The QseC sensor kinase regulates virulence in multiple Gram-negative pathogens, by controlling the activity of the QseB response regulator. We have previously shown that qseC deletion interferes with dephosphorylation of QseB thus unleashing what appears to be an uncontrolled positive feedback loop stimulating increased QseB levels. Deletion of QseC downregulates virulence gene expression and attenuates enterohaemorrhagic and uropathogenic Escherichia coli (EHEC and UPEC), Salmonella typhimurium, and Francisella tularensis. Given that these pathogens employ different infection strategies and virulence factors, we used genome-wide approaches to better understand the role of the QseBC interplay in pathogenesis. We found that deletion of qseC results in misregulation of nucleotide, amino acid, and carbon metabolism. Comparable metabolic changes are seen in EHEC ΔqseC, suggesting that deletion of qseC confers similar pleiotropic effects in these two different pathogens. Disruption of representative metabolic enzymes phenocopied UPEC ΔqseC in vivo and resulted in virulence factor downregulation. We thus propose that in the absence of QseC, the constitutively active QseB leads to pleiotropic effects, impairing bacterial metabolism, and thereby attenuating virulence. These findings provide a basis for the development of antimicrobials targeting the phosphatase activity of QseC, as a means to attenuate a wide range of QseC-bearing pathogens.
Bacterial survival and establishment of infection require a pathogen to sense and respond quickly and appropriately to environmental cues. Two-component regulatory systems are the major paradigm for this environmental adaptation in bacteria (Stock et al., 2000). Two-component systems recognize signalling molecules via a membrane sensor kinase and modulate gene expression accordingly through a cognate response regulator (Stock et al., 2000). QseBC is a two-component regulatory system that is ubiquitous among pathogens (Rasko et al., 2008). The QseC sensor kinase becomes activated in response to host and bacterial signals, and phosphorylates the QseB response regulator, a transcription factor that regulates virulence gene expression (Sperandio et al., 2002; Clarke et al., 2006). Studies in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) have shown that QseC is an α-adrenergic receptor, and becomes phosphorylated in the presence of epinephrine/norepinephrine (Clarke et al., 2006), however, adrenergic hormone-mediated virulence in Salmonella may involve additional or alternative pathways (Pullinger et al., 2010; Spencer et al., 2010; Karavolos et al., 2011). Even though this may suggest that QseC is tailored to respond to signals specific to the niche of each pathogen, all current studies converge to the fact that deletion of qseC attenuates important human pathogens, including EHEC, Salmonella typhimurium, Francisella tularensis and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) (Bearson and Bearson, 2008; Rasko et al., 2008; Kostakioti et al., 2009).
Although not typically considered as virulence determinants, metabolic factors play a vital role during infection, as modulation of metabolism ensures survival and replication (Dalebroux et al., 2010). Studies in UPEC revealed that amino acids feeding into the TCA cycle are critical in vivo (Alteri et al., 2009) while studies in F. tularensis, identified the CarAB enzyme, involved in pyrimidine metabolism, to be critical for phagosome escape (Meibom and Charbit, 2010). Many other investigations have connected metabolism with bacterial virulence (Dalebroux et al., 2010; Wolfe, 2010) arguing that regulation of metabolic state is a general requirement during infection and suggesting that metabolic and virulence genes are co-regulated, regardless of infection site or pathogenic strategy.
We have previously shown deletion of qseC impairs IBC formation and attenuates UPEC (Kostakioti et al., 2009), while a single qseB or double qseBC deletion do not affect UPEC virulence (Kostakioti et al., 2009). We found that QseC dephosphorylates and deactivates QseB (Kostakioti et al., 2009), thus in the absence of QseC, QseB is constitutively phosphorylated (presumably by another kinase or phosphodonor molecule) and represses virulence-associated genes important for UTI, including type 1 pili, curli and flagella. This phenomenon (where deletion of only qseC attenuates infection) is also seen in EHEC and S. typhimurium (Clarke et al., 2006; Kostakioti et al., 2009; Bearson et al., 2010).
