Gene genealogies reveal cryptic species and host preferences for the pine fungal pathogen Grosmannia clavigera
Article first published online: 9 MAY 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Volume 20, Issue 12, pages 2581–2602, June 2011
How to Cite
ALAMOUTI, S. M., WANG, V., DiGUISTINI, S., SIX, D. L., BOHLMANN, J., HAMELIN, R. C., FEAU, N. and BREUIL, C. (2011), Gene genealogies reveal cryptic species and host preferences for the pine fungal pathogen Grosmannia clavigera. Molecular Ecology, 20: 2581–2602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05109.x
- Issue published online: 8 JUN 2011
- Article first published online: 9 MAY 2011
- Received 29 November 2010; revision received 23 February 2011; accepted 16 March 2011
Fig. S1 Parsimony haplotype networks for 15 independent gene fragments studied in the 62 isolates of G. clavigera.
Table S1 Fungal isolates used in this study.
Table S2 Primer sequences, scaffold identities and gene descriptions for 67. G. clavigera loci screened for polymorphisms.
Table S3 Polymorphisms summaries and diversity indices with in the two monophyletic clades in G. clavigera.
Table S4 Funal isolates used in this study and GenBank numbers for sequences.
Table S5 Characteristics of Gs isolates compared with those of the G. clavigera holotype.
Appendix S1 Methods.
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_FigS1-1.jpg||2244K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_FigS1-2.jpg||2365K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_MethodS1.doc||23K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_TableS1.xls||54K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_TableS2.xls||66K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_TableS3.doc||82K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_TableS4.xls||65K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5109_sm_SupportingInformation_TableS5.xls||31K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.