • Brodersen, C., Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. (2008) Genetic variation in photosynthetic characteristics among invasive and native populations of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Biological Invasions, 10, 1317–1325.
  • Cornwell, W.K., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Amaltangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V.T. & Godoy, O. et al. (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letters, 11, 1065–1071.
    Direct Link:
  • Danais, M. (1986) The influence of some environmental factors on the production of Carex vesicaria and Phalaris arundinacea. Vegetatio, 67, 45–56.
  • Daufresne, T. & Hedin, L.O. (2005) Plant coexistence depends on ecosystem nutrient cycles: extension of the resource-ratio theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 9212–9217.
  • Diaz-Sierra, R., Zavala, M.A. & Rietkerk, M. (2010) Positive interactions, discontinuous transitions, and species coexistence in plant communities. Theoretical Population Biology, 77, 131–144.
  • Ehrenfeld, J.G. (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems, 6, 503–523.
  • Ehrenfeld, J.G. (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 41, 59–80.
  • Ehrenfeld, J.G., Ravit, B. & Elgersma, K. (2005) Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 75–115.
  • Enrìquez, S., Duarte, C.M. & Sand-Jensen, K. (1993) Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: the importance of C:N:P content. Oecologia, 94, 457–471.
  • Eppinga, M.B., Rietkerk, M., Dekker, S.C., De Ruiter, P.C. & Van der Putten, W.H. (2006) Accumulation of local pathogens: a new hypothesis to explain exotic plant invasions. Oikos, 114, 168–176.
    Direct Link:
  • Eppinga, M.B., De Ruiter, P.C., Wassen, M.J. & Rietkerk, M. (2009) Nutrients and hydrology indicate the driving mechanisms of peatland surface patterning. American Naturalist, 173, 803–818.
  • Eppstein, M.J. & Molofsky, J. (2007) Invasiveness in plant communities with feedbacks. Ecology Letters, 10, 253–263.
    Direct Link:
  • Farrer, E.C. & Goldberg, D.E. (2009) Litter drives ecosystem and plant community changes in cattail invasion. Ecological Applications, 19, 398–412.
  • Funk, J.L. & Vitousek, P.M. (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature, 446, 1079–1081.
  • Gallagher, R.V., Beaumont, L.J., Hughes, L. & Leishman, L.R. (2010) Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. Journal of Ecology, 90, 790–799.
    Direct Link:
  • Gifford, A.L.S., Ferdy, J.B. & Molofsky, J. (2002) Genetic composition and morphological variation among populations of the invasive grass, Phalaris arundinacea. Canadian Journal of Botany, 80, 779–785.
  • Grace, J. & Woolhouse, H.W. (1973) A physiological and mathematical study of the growth and productivity of a Calluna-sphagnum community. II. Light interception and photosynthesis in Calluna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 10, 63–76.
  • Hansel, C.M., La Force, M.J., Fendorf, S. & Sutton, S. (2002) Spatial and temporal association of As and Fe species on aquatic plant roots. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 1988–1994.
  • Hefting, M.M., Clement, J.C., Bienkowski, P., Dowrick, D., Guenat, C., Butturini, A., Topa, S., Pinay, G. & Verhoeven, J.T.A. (2005) The role of vegetation and litter in the nitrogen dynamics of riparian buffer zones in Europe. Ecological Engineering, 24, 465–482.
  • Herr-Turoff, A. & Zedler, J.B. (2007) Does morphological plasticity of the Phalaris arundinacea canopy increase invasiveness? Plant Ecology, 193, 265–277.
  • Hierro, J.L., Maron, J.L. & Callaway, R.M. (2005) A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology, 93, 5–15.
    Direct Link:
  • Hilbert, D.W., Roulet, N.T. & Moore, T.R. (2000) Modelling and analysis of peatlands as dynamic systems. Journal of Ecology, 88, 241–256.
    Direct Link:
  • Huston, M.A. (1994) Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Jakubowski, A.R., Casler, M.D. & Jackson, R.D. (2010) Landscape context predicts reed canarygrass invasion: implications for management. Wetlands, 30, 685–692.
  • Kätterer, T. & Andrén, O. (1999) Growth dynamics of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and its allocation of biomass and nitrogen below ground in a field receiving daily irrigation and fertilization. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 54, 21–29.
  • Kätterer, T., Andrén, O. & Pettersson, R. (1999) Growth and nitrogen dynamics of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) subjected to daily fertilisation and irrigation in the field. Field Crops Research, 55, 153–164.
  • Kawata, M. (2002) Invasion of vacant niches and subsequent sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 55–63.
  • Keane, R.M. & Crawley, M.J. (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 164–170.
  • Larsen, L.G., Harvey, J.W. & Crimaldi, J.P. (2007) A delicate balance: ecohydrological feedbacks governing landscape morphology in a lotic peatland. Ecological Monographs, 77, 591–614.
  • Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. (2004) Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 23, 415–429.
  • Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 3883–3888.
  • Lavergne, S., Muenke, N.J. & Molofsky, J. (2010) Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants. American Journal of Botany, 105, 109–116.
