Development of a rating system for surgeons' non-technical skills
Article first published online: 17 OCT 2006
Volume 40, Issue 11, pages 1098–1104, November 2006
How to Cite
Yule, S., Flin, R., Paterson-Brown, S., Maran, N. and Rowley, D. (2006), Development of a rating system for surgeons' non-technical skills. Medical Education, 40: 1098–1104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02610.x
- Issue published online: 17 OCT 2006
- Article first published online: 17 OCT 2006
- Received 10 October 2005; editorial comments to authors 9 March 2006; accepted for publication 5 May 2006
- professional practice/*standards;
- task performance and analysis;
- interprofessional relations;
- medical staff;
- multicenter study [publication type]
Background Analyses of adverse events in surgery reveal that many underlying causes are behavioural, such as communication failure, rather than technical. Non-technical (i.e. cognitive and interpersonal) skills are not addressed explicitly in surgical training. However, surgeons need to demonstrate these skills, which underpin their technical excellence, to maximise patient safety in the operating theatre. This paper describes the method used to identify surgeons' non-technical skills, and the development of a skills taxonomy and behavioural rating system to structure observation and feedback in surgical training.
Methods Cognitive task analyses (critical incident interviews) were conducted with 27 consultant surgeons in general, cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. The interviews were coded and a multidisciplinary group of surgeons and psychologists used an iterative process to develop a skills taxonomy. This was supported by data gathered from an attitude survey, literature review, analysis of surgical mortality reports and observations in theatre.
Results Five categories of non-technical skills were identified, including situation awareness, decision making, task management, leadership and communication and teamwork. This provided a structure for a prototype skill taxonomy (v1.1), which comprised 14 non-technical skill elements. Observable behaviours (markers) indicative of good and poor performance were developed for each element by 16 consultant surgeons to form a prototype behaviour rating system.
Conclusions The prototype skills taxonomy and behaviour rating system are grounded empirically in surgery. The reliability of the system is currently being tested using standardised scenarios. If this evaluation proves successful, the system could be used to structure feedback and guide non-technical skills training.