SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Seymour NE. VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 2008;32:1828.
  • 2
    Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton C-A, Reznick RK, LeBlanc V, Dubrowski A. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomised controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery 2007;141:4429.
  • 3
    Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O’Brien M, Bansal V, Andersen K, Satava R. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomised, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:45864.
  • 4
    Hogle NJ, Widmann WD, Ude AO, Hardy MA, Fowler DL. Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games? J Surg Educ 2008;65:4315.
  • 5
    Sutherland LM, Middleton P, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2006;243:291300.
  • 6
    Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 2005;241:36472.
  • 7
    Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ 2008;43:217.
  • 8
    Brydges R, Carnahan H, Backstein D, Dubrowski A. Application of motor learning principles to complex surgical tasks: searching for the optimal practice schedule. J Mot Behav 2007;39:408.
  • 9
    O’Connor A, Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CGL. How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc 2008;22:16149.
  • 10
    Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Heniford BT, Scott DJ. Limited feedback and video tutorials optimise learning and resource utilisation during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 2007;142:2026.
  • 11
    Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 4th edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2005;302–4.
  • 12
    McCullagh P, Weiss M. Modelling: considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In: SingerRN, HausenblasHA, JanelleCM, eds. Handbook of sport psychology. New York: Wiley 2001;20538.
  • 13
    Shebilske WL, Regian JW, Arthur W, Jordan JA. A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. Hum Factors 1992;34:36974.
  • 14
    Shea CH, Wulf G, Whitacre C, Wright DL. Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. J Mot Behav 2000;32:2736.
  • 15
    Gallese V, Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn Sci 1998;2:493501.
  • 16
    Grezes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2001;12:119.
  • 17
    Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 1994;17:32638.
  • 18
    Adams JA. Use of the model’s knowledge of results to increase the observer’s performance. J Hum Mov Stud 1986;12:8998.
  • 19
    Blandin Y, Proteau L, Alain C. On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. J Mot Behav 1994;26:1824.
  • 20
    Wright DL, Li Y, Coady WJ. Cognitive processes related to the contextual interference and observational learning: a replication of Blandin, Proteau, and Alain (1994). Res Q Exerc Sport 1997;68:1069.
  • 21
    Shea CH, Wulf G, Park J-H, Gaunt B. Effects of an auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. J Mot Behav 2001;33:12738.
  • 22
    Badets A, Blandin Y. The role of knowledge of results frequency in learning through observation. J Mot Behav 2004;36:6270.
  • 23
    Badets A, Blandin Y. Observational learning: effects of bandwidth knowledge of results. J Mot Behav 2005;37:2116.
  • 24
    Shea CH, Wulf G, Whitacre CA. Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. J Mot Behav 1999;31:11925.
  • 25
    Mueller D, Georges A, Vaslow D. Cooperative learning as applied to resident instruction in radiology reporting. Acad Radiol 2007;14:157783.
  • 26
    LaMorte WW. One hand square knot. http://www.bumc.bu.edu/generalsurgery/technical-training/one-hand-tie/. [Accessed 10 February 2009.]
  • 27
    Wulf G. Attention and Motor Skill Learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2007.
  • 28
    Wulf G, Su J. An external focus of attention enhances golf shot accuracy in beginners and experts. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007;78:3849.
  • 29
    Zachry T, Wulf G, Mercer J, Bezodis N. Increased movement accuracy and reduced EMG activity as the result of adopting an external focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 2005;67:3049.
  • 30
    Marchant DC, Clough PJ, Crawshaw M. The effects of attentional focusing strategies on novice dart throwing performance and their task experiences. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2007;5:291303.
  • 31
    Wulf G, McConnel N, Gärtner M, Schwarz A. Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. J Mot Behav 2002;34:17182.
  • 32
    Wulf G, Höss M, Prinz W. Instructions for motor learning: differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. J Mot Behav 1998;30:16979.
  • 33
    Wulf G, Landers M, Lewthwaite R, Töllner T. External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 2009;89:1628.
  • 34
    Wulf G, McNevin NH, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol 2001;54A:114354.
  • 35
    Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Effortless motor learning? An external focus of attention enhances movement effectiveness and efficiency. In: BruyaB, ed. Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2010; in press.
  • 36
    Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Attentional and motivational influences on motor performance and learning. In: MornellA, ed. Art in Motion: Musical and Athletic Motor Learning and Performance. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2009;95–117.
  • 37
    Wulf G, Shea CH. Understanding the role of augmented feedback: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: WilliamsAM, HodgesNJ, eds. Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice. London: Routledge 2004;12144.
  • 38
    Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull 1984;95:35586.
  • 39
    Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Resnick RK, Dubrowski A. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 2007;193:10510.
  • 40
    Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007;78:407.
  • 41
    Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Res Q Exerc Sport 2002;73:40815.
  • 42
    Moorthy K, Munz Y, Adams S, Pandey V, Darzi A. Self-assessment of performance among surgical trainees during simulated procedures in a simulated operating theatre. Am J Surg 2006;192:1148.
  • 43
    Kavussanu M, Roberts GC. Motivation in physical activity contexts: the relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1996;18:26480.
  • 44
    Hutchinson JC, Sherman T, Martinovic N, Tenenbaum G. The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. J Appl Sport Psychol 2008;20:45772.
  • 45
    Johnson DS, Turban DB, Pieper KF, Ng YM. Exploring the role of normative- and performance-based feedback in motivational processes. J Appl Soc Psychol 1996;26:97392.
  • 46
    Wulf G, Chiviacowsky S, Lewthwaite R. Normative feedback effects on the learning of a timing task. Res Q Exerc Sport 2010; in press.
  • 47
    Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Social-comparison feedback and conceptions of ability: effects on motor learning. 2009; Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • 48
    Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Social-comparative feedback affects motor learning. Q J Exp Psychol 2010; in press.
  • 49
    Locke EA, Latham GP. The application of goal setting to sports. J Sport Psychol 1985;7:20522.
  • 50
    Chen DD, Hendrick JL, Lidor R. Enhancing self-controlled learning environments: the use of self-regulated feedback information. J Hum Mov Stud 2002;43:6986.
  • 51
    Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Laroque de Medeiros F, Kaefer A. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Res Q Exerc Sport 2008;79:40510.
  • 52
    Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG, Tennant LK, Cauraugh JH. Maximising performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport 1997;68:26979.
  • 53
    Ferrari M. Observing the observers: self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Dev Rev 1996;16:20340.
  • 54
    McCombs ML. Self-regulated learning and achievement: a phenomenological view. In: ZimmermanBJ, SchunkDH, eds. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement Theory, Research, and Practice: Progress in Cognitive Development Research. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag 1989;5182.
  • 55
    Hartman JM. Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Percept Mot Skills 2007;104:100516.
  • 56
    Wulf G, Toole T. Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999;70:26572.
  • 57
    Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Res Q Exerc Sport 2005;76:10711.
  • 58
    Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychol Inq 2000;11:22768.
  • 59
    Dolmans DHJM, Schmidt HG. What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small-group tutorials in problem-based learning? Adv Health Sci Educ 2006;11:32136.
  • 60
    Epstein RM. Mindful practice. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:8339.
  • 61
    Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Rikers RMJP, Penaforte JC, Coelho-Filho JM. Breaking down automaticity: case ambiguity and the shift to reflective approaches in clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:118592.
  • 62
    Bandura A, Jourden FJ. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. J Pers Social Psychol 1991;60:94151.
  • 63
    Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Social Psychol 2003;84:82248.