Given that absence of QseC affects virulence of pathogens that engage in diverse host–pathogen interactions and cause different diseases, we asked whether attenuation stems from a misregulation of common pathways rather than specific virulence genes. We thus, performed genome-wide analyses of transcription, protein expression and metabolite utilization patterns. We verified and extended observations that deletion of qseC dysregulates virulence factors. Interestingly, we discovered that the majority of dysregulated targets in UTI89ΔqseC are devoted to metabolism; deletion of qseC leads to increased pyrimidine production and utilization, decreased synthesis and catabolism of amino acids important for coupling carbon and nitrogen metabolism (arginine, aspartate, glutamate/glutamine), and upregulation of the energetically less efficient glyoxylate shunt. We confirmed that many of these metabolic changes also occur in a qseC deletion mutant in EHEC, a pathogen which has > 25% sequence divergence from UPEC (Brzuszkiewicz et al., 2006; Darling et al., 2010) and is an exclusively extracellular pathogen in the GI tract (Horne et al., 2002). The similarity in metabolic changes between UPEC and EHEC further suggests that these ΔqseC-mediated changes play an important role in pathogenesis. Indeed, deletion in UPEC of carbon metabolism genes that are dysregulated in the absence of QseC, phenocopied ΔqseC in vivo and affected virulence factor production. Therefore, we propose that attenuation of E. coli, and possibly other pathogens, deleted for qseC stems from pleiotropic effects imparted by the uncontrolled activity of constitutively phosphorylated QseB, which compromises bacterial physiology resulting in downregulation of virulence gene expression and pathogen attenuation. Thus, blocking QseC phosphatase activity could impair metabolic processes in E. coli (and possibly other) QseC-bearing pathogens, thereby impeding their ability to express virulence factors, which opens avenues for the development of novel anti-virulence agents.
Results and discussion
UTI89ΔqseC is defective in cellular processes central for virulence and bacterial physiology
To investigate the hypothesis that deletion of qseC impacts circuits that extend beyond species-specific virulence factors, we used microarrays to compare the transcriptional profiles of the cystitis isolate UTI89, UTI89ΔqseC, UTI89ΔqseBC and UTI89ΔqseC/pQseC [which carries qseC under its native promoter (Kostakioti et al., 2009)], after static growth for 18 hours (h), conditions previously used to study UTI89ΔqseC (Kostakioti et al., 2009). We found that 443 genes were significantly altered in UTI89ΔqseC compared with wild-type (wt) UTI89 (Fig. 1A and GEO accession number GSE28727) and 99.3% of these were restored in UTI89ΔqseC/pQseC (GSE28727). The qseB gene was the third most highly affected target, with > 500-fold elevated transcription in UTI89ΔqseC (GSE28727). This observation corroborates previous qRT-PCR analyses showing that qseB is highly expressed in UTI89ΔqseC, an effect that is most likely a direct outcome of the increased QseB activity in the absence of QseC (Kostakioti et al., 2009). Thus, since deletion of qseC interferes with dephosphorylation of QseB (Kostakioti et al., 2009), the ΔqseC mutation appears to unleash an uncontrolled positive feedback loop stimulating increased levels of QseB, resulting in a massive pleiotropic alteration of gene expression. In addition, the expression patterns of UTI89ΔqseBC did not significantly deviate from those of wt UTI89 (GSE28727), indicating that the UTI89ΔqseC transcriptional differences are primarily connected to the presence of QseB in the absence of QseC.
Among the 443 targets affected upon qseC deletion, genes encoding proteins with known functions (276 total) were classified into 11 broad categories (Fig. 1A) using KEGG and EcoCyc (Kanehisa and Goto, 2000; Keseler et al., 2009). Interestingly, the most upregulated gene in our array was ygiV, encoding a hypothetical transcriptional activator in an operon with ygiW, which was previously identified as the most abundant protein in UTI89ΔqseC whole cell lysates by N-terminal sequencing (unpublished data). QseBC and ygiVW are in close proximity and divergently transcribed. Thus, one possible mechanism for the increased ygiV expression could be that QseB binding to the qseBC promoter region might result in formation of open promoter complexes for both gene loci. Alternatively, ygiV could be upregulated due to a specific role it plays in the absence of QseC. We are currently investigating these hypotheses and the role of ygiV in virulence. Of note, although purified KdpE and QseF response regulators have been previously shown to be phosphorylated by QseC in vitro (Hughes et al., 2009), our analyses showed only a 1.8-fold increase in qseF expression and no altered expression of kdpE, suggesting a more minor role for these proteins in the observed ΔqseC-mediated defects.
