OPINION
1365-294X/asset/MEC_centre.gif?v=1&s=a3addb330bee9658564df3325c89548d75a4238d)
NEWS AND VIEWS†
You have free access to this content
Artefacts, biology and bias in museum collection research
Article first published online: 10 MAY 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05589.x
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
WEHI, P. M., WHAANGA, H. and TREWICK, S. A. (2012), Artefacts, biology and bias in museum collection research. Molecular Ecology, 21: 3103–3109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05589.x
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 JUN 2012
- Article first published online: 10 MAY 2012
- Received 15 December 2011; revision received 16 February 2012; accepted 7 March 2012
Keywords:
- experimenta design;
- haplotype frequency;
- kahukiwi;
- kiwi;
- Maori;
- sampling error;
- stable isotope;
- weaving
Museum collections are increasingly subjected to scientific scrutiny, including molecular, isotopic and trace-element analyses. Recent advances have extended analyses from natural history specimens to historical artefacts. We highlight three areas of concern that can influence interpretation of data derived from museum collections: sampling issues associated with museum collection use, methods of analysis, and the value of cross-referencing data with historical documents and data sets. We use a case study that focuses on kiwi (Apteryx spp.) feather samples from valuable 19th century Māori cloaks in New Zealand to show how sampling and analysis challenges need to be minimized by careful design. We argue that aligning historical records with scientific data generated from museum collections significantly improves data interpretation.