Since 2005, advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have revolutionized biological science. The analysis of environmental DNA through the use of specific gene markers such as species-specific DNA barcodes has been a key application of next-generation sequencing technologies in ecological and environmental research. Access to parallel, massive amounts of sequencing data, as well as subsequent improvements in read length and throughput of different sequencing platforms, is leading to a better representation of sample diversity at a reasonable cost. New technologies are being developed rapidly and have the potential to dramatically accelerate ecological and environmental research. The fast pace of development and improvements in next-generation sequencing technologies can reflect on broader and more robust applications in environmental DNA research. Here, we review the advantages and limitations of current next-generation sequencing technologies in regard to their application for environmental DNA analysis.
If you can't find a tool you're looking for, please click the link at the top of the page to "Go to old article view". Alternatively, view our Knowledge Base articles for additional help. Your feedback is important to us, so please let us know if you have comments or ideas for improvement.
Genomic analysis of complex environmental samples is becoming an important tool for understanding evolutionary history and functional and ecological biodiversity. It bypasses the need for laboratory cultivation and/or isolation of individual specimens. Examples of typical environmental samples include soil, water, sediments, passively collected aquatic, terrestrial, and benthic specimens, gut contents and faeces.
Advances in conventional Sanger DNA-sequencing technology led to large-scale, broad-scope biosystematics projects with a wide range of applications (e.g. the Barcode of Life initiative; Hajibabaei et al. 2007). DNA barcoding employs standardized species-specific genomic regions (DNA barcodes) to generate vast DNA libraries for the primary purpose of identification of unknown specimens. The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region, for example, is capable of discerning between closely related species across Animalia (Hebert et al. 2003; Meusnier et al. 2008). Similarly, 16S ribosomal RNA (16S) is commonly used for bacterial identification (Sogin et al. 2006; Flanagan et al. 2007). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA is employed in studies of fungi (Nilsson et al. 2008). Plant DNA barcoding has relied heavily upon regions of plastid DNA including maturase K (matK) and ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcl) (CBOL Plant Working Group 2009; Burgess et al. 2011). A number of other marker genes have been employed for biodiversity analysis at different phylogenetic depths or in certain taxonomic groups.
The traditional DNA-sequencing method (Sanger et al. 1977) can only sequence specimens individually and, therefore, is inadequate for processing complex environmental samples, especially for large-scale studies. These samples often contain mixtures of DNA from hundreds or thousands of individuals. Although conventional sequencing has provided the most efficient method for the development of large DNA barcode reference libraries, the number of individuals in an environmental sample is beyond the scope of its ability (Hajibabaei et al. 2011). Recovering DNA sequences from the thousands of specimens present in an environmental bulk sample requires the ability to read DNA from multiple templates in parallel; something that next-generation sequencing technologies do effectively, and with ever-lowering costs.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms have made it possible to recover DNA sequence data directly from environmental samples (e.g. Sogin et al. 2006). These data have been used in a variety of applications, including comparing microbiota in healthy versus diseased individuals (e.g. Andersson et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2009); inferring the health of an ecosystem by analysing its biodiversity (Hajibabaei et al. 2011); studying ancient DNA (Haile et al. 2009; Sønstebøet al. 2010; Boessenkool et al. 2011); and diet analysis from DNA fragments in faeces or gut contents (Deagle et al. 2009). By comparing obtained sequences to a growing standard reference library of known organisms, taxa present in an environmental sample can be identified with high confidence. Advanced computational methods have made it possible to infer biodiversity measures across time and space by annotating and clustering DNA sequences using a combination of assignment and phylogenetic techniques (Hajibabaei et al. 2011). A recent explosion in both number and breadth of studies employing NGS platforms demonstrates a paradigm shift in ecological research towards the use of high volumes of sequence data.
Articles published in this special issue are good examples of situations in which NGS analysis provides an effective means of addressing difficult questions in ecology by targeting DNA in environmental samples. The revolution in NGS technologies is also reflected in several competing sequencing systems and their rapid advancement (Fig. 1). It is often difficult for users to determine the appropriate NGS platform for their ecological research. Our review presents the existing NGS platforms along with a comparison of the benefits and limitations of each system with regard to environmental DNA research.
