SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Table S1 Markers that fell under divergent selection (FST > 0.975) or balancing selection (FST < 0.025) in the different pairwise comparisons using DFdist. The populations presented in normal letters are Silene latifolia populations, the one in italic letters are S. dioica populations. BON, Bonaduz; DAV, Davos; LEU, Leuk; GAB, Gabi; COG, Coglio; BOS, Bosco/Gurin; GOR, Gordemo; BER, Monte Berg; SIO, Grosio; PAS, Passo del Fopa; SUR, Sur En; SCH, Susch. Markers in grey were consistently found in all three allopatric comparisons. The marker name consists of the primer pair abbreviations (see Table 2) followed by the fragment size in base pairs

Table S2 Markers that fell under divergent selection or balancing selection using the 95&percnt; and the 99&percnt; confidence interval in the allopatric and/or sympatric comparison. Markers in grey in the divergent selection class were markers with extremely little introgression and are therefore highly species-specific. Silene dioica markers are presented in italic and S. latifolia markers in normal letters. Markers in grey in the balancing marker class were markers that occurred at high allele frequencies in the populations. Markers in bold were characterized by sequencing. These details are only reported for markers identical in the allopatric and sympatric comparison. The marker name consists of the primer pair abbreviations (see Table 2) followed by the fragment size in base pairs

Please note: Blackwell Publishing are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
MEC_3709_sm_supplement.doc92KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.