SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Bioassay;
  • chemical identification;
  • exocrine glands;
  • odour perception;
  • recruitment;
  • stereobiology;
  • trail pheromone

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

Abstract The study of trail laying, recruitment of workers and trail-following by worker ants comprises a co-operative study of entomologists and chemists that has resulted in the identification of the chemical nature of such pheromones in many species of five subfamilies of ants. These pheromones may comprise a single compound or, in one exceptional case, a blend of as many as 14 compounds, they may come from a single gland, or in some cases, a combination of two glands. They may be peculiar to a single species or may be shared by a number of species. They exist in the glandular secretion in nanogram to picogram quantities and are detected by workers in minute amounts on a trail. The present state of knowledge of these pheromones and their chemical structures is reviewed. Suitable bioassays and odour perception are discussed and the stereobiology of a few examples is considered.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

Any observant person cannot but marvel at the sight of a column of ants moving back and forth along a trail between a source of food and their nest. The ability to exploit a food source in this way is one of the marks of social organization. Wilson (1971) said that the odour trail system is the most elaborate of all known forms of chemical communication. Darwin (1871), 100 years before Wilson, on considering the abilities of ants, had observed that ‘… yet their cerebral ganglia are not so large as a quarter of a small pin’s head … yet the brain of an ant is one of the most marvellous atoms of matter in the world’. Taking these statements together, it is not surprising that the use of foraging trails by ants has attracted so much curiosity and investigation.

Much of our knowledge of behaviour of ants in foraging and its variation between species has been summarized by Hölldobler (1978), by Brian (1983) in his chapter on ‘Foraging in groups’ and also by Hölldobler & Wilson (1990) in their monumental book. The more theoretical studies of ant behaviour on trails by Deneubourg and others (Beckers et al., 1989, 1992; Fourcassie & Deneubourg, 1994; Jeanson et al., 2003; Sumpter & Beckman, 2003; Dussutour et al., 2006; Jackson & Chaline, 2007; Montgomery et al., 2008) are beyond the scope of this review.

Trail laying has been defined as a field activity in which an insect marks a route with scent or odour traces such that other insects of the same community are able to follow it (Sudd, 1959). The process of creating a trail begins with a scout ant finding food. After it has fed, it deposits a trail of chemicals as it returns to the nest. Inside or just outside the nest, it attracts other workers in a variety of ways that are not always understood. It may include antennal contact, regurgitation, jerking movements or the emission of another odour that recruits workers to leave the nest. It has become clear that this act of recruitment can be an integral part of the overall chemical process of trail-following. Wilson (1971: 548) defines recruitment as communication that brings nestmates to some point in space where work is required. The recruited workers then follow the trail to the food source. Workers returning laden with food re-enforce the trail. When the food is exhausted and the workers return empty, they no longer re-apply the trail substance, and the odour evaporates. The trail therefore exists only as long as it is useful. The process of mass foraging trails, as we now understand them, is illustrated in Figure 1.

image

Figure 1. Outline of the life of a foraging trail. (a) A worker randomly searching finds food. (b) As it returns to the nest, it lays a chemical trail. (c) Inside the nest, other workers are stimulated in various ways to emerge and follow the trail. (d) Replete workers continue to reinforce the trail with their secretion. (e) When the food is fully exploited, unsuccessful workers no longer re-enforce the trail. (f) The food is consumed, hungry workers do not lay secretion. The thickness of the line indicates the strength of the odour. Broken lines represent weakening odour as the trail evaporates. The trail is efficient because the number of workers using it is proportional to the amount of food available (Billen, 2006; reproduced with permission of the Netherlands Entomological Society).

Download figure to PowerPoint

It had long been recognized that the trails the ants follow must have an odour content subsequent to the simple scientific experiment of drawing a finger across a trail causing the foragers to temporarily lose the trail and search around for it (Bonnet, 1779). Forel (1886, 1908) proposed that the ants use their antennae to follow the odour. Eidmann (1927) used a laboratory colony of Myrmica to show that, after a single worker had found some sugar solution and returned to the nest, a number of ants took the same route that the finder had used in returning, even in its detailed turnings. If a clean floor was substituted after the first returned, the following ants wandered about and reached the food only by chance. Santschi (1911, 1930), using Tapinoma nigerrimum, found that the finder ant rubbed her gaster against the floor. When he examined the area near the nest with a hand lens, he saw tiny droplets in the line she had taken, suggesting that something from the anal gland had been deposited when the gaster was rubbed against the floor. Goetsch (1934) showed that a trail could be laid with the gaster of a newly-killed ant. Carthy (1951) noted that a following ant closely followed the unseen trail with its antenna, and conducted experiments from which he concluded there was no directional information in the trail. Furthermore, he was able to make the trails of Acanthomyops (Lasius) fuliginosus visible by dusting them with Lycopodium spores (Carthy, 1951).