Our microarray analyses confirmed that type 1 and S pili expression was altered in UTI89ΔqseC, in agreement with previous studies (Kostakioti et al., 2009), and identified other putative virulence-associated genes dysregulated in the absence of QseC (fimbriae, Fig. 1A). However, only 4% of the affected genes were dedicated to virulence factor production. The vast majority of known genes with altered expression in UTI89ΔqseC belonged to conserved processes, including metabolism, membrane transport, genetic information processing (DNA/RNA synthesis), translation and stress responses (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, deletion of qseC altered the expression of 36 regulators, 52% of which modulate metabolism (Table S1). In addition to being numerically dominant, metabolic genes had higher fold-changes in expression compared with virulence factors (Fig. 1B). For example, the most highly upregulated virulence-related gene was sfaG with a 9.6-fold change, but 18 known or putative metabolic factors had > 10-fold elevated transcription in UTI89ΔqseC (GSE28727).
We also performed whole-cell proteome analysis (2D-DIGE) to capture changes between UTI89ΔqseC and wt UTI89 at the protein level (post-transcriptional and post-translational effects). UTI89ΔqseC had 536 protein spots with significantly different concentration/migration patterns. Fifty of these spots, selected to represent upregulated and downregulated proteins (cut-off P < 0.0085), were identified by mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Our findings validated the expression patterns of seven microarray targets (14% of identified proteins) and overall revealed effects in the same pathways as those identified by the transcriptional profiling (Fig. 1C). Considering the time-lapse between transcription and translation, the proteome is not expected to exactly reflect the mRNA pool present at that time. However, the same pathways were elucidated by both techniques, which support the argument that these pathways are compromised in UTI89ΔqseC. Consistent with the microarray data, most of the 53 identified proteins were dedicated to conserved bacterial processes, with 45.3% implicated in metabolism (Fig. 1C, Table S2). Therefore, in terms of the number of genes affected, the strength of transcriptional regulation and actual changes in steady-state protein expression, conserved metabolic genes are the predominant factors affected by the qseC deletion.
We further asked whether the changes in metabolic gene transcription and protein expression resulted in measurable differences in metabolism, using Biolog metabolic phenotype microarrays. We found that UTI89ΔqseC did not grow well in the presence of metabolites consumed in pathways which are downregulated upon qseC deletion (Table 1A, discussed further in later sections). Conversely, UTI89ΔqseC grew better than wt UTI89 on metabolites utilized in pathways which are upregulated in the absence of QseC (Table 1B). The most striking effects on UTI89ΔqseC growth were observed in the presence of nucleotide, amino acid and TCA cycle intermediates, corresponding to the metabolic pathways most affected upon qseC deletion (Fig. 1D, Table 1). Moreover, administration of substrates imported by metabolite transporters that were downregulated in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. S1) did not support efficient growth of UTI89ΔqseC (Table 1). Thus, global analyses of transcription, protein expression and metabolic potential showed that deletion of qseC primarily alters multiple metabolic pathways besides specific virulence factors.
Table 1A. Phenotypes lost by the qseC mutant as shown by metabolome analysis.
Table 1B. Phenotypes gained by the qseC mutant as shown by metabolome analysis.
B. Phenotypes gained by UTI89ΔqseC
Uridine 5′- monophosphate
P-source/AA, TCA, pyruvate
Methylene diphosphonic acid
Nutritional supplement/AA, TCA
C-source/glycolysis, glucose, ascorbate, aldarate
Pathogen-specific virulence networks are dysregulated in UTI89 in the absence of QseC
CUP pili have been extensively implicated in uropathogenesis (Uhlin et al., 1985; Mulvey et al., 1998; Waksman and Hultgren, 2009; Kline et al., 2010). UTI89 harbours 10 gene clusters encoding known or putative CUP pili; fim, pap, sfa, yeh, yqi, fml, F17-like, auf, yad and yfc (Chen et al., 2006). We have previously shown that deletion of qseC in UTI89 leads to reduced fim and increased sfa transcription (Kostakioti et al., 2009). Microarray analysis verified these observations (Fig. 2A), and revealed that sfaB and iscR were both upregulated in UTI89ΔqseC (Table S1). SfaB is a transcriptional activator of the sfa operon (Morschhauser et al., 1993), and IscR is a repressor of type 1 pili (Wu and Outten, 2009). Thus, increased expression of sfaB and iscR correlate with sfa upregulation and fim downregulation, respectively, suggesting a mechanism for how QseBC coordinates the expression of multiple CUP pili. Besides fim and sfa, five additional CUP pili systems were significantly affected in UTI89ΔqseC compared with wt UTI89; yeh, yqi, auf were downregulated and the fml and F17-like systems were upregulated (Fig. 2A). This is the first study to show that, yqi, auf and F17-like gene clusters are expressed in UTI89 and that yeh and fml are expressed in E. coli. Given that our previous studies confirm the fim and sfa transcriptional effects (Kostakioti et al., 2009), we selected two more CUP systems (yeh and F17-like) and validated their expression changes by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2B).
