Staff variables associated with the challenging behaviour of clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities
Article first published online: 27 FEB 2009
© 2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Mental Health and Intellectual Disability: XXV (Edited by S.-A. Cooper)
Volume 53, Issue 7, pages 620–632, July 2009
How to Cite
Lambrechts, G., Kuppens, S. and Maes, B. (2009), Staff variables associated with the challenging behaviour of clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53: 620–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01162.x
- Issue published online: 11 JUN 2009
- Article first published online: 27 FEB 2009
- Accepted 9 February 2009
- challenging behaviour;
- severe or profound intellectual disability;
- staff variables
Background Previous research has identified that staff–client interactions play an important role in the origin and maintenance of challenging behaviour. Particularly, the reciprocity between staff behaviour and client behaviour has been considered a key issue. Furthermore, severe challenging behaviour has been found to elicit negative emotional reactions from staff which in turn may influence staff's behaviour. Another variable that has been associated with staff behaviour are staff's attributions regarding clients' challenging behaviour. The present study tested several hypotheses about associations between staff variables and challenging behaviour.
Method Questionnaires were used to investigate associations between the attributions, emotional reactions and behavioural reactions of 51 staff members towards challenging behaviour of clients with severe or profound intellectual disabilities who displayed self-injurious behaviour, stereotyped behaviour and/or aggressive/destructive behaviour.
Results Staff members reported that reactions to challenging behaviour differed according to the type of challenging behaviour. Negative emotional reactions were positively associated with challenging behaviour. Associations between emotional reactions, staff beliefs and staff reactions were inconsistent.
Conclusions The findings suggest that there is a need to look for a better conceptualisation and assessment of the variables under investigation.