History and advances of next-generation sequencing technologies
The conventional DNA-sequencing approach was introduced by Sanger et al. (1977) and is capable of recovering up to 1 kb of sequence data from a single specimen at a time. The most advanced version of automated Sanger sequencers is capable of sequencing up to 1 kb for 96 individual specimens at a time. In the last few years, a series of high-throughput sequencing devices have been commercially introduced based on different chemistries and detection techniques. These NGS technologies can potentially generate several hundred thousand to tens of millions of sequencing reads in parallel. This massively parallel throughput sequencing capacity can generate sequence reads from fragmented libraries of a specific genome (i.e. genome sequencing); from a pool of cDNA library fragments generated through reverse transcription of RNA molecules (i.e. RNAseq or transcriptome sequencing); or from a pool of PCR-amplified molecules (i.e. amplicon sequencing). In all cases, sequences are generated without the need of a conventional, vector-based cloning procedure that is typically used to amplify and separate DNA templates. As such, some of the cloning bias issues that impact sequencing evenness in sequencing projects may be avoided, although each NGS platform may have its own associated limitations (Mardis 2008a).
Since their introduction in 2005, high-throughput NGS technologies have faced several general challenges. The first has been the improvement in sequencing output, in terms of read length and accuracy. The second challenge has been the total output of the sequencing experiment in relation to the cost and the labour expended. The third challenge is related to the amplification step prior to sequencing. This final challenge includes different sources of PCR bias, formation of chimeric sequences and secondary structure-related issues (Mardis 2008a; Shendure & Ji 2008). New technologies promise to fundamentally change the nature of genomics-based studies, especially when coupled with the computational algorithms necessary to analyse their vast sequencing output (Mardis 2008b). A timeline comparison of different high-throughput platforms in regard to read length and total output illuminates the rapid progress in sequencing capabilities of NGS machines (Fig. 1). In fact, sequencing technology’s rapid progress has now out-paced computational processing as predicted by Moore’s law (http://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/).
Although available NGS technologies utilize quite diverse chemistry and base incorporation/detection tools, they share two main steps: library fragmentation/amplicon library preparation and detection of the incorporated nucleotides (Glenn 2011; Zhang et al. 2011). NGS technologies can be classified into two main categories. The first group are PCR-based technologies, which currently include four commercially available platforms: Roche 454 Genome Sequencer (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Branford, CT, USA), HiSeq 2000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), AB SOLiD™ System (Life Technologies Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Ion Personal Genome Machine (Life Technologies, South San Francisco, CA, USA). The other group, called ‘single-molecule’ sequencing (SMS) technologies, are non-PCR based and do not include an amplification step prior to sequencing. Two single-molecule sequencing systems have been announced recently: HeliScope (Helicos BioSciences Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA) and PacBio RS SMRT system (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Here, we briefly describe available NGS platforms in each category.
Introduced in 2005, the 454 Genome Sequencer was the first NGS technology to become commercially available. It uses real-time sequencing-by-synthesis pyrosequencing technology. In 454 pyrosequencing, each nucleotide incorporated by DNA polymerase results in the release of a pyrophosphate molecule. This release initiates a series of downstream reactions to produce light by the action of the enzyme luciferase. The amount of generated light is directly proportional to the number of nucleotides incorporated (Margulies et al. 2005). The 454 pyrosequencing workflow includes the immobilization of the library fragments on either sepharose or styrofoam beads whose surfaces carry oligonucleotides complementary to the 454-specific adapter sequences ligated or PCR-generated onto both ends of the fragmented library. The library fragments are amplified through emulsion PCR thermal cycling into individual water:oil micro-reactors that contain PCR ingredients. Each library fragment is amplified on the surface of one bead in a single micro-reactor, generating billions of copies of the same fragment covering the surface of the DNA bead. The amplified beads are recovered from emulsion oil followed by an enrichment step to keep only the amplified beads and discard the failed ones. The enriched beads are then prepared as single-stranded and annealed to a specific sequencing primer. These beads are then arrayed into a picotiter plate (PTP) that is designed to have more than one million wells per plate. Each of the wells can hold only one amplified DNA bead. Four layers of engineered beads are deposited into the PTP. From bottom to top, diluted pyrosequencing enzyme beads, DNA amplified beads, pyrosequencing enzyme beads and, finally, PPiase beads. All bead layers are deposited by centrifugation. The PTP is then sequenced en masse in the 454 GS pyrosequencing instrument. The sequencing steps include the flow of repetitive cycles of nucleotide solutions (T, C, A and G). The PTP is seated opposite a CCD camera that records the emitted light from each bead with the flow of different nucleotide solutions. The current GS FLX+ system provides 200 nucleotide flow cycles to generate up to 800-bp sequencing reads. The generated raw signals are processed by 454 pyrosequencing analysis software and then screened by various quality filters to remove poor-quality sequences (Mardis 2008a). Roche 454 genome sequencers are available in two versions: a GS FLX+ system (1 M sequence read capacity) and the recently introduced the GS junior system (100 k sequence read capacity) (Fig. 1; Table 1).
