• 1
    McNamara DS, Scott JL. Working memory capacity and strategy use. Mem Cognit 2001;29:107.
  • 2
    O’Reilly T, McNamara DS. The impact of science knowledge, reading strategy knowledge on more traditional ‘high-stakes’ measures of high school students’ science achievement. Am Educ Res J 2007;44:16196.
  • 3
    Azevedo R, Cromley JG. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? J Educ Psychol 2004;96:52335.
  • 4
    Bereiter C, Bird M. Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cogn Instr 1985;2:13156.
  • 5
    King A, Rosenshine B. Effects of guided cooperative-questioning on children’s knowledge construction. J Exp Educ 1993;6:12748.
  • 6
    McNamara DS. IIS: a marriage of computational linguistics, psychology, and educational technologies. In: WilsonD, SutcliffeC, eds. Proceedings of the 20th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference. Menlo Park, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Press 2007;1520.
  • 7
    Ozgungor S, Guthrie JT. Interactions among elaborative interrogation, knowledge, and interest in the process of constructing knowledge from text. J Educ Psychol 2004;96:43743.
  • 8
    Palincsar AS, Brown AL. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cogn Instr 1984;2:11775.
  • 9
    Magliano JP, Todaro SA, Millis KA, Wiemer-Hastings KA, Kim HJA, McNamara DS. Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: a comparison of live and computerised training. J Educ Comput Res 2005;32:185208.
  • 10
    McNamara DS, O’Reilly T, Rowe M, Boonthum C, Levinstein IB. iSTART: a web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In: McNamaraDS, ed. Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2007;397421.
  • 11
    Moos DC, Avezedo R. Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instr Sci 2009;36:20331.
  • 12
    O’Reilly T, McNamara DS. Good texts cam be better for skilled comprehenders. Discourse Process 2006;43:12152.
  • 13
    Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY: McKay 1956.
  • 14
    Branford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How People Learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2000.
  • 15
    Graesser AC, Leon JA, Otero JC. Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In: OteroJ, LeonJA, GraessarAC, eds. The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2002;15.
  • 16
    Kintsch W. Comprehension: a Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press 1998.
  • 17
    Craig SD, Sullins J, Witherspoon A, Gholson B. Deep-level reasoning questions effect: the role of dialogue and deep-level reasoning questions during vicarious learning. Cogn Instr 2006;24:56389.
  • 18
    Otero J, Graesser AC. PREG: elements of a model of question asking. Cogn Instr 2001;19:14375.
  • 19
    Collins A. Different goals of inquiry teaching. Questioning Exchange 1988;2:3945.
  • 20
    White B, Frederiksen J. Inquiry, modelling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Educ Psychol 1998;16:3117.
  • 21
    White B, Frederiksen J. A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educ Psychol 2005;40:21123.
  • 22
    Chi MTH, De Leeuw N, Chiu M, LaVancher C. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cogn Sci 1994;18:43977.
  • 23
    McNamara DS. SERT: self-explanation reading training. Discourse Process 2004;38:130.
  • 24
    Van Lehn K, Jones RM, Chi MTH. A model of the self-explanation effect. J Learn Sci 1992;2:159.
  • 25
    Azevedo R. The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In: RobinsonD, SchrawG, eds. Recent Innovations in Educational Technology that Facilitate Student Learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing 2008;12756.
  • 26
    Graesser AC, McNamara DS, Van Lehn K. Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educ Psychol 2005;40:22534.
  • 27
    Winne PH. Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In: ZimmermanBJ, SchunkDH, eds. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2001;15389.
  • 28
    Zimmerman BJ. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview and analysis. In: ZimmermanBJ, SchunkDH, eds. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press 2007;137.
  • 29
    Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 1979;34:90611.
  • 30
    Hacker DJ, Dunlosky J, Graesser AC, eds. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1998.
  • 31
    Avezedo R, Moos DC, Green JA, Winters FI, Cromley JC. Why is externally regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educ Tech Research Dev 2008;56:4572.
  • 32
    Baker L. Social influences on metacognitive development in reading. In: CornoldiC, OakhillJ, eds. Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1996;33152.
  • 33
    Graesser AC, Person NK, Magliano JP. Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Appl Cogn Psychol 1995;9:495522.
  • 34
    Azevedo R, Witherspoon AM. Self-regulated use of hypermedia. In: GraesserA, DunloskyJ, HackerD, eds. Handbook of Metacognition in Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2009;31939.
  • 35
    Baker L. Differences in standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Read Res Q 1985;20:298313.
  • 36
    Bjork RA. Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In: MetcalfeJ, ShimmauraA, eds. Metacognition: Knowing About Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1994;185205.
  • 37
    Chinn CA, Brewer WF. Factors that influence how people respond to anomalous data. In: KintschW, ed. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1993;31823.
  • 38
    Dillon JT. Questioning and Teaching: a Manual of Practice. London: Croom Helm 1988.
  • 39
    Frame A. Towards a theory of question asking. Psychol Res 1981;43:40720.
  • 40
    Graesser AC, McMahen CL. Anomalous information triggers questions when adults solve problems and comprehend stories. J Educ Psychol 1993;85:13651.
  • 41
    Piaget J. The Grasp of Consciousness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1977.
  • 42
    McNamara DS, Kintsch E, Songer NB, Kintsch W. Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cogn Instr 1996;14:143.
  • 43
    McNamara DS. Reading both high coherence and low coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Can J Exp Psychol 2001;55:5162.
  • 44
    McNamara DS, Kintsch W. Learning from text: effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Process 1996;22:24788.
  • 45
    Ozuru Y, Dempsey K, McNamara DS. Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learn Instr 2009;19:22842.
  • 46
    Chi MTH, Bassock M, Lewis M, Resimann P, Glaser R. Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cogn Sci 1989;2:14582.
  • 47
    McNamara DS, O’Reilly T, Best R, Ozuru Y. Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. J Educ Comput Res 2006;34:14771.
  • 48
    Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1978.
  • 49
    McNamara DS, Levinstein IB, Boonthum C. iSTART: interactive strategy trainer for active reading and thinking. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004;36:22233.
  • 50
    McNamara DS, Boonthum C, Levinstein IB, Millis K. Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: comparing word-based and LSA analysis. In: LandauerT, McNamaraDS, DennisS, KintschW, eds. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2007;22742.
  • 51
    Millis KK, Kim HJ, Todaro S, Magliano J, Wiemer-Hastings K, McNamara DS. Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: comparing semantic benchmarks. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004;36:21221.
  • 52
    O’Reilly T, Sinclair GP, McNamara DS. iSTART: a web-based reading strategy intervention that improves students’ science comprehension. In: KinshukD, SampsonG, IsaiasP, eds. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference of Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age: CELDA 2004. Lisbon: IADIS Press 2004;17380.
  • 53
    O’Reilly T, Best R, McNamara DS. Self-explanation reading training: effects for low-knowledge readers. In: ForbusK, GenterD, RegierT, eds. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2004;10538.
  • 54
    Taylor RS, O’Reilly T, Sinclair G, McNamara DS. Enhancing learning of expository science texts in remedial reading classroom via iSTART. In: BarabS, HayK, HickeyD, eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2006;76570.
  • 55
    O’Reilly T, Sinclair GP, McNamara DS. Reading strategy training: automated versus live. In: ForbusK, GenterD, RegierT, eds. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2004;105964.
  • 56
    McNamara DS. Aprender del texto: efectos de la estructura textual y las estrategias del lector. Revista Signos 2004;37:1930.