• 1
    Johnson PT, Eng J, Rowell MR, Fishman EK. Evolving physician perception of worldwide web education: 2007 update and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1092101.
  • 2
    Kamin C, Souza KH, Heestand D, Moses A, O’Sullivan P. Educational technology infrastructure and services in North American medical schools. Acad Med 2006;81:6327.
  • 3
    Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005;80:5418.
  • 4
    Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:118196.
  • 5
    Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2010;85:90922.
  • 6
    Mars M, McLean M. Students’ perceptions of a multimedia computer-aided instruction resource in histology. S Afr Med J 1996;86:1098102.
  • 7
    Spickard A III, Alrajeh N, Cordray D, Gigante J. Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter? J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:5405.
  • 8
    Xiao Y, Seagull FJ, Bochicchio GV et al. Video-based training increases sterile-technique compliance during central venous catheter insertion. Crit Care Med 2007;35:13026.
  • 9
    Lipman AJ, Sade RM, Glotzbach AL, Lancaster CJ, Marshall MF. The incremental value of Internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomised study. Acad Med 2001;76:10604.
  • 10
    Kemper KJ, Amata-Kynvi A, Sanghavi D, Whelan JS, Dvorkin L, Woolf A, Samuels RC, Hibberd P. Randomised trial of an Internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals. Acad Med 2002;77:8829.
  • 11
    Frith KH, Kee CC. The effect of communication on nursing student outcomes in a web-based course. J Nurs Educ 2003;42:3508.
  • 12
    Allen M, Sargeant J, Mann K, Fleming M, Premi J. Videoconferencing for practice-based small-group continuing medical education: feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and cost. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003;23:3847.
  • 13
    Kobak KA, Engelhardt N, Lipsitz JD. Enriched rater training using Internet-based technologies: a comparison to traditional rater training in a multi-site depression trial. J Psychiatr Res 2006;40:1929.
  • 14
    Little BB, Passmore D, Schullo S. Using synchronous software in web-based nursing courses. Comput Inform Nurs 2006;24:31725; quiz 326–7.
  • 15
    Fleetwood J, Vaught W, Feldman D, Gracely E, Kassutto Z, Novack D. MedEthEx online: a computer-based learning program in medical ethics and communications skills. Teach Learn Med 2000;12:96104.
  • 16
    Taradi SK, Taradi M, Radic K, Pokrajac N. Blending problem-based learning with web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ 2005;29:359.
  • 17
    Casebeer L, Strasser SM, Spettell CM, Wall TC, Weissman N, Ray MN, Allison JJ. Designing tailored web-based instruction to improve practising physicians’ preventive practices. J Med Internet Res 2003;5 (3):20.
  • 18
    Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Thompson WG. Adapting web-based instruction to residents’ knowledge improves learning efficiency: a randomised controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:98590.
  • 19
    Thompson GA, Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG, Clark TK. Evaluation of an online analogical patient simulation program. Presented at the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2223 June 2006, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • 20
    Kopp V, Stark R, Fischer MR. Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: effects of erroneous examples and feedback. Med Educ 2008;42:8239.
  • 21
    Kerfoot BP. Interactive spaced education versus web-based modules for teaching urology to medical students: a randomised controlled trial. J Urol 2008;179:23516.
  • 22
    Jedlicka JS, Brown SW, Bunch AE, Jaffe LE. A comparison of distance education instructional methods in occupational therapy. J Allied Health 2002;31:24751.
  • 23
    Tunuguntla R, Rodriguez O, Ruiz JG, Qadri SS, Mintzer MJ, Van Zuilen MH, Roos BA. Computer-based animations and static graphics as medical student aids in learning home safety assessment: a randomised controlled trial. Med Teach 2008;30:8157.
  • 24
    Kemper KJ, Gardiner P, Gobble J, Mitra A, Woods C. Randomised controlled trial comparing four strategies for delivering e-curriculum to health care professionals. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:2.
  • 25
    Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002;77 (10 Suppl):8693.
  • 26
    Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, Borokhovski E, Wade A, Wozney L, Wallet PA, Fiset M, Huang B. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res 2004;74:379439.
  • 27
    Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Borokhovski E, Wade CA, Tamim RM, Surkes MA, Bethel EC. A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Rev Educ Res 2009;79:124389.
  • 28
    Chaffin AJ, Maddux CD. Internet teaching methods for use in baccalaureate nursing education. Comput Inform Nurs 2004;22:13242.
  • 29
    Lau F, Bates J. A review of e-learning practices for undergraduate medical education. J Med Syst 2004;28 (1):7187.
  • 30
    Sandars J. Twelve tips for using blogs and wikis in medical education. Med Teach 2006;28:6802.
  • 31
    McGee JB, Begg M. What medical educators need to know about ‘Web 2.0’. Med Teach 2008;30:1649.
  • 32
    Beard L, Wilson K, Morra D, Keelan J. A survey of health-related activities on Second Life. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:17.
  • 33
    Adler MD, Johnson KB. Quantifying the literature of computer-aided instruction in medical education. Acad Med 2000;75:10258.
  • 34
    Cook DA, Dupras DM. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:698707.
  • 35
    Mayer RE, ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 2005.
  • 36
    Jonassen DH. Problem solving: the enterprise. In: SpectorJM, OhrazdaC, Van SchaackA, WileyDA, eds. Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M David Merrill. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2005;91110.
  • 37
    Spiro RJ, Coulson RJ, Feltovich PJ, Anderson DK. Cognitive Flexibility Theory: Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-structured Domains. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1988.
  • 38
    Laurillard D. Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies, 2nd edn. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer 2001.
  • 39
    Ruiz JG, Cook DA, Levinson AJ. Computer animations in medical education: a critical literature review. Med Educ 2009;43:83846.
  • 40
    Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ 2009;43:30311.
  • 41
    Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Thompson WG. Measuring motivational characteristics of courses: applying Keller’s instructional materials motivation survey to a web-based course. Acad Med 2009;84:15059.
  • 42
    Youngblood P, Harter PM, Srivastava S, Moffett S, Heinrichs WL, Dev P. Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams. Simul Healthc 2008;3:14653.
  • 43
    Wiecha J, Heyden R, Sternthal E, Merialdi M. Learning in a virtual world: experience with using Second Life for medical education. J Med Internet Res 2010;12 (1):1.
  • 44
    Philip CT, Unruh KP, Lachman N, Pawlina W. An explorative learning approach to teaching clinical anatomy using student-generated content. Anat Sci Educ 2008;1 (3):10610.
  • 45
    Hull P, Chaudry A, Prasthofer A, Pattison G. Optimal sequencing of bedside teaching and computer-based learning: a randomised trial. Med Educ 2009;43:10812.