Size and velocity-dispersion evolution of early-type galaxies in a Λ cold dark matter universe
Article first published online: 19 MAR 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20749.x
© 2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS
Issue

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume 422, Issue 2, pages 1714–1731, May 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Nipoti, C., Treu, T., Leauthaud, A., Bundy, K., Newman, A. B. and Auger, M. W. (2012), Size and velocity-dispersion evolution of early-type galaxies in a Λ cold dark matter universe. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 422: 1714–1731. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20749.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 19 MAR 2012
- Accepted 2012 February 13. Received 2012 February 3; in original form 2011 December 9
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD;
- galaxies: evolution;
- galaxies: formation;
- galaxies: kinematics and dynamics;
- galaxies: structure
ABSTRACT
Early-type galaxies (ETGs) are observed to be more compact at z≳ 2 than in the local Universe. Remarkably, much of this size evolution appears to take place in a short ∼1.8 Gyr time span between z∼ 2.2 and 1.3, which poses a serious challenge to hierarchical galaxy formation models where mergers occurring on a similar time-scale are the main mechanism for galaxy growth. We compute the merger-driven redshift evolution of stellar mass
, half-mass radius
and velocity dispersion
predicted by concordance Λ cold dark matter for a typical massive ETG in the redshift range z∼ 1.3–2.2. Neglecting dissipative processes, and thus maximizing evolution in surface density, we find −1.5 ≲aM≲−0.6, −1.9 ≲aR≲−0.7 and 0.06 ≲aσ≲ 0.22, under the assumption that the accreted satellites are spheroids. It follows that the predicted z∼ 2.2 progenitors of z∼ 1.3 ETGs are significantly less compact (on average a factor of ∼2 larger Re at given M*) than the quiescent galaxies observed at z≳ 2. Furthermore, we find that the scatter introduced in the size–mass correlation by the predicted merger-driven growth is difficult to reconcile with the tightness of the observed scaling law. We conclude that – barring unknown systematics or selection biases in the current measurements – minor and major mergers with spheroids are not sufficient to explain the observed size growth of ETGs within the standard model.

1365-2966/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=87f89c955da459679648fd327771ae82f16e5b8e)
1365-2966/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=08ebd3f71adfe4db0c1f9f65790c139e62520103)