Summary
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
1. A long-term study (19 years) of a host–pathogen metapopulation involving 133–220 separate populations of the wild plant Filipendula ulmaria and its rust pathogen Triphragmium ulmariae shows marked changes in the occurrence (32–55% demes) and severity of disease and rates of extinction and re-establishment of individual populations (0.006–0.174 and 0.030–0.195 per annum, respectively) over time.
2. Modelling of the spatio-temporal dynamics of disease demonstrated year-to-year changes associated with a range of different environmental features, but also more consistent, longer-term patterns influenced by a complex suite of factors.
3. Both the level of disease and its spatial location varied through time and generated a changing pattern of selective pressure across the metapopulation.
4. Synthesis. Our results suggest that co-evolutionary hot spots and cold spots can be highly dynamic within metapopulations, thereby fuelling the co-evolutionary process even more than previously suspected.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
The dynamics of co-evolutionary systems are greatly affected by spatial scale and time. However, it took the development of metapopulation theory (Levins 1970; Gilpin & Hanski 1991; Hanski 1999) and the geographic mosaic theory of co-evolution (Thompson 1994, 2005) to provide a formal coherent theoretical framework describing the dynamics of co-evolutionary interactions. In this framework, organisms are dispersed in small, somewhat isolated and often ephemeral populations. These demes are distributed across a heterogeneous landscape where local selective pressures over the whole metapopulation or for any deme can differ over time. Isolation and interaction of specific life-history features of both players in the interaction lead to marked changes in genetic drift, migration, extinction and recolonization, and as a consequence, the evolutionary trajectory of the whole metapopulation may be quite distinct from that of its individual component demes.
Over the last decade, computer simulation studies and empirical assessments of interacting species have provided substantial corroborative support for the geographic mosaic theory of co-evolution. At the whole metapopulation scale, simulation models have reinforced the view that the evolutionary trajectory of interactions in the metapopulation as a whole may be quite different to that occurring in individual demes (Thrall & Burdon 1999; Gomulkiewicz et al. 2000). Empirical studies of insect–plant (Greya–HeucheraThompson & Merg, 2008; Eurosta–SolidagoCraig, Itami & Horner, 2007) and fungal–plant (Podosphaera–PlantagoLaine, 2006; Melampsora–LinumBurdon & Thrall, 2000 and Melampsora–HeptolinonSpringer, 2007) associations highlight the complexity and show that markedly different outcomes can occur in adjacent populations.
In fungal pathogen–plant associations, spatial variation in disease resistance from different patches within single populations to different demes within single metapopulations and beyond has been extensively documented (Laine et al. 2011). Despite this, the link between these outcomes and putative variation in selective pressures imposed by pathogens is very poorly documented. An important link in that chain is demonstrating how pathogen incidence and selection intensity vary in space and time over long time periods. Although a few data sets exist (Ericson, Burdon & Müller 1999; Laine & Hanski 2006), these are as yet either of insufficient duration or size as to follow the outcome of long-term dynamics or to assess Thompson’s view that the geographic mosaic of co-evolution is driven by the occurrence of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ spots in which the intensity of interactions varies.
A long-term study of the interaction occurring between the host-specific rust pathogen Triphragmium ulmariae and its herbaceous perennial host plant Filipendula ulmaria provides an exception to this temporal shortcoming. Over a 19-year period, we have built up an extensive data set that records the incidence, prevalence and severity of disease in a large island metapopulation. Using the initial 11 years of this data set (1990–2000 inclusive), we demonstrated a high degree of spatial complexity of interactions occurring among populations (Smith, Ericson & Burdon 2003). Since that analysis, the period covered by this data set has extended (1990–2008), and during this time, the number of populations has also increased.
Here, we use this expanded data set to undertake a deeper assessment of the changing spatial and temporal dynamics of this metapopulation. Specifically, we wanted to know whether:
- 1
pathogen dynamics varies over time and how this affects the overall epidemiological pattern of interaction;
- 2
an observed doubling of the pathogen extinction and recolonization rate had a noticeable affect on disease dynamics;
- 3
the longer-time sequence of data provides a significant increase in the resolving power of our models; and
- 4
hot and cold spots of pathogen activity shift over time and space.
Results and discussion
- Top of page
- Summary
- Introduction
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Supporting Information
Overall similarities in general host population and pathogen epidemic behaviour between the 1990–2000 and 2001–2008 periods mask a greater instability in both host and pathogen populations (Fig. 1a). Since 2000, the percentage of host populations infected has remained in the 40–55% band, but there was considerably greater year-to-year variability in the last 8 years compared with the first 11, with disease levels in 2002 and 2005 being considerably below the 8-year average (Fig. 1a). Host population sizes have shown similar drops.
