SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • autologous cells;
  • biomaterials;
  • enteric nervous system;
  • functional tissue engineering;
  • smooth muscle

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References

Background and Purpose  Functional tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a complex process aiming to aid the regeneration of structural layers of smooth muscle, intrinsic enteric neuronal plexuses, specialized mucosa, and epithelial cells as well as interstitial cells. The final tissue-engineered construct is intended to mimic the native GI tract anatomically and physiologically. Physiological functionality of tissue-engineered constructs is of utmost importance while considering clinical translation. The construct comprises of cellular components as well as biomaterial scaffolding components. Together, these determine the immune response a tissue-engineered construct would elicit from a host upon implantation. Over the last decade, significant advances have been made to mitigate adverse host reactions. These include a quest for identifying autologous cell sources like embryonic and adult stem cells, bone marrow-derived cells, neural crest-derived cells, and muscle derived-stem cells. Scaffolding biomaterials have been fabricated with increasing biocompatibility and biodegradability. Manufacturing processes have advanced to allow for precise spatial architecture of scaffolds to mimic in vivo milieu closely and achieve neovascularization. This review will focus on the current concepts and the future vision of functional tissue engineering of the diverse neuromuscular structures of the GI tract from the esophagus to the internal anal sphincter.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a structurally complex hollow organ that displays diverse motility patterns to perform a variety of functions that aid ingestion, digestion, absorption of nutritive elements, and excretion of waste. Gastrointestinal motility is a result of chemical and electrical interactions between smooth muscle, intramural innervation, interstitial cells, and mucosal epithelial layers. This innate anatomical and physiological complexity dictates the requirement for a multi-disciplinary approach to regeneration of functional tissue replacements.

Anatomic complexity is recreated by engineering biomaterial microenvironments with characterized porosity and stiffness. Remodeling of the scaffold occurs upon cellular seeding according to the microenvironment, thereby dictating the functionality of the final bioengineered product. The primary goal of tissue engineering is to manufacture/engineer a physiological functional replacement tissue, using materials with appropriate biologic activity and biodegradability. Various strategies, including flow/perfusion or mechanical conditioning, are employed to maximize the functionality of the engineered ‘replacement tissue’ before implantation. Although the flow of the process is fairly logical, there are multiple hurdles involved in each step. Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of the complexity involved in intestinal tissue engineering.

image

Figure 1.  Schematic of tissue-engineered tubular constructs for replacement of gastrointestinal (GI) neuromuscular structures. The chosen biomaterial scaffold must be adequately porous to allow neovascularization when implanted. Ideally, the tissue-engineered replacement is envisioned to contain different cellular components in different layers namely, the circular and longitudinal smooth muscle components with intramuscular interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). Additionally, the tubular construct would also contained localized enteric neuronal plexuses (myenteric and submucosal). The scaffolding material along with its cellular component must allow re-epithelialization to regenerate mucosal layers. Most importantly, the bioengineered tubular constructs must be able to maintain a patent lumen and maintain integrity so as not to allow leakage during use in the body as a replacement. The ideal tissue-engineered construct, when implanted, would integrate with the existing muscular, neuronal, and mucosal layers as well as receive cues from the central nervous system, to facilitate peristalsis, gut motility, digestion, and excretion. For the stomach, different shaped molds can be envisioned with the same modular approach to repopulation of different cellular layers.

Download figure to PowerPoint

This review will focus on the multiple approaches used to reconstruct the neuromusculature of the gut, classified under the following functional segments: esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and colon that are interspersed with ‘sphincters’– closure zones that prevent backflow and reflux. These sphincteric regions include the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), pyloric sphincter, and the internal anal sphincter (IAS). Table 1 summarizes different GI neuromuscular disorders that could directly benefit from intestinal tissue engineering.