Table 1. Comparison of currently available next-generation sequencing technologies
Read length (bp)
Max. number of reads/run
PCR-based NGS technologies
Roche 454 GS FLX
1 × 106
Roche 454 GS FLX+
1 × 106
Roche 454 GS Junior
1 × 105
Illumina HiSeq 2000
6 × 109
Illumina HiSeq 1000
3 × 109
6.4 × 108
7 × 106
AB SOLiD 5500 system
2.4 × 109
AB SOLiD 5500 xl system
6 × 109
Ion Torrent -314 chip
1 × 106
Ion Torrent -316 chip
6 × 106
Ion Torrent -318 chip
11 × 106
1 × 109
Pacific Biosciences system
50 × 103
Illumina (formerly known as Solexa) introduced the genome analyzer in 2007. Due to its high capacity, it soon became a workhorse for whole-genome resequencing applications, including human and model organism genomic projects. The Illumina platform utilizes a sequencing-by-synthesis approach coupled with bridge amplification on the surface of a flow cell. Each flow cell is divided into eight separate lanes. The interior surfaces of the flow cells have covalently attached oligos complementary to specific adapters that are ligated onto the library fragments. DNA fragment-to-oligo hybridization on the flow cell occurs by active heating and cooling steps. This is followed by a subsequent incubation with the amplification reactants and an isothermal polymerase that generates millions of clusters of the library fragments. In the sequencing step, each cluster is supplied with polymerase and four differentially labelled fluorescent nucleotides that have their 3′-OH chemically inactivated. This blocking modification ensures that only a single base will be incorporated per flow cycle. After each nucleotide is incorporated, an excitation followed by an imaging step takes place to identify the incorporated nucleotide in each cluster. A chemical deblocking treatment removes the fluorescent group and allows the incorporation of the following nucleotide during the next flow cycle. The sequence of each cluster is computed and subjected to quality filtering to eliminate low-quality reads (Shendure & Ji 2008). Today, four versions of Illumina sequencers are commercially available. The HiSeq 2000, HiSeq 1000 and Genome Analyzer IIx have sequencing outputs of up to 600, 300 and 95 Gb, respectively. The recently introduced MiSeq platform can generate up to 150-bp sequencing reads with a total throughput of 1.5–2 Gb per run (Fig. 1; Table 1). In 2012, Illumina introduced HiSeq2500 platform as an upgrade of HiSeq2000. This new platform can generate up to 120 Gb of data in 27 h, enabling researchers to sequence an entire genome in 24 h (i.e. ‘Genome in a Day’). Illumina has announced that this platform will be commercially available in the second half of 2012.
In 2007, Applied Biosystems (Life Technologies) introduced SOLiD technology as their NGS platform. Unlike the previous two platforms, SOLiD uses a sequencing-by-oligo ligation technology. This process couples oligo adaptor-linked DNA fragments with complementary oligos immobilized on the surface of 1-mm magnetic beads. The beads are individually amplified through emulsion PCR. After amplification, the beads are covalently attached to the surface of a specially treated glass slide that is placed into a fluidics cassette within the sequencer. The ligation-based sequencing process starts with the annealing of a universal sequencing primer that is complementary to the SOLiD-specific adapters ligated to the library fragments. Four semi-degenerate 8-mer fluorescent oligos are added along with DNA ligase in an automated manner within the instrument. When a matching 8-mer oligo hybridizes to the DNA fragment sequence adjacent to the universal primer at the 3′-end, DNA-ligase seals the phosphate backbone. After the ligation step, a fluorescent readout identifies the ligated 8-mer oligo, which corresponds to one of the four possible bases. A subsequent chemical cleavage of the linkage between the fifth and sixth bases of the 8mer oligo takes place, removing the fluorescent group and enabling a further ligation round. The second sequencing round is initiated with hybridization of an n-1 positioned universal primer, and subsequent rounds of ligation-mediated sequencing. The same process is repeated with n-2, n-3 and n-4 positioned universal primers. The generated fluorescence from the five universal primers is decoded with a two-base calling processing software. In the SOLiD system, two slides can be processed in a single run; one slide receives sequencing reagents while the second slide is being imaged (Mardis 2008b). Today, Applied Biosystems SOLiD sequencers are available in two versions, the 5500 system and the 5500xl system, with up to 100- and 250-Gb sequencing capacity, respectively (Fig. 1; Table 1).