One of the most noticeable differences between the first and second census periods was a marked increase in the rate of extinction and re-establishment of individual pathogen populations (Fig. 1b). Between 1990–2000 and 2001–2008, extinction rates jumped from 0.030 to 0.081 year−1 (P = 0.009), and re-establishment rates rose from 0.056 to 0.082 year−1 (P = 0.052). Not surprisingly, extinction rates recorded in any given year (n) correlated well with establishment rates in the following year (n + 1) (adj r2 = 0.481; P < 0.005), probably reflecting the increased number of disease-free host populations in which new pathogen appearances can be observed. Notwithstanding this, conditions favouring pathogen population extinction and recolonization are very different, although all factors ultimately relate back to the interaction of aspects of the pathogen’s life history with the particular environmental circumstances occurring in the archipelago. Thus, although host population size and site exposure are factors of importance for both extinction and recolonization, extinction events may often reflect a failure in the transition from aecial to uredial infections in dry summers. Recolonization, on the other hand, is strongly influenced by the deposition of telial-infected material on island shores, which in turn is driven by a range of environmental factors (especially water level and winter storm intensity) interacting with the spatial distribution of the islands.
The persistence of pathogen demes at any given site varied greatly. Although the largest fraction of sites were either continuously occupied or empty (disease-free, Fig. 1c), in line with the increased frequency of disease in the metapopulation as a whole, an increasing proportion of all sites were occupied for at least some years in the 2001–08 period. Sites that were either continuously occupied or empty were typically among the largest and smallest host populations, respectively.
As noted above, the frequency of host populations in which the pathogen was present varied over time (Fig. 1a). However, more subtly and reflecting the semi-independent behaviour of pathogen–host interactions in individual demes in this metapopulation, even when disease was present, disease severity fluctuated markedly between individual populations across the archipelago (Fig. 2a,c). Indeed, even on the one island (no. 15, Fig. 2b,c) different populations frequently showed diverse disease status with some demes being disease-free whereas other closely adjacent ones were moderately infected. Such seemingly unpredictable variation in disease severity with and among populations within and across seasons is a feature of all natural host plant–pathogen interactions studied to date (Ericson, Burdon & Müller 1999; Thrall, Burdon & Bock 2001; Laine & Hanski 2006). This reflects the patchy nature of pathogen survival and dispersal, and the semi-localized nature of the interaction between host, pathogen and environment in individual demes that generates different pathogen development dynamics.
Here, in focusing on levels of disease severity, we do not provide unequivocal evidence for co-evolutionary ‘hot spots’ (defined as regions in which reciprocal selection occurs; Gomulkiewicz et al. 2007). However, an earlier study of this pathogen–host association has already demonstrated that disease pressure leads to selective death of more susceptible individuals and that, within the Skeppsvik metapopulation, different host demes show different levels of resistance to T. ulmariae (Ericson, Burdon & Müller 2002). Given these observations, and the fact that the probability of death in that study was correlated with disease severity, we use here the risk of infection as an index for selection intensity.
Pathogen presence in the existing spatial mosaic of host populations was complex as both host and pathogen populations varied over time. Because we were particularly interested in temporal changes, we applied the modelling–fitting procedure to select a best overall model for shorter blocks of time, to evaluate what factors would have been important in 2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year studies, and hence whether there were marked differences that could reflect changing selection over time. Examination of these overlapping assessments demonstrated differences between the important factors operating during individual years and the longer-term behaviour of the metapopulation (Fig. 3). Over 2-year snapshots of the metapopulation, the shortest interval possible, simpler models were the most efficient in explaining pathogen dynamics but the identity of the most important factor changed from year-to-year. Core-satellite dynamics were favoured in all years [(Ψ(N,…)], but these were combined with different factors in different years: weather zone was important in 1997–1998 and 2000–2001 [Ψ(NZ)], islands in 1990–1991 [Ψ(NI)], severe disease in 2004–2005 [Ψ(ND)], islands and severe disease in 2006–2007 [Ψ(NDI)].