Table 1.   Future vision of intestinal tissue engineering
Organ systemDisorderRegenerative medicine alternative
EsophagusCongenital long-gap atresia, esophageal cancerTubular constructs that allow neomucosa formation and perform conduit function Muscular layers and enteric plexuses for motility Integrate with central nervous system for ‘at-will’ peristalsis
Lower Esophageal SphincterGastro-esophageal reflux diseaseSphincteric augmentation with sphincter-specialized aligned circular smooth muscle Maintenance of pressure to prevent reflux Enteric neuronal plexuses for receptive relaxation to allow passage of luminal contents to stomach
StomachGastroparesis, altered gastric emptyingElastic reservoir for accommodation of food (Fundus) Intrinsically innervated smooth muscle layer for propulsive mixing (Antrum) Neomucosa for secretion Repopulation of interstitial cells of Cajal for adequate pacemaking
Pyloric sphincterHypertensive pylorus, dumping syndromeSphincteric augmentation with sphincter-specialized aligned circular smooth muscle to maintain high pressure closure Enteric neuronal plexuses for adequate relaxation to allow passage of chyme
Small intestineShort bowel syndromeTubular constructs with mucosal villi and crypts for adquate nutrient absorption Circular and longitudinal smooth muscle and enteric plexuses for peristalsis, absorption and motility
Large intestineAganglionosis, inflammatory bowel disordersTubular constructs with concentrically aligned circular and longitudinal smooth muscle for peristalsis, motility and emptying Enteric neuronal plexuses for neurotransmission and motility
Internal anal sphincterFecal incontinence, hypertensive sphincterSphincteric augmentation with sphincter-specialized aligned circular smooth muscle to maintain anorectal closure pressure Enteric neuronal plexuses to mediate relaxation of the sphincter to allow defecation

Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References

Cell source & proliferation

The first hurdle in bioengineering any tissue is the cell source. Due to the complexity of the gut, procuring cells of multiple phenotypes remains a challenge. Many individual types of cells need to be isolated by enzymatic dissociation of a single full-thickness biopsy. In this process of identifying a cell source, one also has to pay heed to the challenge of expansion of these cells to adequate numbers. Biopsy of native gut may not be an efficient source of highly proliferative cells. Therefore, cell expansion of isolated intestinal smooth muscle cells, enteric neuronal and glial precursor cells, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), or epithelial cells is an on-going challenge in intestinal tissue engineering.

Tissue-engineered replacements can be autologous, heterologous, or allogenic. The cellular component as well as the material component of the tissue-engineered construct contributes to its biocompatibility and its immunogenicity. Advancement in our understanding of immunology has led to various immune-suppression and immune-tolerance treatments for patients receiving xenografts. However, this prospect of eliciting an adverse host immune response has driven regenerative medicine toward acquiring autologous cell sources.

The quest for autologous cell sources led to the discovery of populations of tissue-resident, organ-associated adult stem cells.1 Recent reports suggest that bone marrow-derived cells can be used for vascular and bladder smooth muscle regeneration by manipulating the soluble factors in their growth medium.2–4 This is an optimistic step toward producing tissue-engineered smooth muscle from autologous bone marrow-derived cells. Multiple populations of muscle derived-stem cells have been identified with evidence of self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation capabilities.5,6 These cells have displayed the ability to differentiate into myotubes as well as smooth muscle phenotypes.7

Neuronal progenitor cells have been identified to reside within both the central nervous system as well the enteric nervous system in embryonic as well as postnatal rodents and humans.8 Neural crest derived-stem cells have been shown to persist through adult development9 and are a potential source of autologous neuronal cells required to re-engineer the gut neuromusculature.10 Advances in cell culture techniques have allowed the isolation of enteric neuronal and glial progenitor cells by cell sorting that express markers such as Ret and p75.11 A recent report by Kulkarni et al. focuses on nudging CNS-derived neuronal progenitor cells into an enteric phenotype by culturing them in the presence of gut-derived soluble factors.12 Metzger et al.13 also demonstrated the reliable and reproducible isolation of enteric neuronal progenitor cells from adult human gut up to 84 years of age. These cells demonstrated the ability to differentiate into a number of mature enteric neuronal subtypes. Thus, advances in cell culture techniques have expanded the pool of available cells for autologous intestinal tissue engineering.

Biomaterials

Cells cultured within a three-dimensional environment demonstrate better cell–cell contact. The cellular microenvironment mimics in vivo milieu more closely. Tissue engineering aims to re-engineer this environment using multiple approaches, including the use of porous biocompatible scaffolds or spinner flasks maintained in bioreactor cultures. Biomaterials act as a surface to direct cell–cell interactions. They support the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of cells seeded on to them. Scaffolding substances are typically polymeric biomaterials that are either bioinert or are adequately biodegradable. Many biomaterials have been widely used in tissue engineering applications for decades. Porous three-dimensional scaffolds provide a matrix for seeding a high density of cells to promote reorganization into a functional tissue. During this process, the cells secrete and deposit their own extra cellular matrix, while the biomaterial degrades ideally into non-toxic products. Biodegradable materials or bioinert materials are chosen depending on the end objective of the tissue-engineered construct.14 Biodegradable materials need to provide adequate mechanical support until remodeling by cellular components over time can support the engineered structure structurally and mechanically. Ideally, when neuronal and muscular in-growth and mechanical activity are required, biodegradable materials that degrade slowly over time while being replaced by cellular extracellular matrix are preferred. Moreover, bioinert materials prolong the body’s exposure time with the biomaterial, which may trigger an inflammatory or foreign body response due to its permanent presence.15,16