In addition to CUP systems, we have previously shown that qseC deletion abolishes expression of curli fibres, by affecting the transcription of the csgD curli positive regulator (Kostakioti et al., 2009). Our microarray data revealed a 2.7-fold increase in the expression of rstA (Table S1), encoding a transcriptional repressor of csgD (Barnhart and Chapman, 2006), which could be responsible for the observed curli downregulation in the absence of QseC. We validated the increased rstA transcription and the corresponding reduction in csgD transcript in UTI89ΔqseC by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2B).
Conserved metabolic pathways are affected upon qseC deletion
Since metabolic factors are predominantly dysregulated in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 1A, Table S3), we examined the effects on nucleotide, amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism and iron homeostasis (Fig. S2).
Nucleic acid metabolism. Compared with UTI89, UTI89ΔqseC upregulated genes involved in de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis and downregulated genes devoted to purine synthesis (Fig. 3A and B). Specifically, CarAB, catalysing the first step in pyrimidine biosynthesis, was significantly upregulated compared with wt UTI89 (Fig. 3A, GSE28727 and Table S2), suggesting increased carbamoyl-phosphate production. In addition, pyrIB, encoding the enzyme that breaks down carbamoyl-phosphate (Fig. 3B), were the most highly upregulated (29- and 31-fold respectively) metabolic genes (Fig. 3A, Table S3). In addition, pyrH, important for UMP-UDP interconversions was also upregulated (Fig. 3A), pointing towards increased levels of PyrH, which could explain the efficient growth of UTI89ΔqseC on 5′- and 2′-UMP, compared with wt UTI89 (Table 1). In contrast, the purine biosynthetic genes purK, purM and purT, the ribonucleoside reductase nrdF, and the transcriptional activator xapR (involved in purine interconversions) were all downregulated in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 3A, Table S1), suggesting reduced purine synthesis and defects in some of the purine utilization pathways. Administration of GMP or AMP bypassed the corresponding purine synthesis defects in UTI89ΔqseC, resulting in growth that resembled or surpassed that of the parent strain respectively (data not shown and Table 1B). Given that deletion of qseC did not result in detectable effects in the pathways converting AMP to ATP and GMP to GTP, provision of AMP or GMP could be used for generation of ATP or GTP, respectively, and result in efficient UTI89ΔqseC growth possibly by accounting for the energy shortcomings of this mutant. The ability of UTI89ΔqseC to utilize administered AMP and GMP may suggest a defect that arises prior to the branch in the biosynthetic pathway where AMP and GMP synthesis diverge, most likely prior to IMP formation during de novo purine biosynthesis.
Collectively, our data suggest an imbalanced pyrimidine:purine ratio in ΔqseC, which could increase nucleotide mismatches during DNA replication and transcription. Interestingly, genes involved in DNA replication and repair (recG, recB, recD, recN, dinG, the dinG-like UTI89_C2002, ycaJ, rmuC, mfd and hepA) were upregulated in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. S3, GSE28727), indicating a stress response that may occur upon accumulation of nucleotide mismatches.
Amino acid metabolism. Previous studies reported that the arginine pathway is induced in UPEC during growth in urine, supporting a role for this metabolite in bacterial survival inside the host (Alteri et al., 2009; Darling et al., 2010). We observed that argC (involved in ornithine production from glutamate), and argF, argG and argR (implicated in utilization of ornithine for arginine synthesis) were downregulatred in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 3C and D). In agreement with downregulation of ornithine utilization genes, UTI89ΔqseC displayed a growth defect on l-ornithine (Table 1), supporting the hypothesis that this mutant cannot efficiently produce arginine (Fig. 3C and D). Notably, arginine- and de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis are coupled, as both pathways utilize carbamoyl-phosphate (Fig. 3B). It is thus possible, that downregulation of arginine biosynthetic genes leads to accumulation of carbamoyl-phosphate and its subsequent shunt towards pyrimidine production, accounting for the upregulation of pyrimidine synthesis genes. Alternatively, upregulation of pyrimidine synthesis may be titrating carbamoyl-phosphate away from the arginine pathway, resulting in downregulation of arginine biosynthetic genes.
