The human degree of care. Professional loving care for people with a mild intellectual disability: an explorative study
Article first published online: 12 OCT 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, MENCAP & IASSIDD
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume 58, Issue 3, pages 221–232, March 2014
How to Cite
Hermsen, M. A., Embregts, P. J. C. M., Hendriks, A. H. C. and Frielink, N. (2014), The human degree of care. Professional loving care for people with a mild intellectual disability: an explorative study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58: 221–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01638.x
- Issue published online: 17 JAN 2014
- Article first published online: 12 OCT 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 SEP 2012
- commercialisation of care;
- professional loving care;
- quality care;
- staff–client relationship
Research has shown that care staff are not always able to offer quality care. Commercialisation and market forces within the care sector are often pointed to as an explanation for this shortcoming. In the present study, insight is gained into the possible connections between the commercialisation of care, on the one hand, and the shrinkage of possibilities and motivation to offer professional loving care, on the other hand, from the perspective of care staff working with people with mild intellectual disabilities.
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 28 care staff working with people with mild intellectual disabilities. Scientific research methods were combined with normative ethical reflection to examine the internal morals of the care staff.
According to participating care staff, an affiliation with and recognition of the client form the basis for professional loving care. Care staff recognise that their profession is increasingly being built upon manageability and accountability, and this is making their jobs more difficult.
We conclude that care staff perceive the precedence given to the smooth running of production processes over investment in direct contact with clients to be a real threat to the quality of care. Concerns about declining motivation and loss of work satisfaction as a result of the commercialisation of care are only partly acknowledged by care staff. While shrinkage of space for professional loving care is recognised, one can hardly speak of declining motivation.