SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Fig. S1 Map of study area showing its situation with respect to surrounding non-forested areas and the distribution of D. pumilio color morphs (red = red circle, yellow = yellow circle) during a survey conducted on May 18, 2009.

Fig. S2 True confidence in pedigree assignments (solid lines) and the number of full siblings of candidate offspring in the dataset (dashed lines) as a function of the number of matings between parents.

Fig. S3 Parent-offspring trios supported by one or more pedigree analyses.

Fig. S4 Dorsal coloration of yellow (n = 9) and red (n = 10) males from the Richards-Zawacki and Cummings (2011) study plotted in D. pumilio color space under two lighting conditions.

Table S1 Frequencies of assortative/disassortative mating for mated pairs supported by (a) full CERVUS analysis at 95% confidence, (b) CERVUS relationships with juveniles in the offspring position, (C) CERVUS relationships also supported by COLONY and/or MASTERBAYES.

Table S2 Comparison of offspring phenotypes to expectations if dorsal coloration is controlled by a single locus (with red being dominant over yellow) for offspring from: (a) full CERVUS analysis at 95% confidence, (b) CERVUS relationships with juveniles in the offspring position, (c) CERVUS relationships also supported by COLONY and/or MASTERBAYES.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
MEC_5644_sm_figS1-S4-TableS1-S2.pdf610KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.