SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Cryptococcus neoformans;
  • immunocompetence;
  • magpie;
  • transmission

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. Conflict of interest statement
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Reference

Abstract.  Lagrou K, Van Eldere J, Keuleers S, Hagen F, Merckx R, Verhaegen J, Peetermans WE, Boekhout T (University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, CT Utrecht, the Netherlands) Zoonotic transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a magpie to an immunocompetent patient (Case report). J Intern Med 2005; 257: 385–388.

Abstract.  We report a case of cryptococcal meningitis in an immunocompetent female patient with exposure to a pet magpie (Pica pica). Genetically indistinguishable isolates were cultured from the cerebrospinal fluid of the patient and excreta of the bird. Our data strongly suggest zoonotic transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii from a magpie to this patient.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. Conflict of interest statement
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Reference

Cryptococcus neoformans commonly infects immunocompromised patients, especially AIDS patients and organ transplant recipients and causes fungal meningoencephalitis. The yeast has been isolated from environmental sources, such as house dust and soil, and from the excrements of a variety of avian species (e.g. pigeons, chickens, parrots, sparrows, starlings, turtledoves, canaries and skylarks) [1]. Several reports have been published describing the development of cryptococcosis in patients after exposure to birds or avian excreta, suggesting that human infection can result from this source [2, 3]. With the use of molecular techniques, it has been possible to demonstrate that isolates obtained from bird excreta on the one hand and isolates from patients on the other are closely related [4, 5]. This adds to the increasing evidence linking clinical isolates to those found in bird excreta. In 2000, Nosanchuk et al. [6] documented zoonotic transmission of C. neoformans, from a pet cockatoo to a renal transplant recipient patient, for the first time. We document a second case of probable zoonotic transmission of C. neoformans. Genetically indistinguishable isolates were cultured from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of the patient and excreta of the magpie (Pica pica). Our data strongly suggest that the yeast was transmitted from a pet magpie to an immunocompetent patient causing meningitis.

Case report

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. Conflict of interest statement
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Reference

A 44-year-old woman with epilepsy in the medical history was admitted to the hospital because of headache since 3 weeks. The patient suffered from anorexia, nausea and weight loss. The patient did not register her body temperature at home. Physical examination was normal. There was no nuchal rigidity or photophobia. Temperature was 37.5 °C. A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scan showed a few small lesions in the white matter of the corona radiata, interpreted by the radiologist as old ischaemic lesions. There was no contrast enhancement. Three days after admission, fever went up to 39 °C and a lumbar puncture was made. The CSF showed 444 white blood cells per microlitre (4% granulocytes, 13% monocytes, 83% lymphocytes), a glucose content of 5 mg dL−1 and a protein content of 2161 mg L−1. CSF culture grew C. neoformans. The C. neoformans antigen titre was 1/512 in CSF and 1/256 in serum. Mycobacterial and viral CSF culture and PCR remained negative.

The patient was treated with amphotericin B plus flucytosine for 2 weeks followed by a treatment with fluconazole 400 mg day−1 for 6 months. Initially, she developed intracranial hypertension, a transient paralysis of the abducens nerve and cerebellar ataxia. An NMR scan revealed a new cystic lesion with peripheral contrast enhancement in the cerebellum and bilateral choroiditis (Fig. 1). After discharge from the hospital, the patient did well under prolonged treatment with fluconazole.

image

Figure 1. Nuclear magnetic resonance scans of the brain showing a cystic lesion in the cerebellum (arrow).

Download figure to PowerPoint

The patient was HIV seronegative and had no history of an increased infection rate. White blood cell count, immunoglobulin A, G, M and E concentrations, complement factors C3, C4 and total complement, the CD4 cell count (504 cells mm−3, 46.9%) were all within normal limits. A lymphocyte stimulation test with Candida, tuberculin, tetanus toxoid antigen and pokeweed mitogen revealed high proliferation ratios. The hypothesis of a zoonotic transmission was suggested by one of us (SK) and an anamnesis for bird exposure was performed. The patient told a pet magpie bird was present at the veranda of her parents’ home where she stayed the last 3 months before admission to the hospital. Excreta, collected from the bird's cage were brought to the microbiology lab for culture and also grew C. neoformans.

