Get access

A spatial genetic structure and effects of relatedness on mate choice in a wild bird population

Authors

  • K. FOERSTER,

    1. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Department of Behavioural Ecology & Evolutionary Genetics, PO Box 1564, D-82305 Starnberg/Seewiesen, Germany,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. VALCU,

    1. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Department of Behavioural Ecology & Evolutionary Genetics, PO Box 1564, D-82305 Starnberg/Seewiesen, Germany,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A. JOHNSEN,

    1. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Department of Behavioural Ecology & Evolutionary Genetics, PO Box 1564, D-82305 Starnberg/Seewiesen, Germany,
    2. Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
    Search for more papers by this author
  • B. KEMPENAERS

    1. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Department of Behavioural Ecology & Evolutionary Genetics, PO Box 1564, D-82305 Starnberg/Seewiesen, Germany,
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Present address: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK

Katharina Foerster, Fax: +44 131650 6564, E-mail: kathi.foerster@ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Inbreeding depression, as commonly found in natural populations, should favour the evolution of inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. If natal dispersal, the first and probably most effective mechanism, does not lead to a complete separation of males and females from a common origin, a small-scale genetic population structure may result and other mechanisms to avoid inbreeding may exist. We studied the genetic population structure and individual mating patterns in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). The population showed a local genetic structure in two out of four years: genetic relatedness between individuals (estimated from microsatellite markers) decreased with distance. This pattern was mainly caused by immigrants to the study area; these, if paired with fellow immigrants, were more related than expected by chance. Since blue tits did not avoid inbreeding with their social partner, we examined if individuals preferred less related partners at later stages of the mate choice process. We found no evidence that females or males avoided inbreeding through extra-pair copulations or through mate desertion and postbreeding dispersal. Although the small-scale genetic population structure suggests that blue tits could use a simple rule of thumb to select less related mates, females did not generally prefer more distantly breeding extra-pair partners. However, the proportion of young fathered by an extra-pair male in mixed paternity broods depended on the genetic relatedness with the female. This suggests that there is a fertilization bias towards less related copulation partners and that blue tits are able to reduce the costs of inbreeding through a postcopulatory process.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary