These authors contributed equally to this work and are joint first authors.
Comparative phylogeography reveals a shared impact of pleistocene environmental change in shaping genetic diversity within nine Anopheles mosquito species across the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot
Article first published online: 10 OCT 2011
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Volume 20, Issue 21, pages 4533–4549, November 2011
How to Cite
MORGAN, K., O’LOUGHLIN, S. M., CHEN, B., LINTON, Y.-M., THONGWAT, D., SOMBOON, P., FONG, M. Y., BUTLIN, R., VERITY, R., PRAKASH, A., HTUN, P. T., HLAING, T., NAMBANYA, S., SOCHEAT, D., DINH, T. H. and WALTON, C. (2011), Comparative phylogeography reveals a shared impact of pleistocene environmental change in shaping genetic diversity within nine Anopheles mosquito species across the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. Molecular Ecology, 20: 4533–4549. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05268.x
- Issue published online: 18 OCT 2011
- Article first published online: 10 OCT 2011
- Received 6 April 2011; revision received 9 July 2011; accepted 20 July 2011
Fig. S1 Bayesian Skyline Plots, as constructed in BEAST v1.4 , showing changes in effective population size withi n each species over time.
Fig. S2 Correlation coefficients for the FST matrices of each intraspecific dataset to the matrices of the 1000 datasets simulated under various evolutionary scenarios in SPLATCHE. Vertical bars indicate means. The red histogram shows the correlation coefficients between the real data and data simulated under the best fitting evolutionary model; the blue histogram shows the coefficients under the scenario that differs from the best fitting scenario only in the range of glacial carrying capacities (figure 2a or b); the black histogram shows the coefficients under the null model (see table 1 for details).
Fig. S3 The relationship between genetic diversity, as represented by θπ, and latitude, across the seven species included within this study.
Table S1 Details of sample locations and numbers of specimens obtained for each species.
|MEC_5268_sm_figs1-SupplementaryMaterial-2.pdf||104K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5268_sm_figs2-SupplementaryMaterial-3.pdf||1964K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5268_sm_figs3-SupplementaryMaterial-4.pdf||210K||Supporting info item|
|MEC_5268_sm_Tables1-SupplementaryMaterial-1.doc||126K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.