Cataclysmic variables below the period gap: mass determinations of 14 eclipsing systems
Article first published online: 6 JUL 2011
© 2011 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2011 RAS
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume 415, Issue 3, pages 2025–2041, August 2011
How to Cite
Savoury, C. D. J., Littlefair, S. P., Dhillon, V. S., Marsh, T. R., Gänsicke, B. T., Copperwheat, C. M., Kerry, P., Hickman, R. D. G. and Parsons, S. G. (2011), Cataclysmic variables below the period gap: mass determinations of 14 eclipsing systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415: 2025–2041. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18707.x
- Issue published online: 2 AUG 2011
- Article first published online: 6 JUL 2011
- Accepted 2011 March 13. Received 2011 March 11; in original form 2011 February 18
- binaries: close;
- binaries: eclipsing;
- stars: evolution;
- stars: low-mass;
- novae, cataclysmic variables
We present high-speed, three-colour photometry of the eclipsing cataclysmic variables CTCV J1300−3052, CTCV J2354−4700 and SDSS J115207.00+404947.8. These systems have orbital periods of 128.07, 94.39 and 97.52 min, respectively, placing all three systems below the observed ‘period gap’ for cataclysmic variables. For each system we determine the system parameters by fitting a parametrized model to the observed eclipse light curve by χ2 minimization.
We also present an updated analysis of all other eclipsing systems previously analysed by our group. The updated analysis utilizes Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques which enable us to arrive confidently at the best fits for each system with more robust determinations of our errors. A new bright-spot model is also adopted, that allows better modelling of bright-spot dominated systems. In addition, we correct a bug in the old code which resulted in the white dwarf radius being underestimated, and consequently both the white dwarf and donor mass being overestimated. New donor masses are generally between 1σ and 2σ of those originally published, with the exception of SDSS 1502 (−2.9σ, ΔMr=−0.012 M⊙) and DV UMa (+6.1σ, ΔMr=+0.039 M⊙). We note that the donor mass of SDSS 1501 has been revised upwards by 0.024 M⊙ (+1.9σ). This system was previously identified as having evolved past the minimum orbital period for cataclysmic variables, but the new mass determination suggests otherwise. Our new analysis confirms that SDSS 1035 and SDSS 1433 have evolved past the period minimum for cataclysmic variables, corroborating our earlier studies.
We find that the radii of donor stars are oversized when compared to theoretical models, by approximately 10 per cent. We show that this can be explained by invoking either enhanced angular momentum loss, or by taking into account the effects of star spots. We are unable to favour one cause over the other, as we lack enough precise mass determinations for systems with orbital periods between 100 and 130 min, where evolutionary tracks begin to diverge significantly.
We also find a strong tendency towards high white dwarf masses within our sample, and no evidence for any He-core white dwarfs. The dominance of high-mass white dwarfs implies that erosion of the white dwarf during the nova outburst must be negligible, or that not all of the mass accreted is ejected during nova cycles, resulting in the white dwarf growing in mass.