Towards an evaluation framework for information quality management (IQM) practices for health information systems – evaluation criteria for effective IQM practices
Article first published online: 15 APR 2012
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Volume 19, Issue 2, pages 379–387, April 2013
How to Cite
Mohammed, S. A. and Yusof, M. M. (2013), Towards an evaluation framework for information quality management (IQM) practices for health information systems – evaluation criteria for effective IQM practices. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 19: 379–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01839.x
- Issue published online: 7 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 15 APR 2012
- Accepted for publication: 9 January 2012
- health information systems;
- human factors;
- information quality management;
- organizational factors
Rationale, aims and objectives Poor information quality (IQ) must be understood as a business problem rather than systems problem. In health care organization, what is required is an effective quality management that continuously manages and reviews the factors influencing IQ in health information systems (HIS) so as to achieve the desired outcomes. Hence, in order to understand the issues of information quality management (IQM) practices in health care organizations, a more holistic evaluation study should be undertaken to investigate the IQM practices in health care organizations. It is the aim of this paper to identify the significant evaluation criteria that influence the production of good IQ in HIS.
Methods Six selected frameworks and best practices both from health informatics and information systems literature have been reviewed to identify the evaluation criteria from the perspective of human, organizational and technological factors.
Results From the review, it was found that human and organization factors are of greater significance in influencing HIS IQ. Our review depicts that there is still shortage in finding a comprehensive IQM evaluation framework. Thus, the criteria from the frameworks reviewed can be used in combination for more comprehensive evaluation criteria. Integrated IQM evaluation criteria for HIS are then proposed in this study.
Conclusions Poor IQ is the result of complex interdependency within sociotechnical factors in health care organization and lack of formal and structured IQM practices. Thus, a feedback mechanism such as evaluation is needed to understand the issues in depth in the future.