Arginine biosynthesis is tied to glutamate metabolism since ornithine is produced from glutamate conversions (Fig. 3D). Thus, downregulation of arginine biosynthetic genes may be due to reduced glutamate availability, which could influence glutamine and aspartate production (Fig. 3D). Indeed, we observed a two-fold downregulation of ybaS involved in glutamate/glutamine interconversions (Fig. 3C and D), and a reduction in the abundance of glutamine (UTI89_C0814, 3.6-fold) and glutamate/aspartate (UTI89_C0651, seven-fold) transporters in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. S1). Consistent with a defect in transport/metabolism of these amino acids, UTI89ΔqseC could not grow well on l-glutamate, l-pyroglutamate and l-aspartate (Table 1).
l-aspartate can be used for the production of l-asparagine, l-methionine and l-cysteine (Fig. 3D) (Phillips and Stockley, 1996). Studies have shown that reduction of l-asparagine upregulates asnA and asnB, implicated in aspartate/asparagine interconversions (Thaw et al., 2006). Expression of asnA was higher in UTI89ΔqseC suggesting lower asparagine levels, which further supports a decrease in aspartate (Fig. 3C). In parallel, we observed downregulation of asnC (Table S1), an asnA repressor expressed in high asparagine concentrations (Thaw et al., 2006). Taken together, these observations imply a reduction in asparagine upon QseC deletion. In addition, the methionine biosynthesis genes metL, metA and metF and the regulators metJ and metR were downregulated (2- to 3.6-fold) in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 3C, Table S1), suggestive of lower production of methionine, which could lead to defects in protein synthesis and DNA replication, eliciting stress responses (Figs S1A and S3). Downregulation of met genes, along with downregulation of gadB important for cysteine utilization (Fig. 3C and D), indicate reduced availability of cysteine and its derivatives. This was supported by a two- and three-fold reduction of the transporters FliY (cysteine) and TauB (taurine) (Fig. S1), and defective growth of UTI89ΔqseC on N-acetyl-l-cysteine, cysteamine-S-phosphate, glutathione, taurine, hypotaurine and taurocholic acid (Table 1). Although, no annotated genes implicated in methionine utilization were downregulated in our analyses, UTI89ΔqseC could not grow well on methionine (Table 1A). However, given that many of the UTI89 methionine utilization genes are not annotated, the inability of the qseC mutant to utilize methionine for growth could be attributed to some of the effects involving hypothetical proteins. Overall, our analyses indicate that deletion of qseC leads to dysregulation of genes and proteins involved in pathways that are inter-connected and could thus lead to pleiotropic effects on metabolism and bacterial physiology.
TCA cycle. Many of the amino acid pathways affected in UTI89ΔqseC are used for the replenishment of TCA cycle intermediates (Hanson and Cox, 1967; Alteri et al., 2009). l-glutamate gives rise to succinate and glutamine, which can be used for production of 2-oxoglutarate (Fig. 4A). Thus, the downregulation of the corresponding amino acid pathways in UTI89ΔqseC may impact TCA cycle progression. In further support of a disruption in the TCA cycle, we observed a seven-fold reduction in the levels of FrdB (Fig. 4A, Table S2), the enzyme implicated in fumarate to succinate conversion. Moreover, reduction in the formation of fumarate in UTI89ΔqseC could arise from the downregulation of the purine pathway, since fumarate is a byproduct of AMP biosynthesis. In parallel, we observed a two- to seven-fold upregulation of pyruvate metabolism genes (aceF, lldD, dld, gloA and aceB) and proteins (Mdh) in UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 4A and B, GSE28727 and Table S2), supporting that part of acetyl-CoA is preferentially consumed in the glyoxylate shunt (Fig. 4A). In agreement with a shift towards the glyoxylate shunt, UTI89ΔqseC grows better than UTI89 on saccharic and glyoxylic acids (Table 1 and Fig. 4C), which can be used for the production of malate and oxaloacetate (Fig. 4A). In contrast, neither butyric, ketobutyric or a-hydorxybutyric acids (Table 1), which are all used to generate oxaloglutarate, nor fumarate (Fig. 4B) sustains efficient growth of UTI89ΔqseC (Table 1 and Fig. 4C). Given that TCA cycle intermediates are in turn consumed in numerous pathways, TCA cycle depression could play a key role in the severity of the qseC deletion defects; particularly, defects in 2-oxoglutarate production could impair formation of glutamate, which is central to various processes, including nitrogen metabolism. In further support of a defect in TCA cycle progression, is the upregulation of the iscRSUA, hscA and fdx genes, suggestive of low [Fe-S] cluster assembly (further discussed in Supporting Information), which could impact the activity of several iron–sulphur TCA cycle enzymes. In addition, the UTI89ΔqseC proteome revealed a three-fold upregulation of Pta and AckA, which utilize acetyl-CoA and acetate for the production of acetyl phosphate. Since acetyl-phosphate is a major phosphodonor molecule in the cell, a potential increase in its levels could account for, or be the outcome of the increased phosphorylation of QseB.
