Period changes in ultracompact double white dwarfs
Article first published online: 14 SEP 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09467.x
Issue

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume 363, Issue 2, pages 581–585, October 2005
Additional Information
How to Cite
Marsh, T. R. and Nelemans, G. (2005), Period changes in ultracompact double white dwarfs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 363: 581–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09467.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 SEP 2005
- Article first published online: 14 SEP 2005
- Accepted 2005 July 22. Received 2005 June 17
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- accretion, accretion discs;
- gravitational waves;
- binaries: close;
- novae, cataclysmic variables;
- white dwarfs
ABSTRACT
In recent years there has been much interest in the nature of two stars, V407 Vul and RX J0806+1527, which are widely thought to be binary white dwarfs of very short orbital period, 570 and 321 s, respectively. As such they should be strong sources of gravitational waves and possible ancestors of the accreting AM CVn stars. Monitoring at X-ray and optical wavelengths has established that the period of each star is decreasing, at rates compatible with that expected from gravitational radiation. This has been taken to support the ‘unipolar inductor’ (UI) model in which the white dwarfs are detached and the X-rays produced by the dissipation of magnetically induced electric currents. In this paper we show that this interpretation is incorrect because it ignores associated torques which transfer angular momentum between the spin of the magnetic white dwarf and the orbit. We show that this torque is ∼105 times larger than the gravitational radiation term in the case of V407 Vul and ∼10 times larger for RX J0806+1527. For V407 Vul, the UI model can only survive if the white dwarf spins ∼100 times faster than the orbit. As this could only come about through accretion, the validity of the UI appears questionable for this star. We also consider whether accretion models can fit the observed spin-up, concluding that they can, provided that a mechanism exists for driving the mass transfer rate away from its equilibrium value.

1365-2966/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=87f89c955da459679648fd327771ae82f16e5b8e)
1365-2966/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=08ebd3f71adfe4db0c1f9f65790c139e62520103)