Factors to keep in mind while designing scaffolds for intestinal tissue engineering are: (i) mechanical properties of the scaffold itself, (ii) porosity to promote gas and nutrient exchange, (iii) degradation rates, and (iv) biocompatibility with respect to adhesion, proliferation as well as host immune response.14,16 Commonly used biomaterials for intestinal tissue engineering have been naturally derived materials (collagen scaffolds, small-intestinal submucosa derived scaffolds) or synthetic polymer based scaffolds (poly-l-lactic acid, poly glycolic acid (PGA), poly ε-caprolactone, etc.).

While designing scaffolds for smooth muscle, the end objectives are to provide the cells a microenvironment that specifically permits the following: (i) maintenance of a contractile phenotype, (ii) formation of cellular syncytium connections, and (iii) directional self-organization.

Overall function directly translates from the structural cellular alignment as well as the maintenance of the contractile muscle phenotype. The template scaffold must permit circular smooth muscle of the gut to concentrically align in syncytium and form a hollow tube that can contract to propel luminal contents. Similarly, the scaffold must also allow the alignment of longitudinal smooth muscle in parallel sheets orthogonal to the circular smooth muscle layer. Scaffold chemistry and mechanical properties highly influence self-organization and regeneration of functional smooth muscle.17

Challenges in vascularization

Vascularization is the limiting step in the survival of a tissue-engineered construct. It determines the optimal size and porosity of the scaffolding backbone. Neovascularization of implanted de novo re-engineered tissues remains a challenge to the success of tissue engineering constructs. Generation of vasculature is key to the survival of implanted tissues in vivo, because oxygen diffusion is limited to ∼200 μm in tissues. Beyond this limit, vascular in-growth is required to facilitate nutrient exchange and survival. Lack of vascular in-growth into the thickness of engineered tissue will result in hypoxia, necrosis, and loss of viability and subsequently functionality.

Prevascularization, either in vivo or in vitro, has been a commonly used strategy. tissue-engineered grafts are often initially implanted into a region with an artery suitable for microsurgery like the omentum for in vivo prevascularization. Alternately, tissue-engineered grafts are often combined with endothelial cells that form prevascular structures in order to speed up vascular in-growth upon implantation.18–20 For the regeneration of complex tissues with multiple layers, like GI neuromuscular structures, thicker tissues will require more extensive vascular networks to provide nutrients to every cellular layer. Prevascularization provides the advantage of providing a vascular network-ready tissue-engineered construct that can be readily perfused upon implantation, although an additional surgical step is often involved. Moreover, prevascularization offers a distinct advantage only when anastomosis to the host vasculature is available at the final site of implantation for ready perfusion.21,22

Delivery of angiogenic growth factors, like FGF-2, VEGF, TGF-β, and more recently PDGF-BB (approved by the FDA), promote mobilization and recruitment of endothelial cells as well as stabilization of newly formed vessels.23 Delivery is achieved either by the use of micro-osmotic pumps, polymeric carrier systems, growth factor loaded collagen microspheres, or even adenoviral vectors that stimulate the secretion of growth factors in situ. Polymeric carrier systems can have precisely defined spatio-temporal release patterns to locally deliver a cocktail of angiogenic growth factors to tissue-engineered grafts.24 Collagen microspheres encapsulating FGF-2 have been successfully used in intestinal smooth muscle maintenance for grafts implanted in the small bowel of a mouse model.25 Recently, our group compared the use of FGF-2, VEGF, and PDGF-BB in maintenance of bioengineered sphincteric smooth muscle implanted in a mouse animal model. Our data indicated that there was no significant difference with the use of any of these growth factors on neovascularization, smooth muscle fiber diameter, viability, and phenotype.26

Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References

Phasic neuromuscular structures of the GI tract contain orthogonal layers of smooth muscle, interlaced with enteric neuronal plexuses. They are also associated with the ICC and specialized mucosal layers. The propagating peristaltic wave defines the phasic nature of this neuromusculature. It encompasses contraction and relaxation of both the circular and longitudinal smooth muscle layers. The neuronal components as well as the ICC generate electrical activity for the coordination of peristalsis. This activity is coupled in a highly coordinated manner to intracellular biochemical events in the smooth muscle layers to result in gut motility. These mechanisms are additionally segmentally modulated by the release of different neurotransmitters from the enteric neuronal plexuses as well as the electrical activity from the ICCs.27,28 While designing tissue engineering replacements, it is important to keep in mind that motility patterns of the GI tract, though segmental are inherently linked to one another and work in a highly coordinated fashion.29 An example of this phenomenon is the entry of the food into the esophagus leading to the relaxation of the LES to allow passage of food into the stomach.30Table 2A–D summarizes literature cited in the following section.

Table 2.   Current concepts in intestinal tissue engineering
AuthorAnimal modelBiomaterial componentCellular/acellular approachType of defectPeriod of follow-upStudy outcomes
A. Esophagus
 Takimoto et al. (1998)DogsSilicone tube with porcine collagenAcellularSegmental1, 3, 6 monthsConstriction of esophagus, high rates of scar tissue formation; repopulation of striated muscle and epithelialization upon removal of silicone stent
 Freud et al. (1999)DogsPolytetrafluoroethylene, DacronAcellularPatch and circumferential1, 2, 4, 6, 7 monthsGood epithelialization but no muscular in-growth; circular and longitudinal stenosis
 Jansen et al. (2004)RabbitsPolyvinylidene fluoride and polyglactic 910AcellularSemicircular wall3 monthsReepithelialization and minimal muscular in-growth in polyglactic; high rates of anastomotic leakage
 Badylak et al. (2000)DogsPorcine submucosal extracellular matrix scaffoldAcellularPatch and segmental4 days to 15 monthsContiguous muscle in-growth in patch defects and good reepithelialization, stricture formations in tube grafts
 Lopes et al. (2006)RatsPorcine small intestinal submucosa derived collagen matrixAcellularSemi circumferential5 monthsMinimal nerve in-growth, good reepithelialization, and muscular in-growth
 Saxena et al. (2009)In vitroCollagen scaffolds with a Matrigen® coatingRat esophageal epithelial cells, aortic smooth muscle cellsIn vitro three-dimensional cultures1–8 weeksUnidirectionally aligned tissue-engineered smooth muscle strands as well as esophageal epithelium
 Hayashi et al. (2005)Athymic ratsPorcine type I collagenHuman esophageal epithelial cells, dermal fibroblasts, aortic smooth muscle cellsSubcutaneous transplantation on dorsum1, 2 weeksPreservation of aligned epithelial, submucosal, and smooth muscle layers, neovascularization
 Sato et al. (1994)Athymic ratsPolyglycolic acid and collagenHuman esophageal epithelial cellsSubcutaneous implantation on dorsum4, 8, 20 and 28 daysHealthy epithelium and neovascularization in tubular structures
 Nakase et al. (2008)DogPolyglycolic acidCanine oral fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and gastric smooth muscleTubular esophageal replacement10, 20, 50 and 70 weeksRepopulation of epithelium, muscularis mucosa, and smooth muscle; stricture formation in tubular grafts; report absence of peristaltic activity in tissue-engineered esophagus
B. Stomach
 Hori et al. (2002)DogsCollagen sponge with polyglycolic acidAcellularWall defect16 weeksModerate repopulation of mucosal and smooth muscle layers, minimal proton pump staining and no acetylcholine induced contraction in tissue-engineered gastric wall
 Araki et al. (2009)DogsCollagen sponge reinforced with polylactide and caprolactoneScaffolds dipped in bone marrow and peripheral bloodCircular defect16 weeksUlcerations before minimal mucosal regeneration, no smooth muscle regeneration, shrinkage of tissue-engineered constructs