  • Lavoie, C., Dufresne, C. & Delisle, F. (2005) The spread of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) in Québec: a spatio-temporal perspective. Ecoscience, 12, 366–375.
  • Lesica, P. (1997) Spread of Phalaris arundinacea adversely impacts the endangered plant Howellia aquatilis. Great Basin Naturalist, 57, 366–368.
  • Levin, L.A., Neira, C. & Grosholz, E.D. (2006) Invasive cordgrass modifies wetland trophic function. Ecology, 87, 419–432.
  • Levine, J.M., Vilà, M., D’Antonio, C.M., Dukes, J.S., Grigulis, K. & Lavorel, S. (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 775–781.
  • Mason, C.F. & Bryant, R.J. (1975) Production, nutrient content and decomposition of Phragmites Communis Trin. and Typha Angustifolia L. Journal of Ecology, 63, 71–95.
  • Maurer, D.A. & Zedler, J.B. (2002) Differential invasion of a wetland grass explained by tests of nutrients and light availability on establishment and clonal growth. Oecologia, 131, 279–288.
  • McJannet, C.L., Keddy, P.A. & Pick, F.R. (1995) Nitrogen and phosphorus tissue concentrations in 41 wetland plants: a comparison across habitats and functional groups. Functional Ecology, 9, 231–238.
  • Nilsson, M.-C., Wardle, D.A. & Dahlberg, A. (1999) Effects of plant litter species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant-soil system. Oikos, 86, 16–26.
  • Perry, L.G. & Galatowitsch, S.M. (2004) The influence of light availability on competition between Phalaris arundinacea and a native wetland sedge. Plant Ecology, 170, 73–81.
  • Perry, L.G. & Galatowitsch, S.M. (2006) Light competition for invasive species control: a model of cover crop–weed competition and implications for Phalaris arundinacea control in sedge meadow wetlands. Euphytica, 148, 121–134.
  • Perry, L.G., Galatowitsch, S.M. & Rosen, C.J. (2004) Competitive control of invasive vegetation: a native wetland sedge suppresses Phalaris arundinacea in carbon-enriched soil. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 151–162.
    Direct Link:
  • Perry, L.G., Neuhauser, C. & Galatowitsch, S.M. (2003) Founder control and coexistence in a simple model of asymmetric competition for light. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 222, 425–436.
  • Pimentel, D. (2002) Biological Invasions: Economic and Environmental Costs of Alien Plant, Animal, and Microbe Species. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
  • Ren, M.-X. & Zhang, Q.-G. (2009) The relative generality of plant invasion mechanisms and predicting future invasive plants. Weed Research, 49, 449–460.
    Direct Link:
  • Reynolds, H.L. & Pacala, S.W. (1993) An analytical treatment of root-to-shoot ratio and plant competition for soil nutrient and light. American Naturalist, 141, 51–70.
  • Ryser, P. & Urbas, P. (2000) Ecological significance of leaf life span among Central European grass species. Oikos, 91, 41–50.
    Direct Link:
  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.
  • Shurpali, N.J., Hyvönen, N.P., Huttunen, J.T., Clement, R.J., Reichstein, M., Nykänen, H., Biasi, C. & Martikainen, P.J. (2009) Cultivation of a perennial grass for bioenergy on a boreal organic soil – carbon sink or source? Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 1, 35–50.
  • Suding, K.N., Gross, K.L. & Houseman, G.R. (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 46–53.
  • Sydes, C. & Grime, J.P. (1981) Effects of tree leaf litter on herbaceous vegetation in deciduous woodland: II. An experimental investigation. Journal of Ecology, 69, 249–262.
  • Taub, D.R. (2002) Analysis of interspecific variation in plant growth responses to nitrogen. Canadian Journal of Botany, 80, 34–41.
  • Theoharides, K.A. & Dukes, J.S. (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytologist, 176, 256–273.
    Direct Link:
  • Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Tilman, D. (1999) The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455–1474.
  • Tilman, D. (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic resource theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 10854–10861.
  • Vaccaro, L.E., Bedford, B.L. & Johnston, C.A. (2009) Litter accumulation promotes dominance of invasive species of cattails (Typha spp.) in Lake Ontario wetlands. Wetlands, 29, 1036–1048.
  • Violle, C., Richarte, J. & Navas, M.-L. (2006) Effects of litter and standing biomass on growth and reproduction of two annual species in a Mediterranean old-field. Journal of Ecology, 94, 196–205.
    Direct Link:
  • Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Settälä, H., Klironomos, J.N., Van der Putten, W.H. & Wall, D.H. (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 304, 1629–1633.
  • Wetzel, P.R. & Van der Valk, A.G. (1998) Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea, and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecology, 138, 179–190.
  • Xiong, S., Nilsson, C. & Johansson, M.E. (2001) Effects of leaf litter accumulation on riparian vegetation: importance of particle size. Journal of Vegetation Science, 12, 231–236.
    Direct Link:
  • Zavaleta, E. (2000) Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. Invasive Species in A Changing World (eds H.A.Mooney & R.J.Hobbs), pp. 261–300. Island Press, Washington DC.
View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (419K)