Both isolates utilized urea and were encapsulated. The isolates were further identified using the ID 32C system (bioMérieux, Hazelwood, MI, USA) and had identical biochemical profiles (code 5166764351). Both isolates were serotype A isolates (C. neoformans var. grubii), mating type α [7]. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis performed following Perfect et al. [8] with some minor modifications, resulted in identical chromosomal DNA banding patterns (Fig. 2a). Analysis of genetic relatedness of the isolates as investigated by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis [9], showed that the similarity between the isolate from the magpie MP and that from the patient PT was 99.2% (Fig. 2b), calculated by the unweighted pair-group method by using average linkages (upgma, no optimization; 0.05% position tolerance). The clinical strain H99 (αA) and the congenic backcrosses KN99a (aA) and KN99α (αA) were included, as well as the congenic serotype D strains JEC20 (aD) and JEC21 (αD) as control strains with high genetic similarity [10, 11]. Strain similarity by AFLP amongst the congenic control was 99.5% and 98.8% for the strains KN99a/KN99α and JEC20/JEC21 respectively.

image

Figure 2. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of the clinical (PT) and bird (MP) isolate. (a) Electrophoretic karyotypes obtained by contour-clamped homogenous electric field (CHEF) analysis. DNA molecular size markers are indicated along the left margin. Other strains on the gel are: G1, serotype D strain of Cryptococcus neoformans; B1–B4, C. neoformans isolated from Belgian aviaries. (b) Dendrogram obtained by AFLP analysis showing high similarity between the clinical isolate PT and the isolate MP from the magpie droppings.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. Conflict of interest statement
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Reference

We report the second case of human cryptococcosis in which a genetically indistinguishable C. neoformans isolate was recovered from excreta of a bird in the patient's environment. The isolate recovered from the excreta of the magpie and the isolate from the patient's CSF were shown to be identical by ID 32C identification and karyotyping. Similarity with AFLP analysis was 99.2%. Clinical isolates of C. neoformans exhibit great variation in chromosome number and size [12]. The high frequency of chromosome differences between strains makes electrophoretic karyotyping a highly discriminatory technique for distinguishing amongst isolates [8]. AFLP is a genotyping method with a high discriminative power and reproducibility [9]. The available data strongly suggest that the magpie excreta were a reservoir for the strain of C. neoformans that infected the patient. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that both patient and the bird excreta were infected by an undetermined third source, although we consider this option less likely than transfer from the bird to the patient.

Except for some rare cases of primary cutaneous cryptococcosis, the infection is thought to result initially from inhalation of airborne fungi from an environmental source. Our case illustrates that prolonged contact with birds may not be required for exposure to C. neoformans. The magpie was not let out of its cage and the patient was not involved in cleaning the cage. Our patient's contact with the bird was limited to passing by the cage when entering home. Staib [13] showed that C. neoformans can be isolated from the ambient air near caged birds. This has to be kept in mind when asking patients for environmental exposure to birds. A thorough anamnesis aimed at the identification of bird contact (and not only handling of birds or cleaning bird cages) is indicated when a clinician is confronted with a patient with cryptococcosis.

To our knowledge, isolation of cryptococci from excreta of a magpie has not been reported yet. In contrast to the previous report of zoonotic transmission of C. neoformans, our patient is not immunocompromised. Whereas C. neoformans var. gatii infects immunocompetent individuals, C. neoformans var. grubii typically infects immunocompromised patients [14, 15]. Those patients at particularly high risk have defects in the cell-mediated immunity, such as patients with AIDS, lymphomas, and sarcoidosis and those receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Cryptococcosis also appears to occur with increased frequency in association with leucopenia, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, and hepatic cirrhosis [1]. Therapy with infliximab, a tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist, may predispose patients to cryptococcal disease as suggested by Shrestha et al. [16]. This recent case also suggests the possibility of zoonotic transmission from a pet cockatiel, although they did not succeed in culturing C. neoformans from its faeces. Our patient did not have any of these risk factors mentioned. The basis of virulence in serotype A strains of C. neoformans strains infecting apparently immunocompetent individuals is not well understood yet, but may be attributable to mutations occurring in the yeast and/or underlying immune system impairment in patients [14].