 Maemura et al. (2003)RatsComposite poly- lactic and glycolid acid meshesRodent gastric organoid unitsFull stomach12 weeksNeomucosa, stratified smooth muscle, vascularization, good reservoir function, no stenosis
C. Small Instestine
 Nakase et al. (2006)DogsCollagen spongeWith and without intestinal smooth muscleIleal patch graft4, 8, 12 weeksVery short villi and very minimal muscular repopulation in the acellular group; well populated epithelial layer with villi and a circular smooth muscle layer in the cellular group. Shrinkage of graft
 Kaihara et al. & Kim et al. (1999)RatsPolyglycolic acid meshesIntestinal organoid unitsSide to side grafts in jejunum, tubular replacements10 weeksPrevascularized in the omentum, continuous neomucosa formation with crypt-villi structures, no report on muscular in-growth
 Chen et al. (2001)DogsSmall intestinal submucosaAcellularPartial wall defect2 weeks to 1 yearReepithelialization and formation of neomucosa, moderate repopulation of smooth muscle, intestinal leakage and obstruction
D. Colon
 Grikscheit et al. (2003)RatsPolyglycolic acid meshColonic organoid unitsOmentum implantation2–14 weeksRepopulation of muscosal, muscularis propria layers, and enteric plexuses
 Metzger et al. (2009)Organotypic human and chick hindgut culturesNo biomaterialHuman neural crest progenitor cellsInjection into organotypic aganglionic gut tissue cultures12 daysNeurosphere-like bodies localized and repopulated myenteric and submucosal plexuses, differentiated into glial and neuronal phenotypes (serotonergic, nitrergic, cholinergic, VIP-ergic)
 Pan et al. (2011)RatsNo biomaterialNeural crest progenitor cellsIntramuscular injection into distal colon1, 4, 8 weeksProgenitor cells differentiated into neurons and glia in the host colon, moderate reversal of denervation on colonic function
E. Sphincters
 Feretis et al. (2001)HumanPolymethylmethacrylate microspheresAcellularSubmucosal injection into esophageal folds5–11 monthsDecrease in reflux episodes and symptoms, no granulomas or ulcerations at the site of injection; require long-term follow-up studies as well as establishment of a clear method for reduction of reflux
 Fockens et al. (2004)HumanPolyacrylonitrile based hydrogelAcellularSubmucosal injection into lower esophageal sphincter1, 3, and 6 monthsSignificant improvement in reflux symptoms, reduced acid exposure of the LES-esophagus junction; requires long-term efficacy as well as migration of prosthetic material studies
 Bonavina et al. (2008)HumanTitanium wiring encasing magnetic beadsAcellularLaproscopic implantation of device around lower esophageal sphincter3 months to 1 yearSymptomatic improvement, reduced acid exposure; risk of device erosion and no significant change in manometric pressure recordings pre and postsurgery
 Pasricha et al. (2009)Rats and DogsNo biomaterialSkeletal muscle derived-cellsBilateral injection into pyloric wall or lower esophageal sphincter3–4 weeksCells localized in muscularis mucosa and muscular layers, differentiated into skeletal muscle and not smooth muscle, improved baseline LES pressure but no change in pyloric pressure; increased cholinergic contraction but lacks adequate controls or long-term follow-up
 Kang et al. (2008)RatsNo biomaterialMuscle derived-stem cellsIntramuscular injection into the Internal Anal Sphicnter1 weekAmbiguity over whether injected stem cells perform a bulking function or augment injured sphincteric muscle function; moderately improved cholinergic contractility, but lack of long-term follow-up of migration of injected cells
 Raghavan et al. (2009)MiceFibrin-based hydrogelMurine Internal Anal Sphincter circular smooth muscle cellsDorsal implantation4 weeksGood neovascularization and maintenance of smooth muscle phenotype; adequate physiological response compared to preimplant control bioengineered tissues; lack of enteric neuronal population
 Raghavan et al. (2010)MiceCollagen-based hydrogelHuman Internal Anal Sphincter circular smooth muscle and Mouse enteric neuronal progenitor cellsDorsal implantation4 weeksFormation of enteric neuronal network, Neovascularization and maintenance of neuronal network upon implantation; maintenance of aspects of neuronal and myogenic IAS physiology

