The role of collaborative interactivity in the observational practice of clinical skills

Authors

  • Lawrence E M Grierson,

    1. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    2. Programme for Educational Research and Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Maureen Barry,

    1. Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Bill Kapralos,

    1. Faculty of Business and Information Technology, Ontario University Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Heather Carnahan,

    1. Wilson Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Adam Dubrowski

    1. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. SickKids Learning Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author

Adam Dubrowski, SickKids Learning Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, 525 University Avenue, Unit 600, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2L3, Canada. Tel: 00 1 416 813 7654 x8912; Fax: 00 1 416 813 6924; E-mail: adam.dubrowski@utoronto.ca

Abstract

Medical Education 2012: 46: 409–416

Context  Video-based observational practice can extend simulation-based learning outside the training space. This study explores the value of collaborative feedback provided during observational practice to the acquisition of clinical skills.

Methods  Nursing students viewed a video demonstrating the proper ventrogluteal injection technique before performing a videotaped pre-test trial on a simulator. They were then assigned randomly to one of three observational practice groups: a group that observed the expert demonstration (EO group); a group that viewed the expert demonstration, self-assessed their individual pre-test and contrasted their self-assessments with expert feedback (ESO group), and a group that observed the expert demonstration, self-assessed and contrasted their assessments with those of an expert, and formed a community that engaged in peer-to-peer feedback (ESPO group). The observation of all videos, the provision of assessments and all networking occurred via an Internet-mediated network. After 2 weeks, participants returned for post-tests and transfer tests.

Results  The pre-test–post-test analyses revealed significant interactions (global rating scale: F(2,22) = 4.00 [p = 0.033]; checklist: F(2,22) = 4.31 [p = 0.026]), which indicated that post-test performance in the ESPO group was significantly better than pre-test performance. The transfer analyses revealed main effects for both the global rating scale (F(2,23) = 6.73; p = 0.005) and validated checklist (F(2,23) = 7.04; p = 0.004) measures. Participants in the ESPO group performed better on the transfer test than those in the EO group.

Conclusions  The results suggest that video-based observational practice can be effective in extending simulation-based learning, but its effectiveness is mediated by the amount of time the learner spends engaged in the practice and the type of learning activities the learner performs in the observational practice environment. We speculate that increasing collaborative interactivity supports observational learning by increasing the extent to which the educational environment can accommodate learners’ specific needs.

Ancillary