Optimizing analysis of stable isotope breath tests to estimate gastric emptying of solids

Authors


Michael Camilleri, MD, Mayo Clinic, Charlton 8-110, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Tel: 507-266-2305; e-mail: camilleri.michael@mayo.edu

Abstract

Abstract  Breath tests (BT) using 13C–substrates have been proposed for the measurement of gastric emptying (GE). The mathematical analysis of the breath 13CO2 excretion that most accurately predicts GE t1/2 from simultaneous scintigraphy is unresolved. To compare five mathematical methods to estimate GE t1/2 by BT with t1/2 from simultaneous scintigraphy. Data acquired from a dual-labelled solid–liquid meal containing 99mTc sulphur colloid and 13C-Spirulina platensis from 57 healthy volunteers were used to compare four mathematical methods reported in the literature [Ghoos method; generalized linear regression (Viramontes); linear regression (Szarka); Wagner–Nelson method] and the total cumulative breath 13CO2 excretion with ≥12 breath samples collected over at least 4 h. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for the t1/2 results obtained with each method using BT data was compared with the results obtained with scintigraphy. The linear regression and generalized linear regression methods used five samples at 45, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min. All methods, except for the Wagner–Nelson method, resulted in mean GE t1/2 that approximated t1/2 obtained with scintigraphy. The highest CCC was observed with the linear regression method. Simple cumulative excretion of breath 13CO2 provides a better CCC than the Ghoos method. The linear regression and generalized linear regression methods (which also require relatively few breath samples) provide the most accurate analyses of breath 13CO2 excretion in stable isotope GEBT.

Ancillary