SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Fig. S1 Bayesian maximum credibility tree of Halictus rubicundus based 1 on 1131 bp of mtDNA 2 sequence data, with posterior probability values shown at the right of those nodes for which the 3 probability exceeded 0.50.

Table S1 Summary statistics for 12 microsatellite loci screened for 397 Halictus rubicundus females at nine locations

Table S2 Proportional membership of each pre-defined population of Halictus rubicundus in each of the inferred clusters (cluster numbers differ across tables)

Table S3 Results from four separate amova analyses of Halictus rubicundus microsatellite data using arlequin (version 3.1; Excoffier et al. 2005) to partition the total molecular variance among different hierarchical groups and specifically to test for molecular genetic differentiation among the two social forms

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
MEC_4753_sm_FigS1.pdf227KSupporting info item
MEC_4753_sm_TableS1.pdf85KSupporting info item
MEC_4753_sm_TableS2.pdf88KSupporting info item
MEC_4753_sm_TableS3.pdf119KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.