Investigation of cryptococcosis cases using molecular tools may improve our understanding of the risk factors for this disease and identify particular disease causing exposures. This could lead to formulation of prevention strategies.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. Conflict of interest statement
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Reference

We thank D. Swinne for her generous gift of cryptococcal strains isolated from Belgian aviaries. J. Van Eldere is holder of the GSK chair in medical microbiology.

Reference

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Case report
  5. Discussion
  6. Conflict of interest statement
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Reference
  • 1
    Levitz SM. The ecology of Cryptococcus neoformans and the epidemiology of cryptococcosis. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13: 11639.
  • 2
    Fessel WJ. Cryptococcal meningitis after unusual exposures to birds. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 13545.
  • 3
    Micalizzi C, Persi A, Parodi A. Primary cutaneous cryptococcosis in an immunocompetent pigeon keeper. Clin Exp Dermatol 1997; 22: 1957.
  • 4
    Varma A, Swinne D, Staib F, Bennett JE, Kwon-Chung KJ. Diversity of DNA fingerprints in Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 180714.
  • 5
    Franzot SP, Hamdan JS, Currie BP, Casadevall A. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans in Brazil and the United States: evidence for both local genetic differences and a global clonal population structure. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 224351.
  • 6
    Nosanchuk JD, Shoham S, Fries BC, Shapiro DS, Levitz SM, Casadevall A. Evidence of zoonotic transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a pet cockatoo to an immunocompromised patient. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 2058.
  • 7
    Barreto de Oliveira MT, Boekhout T, Theelen B et al. Cryptococcus neoformans shows a remarkable genotypic diversity in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 13569.
  • 8
    Perfect JR, Ketabchi N, Cox GM, Ingram CW, Beiser CL. Karyotyping of Cryptococcus neoformans as an epidemiological tool. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 33059.
  • 9
    Boekhout T, Theelen B, Diaz M et al. Hybrid genotypes in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology 2001; 147: 891907.
  • 10
    Nielsen K, Cox GM, Wang P, Toffaletti DL, Perfect JR, Heitman J. Sexual cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and virulence of congenic a and alpha isolates. Infect Immun 2003; 71: 483141.
  • 11
    Heitman J, Allen B, Alspaugh JA, Kwon-Chung KJ. On the origins of congenic MATalpha and MATa strains of the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet Biol 1999; 28: 15.
  • 12
    Boekhout T, van Belkum A, Leenders AC et al. Molecular typing of Cryptococcus neoformans: taxonomic and epidemiological aspects. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47: 43242.
  • 13
    Staib F. Sampling and isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans from indoor air with the aid of the Reuter Centrifugal Sampler (RCS) and Guizotia abyssinica creatinine agar. A contribution to the mycological-epidemiological control of Cr. neoformans in the fecal matter of caged birds. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B 1985; 180: 56775.
  • 14
    D'Souza CA, Hagen F, Boekhout T, Cox GM, Heitman J. Investigation of the basis of virulence in serotype A strains of Cryptococcus neoformans from apparently immunocompetent individuals. Curr Genet 2004; 46: 92102.
  • 15
    Speed B, Dunt D. Clinical and host differences between infections with the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 21: 2834.
  • 16
    Shrestha RK, Stoller JK, Honari G, Procop GW, Gordon SM. Pneumonia due to Cryptococcus neoformans in a patient receiving infliximab: possible zoonotic transmission from a pet cockatiel. Respir Care 2004; 49: 6068.