Life Technologies Ion Torrent
In 2010, Life Technologies introduced the Ion Personal Genome Machine (PGM) as a postlight sequencing technology. This system relies on the real-time detection of hydrogen ion concentration, released as a by-product when a nucleotide is incorporated into a strand of DNA by the polymerase action. Ion Torrent uses a high-density array of micro-machined wells to perform this biochemical process in a massively parallel way. Each well holds a single DNA template from the library. Beneath the wells are an ion-sensitive layer and a proprietary ion sensor to detect the change in hydrogen ion concentration because of nucleotides incorporation (Miller et al. 2011; Rothberg et al. 2011). The Ion Torrent platform can utilize one of the three available ion chips: 314; 316; or 318, which can generate up to 10 Mb, 100 Mb or 1 Gb, respectively, according to the required sequencing coverage (Fig. 1; Table 1). In 2012, Life Technologies introduced a new generation of Ion semiconductor sequencers; the Ion Proton bench top sequencer. Ion Proton chips will deliver the human genome or human exome in just a few hours. Ion Proton chips will be available in two versions: Ion Proton I chip with 165 million wells (about 100-fold more than the Ion 314 chip); and Ion Proton II chip with 660 million wells (about 1000-fold more than the Ion 314 chip). Both of these chips use CMOS semiconductor chip technology to capture chemistry changes instead of light and translate these changes into digital data. Life Technologies has announced that this platform will be commercially available soon.
Single-molecule DNA-sequencing technologies
Helicos biosciences HeliScope
HeliScope, introduced in 2008, was the first commercially available, single-molecule sequencing (SMS) system. It utilizes sequencing-by-synthesis on a single DNA molecule (Harris et al. 2007; Pushkarev et al. 2009). The library construction step depends on the preparation of single-stranded DNA fragments. No amplification step is required. During the sequencing cycles, repetitive cycles of the DNA polymerase and one of the four fluorescently labelled nucleotides are flowed in, resulting in template-dependent extension of DNA strands according to the flowed nucleotide. The fluorescent nucleotides are modified to stop the polymerase extension until the incorporated nucleotide’s fluorescence is captured and the images are recorded with a highly sensitive CCD camera connected to a fluorescent microscope. A washing step then takes place to wash off the unincorporated nucleotides as well as the by-products of the previous cycle. After washing, fluorescent labels on the extended strands are chemically cleaved and removed. Another cycle of single-base extension, label-cleaving and imaging follows (Ewing et al. 1998; Harris et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2011). HeliScope is capable of producing approximately 1 billion sequence reads (Fig. 1; Table 1).
Pacific Biosciences SMRT DNA sequencer
The single-molecule real-time (SMRT) DNA-sequencing platform, introduced in 2010 by Pacific Biosciences, is another example of a real-time, fluorescence-based, SMS platform (Korlach et al. 2010). It requires no amplification step for sample preparation as it involves a single-molecule sequencing-by-synthesis approach. This platform utilizes a nano-structure called a Zero Mode Waveguide (ZMW) for real-time observation of DNA polymerization (Levene et al. 2003; Korlach et al. 2008). It consists of tens of thousands of subwavelength, ten nanometre diameter holes, fabricated by perforating a thin metal film supported by a transparent substrate. During the sequencing workflow, the complimentary DNA strand is synthesized from the single-stranded template by the action of DNA polymerase planted at the bottom of each waveguide. Four different-coloured phosphor-linked nucleotides are utilized in this platform. Unlike other technologies, the fluorescence label is attached on the terminal phosphate group rather than the nucleotide base, leading to the release of the fluorescence moiety with the nucleotide incorporation (Pushpendra 2008; Flusberg et al. 2010). This approach does not need a washing step between each nucleotide flow, thus accelerating the speed of nucleotide incorporation as well as improving sequence quality. This technology uses the natural capacity of DNA polymerase to incorporate ten or more nucleotides per second in several thousand parallel ZMWs (Eid et al. 2009; Zhou et al. 2010).