Esophagus

The esophageal conduit extends from the pharynx to the gastro-esophageal junction. Due to coordinated motility in the GI tract, the lack of peristalsis in the esophagus leads to hypertensive LES. Surgical interventions to remedy long-gap esophageal atresia are usually followed by dysmotility and impaired quality of life. In the case of bioengineered esophageal replacements, the restoration of physiological functionality must meet the requirement of both gravitational and peristaltic food transport. This becomes challenging due to the phenomenon of at-will ‘primary peristalsis’; a complex interplay between the central and enteric nervous systems.31

Early reports in esophageal wall replacement demonstrated no muscular in-growth with non-absorbable materials like polytetrafluoroethylene or Dacron. Surface functionalization of these bioinert prosthetic materials with antigenic collagen resulted in a moderate cellular repopulation. However, major side-effects associated with the use of these materials were stricture formation and inflammatory reaction.32–35 Acellular absorbable biomaterials were developed in order to improve the biocompatibility and minimize the host-inflammatory response of the existing prosthetic materials. These were typically extracellular matrix patches or collagen matrices derived from the urinary bladder or intestinal submucosa. The use of acellular xenogenic extracellular matrix scaffolds to repair patch defects in the esophageal wall of canine models demonstrated neovascularization and neo-innervation, but no repopulation of esophageal smooth muscle.35,36

Acellular approaches were improved by seeding biomaterials with cells. A modular approach to the regeneration of the esophagus by Saxena et al. used basement membrane matrix coated scaffolds to promote survival and unidirectional alignment of both epithelial cells as well as smooth muscle.37 Autologous neo-esophagus constructs have been engineered using composite cells (human esophageal epithelial cells, aortic smooth muscle cells, and dermal fibroblasts) all embedded into porcine tendon collagen or PGA meshes.38,39 More recently, Nakase et al. replaced a small portion of resected esophagus using keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells seeded on human amniotic membrane and PGA sheets.40

Although these tissue engineering attempts display significant repopulation of constituent cell types and similarities to native esophagus morphology, most segments remain aperistaltic and may cause dysmotility related problems during long-term implantation. In order to externally induce peristalsis, artificial esophagus have been engineered using nickel–titanium shape memory alloys, and programmed to display peristaltic patterns when implanted in a goat model.41 Independent experiments using these materials for esophageal reconstruction, however, resulted in stenosis to different degrees.42 The paradigm of functional esophageal tissue engineering, if clinically intended to replace long segments, must mandatorily include peristalsis mediated by the intramural and myogenic esophageal components.

Stomach

The stomach acts as a food reservoir. Gastric motility breaks down food mechanically and enhances mixing with digestive enzymes. This further breaks down food chemically. Gastric emptying into the duodenum is mediated by mechanical, neuronal, and hormonal influences. This insures delivery of nutrients in an orderly manner to facilitate absorption. Disruption of motility in the stomach, due to diabetes, depletion of ICCs, or weakened smooth muscle function results in either delayed or rapid gastric emptying.

Hori et al. used acellular collagen sponge scaffolds to repair gastric wall defects in a canine model. They demonstrated the regeneration of a mucosal layer with proton pump positive cells. However, the regenerated muscular layer did not display the ability to contract upon treatment with acetylcholine.43 Araki et al. seeded collagen sponge scaffolds with autologous bone marrow and mesenchymal cells. They additionally supported the scaffold with a biodegradable composite of poly-l-lactic acid and polycaprolactone, to prevent shrinkage of the scaffold upon implantation.44 Gastric epithelial organoid units were seeded on composite PLGA meshes to replace native stomach of rats.45 While all the above techniques repopulated a functional mucosa, the regeneration of stratified smooth muscle layers with the proper orientation remains a challenge. Moreover, restoration of functional motility was not demonstrated in the study, highlighting the biggest challenge yet again in functional tissue engineering of the GI neuromusculature.

Tissue engineering of the stomach needs to primarily focus on creating a hollow elastic reservoir. Aspects of bladder tissue engineering, whereby de novo bladder reservoirs are manufactured with a variety of biomaterials, can be used as templates to re-engineer the musculature of the stomach. These can be paced by implantable gastric stimulation units, already commonly used in bariatric surgeries and in gastroparesis to stimulate enteric neurons or simulate gastric electrical rhythm. A report by Micci et al. demonstrates that the transplantation of CNS-derived neuronal progenitor cells can repopulate nitrergic neurons as well as improve gastric function in the pylorus of a rodent model of gastroparesis.46 Transplantation of the progenitor cells offers an alternate route to be explored in mimicking aspects of functional gut motility.

Small intestine

The small intestine is the primary nutrient absorptive structure of the GI tract. Peristalsis and segmental contractions of the small intestine increase the surface area to facilitate greater absorption by the villi of the intestinal epithelium. Loss of intestinal segments due to congenital defects or multiple surgical resections due to inflammation or cancer result in short bowel syndrome. Short segments of small bowel result in malabsorption, malnutrition, and adaptive alteration of motility patterns.