Collectively, our data support that deletion of qseC tilts the nucleotide balance towards pyrimidine synthesis, a defect that is reflected in interconnected amino acid pathways feeding into the TCA cycle. Moreover, the reduced expression of genes involved in succinate and 2-oxoglutarate production, combined with upregulation of genes and proteins important for the glyoxylate shunt, shows a defect in the ability of UTI89ΔqseC to efficiently complete the TCA cycle and generate wt energy levels. The effects conferred upon qseC deletion are not specific to the Luria–Bertani (LB) growth conditions as similar pathways were shown to be affected in both LB (used for microarray and proteome), and minimal media (metabolome profiling). In addition, qPCR analyses probing for qseB and aceB expression suggest similar expression patterns during growth in human urine (Fig. S4). Given that energy production is crucial during infection, and biochemical intermediates, especially those from central pathways, are formed and utilized in a variety of anabolic and catabolic processes, the misregulation of these central metabolic pathways in the absence of QseC leads to the hypothesis that a controlled QseBC interplay is an important fitness determinant of pathogenic bacteria.
The metabolic dysregulation in the absence of QseC is not a UPEC-specific phenomenon
To examine whether the metabolic defects caused by qseC deletion are conserved among QseC-bearing pathogens, we performed metabolic profiling of EHEC strain 86–24 and its isogenic qseC deletion mutant. EHEC and UPEC display significant genomic divergence of at least 25%, and occupy distinct pathogenic niches (Horne et al., 2002; Brzuszkiewicz et al., 2006; Darling et al., 2010). The EHEC qseC mutant displayed defects in the same metabolic pathways as UPEC, and in many cases exhibited more severe phenotypes (Table S4). In particular, similar to UPEC, 86–24ΔqseC had defects growing on l-aspartate, l-glutamine, cysteine and its derivatives (N-acetyl-l-cysteine and cysteamine-S-phosphate), d-methionine, taurine, hypotaurine and taurocholic acid (Table S4). Moreover, the TCA cycle intermediates fumaric, a-ketobutyric, oxaloacetic, a-hydroxybutyric and butyric acids did not support efficient growth of 86–24ΔqseC, verifying that the TCA cycle is compromised in both pathotypes (Table S4). Notably, 86–24ΔqseC exhibited more severe defects, being unable to utilize glycolysis and pyruvate substrates, indicating that qseC deletion has a higher impact on carbohydrate metabolism in EHEC. More pronounced defects were also observed in nucleotide metabolism, as 86–24ΔqseC did not grow well on purine or pyrimidine substrates, indicative of a defect in both metabolic branches (Table S4). The differences in the extent of metabolic perturbation may reflect the distinct lifestyle and energy requirements of EHEC inside the host.
Deletion of qseC from two different bacterial pathogens affects similar core metabolic processes, resulting in altered nucleotide metabolism, downregulation of amino acid pathways that feed into the TCA cycle, and impeding TCA cycle progression. Previous transcriptional profiling studies with an EHEC qseC mutant, focusing on the virulence gene dysregulation of this mutant also reported defects on metabolism gene expression (Hughes et al., 2009); however, the significance and extent of this differential gene expression was not addressed. Our metabolome analyses extend the observations of Hughes et al., and demonstrate that disruption of QseC interferes with metabolic processes. The similarity in metabolic changes in the two pathotypes is even more striking given the differences in specific virulence factors affected and the distinct niches of these pathogens. In addition, transcriptional analyses of Salmonella qse mutants also revealed effects on metabolic gene expression (Merighi et al., 2009). Thus, we propose that the attenuation of qseC mutants is due, at least in part, to these metabolic effects in the absence of QseC.