The pros and cons of NGS platforms
The major advantages of the 454 pyrosequencing platform are its long read length and its relatively short run time. Also, unlike other PCR-based NGS technologies, 454 pyrosequencing does not need to carry out an extra chemical deblocking step to allow DNA extension by the action of the DNA polymerase. This reduces the chances of premature chain termination and nonsimultaneous extension, both of which are causes of dephasing (Metzker 2010; Zhou et al. 2010). Longer sequences generated through 454 provide higher flexibility in terms of accurate annotation of reads in ecological applications involving nonmodel organisms. This has made 454 the most commonly used NGS platform for the analysis of environmental DNA for ecological applications. Reading of homopolymer regions, however, is challenging for 454 pyrosequencing because of a lack of terminating moiety to stop the extension run. The most common error type on this platform is insertion–deletion rather than substitution. This issue has caused concerns for scientists employing this platform in the analysis of environmental DNA because sequence errors may be interpreted as unique haplotypes representing rare biota (Sogin et al. 2006). However, this problem has been largely alleviated using computational tools to distinguish and filter out erroneous sequences (Quince et al. 2009). Another drawback for 454 is its relatively high cost for reagents per megabase sequencing output (Claesson et al. 2010).
The major advantage of both Illumina and SOLiD systems is that nucleotide detection is performed one at a time. Therefore, homopolymer regions can be accurately sequenced. The chemical deblocking step is performed prior to the next nucleotide incorporation in the Illumina system and prior to further ligation in the SOLiD system. Another advantage of both Illumina and SOLiD systems is the high output per run compared to 454 pyrosequencing. The main drawback of these systems is the relative short-read length because of optical signal decay and dephasing. This limits the application of these technologies in situations where no reference sequence is available to align, assign and annotate the short sequences generated. Meanwhile, the error rate is accumulative with longer sequencing reads in both systems (Zhou et al. 2010).
All PCR-based NGS systems share the common disadvantage of bias introduced during amplification. The amplification bias can affect NGS results in two stages. The first incidence is bias introduced during amplicon library preparation. Even before the invention of NGS technologies, research was being directed towards exploring the potential causes and extent of bias in PCR amplification (Polz & Cavanaugh 1998). Annealing temperature is an important parameter for primer binding; to reduce PCR bias of any primer set, the effect of the annealing temperature should be investigated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoretic analysis. Previous studies have indicated that bias can be reduced at lower temperatures when specific amplification is achieved (Ishii & Fukui 2001). PCR bias, however, is also strongly dependent on the number of replication cycles. In this case, bias can be reduced by keeping the number of cycles low (Suzuki & Giovannoni 1996; Qiu et al. 2001). Another means to reduce amplification bias is by setting the fastest ramping rate from the denaturation step to the annealing step using PCR cyclers with a fast ramping rate. This may, however, increase heteroduplex formation when PCR reaches the plateau phase (Kurata et al. 2004). In general, many studies have demonstrated that PCR bias can be considerably reduced using high template concentrations, wise primer selection, low cycle number, low annealing temperature and mixed replicate reaction preparations (Polz & Cavanaugh 1998; Lim et al. 2010). The second stage at which the amplification bias can be introduced is during library amplification prior to sequencing through either emulsion PCR or bridge PCR. Although this late amplification step is carried out with universal probes and can be considered bias-free amplification, it can exaggerate biased amplification in the original amplicon library preparation (Schuster 2008). Single-molecule, non-PCR sequencing technologies overcome this challenge by eliminating the need for template amplification.
With several NGS platforms available and different workflows required in various applications, it is often difficult to select the optimal platform for a specific workflow and application. Table 2 provides an overview of categories of workflows possible for each commercially available NGS platform.
Table 2. Possible applications of NGS platforms related to required sequencing coverage
As mentioned in the previous section, some limitations of NGS platforms can negatively influence their optimal applicability and uptake in various applications. For example, PCR and other workflow-associated biases can lead to highly skewed sequencing results. Additionally, most NGS workflows are time-consuming, tedious and require highly skilled personnel. Several approaches and technologies are being developed to reduce biases as well as enhance and simplify NGS protocols.
