Revision of VLT/UVES constraints on a varying fine-structure constant
Article first published online: 24 JUL 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12695.x
© 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 RAS
Issue

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume 384, Issue 3, pages 1053–1062, March 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Murphy, M. T., Webb, J. K. and Flambaum, V. V. (2008), Revision of VLT/UVES constraints on a varying fine-structure constant. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 384: 1053–1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12695.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 JUL 2008
- Article first published online: 24 JUL 2008
- Accepted 2007 November 1. Received 2007 October 25; in original form 2007 August 24
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- atomic data;
- line: profiles;
- methods: data analysis;
- techniques: spectroscopic;
- quasars: absorption lines
ABSTRACT
We critically review the current null results on a varying fine-structure constant, α, derived from Very Large Telescope (VLT)/Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) quasar absorption spectra, focusing primarily on the many-multiplet analysis of 23 absorbers from which Chand et al. reported a weighted mean relative variation of Δα/α= (−0.06 ± 0.06) × 10−5. Our analysis of the same reduced data, using the same fits to the absorption profiles, yields very different individual Δα/α values with uncertainties typically larger by a factor of ∼3. We attribute the discrepancies to flawed parameter estimation techniques in the original analysis and demonstrate that the original Δα/α values were strongly biased towards zero. Were those flaws not present, the input data and spectra should have given a weighted mean of Δα/α= (−0.44 ± 0.16) × 10−5. Although this new value does reflect the input spectra and fits (unchanged from the original work – only our analysis is different), we do not claim that it supports previous Keck/High Resolution Echelle Spectrograph (HIRES) evidence for a varying α: there remains significant scatter in the individual Δα/α values which may stem from the overly simplistic profile fits in the original work. Allowing for such additional, unknown random errors by increasing the uncertainties on Δα/α to match the scatter provides a more conservative weighted mean, Δα/α= (−0.64 ± 0.36) × 10−5. We highlight similar problems in other current UVES constraints on varying α and argue that comparison with previous Keck/HIRES results is premature.

1365-2966/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=87f89c955da459679648fd327771ae82f16e5b8e)
1365-2966/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=08ebd3f71adfe4db0c1f9f65790c139e62520103)