Disruption of metabolic pathways in UTI89 results in a ΔqseC-like phenotype in vivo
We examined whether perturbation of metabolic pathways interferes with establishment of infection, using the TCA cycle as a proxy. The results described above revealed that deletion of qseC impedes TCA cycle progression, and in the case of UPEC, results in engagement of the glyoxylate shunt. We investigated whether the inability of UTI89ΔqseC to complete the TCA cycle is associated with its attenuation in vivo. We created non-polar deletions of aceA, sdhB or mdh in UTI89. AceA converts isocitrate to glyoxylate, and its deletion disrupts the glyoxylate shunt (Fig. 4A). The sdhB gene encodes the succinate dehydrogenase iron–sulphur subunit, required for the conversion of succinate to fumarate (Fig. 4A), and its deletion interferes with TCA cycle completion. The malate dehydrogenase, Mdh, oxidizes malate to oxaloacetate, participating in both the TCA cycle and the glyoxylate shunt.
Female C3H/HeN mice were transurethrally inoculated with wt UTI89, UTI89ΔsdhB, UTI89Δmdh, UTI89ΔaceA, or UTI89ΔqseC and the ability of each mutant to survive in vivo was assessed at 6 and 16 h post infection by colony-forming units (cfu) enumeration and confocal microscopy, to capture the mid- and late-stages of IBC formation (Justice et al., 2004). Our data showed that disruption of the glyoxylate shunt alone had minor effects on urinary tract colonization and IBC formation as indicated by the UTI89ΔaceA phenotypes (Fig. 5), suggesting that this pathway is not essential for UPEC in vivo survival. However, UTI89ΔsdhB and UTI89Δmdh exhibited a severe survival defect within the bladder, indicated by a significant reduction in the recovered cfu compared with wt UTI89 (Fig. 5A). Reduced UTI89ΔsdhB and UTI89Δmdh bladder titres correlated with fewer IBCs formed by these strains (Fig. 5B), as was the case for UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 5B and Kostakioti et al., 2009). Given that mdh deletion impacts both the TCA cycle and glyoxylate shunt, and since disruption of the glyoxylate shunt does not significantly affect UPEC virulence as evidenced by the UTI89ΔaceA phenotypes, attenuation of UTI89Δmdh is due to the disruption of the TCA cycle. These data argue that the ΔqseC in vivo defects are connected to its inability to complete the TCA cycle and are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating that the TCA cycle is important for uropathogenesis (Alteri et al., 2009). Deletion of sdhB or aceA in a qseC deletion background resulted in a qseC-like phenotype (data not shown), indicating that QseC is indeed upstream of these metabolic factors.
Deletion of qseC impacts virulence gene expression by dysregulating core metabolism
We asked whether disruption of metabolic processes that are dysregulated in the qseC mutant affects virulence gene expression. We screened UTI89ΔsdhB, UTI89Δmdh and UTI89ΔaceA for production of type 1 pili in vitro by haemagglutination (HA). Our findings showed that, while UTI89ΔaceA displayed wt HA titres, UTI89ΔsdhB and UTI89Δmdh exhibited decreased mannose-sensitive HA similar to UTI89ΔqseC (Fig. 5C), indicative of reduced type 1 pili expression, further verified by Western blot analyses (data not shown). Similarly, UTI89ΔsdhB and UTI89Δmdh but not UTI89ΔaceA, displayed defects on other virulence-associated factors affected in UTI89ΔqseC, such as curli and flagella (Fig. 5D and E). Thus, the reduced type 1 pili, curli and flagella expression in UTI89ΔqseC likely stems from its metabolic defects, supporting that the basis of attenuation of qseC mutants in vivo involves a complex metabolic circuitry that affects virulence gene expression.