One important group of enhancements involves target selection for NGS. These enhancements, also known as Sequence Capture, promise to both eliminate initial PCR amplification and allow selective analysis of large numbers of target sequences (e.g. exome sequencing). Sequence capture involves two hybridization-based methods using oligonucleotide probes, either immobilized to a solid array ‘Capture arrays’ or in solution ‘Baits’, to capture the sequencing targets (Tewhey et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2011). The hybridization probes (60–120 bp) are specifically designed to capture target regions across the genome. Nonspecific hybrids are removed by washing and targeted DNA is then eluted for sequencing. Previous studies have shown that the uniformity and specificity of sequences obtained from a solution capture experiment tend to be slightly higher than that of array capture. In addition, solid array hybridization requires expensive hardware, such as a hybridization station. Although target enrichment sequence capture eliminates the need for an initial PCR step, it is necessary to start library preparation with a relatively large amount of DNA (Mamanova et al. 2010). Recently, DNA capture via hybridization has allowed the efficient exploitation of NGS for population genetic analyses of ancient DNA samples (Horn 2012). Examples of available Sequence Capture systems include Roche’s NimbleGen, Agilent’s SureSelect, RainDance Technologies’ RainStorm and Illumina’s TruSeq Exome Enrichment system. These tools are currently in use in studies of human and other model organisms, but they show significant potential for applications in environmental DNA research (Adey et al. 2010; Barzon et al. 2011; Jones et al. 2011; Faircloth et al. 2012). Other enhancements mainly involve modified sample preparation protocols (e.g. library construction). This category of NGS enhancement includes the system developed by Nextera for rapid and automated library construction for Illumina platforms (Caruccio 2011).
Advances in NGS technologies have provided the ability to read millions of DNA sequences in parallel, making them ideally suited for large-scale biodiversity analyses of environmental samples. Constructing mixtures of tagged or bar-coded DNA templates for sequencing has incredible potential for many applications (Binladen et al. 2007). This approach can dramatically accelerate ecological studies by allowing multiplexing of different target gene markers of a single bulk sample or multiplexing of a single marker from multiple samples (Valentini et al. 2009; Harris et al. 2010; Xu et al. 2012). Tags should be designed considering the used sequencing chemistry to reduce the likelihood of ambiguities because of potential sequencing errors. For example, the tags should not start with the same nucleotide as the sequencing chemistry adaptor ends; or end with the same nucleotide as the amplification primer starts. Also, not more than two identical successive nucleotides are allowed within the unique tag (Binladen et al. 2007). Tag-encoded amplicon sequencing has been utilized in many studies, for example, analysis of the human gut microbiome (Wu et al. 2010) and analysis of the cattle tick bacteriome (Andreotti et al. 2011). Although this multiplexing approach opens new avenues for many applications with a reasonable price (Sun et al. 2011), it is also important to consider potential biases caused by the addition of multiplexing identifier tags to primer oligos (Berry et al. 2011).
Application of NGS for analysing environmental DNA
Mass sequencing of environmental samples has been at the forefront of ecology and biodiversity research in recent years. NGS technologies have facilitated analysis of environmentally derived samples from a variety of ecosystems including freshwater, marine, soil, terrestrial and gut microbiota. The majority of these studies seek to answer the question of what is present in a given environment. Through the use of the massive amounts of sequence data produced by NGS platforms, researchers have been able to observe the slight changes in community structure that may occur following anthropogenic or natural environmental fluctuations (Leininger et al. 2006; Fierer et al. 2007). These small alterations, although highly informative of ecosystem health and stability, are not discernible with less-sensitive, traditional, molecular tools such as Sanger sequencing (Sogin et al. 2006; Huse et al. 2010; Xu et al. 2012). Regardless of the ecosystem studied or the specific ecological question asked, the vast majority of studies making use of NGS platforms and environmental samples have employed the 454 pyrosequencing platform mainly because of its longer sequence read lengths. A variety of sample sources and sequence-generation workflows are outlined below.
