Article first published online: 4 MAY 2009
© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Volume 18, Issue 11, page 2543, June 2009
How to Cite
(2009), Erratum. Molecular Ecology, 18: 2543. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04230.x
- Issue published online: 22 MAY 2009
- Article first published online: 4 MAY 2009
In Saenz-Agudelo et al. (2009), the wrong version of Fig. 3 was published. Please see the correct version below.
Fig. 3 Parentage analysis results using FAMOZ software. (A) Number of juveniles assigned in Bootless Bay when the test was carried out using genotypes from Bootless Bay excluding Taurama (B-T), Bootless Bay all sites (B) and Bootless Bay and Schumann Island (B + S). Columns show assignments divided in to five categories: (i) juveniles assigned when test was carried out excluding Taurama B-T (white fill); (ii) juveniles reassigned within the four previous sites when Taurama was included (B) (light grey fill); (iii) new juveniles assigned to/from Taurama (dark grey fill); (iv) new assignments within the four sites data set that were not reassigned when Taurama was included in the test (dashed fill); (v) juveniles from Schumann Island assigned to Bootless Bay (black fill). (B) Juveniles assigned when the test was carried out using genotypes from Schumann Island alone (S), and Schumann Island and Bootless Bay (S + B). (i) Juveniles assigned when test was carried out only with S (white fill); (ii) juveniles reassigned within S when Bootless Bay was included (light grey fill); (iii) new assignments within Schumann that were not assigned in test S (dashed fill); (iv) juveniles from Bootless Bay assigned to Schumann Island (black fill).
We apologise for this error.
- 2009) Estimating connectivity in marine populations: an empirical evaluation of assignment tests and parentage analysis under different gene flow scenarios. Molecular Ecology, 18, 1765–1776. , , , (