In summary, the absence of QseC perturbs critical cellular processes that are common among various bacterial pathogens, compromising bacterial physiology and virulence, due to the aberrant activity of QseB. Thus, null mutations in qseC appear to unleash a potent QseB positive feedback loop that now operates uncontrolled. Increased levels of QseB result in more QseB-P by mass action, which then stimulates production of more QseB, which may explain the cause of the pleiotropy. We thus propose that, under normal conditions QseC tightly controls the phosphorylation of QseB so as to optimize expression patterns (metabolic and virulence genes). In the case of UPEC, this QseBC-controlled interplay may function to maximize fitness during infection by adjusting the internal (carbon and nitrogen metabolism) and the external (surface expressed pili) state of the bacteria during transition from the intestine to the urinary tract (enhancing bladder colonization), as well as during transition from extracellular to intracellular niches (enabling invasion and IBC formation). Disruption of QseC function interferes with QseB phosphorylation and results in an over-active regulator, which dysregulates targets that most likely are not part of its canonical regulon, leading to pronounced pleiotropic effects. Given that several of the affected pathways, like metabolic pathways, are highly conserved across bacteria, this could explain the attenuation conferred by deletion of QseC in diverse pathogens, with distinct virulence factors and disparate host–pathogen interactions. Indeed, we have shown that this is true for UPEC and EHEC, whereas studies in Salmonella qse mutants showing metabolic perturbations support that our findings may pertain to non-E. coli QseC-bearing pathogens; however, further studies are needed to verify whether attenuation of other pathogens deleted for qseC is related to metabolism. Thus, a proper QseBC interplay is critical for optimal bacterial expression patterns and establishment of infection in pathogenic E. coli and possibly other pathogens. Therefore, interfering with QseC and impeding its ability to dephosphorylate QseB opens new avenues for targeting the virulence of QseC-bearing Gram-negative pathogens and makes QseC an excellent candidate for the development of anti-virulence therapeutics.
Strains, constructs and growth conditions
UTI89ΔqseC, UTI89ΔqseBC, UTI89ΔqseC/pQseC and EHEC 86–24ΔqseC were created previously (Kostakioti et al., 2009). UTI89ΔsdhB, UTI89Δmdh and UTI89ΔaceA were created using λ Red Recombinase (Murphy and Campellone, 2003). Bacteria were incubated in LB media at 37°C for 4 h with shaking, subcultured (1:1000) in fresh LB media and incubated statically for 18 h.
RNA extraction, microarray analyses and qRT-PCR
RNA was extracted using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen), DNase-treated and reverse transcribed. Exogenous RNA spikes were added as internal controls for reverse transcription and labelling reactions. Resulting cDNA samples were fragmented, biotinylated and hybridized to GeneChip custom-made genome arrays (Affymetrix UTI89-01a520299F). Data were analysed based on recommendations from the Golden Spike data set analysis (PPLR test threshold cut-off, 0.95) (Pearson, 2008). Microarray data have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE28727 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE28727). qRT-PCR was performed as previously described (Kostakioti et al., 2009) using primers listed in Table S5.
Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), gel image generation and analysis were performed as previously described (Alban et al., 2003). Proteins were identified by mass spectrometry according to King et al. (2007). Detailed description is provided in Supporting Information.
HA, motility and curli Western blots
HA was performed on normalized cells (OD600 = 1) as previously described (Kostakioti et al., 2009). Two-tailed Student's t-test was used for statistical analyses (P < 0.05). Motility and curli expression were assessed as previously described (Kostakioti et al., 2009).
Metabolic phenotype microarrays
Metabolic profiling was performed according to the Biolog guidelines (http://www.biolog.com), using plates PM1-5. Detailed description is provided in Supporting Information. An average of three independent experiments is being reported.
Female C3H/HeN mice (Harlan) were transurethrally infected with 107 bacteria carrying plasmid pCom-GFP as previously described (Kostakioti et al., 2009). Confocal microscopy was used for IBC enumeration (Kostakioti et al., 2009). Experiments were repeated three times. Statistical analyses were performed using two-tailed Mann–Whitney (P < 0.05). The Washington University animal studies committee has approved these studies.
We thank Douglas E. Berg for helpful discussions and provision of the Biolog incubator (fund 1R41GM073965). We are grateful to Joe Palermo, Karen Dodson and Thomas Hannan for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by the NIH grants P50 DK64540, R01 AI048689 and R01 AI02549 (to S.J.H.). Mass spectrometry for enterobactin studies was supported by RR00954, DK20579 and DK56341 (to J.P.H.).