Marine environments have also been the subject of ecological research employing NGS technology. Analyses of marine bacterial communities have been conducted using 18S rDNA (Huber et al. 2007) and 16S rDNA (Sogin et al. 2006) amplicons. Frias-Lopez et al. (2008) studied microbial community gene expression in ocean surface waters through transcriptomic sequencing analysis of cDNA libraries. Mou et al. (2008) investigated functional assemblages within seawater through a NGS analysis of functional metabolic gene regions within bacterioplankton. Marine eukaryotic microbiota were investigated through NGS analysis of 18S rDNA amplicons (Stoeck et al. 2010). A shotgun sequencing approach was employed to investigate microbial and viral diversity in sea water (Williamson et al. 2008). Marine viromes were also investigated by Angly et al. (2006). Rare and extreme habitats such as acid mines (Edwards et al. 2006) and coral reefs (Wegley et al. 2007) are now also readily subjected to NGS-based analysis of biodiversity.
Four recent articles have outlined the application of NGS approaches to analysis of freshwater environmental samples. Ficetola et al. (2008) combined an NGS approach with conventional Sanger sequencing of cytochrome b amplicons to detect the presence of bullfrogs in freshwater samples. Also, freshwater microbialities were investigated with a whole-genome shotgun approach to provide further insight into fossil stromatolite communities (Breitbart et al. 2009). Amplicons of 18S rDNA were used to investigate protist diversity in freshwater samples (Medinger et al. 2010). Recently, short fragments of COI DNA barcodes were used to provide species-level identification of freshwater macro-invertebrates from benthic samples (Hajibabaei et al. 2011). This environmental barcoding study demonstrates the efficiency of 454 pyrosequencing in environmental biomonitoring projects by comparing benthic macro-invertebrate communities from both urban and conservation areas. The analysis of these benthic samples can provide a real-world test of NGS approaches for biomonitoring applications (see Baird & Hajibabaei 2012 in this issue).
Next-generation technology has also been employed in recent research into terrestrial environmental samples, both ancient and modern. Haile et al. (2009) utilized both 454 pyrosequencing and conventional Sanger sequencing methods in the analysis of ancient DNA recovered from Arctic permafrost cores. Sønstebøet al. (2010) analysed permafrost samples to identify ancient plant species. Both pathogens associated with colony collapse disorder in honey bees (Cox-Foster et al. 2007) and plant viruses from infected tomato plants have been identified with NGS technology (Adams et al. 2009). A variety of terrestrial microhabitats, specifically soil, leaf litter and canopy epiphytes in a Costa Rican rainforest, have been examined using NGS approaches (Creer et al. 2010; Porazinska et al. 2010). Amplicons of 16S rDNA have been utilized to explore the sensitivity of topsoil in determining vertebrate presence and diversity in regions with known species compositions (Andersen et al. 2011).
Besides 454 pyrosequencing, the sequencing capacity of Illumina platforms has been successfully utilized for assessing microbial community diversity using short fragments of 16S rDNA (Lazarevic et al. 2009). Paired-end sequencing can increase the read length for Illumina sequencing applications. However, potential sources of error, including sequencing artefacts and taxonomic misidentification, should be taken into consideration when using short-read NGS tools to discover the biodiversity of environmental samples (Degnan & Ochman 2011). A recent study (Miller et al. 2011) has shown the promise of the Ion Torrent semiconductor platform for the assessment of intraspecies genetic diversity in an endangered mammal species.
The introduction of and advancements in next-generation sequencing have revitalized research in environmental DNA. New methods of gathering sequence data, however, require optimization and benchmarking before being utilized on samples of unknown nature to avoid false negatives and biased results. The excitement of using new platforms has generated momentum among researchers to apply NGS tools in various applications involving environmental DNA. Rapid progress in the last 5 years has provided optimism for a bright future for the field of next-generation environmental DNA analysis.
This work was supported by the Government of Canada through funds from Genome Canada and the Ontario Genomics Institute (OGI-050) and by NSERC Canada.
S.S. is a molecular microbiologist broadly interested in genomics technology development including laboratory protocols and data analysis tools especially for metagenomics and environmental applications. J.L.S. is a graduate student interested in evaluating the potential of NGS in providing biodiversity measurements at the community level for bioindicator species commonly used in biomonitoring programs and ecological assessments. J.F.G. is a molecular systematist with research interests including biodiversity of terrestrial arthropods, especially Diptera. He is currently developing NGS-based applications for monitoring arthropod diversity. M.H. is a molecular evolutionary biologist interested in studying biodiversity in different ecological settings through comparative analysis of genomics information. He currently leads the Biomonitoring 2.0 project (http://www.biomonitoring2.org), a large-scale effort that utilizes NGS technologies for monitoring environmental change.