Adjusting for publication bias: modelling the selection process
Article first published online: 4 JUN 2004
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Special Issue: Evidence Based Medicine
Volume 10, Issue 2, pages 313–322, May 2004
How to Cite
Preston, C., Ashby, D. and Smyth, R. (2004), Adjusting for publication bias: modelling the selection process. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10: 313–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00457.x
- Issue published online: 4 JUN 2004
- Article first published online: 4 JUN 2004
- Accepted for publication: 18 July 2003
- publication bias
Rationale, aims and background Systematic review with meta-analysis, a statistical technique for combining results of several studies, is progressively being used to guide decisions in medicine. Publication bias is acknowledged as a threat to the validity of systematic reviews and its existence may lead to inappropriate decisions about patient management or health policy. It is said to occur when the results of research available in the literature are not representative of the totality of all research. The selection mechanism that causes publication bias is complex, yet despite an extensive literature of empirical research identifying risk factors for publication, little work has been done to improve models of selection.
Methods Methods that adjust combined meta-analytic estimates for publication bias are compared and applied to a systematic review of oral rehydration solution in the treatment of dehydration. Within a weighted distributions framework models of the selection process are considered and developed further.
Conclusions Weighted distributions offer a flexible approach that allows the potential to modify the selection function to incorporate other factors. Methods that adjust combined estimates should not be used to provide an alternative answer but to consider the robustness of the combined estimate to publication bias.