Tissue engineering has offered an elegant solution to the bowel lengthening surgeries commonly carried out in short bowel syndrome. Collagen sponge scaffolds seeded with autologous smooth muscle cells have been successfully implanted as a patch graft in a canine model.47 This patch graft regenerated the mucosal and intestinal epithelial layers along with the villi structures. The major problem encountered with these grafts was shrinkage. Lee et al. used pseudotubular structures formed from collagen sponge scaffolds seeded with intestinal smooth muscle cells. These were neovascularized within a month after prevascularization in the omentum.25 These techniques did not regenerate the enteric neuronal layers, and the smooth muscle cells demonstrated a phenotypic switch to their non-contractile forms.

In order to preserve the epithelium–mesenchyme interaction to aid survival, intestinal organoid units were cultured and seeded onto tubular polymer scaffolds.48,49 Vacanti and colleagues implanted tissue-engineered intestine comprised of neonatal rat intestinal organoid units into the omentum of adult rats, and then subsequently implanted these constructs to rescue morbidity resulting from a massive bowel resection.50 Scaffolds made of small intestinal submucosa and wrapped with omentum were implanted in canine models of short bowel syndrome. These scaffolds repaired patch defects and replaced tubular segments of short bowel, thereby increasing the length of the short bowel.51 Tissue-engineered small intestinal constructs regenerated enteric neuronal plexuses and met basic physiological demands. However, these techniques did not regenerate the alignment of the circular and longitudinal smooth muscle that is crucial to generating appropriate force and motility to facilitate nutrient absorption.

Colon

The colon is contiguous with the small intestine, facilitating water absorption, and excretion of stool. Loss of colonic segments by surgical resections to treat aganglionosis (Hirschsprung’s disease) or inflammation significantly alters colonic motility. Disruption of colonic motility alters transit time, resulting in constipation or diarrhea. The idiopathic nature of some of these disease states poses a strong demand for in vitro tissue-engineered models of colon, where investigations can be carried out on individual components (smooth muscle, enteric neurons, interstitial cells, and mucosa) to understand alterations in pathophysiological conditions. Moreover, alterations in peristalsis and segmental contractions of the colon have direct implications on an individual’s quality of life.

Vacanti et al. generated tissue-engineered colon on composite poly lactic and glycolic acid polymers from organoid units isolated from the sigmoid colon.52 These approaches demonstrated that the tissue-engineered conduits have significant absorptive capacity when implanted, but there was no direct measurement of peristalsis or motility. Our group has successfully bioengineered three-dimensional fibrin-based models of colon that allow self-alignment of circular smooth muscle layers concentrically around a patent lumen. These bioengineered tissues mimic native smooth muscle alignment and maintain aspects of colonic physiology like peristalsis, contraction and relaxation.53 In a recent study by Pan et al.54 neural crest progenitor cells isolated from neonatal rats were transplanted into the distal colon of a rat model of Hirschsprung’s disease. These cells differentiated into neurons and glia in the host colon. They also demonstrated rescue of neuronal mediated motility in the aganglionic host colon. Metzger et al.55 demonstrated that adult human gut-derived enteric progenitor cells can repopulate segments of human aganglionic colon grown in organotypic cultures. Transplantation of enteric neuronal progenitor cells therefore offer successful alternate routes to regeneration and improvement of gut function.

Although significant advances have been made in tissue engineering of phasic neuromuscular structures, focus is required on the identifiable gaps that exist in regeneration of functional smooth muscle and enteric neuronal plexuses.

Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References

Sphincters of the GI tract segregate the different phasic segments. They are made of concentrically aligned specialized circular smooth muscle with dense enteric neuronal plexuses. Sphincters remain tonically closed, creating a high pressure (basal tone) closure zone. They mediate transfer of luminal contents between esophagus and stomach (LES), stomach and small intestine (pyloric sphincter) or from the rectum to the outside (IAS). Efferent innervation pathways automatically signal to the sphincter during the passage of food. This allows sphincters to transiently relax their pressure and allow luminal contents to pass and then subsequently return to their basal closure pressure. Sphincter-specialized circular smooth muscles express higher levels of proteins involved in contractility like RhoA, PKCα, smooth muscle actin, myosin isoforms, etc to myogenically generate basal tone in the absence of innervation.56–58 Inhibitory neurotransmission, in particular mediated by nitric oxide, is more important in sphincters than in adjoining phasic muscle segments to mediate transient relaxation. Age-related weakening of the mechanical efficiency of the sphincters, diabetes-induced neuropathy, idiopathic degeneration of sphincter muscle all result in altered closure pressures of the sphincter leading to reflux (LES), gastroparesis (pylorus), or incontinence (IAS). Ideally, the paradigm for functional sphincteric tissue engineering should focus on manufacturing innervated smooth muscle replacement structures. These replacements must be made of structurally sound biomaterials that do not alter mechanotransduction while allowing biocompatible integration, neovascularization and neuronal in-growth from the central and peripheral nervous system. Table 2E summarizes literature cited in the following section.

