Institution at which work was carried out: University of Toronto, Department of Physical Therapy, 160-500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1V7.
From continuing education to personal digital assistants: what do physical therapists need to support evidence-based practice in stroke management?
Version of Record online: 11 OCT 2010
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Special Issue: Evidence Based Medicine
Volume 17, Issue 4, pages 786–793, August 2011
How to Cite
Salbach, N. M., Veinot, P., Jaglal, S. B., Bayley, M. and Rolfe, D. (2011), From continuing education to personal digital assistants: what do physical therapists need to support evidence-based practice in stroke management?. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17: 786–793. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01456.x
- Issue online: 27 JUL 2011
- Version of Record online: 11 OCT 2010
- Accepted for publication: 3 February 2010
- continuing education;
- evidence-based practice;
- physical therapy;
Rationale, aims and objectives Understanding how to structure educational interventions and resources to facilitate physical therapists' application of the research literature is required. The objective of this study was to explore physical therapists' preferences for strategies to facilitate their access to, evaluation and implementation of the stroke research literature in clinical practice.
Methods In-depth, qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 23 physical therapists who treat people with stroke in Ontario, Canada and who had participated in a previous survey on evidence-based practice. Data were analysed using a constant comparative approach to identify emergent themes.
Results Participants preferred online access to research summaries or systematic reviews to save time to filter and critique research articles. To enable access in the workplace, an acceptable computer-to-staff ratio, permission to access web sites and protected work time were suggested. Participants considered personal digital assistants as excellent tools for quick access to online resources but were unsure of their advantage over a desktop computer. Therapists favoured use of non-technical language, glossaries of research terms and quality ratings of studies to ease understanding and appraisal. Teleconferencing or videoconferencing overcame geographical but not scheduling barriers to accessing education. To achieve behaviour change in clinical practice, therapists preferred multiple interactive, face-to-face education sessions in a group format, with opportunities for case-based learning and practice of new skills.
Conclusion Physical therapists prefer technology-assisted access to resources and education and favour attending multiple interactive, expert-facilitated education sessions incorporating opportunities for case-based learning and practice of new skills to change behaviour related to evidence-based practice.