However, as has been seen in simulation models (Thrall & Burdon 1999) and hinted at in real-world host population resistance structures (Burdon & Thompson 1995), such snapshots make up only a small part of long-term co-evolutionary patterns. The extended analysis of the dynamics of the Triphragmium–Filipendula host–pathogen metapopulation made possible by the addition of a further 8 years of census data demonstrates the overall stability and resilience of this interaction in which multiple environmental and life-history factors play a role. Thus, for longer simulated studies, a small set of multifactor models was consistently among the best at approximating observed pathogen dynamics (Fig. 3, 5- and 10-year studies). The overall best model identified for the 1990–2000 census period (NDIKC) was also the best for the second census period (2001–2008) and for the entire 19-year data run. However, the analysis of a sequence of three overlapping 9-year runs (not shown) found that slightly different models best explained epidemiological patterns in the different periods. Surprisingly, although host population size, and pathogen extinction and recolonization rates showed greater stochasticity during the second census period (2001–2008), this appears to have had little effect on the factors influencing the metapopulation as a whole. This probably reflects the dominating impact that the fixed spatial structure of the island chains imposes both as a factor in its own right and also through its effect on the watercourses and general environmental gradient banding.
Stability in the Skeppsvik Triphragmium–Filipendula metapopulation is a balance of biological and geographical features. A perennial host, effective off-season survival of the pathogen, and the mild nature of their interaction characterize the biology. Infections are discrete, disease severity is generally low and, hence, the disease generally fails to kill individual plants, other than seedlings (Ericson, Burdon & Müller 2002). Against this biological overlay, the geography (island chains, watercourses) and a marked environmental gradient across the archipelago together provide strong forcing to the system. More variable and unpredictable host–pathogen metapopulations are likely when there is stronger endogenous instability because of host and pathogen life-history traits, and when features of the physical environment have relatively less long-term strength and predictability. Unfortunately, the distinctly different nature (e.g. physical structure of the environmental matrix; nature of the pathogens and their life histories) of the only other long-term host–pathogen associations (Silene–Microbotryum, Antonovics 2004; Plantago–Podosphaera, Laine & Hanski 2006; Soubeyrand et al. 2009) make comparisons inappropriate.
The models predict the risk of infection in a putative population as a measure of selection intensity and allow us to map and identify ‘selective hot spots’. Using the best overall model, NDIKC, we produced a 19-year mean selection intensity map. The intensity of selection ranged over several orders of magnitude with populations to the south and west showing significantly lower average selection intensity scores (Fig. 4a). The overall average can be contrasted with selection intensity maps generated by the best model from three specific snapshots (1990–1991, 2000–2001, 2007–2008). In 2000–2001 (Fig. 4c), there was a markedly higher probability of infection at the outer edges of the archipelago where exposure to the wave action was greater [Ψ(NZ)]. In 2007–2008 (Fig. 4d), selection intensity varied among populations on the different north–south running island chains [Ψ(NDC)]. In 1990–1991, the patterns were strongest within the populations on the same island [Ψ(NI)], with high local variation in selection intensity across the metapopulation (Fig. 4b).
Finally, a comparison of average selection intensity for the first and last 5-year periods of the metapopulation survey shows a general increase in selection intensity (Fig. 5). The responses varied for some individual populations and areas of the metapopulation. Selection intensities showed little change or even declined in a few focal spots (Fig. 5, green), but many areas and populations showed large increases in selection intensity (Fig. 5, red and orange). Thus across these periods, selection intensity changed at different rates and in different directions in different populations. Hot spots became hotter at different rates and at least some hot spots became cooler!
The concept of hot and cold spots of selection and their spatial dynamic has generated considerable interest regarding the links between this patchy application of selection and the maintenance of variation, local adaptation (Lively 1999), clinal effects (Nuismer, Thompson & Gomulkiewicz 2003) and, when mediated by gene flow, evolutionary dynamics across metapopulations. Although the importance of the explicit spatial structure of hot and cold spots has been recognized (Nuismer, Thompson & Gomulkiewicz 2003), most studies to date have assumed a fixed identity of hot and cold spots over time; the intensity of a hot spot might vary over time, but they remain hot relative to cold spots. More importantly, there has been no specific consideration as to the impact on the strength, intensity and direction of co-evolution if hot spots move around the landscape over time. Certainly, data from a range of studies including shifts from mutualism to commensalism, and from commensalism to antagonism (Thompson & Fernandez 2006), and single-year population differences in systems with strong metapopulation dynamics (Laine 2006), can be interpreted as indicative that hot and cold spots may move around, but only Thompson (2005) has explicitly recognized that current models fail to address these complexities.
A particularly important feature of the current study is the demonstration that not only do hot and cold spots of pathogen severity (and hence potentially selective activity) occur, but, more importantly, that the intensity and spatial focus of those selective pressures is constantly shifting around the metapopulation as the relative importance of different environmental factors wax and wane. These changes have significant implications for the nature of selective pressures being applied and may well provide conditions favouring increased diversity among and within populations.