SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Table S1 Classification from linear discriminant function analysis. Rows correspond to taxonomic designation based on genetic data and locality, whereas columns correspond to predicted classification from the linear discriminant function analysis

Table S2 Coefficients of linear discriminants and standardized coefficients of linear discriminants for wing pattern

Fig. S1 Plots show the marginal likelihood of the model (A) and DK (B) for different assumed numbers of clusters. Mean values plus and minus one standard error are depicted for the former. Calculations of DK follow Evanno et  al. (2005).

Fig. S2 Boxplots depicting variation in wing pattern PC1 and PC2 scores for Lycaeides by species and sex. Wing pattern differences between species are greater for males than females.

Fig. S3 Distribution of admixture proportions (A), fuzzy cluster membership based on male genitalia (B), and fuzzy cluster membership based on male wing pattern (C) for individuals from the core of the Rocky Mountain hybrid zone. Admixture proportions were estimated using structure with = 2. The distributions of admixture proportion and fuzzy cluster memberships were not different from unimodal. See the main text for more details.

Fig. S4 Scatterplot of geographical location by LD. Points show LD estimates for individual pairs of markers.

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
MEC_4727_sm_figs1-4.pdf66KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.