Lower esophageal sphincter

The LES is responsible for preventing reflux of acidic gastric contents back to the esophagus, which can lead to severe conditions ranging from gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) to Barretts esophagus and adenocarcinomas. Pharmacotherapies do not directly address the issue of weakened sphincter efficiency, while surgical manipulations significantly alter the GI tract anatomy at the gastro-esophageal junction.

Initial solutions for reflux management focused on augmenting the bulk of the LES by submucosal injection of bioinert materials like polymethylmethacrylate beads59, polyacrylonitrile based hyrdrogels60, etc. However, there was no evidence of long-term efficacy or improvement in sphincteric physiology due to a lack of follow-up. Bioinert magnetic titanium beads looped in a roman arch were implanted laprascopically to augment LES closure pressure.61 Feasibility trials with this device, however, did not rule out the propensity for device erosion. Recently, a cellular transplantation approach to improving baseline LES pressure was achieved by injecting skeletal muscle derived-stem cells in the LES region of canine models. These cells integrated within the underlying GI smooth muscle, but did not demonstrate differentiation into contractile smooth muscle phenotypes.62

Tissue-engineered LES constructs must possess the ability to generate myogenic basal tone. They must also additionally be highly biocompatible and wire into the existing neuronal network to transiently relax to allow food to pass from the esophagus to stomach, upon esophageal peristalsis.

Internal anal sphincter

The IAS contributes to 70% of the anal canal closure pressure, maintaining continence. Weakened mechanical efficiency of the IAS due to idiopathic sphincteric degeneration, surgical, or obstetric trauma all lead to passive and active incontinence. Similar to the LES, current therapeutic mainstays do not address the direct issue of muscular degeneration of the sphincter itself.

A biomedical device approach to restore sphincteric function involved the manufacture of artificial anal sphincters. These were prone to device failure and had significant morbidity associated with them.63 Bulking of the IAS, similar to the LES, was carried out by injecting biocompatible materials like microspheres of hydroxyapatite or cross-linked collagen. This approach was associated with the potential of migration of biomaterials into the lymph drainage and did not significantly improve sphincter contractility. These measures of introducing biomaterials or biomedical devices have had limited success in their outcome in overcoming incontinence or augmenting sphincteric function.

Recently, Kang et al. used a cellular transplantation approach to augment IAS function in a rat incontinence model. The authors transplanted autologous skeletal muscle derived-stem cells in cryo-injured IAS. These injected cells were integrated within the muscle with minimal inflammation, but demonstrated no evidence of developing into functional muscle.64 Our lab has demonstrated the functional bioengineering of self-aligned IAS smooth muscle tissue constructs from rodents, rabbits, and humans. These constructs generate myogenic basal tone, display native smooth muscle alignment, and contractile smooth muscle phenotype. These constructs were neovascularized upon implantation on the dorsum of mice. Additionally, they also maintained key aspects of IAS physiology like myogenic basal tone generation and transient relaxation.65 More recently, our group also demonstrated the ability to bioengineer ‘prewired’ sphincters with an intrinsic enteric neuronal population associated with the smooth muscle. Implantation of these constructs preserved neuronal networking as well myogenic and neuronal functionality.66

Conclusion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References

The evolution of tissue engineering has advanced from its novelty as an experimental therapeutic paradigm to an immensely clinically translatable therapy. Examples of GI motility-related pathologies that are inclined to tissue engineering solutions are short bowel syndrome, fecal incontinence and GERD among others. Bioengineering of GI neuromuscular structures offers a solution to improve quality of life and reduce morbidity associated with the use of external devices or conventional surgical and pharmacological approaches that have formed the mainstay of current clinical management for many of these conditions. Additionally, de novo generation of three-dimensional neuromuscular structures of the GI tract in vitro can be used to investigate molecular mechanisms that contribute to pathophysiology of functional GI disorders.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Challenges in intestinal tissue engineering
  5. Functional tissue engineering of phasic GI neuromusculature: esophagus, stomach, small intestine & colon
  6. Functional tissue engineering of sphincteric neuromusculature: lower esophageal, pyloric, and IAS
  7. Conclusion
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Author contributions
  10. Competing interests
  11. References