• 1
    Saunders N, Paterson C. Can we abandon Naegele's rule? Lancet 1991; 337:600601.
  • 2
    Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 1998; 30:2429, 46.
  • 3
    Hall MH, Carr-Hill RA, Fraser C, Campbell D, Samphier ML. The extent and antecedents of uncertain gestation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985; 92:445451.
  • 4
    Buekens P, Delvoye P, Wollast E, Robyn C. Epidemiology of pregnancies with unknown last menstrual period. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1984; 38:7980.
  • 5
    Wenner WH, Young EB. Nonspecific date of last menstrual period: an indication of poor reproductive outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1974; 120:10711079.
  • 6
    Waller DK, Spears WD, Gu Y, Cunningham GC. Assessing number-specific error in the recall of onset of last menstrual period. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2000; 14:263267.
  • 7
    World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Determination of the Fertile Period. Temporal relationships between ovulation and defined changes in the concentration of plasma estradiol-17 beta, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone. I. Probit analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1980; 138:383390.
  • 8
    Saito M, Yazawa K, Hashiguchi A, Kumasaka T, Nishi N, Kato K. Time of ovulation and prolonged pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1972; 112:3138.
  • 9
    Berg AT. Menstrual cycle length and the calculation of gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology 1991; 133:585589.
  • 10
    Nakling J, Buhaug H, Backe B. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy. Early Human Development 2005; 81:833839.
  • 11
    Baird DD, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR, Musey PI, Collins DC, Kesner JS, et al. Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology 1995; 6:547550.
  • 12
    Bergsjo P, Denman DW, Hoffman HJ, Meirik O. Duration of human singleton pregnancy. A population-based study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1990; 69:197207.
  • 13
    Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ. A model for estimating the potency and survival of human gametes in vivo. Biometrics 1995; 51:405412.
  • 14
    Royston JP. Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 1982; 38:397406.
  • 15
    Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Kesner JS, Wilcox AJ. Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20:965978.
  • 16
    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Post-ovulatory ageing of the human oocyte and embryo failure. Human Reproduction 1998; 13:394397.
  • 17
    Gjessing HK, Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ. Errors in gestational age: evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy. American Journal of Public Health 1999; 89:213218.
  • 18
    Henriksen TB, Wilcox AJ, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ. Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. Epidemiology 1995; 6:533537.
  • 19
    Horger EO III, Tsai CC. Ultrasound and the prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies: a medicolegal perspective. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989; 74:617619.
  • 20
    Ewigman BG, Crane JP, Frigoletto FD, LeFevre ML, Bain RP, McNellis D. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 1993; 329:821827.
  • 21
    Bakketeig LS, Eik-Nes SH, Jacobsen G, Ulstein MK, Brodtkorb CJ, Balstad P, et al. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1984; 2:207211.
  • 22
    Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Eklund G, Fall O, Lindeberg S, et al. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; 2:585588.
  • 23
    Ewigman B, LeFevre M, Hesser J. A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 76:189194.
  • 24
    Geerts LT, Brand EJ, Theron GB. Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome – a prospective randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1996; 103:501507.
  • 25
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. Number 55, September 2004 (replaces practice pattern number 6, October 1997). Management of Postterm Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 104:639646.
  • 26
    Stebbins B, Jaffe R. Fetal biometry and gestational age estimation. In: Textbook of Fetal Ultrasound. Editors: JaffeR, BuiT-H. New York: Pantheon Publishing Group, 1999;pp. 4757.
  • 27
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice Bulletin No. 58. Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 104:14491458.
  • 28
    Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology 1984; 152:497501.
  • 29
    Chervenak FA, Skupski DW, Romero R, Myers MK, Smith-Levitin M, Rosenwaks Z, et al. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1998; 178:678687.
  • 30
    Mul T, Mongelli M, Gardosi J. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 8:397402.
  • 31
    Koudstaal J, Braat DD, Bruinse HW, Naaktgeboren N, Vermeiden JP, Visser GH. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Human Reproduction 2000; 15:18191825.
  • 32
    Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V, Goldberg C. Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. Journal of Pediatrics 1970; 77:110.
  • 33
    Ballard JL, Novak KK, Driver M. A simplified score for assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infants. Journal of Pediatrics 1979; 95:769774.
  • 34
    Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. Journal of Pediatrics 1991; 119:417423.
  • 35
    Alexander GR, De Caunes F, Hulsey TC, Tompkins ME, Allen M. Validity of postnatal assessments of gestational age: a comparison of the method of Ballard et al. and early ultrasonography. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 166:891895.
  • 36
    Sanders M, Allen M, Alexander GR, Yankowitz J, Graeber J, Johnson TR, et al. Gestational age assessment in preterm neonates weighing less than 1500 grams. Pediatrics 1991; 88:542546.
  • 37
    Alexander GR, De Caunes F, Hulsey TC, Tompkins ME, Allen M. Ethnic variation in postnatal assessments of gestational age: a reappraisal. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 1992; 6:423433.
  • 38
    Rossavik IK, Fishburne JI. Conceptional age, menstrual age, and ultrasound age: a second-trimester comparison of pregnancies of known conception date with pregnancies dated from the last menstrual period. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989; 73:243249.
  • 39
    Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH. The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. JAMA 1988; 260:33063308.
  • 40
    Backe B, Nakling J. Term prediction in routine ultrasound practice. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1994; 73:113118.
  • 41
    Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1985; 65:613620.
  • 42
    Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Gardosi J. Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 174:278281.
  • 43
    Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 8:178185.
  • 44
    Waldenstrom U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S. A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 76:336338.
  • 45
    Kieler H, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U. Comparison of ultrasonic measurement of biparietal diameter and last menstrual period as a predictor of day of delivery in women with regular 28 day-cycles. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 1993; 72:347349.
  • 46
    Reuss ML, Hatch MC, Susser M. Early ultrasound dating of pregnancy: selection and measurement biases. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1995; 48:667674.
  • 47
    Savitz DA, Terry JW Jr, Dole N, Thorp JM Jr, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 187:16601666.
  • 48
    Källén K. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 20:558563.
  • 49
    Gardosi J, Francis A. Early pregnancy predictors of preterm birth: the role of a prolonged menstruation-conception interval. BJOG 2000; 107:228237.
  • 50
    Morin I, Morin L, Zhang X, Platt RW, Blondel B, Bréart G, et al. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates. BJOG 2005; 112:145152.
  • 51
    Chiazze L Jr, Brayer FT, Macisco JJ Jr, Parker MP, Duffy BJ. The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle. JAMA 1968; 203:377380.
  • 52
    Rowland AS, Baird DD, Long S, Wegienka G, Harlow SD, Alavanja M, et al. Influence of medical conditions and lifestyle factors on the menstrual cycle. Epidemiology 2002; 13:668674.
  • 53
    Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2003; 111:914.