The foraging strategy of 98 species of ant and their colony size are related in a table by Beckers et al. (1989). In species that have a smaller number of workers, the system of tandem running is often used (Möglich et al., 1974; Hölldobler & Wilson, 1990: 273; Richardson et al., 2007). In this strategy, the first scout to find the food lays a trail back to the nest and recruits another worker. The scout follows its own odour trail, whereas the recruited worker keeps in contact with the first by antennal contact until the food is reached. Both can feed and then lay trails back to the nest, and both can recruit one more nestmate on the return journey (Fig. 2). The antenna contact encourages the lead ant to continue running, and the chemical odour entices the follower to keep contact. It is tempting to speculate that the odour trail developed from an ability to detect one or more metabolic by-products in a worker that had just ingested and was digesting food. As yet, because of the difficulty in testing them, no substances used in tandem running have been identified.

image

Figure 2. Scheme of tandem running in ants. (a, b) The randomly searching scout lays a trail to the nest after finding food. (c) It recruits another worker, which follows it by antennal contact and odour of the food. (d) Both ants lay odour trails as they return to the nest. (e, f) Each returning worker can recruit one more. The original finder is shown in white, recruited ants are black. Broken lines indicate older, evaporating trails (Billen, 2006; reproduced with permission of the Netherlands Entomological Society).

Download figure to PowerPoint

The subject of ant trail pheromones has been reviewed a number of times, (Parry & Morgan, 1979; Attygalle & Morgan, 1985; Ali & Morgan, 1990; Morgan, 1990; do Nascimento & Morgan, 1996) but it has not received attention recently. It is appropriate to review the subject now, to include and honour the great work done in discovery of formicine trail pheromones, by the late Professor Dr Hans-Juergen Bestmann of the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, in collaboration with Professor Bert Hölldobler of Würzburg.

Glandular sources

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

The glandular sources of trail pheromones are variable. The subject has been reviewed by Attygalle & Morgan (1985) and by Billen & Morgan (1998). Those pheromones known at present come either from various abdominal glands, or in the special case of the genus Crematogaster, paired tibial glands. In myrmicine ants, the venom gland is usually the source, with the exceptions of Monomorium pharaonis and Solenopsis invicta, where it is found in the Dufour gland. In those formicine ants so far studied, it has been the hind gut, also described as the anal sac.

Foraging behaviour varies widely among poneromorph ants. Some forage with visual cues, others use tandem running, some behave like army ants, and some do use trails, either to exploit large prey or for colony migration. In the few species studied so far, the venom, Dufour and pygidial glands have all been found as sources. The few examples from the Dolichoderinae produce it in the Pavan gland (Cavill et al., 1979, 1980; Attygalle et al., 1998a) and the sole identified pheromone from the army ants, an Aenictus species from the Aneuritinae (Oldham et al., 1994a), is stored in a postpygidial gland. In all but Crematogaster, the pheromone is applied to the substrate by dragging the sting lance or the abdomen along the ground as the ant returns to the nest. The shape of the gaster of Crematogaster workers does not permit the touching of the sting lance to the ground.

Billen et al., (2005) have identified a footprint gland on the hind pretarsi of the queenless ant Amblyopone reclinate, and have shown by bioassay that it contains a trail pheromone, but no isolation studies have been made yet.

Bioassays

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

The study of trail pheromones appeals particularly to chemists with an interest in insects because the bioassays are relatively easy to carry out, can be performed in the laboratory and can quickly provide a result. The difficulties to be overcome are the minute amounts of substance involved, the necessity to take great care against contamination because worker ants are extremely sensitive to the presence of part per billion of the chemicals, and the possibility that sometimes a pheromone may consists of several components. In the case of S. invicta, difficulty was encountered because it consisted of a following element and a recruitment element. Other complications are encountered below, but most notably, as in Tetramorium meridionale or Aphaenogaster rudis, when any one component may show little or no activity and only the complete mixture has activity comparable to a glandular extract.

The first bioassay methods with glandular extracts were described by Wilson (1959) using Solenopsis saevissima. Today, three types of bioassay are generally used: the straight line, the Y-shaped choice assay and the circular trail. The first two have variations between laboratories. The straight line test has the advantage of simplicity. A length of paper or plastic marked with a gland extract or fraction, or synthetic compound can be inserted into an existing natural trail and the behaviour of the ants is observed as they reach the inserted section (Fletcher & Brand, 1968; Barlin et al., 1976). In the Y-choice, solutions of the material (usually a solvent extraction of some part of an insect) and a control (either the solvent used for the extract or an alternative candidate compound) are streaked along from the origin in the lower part of the Y-tube (approximately 3 cm). The arms of the Y-tube diverge at 30–40° with the solvent or alternative compound continuing into one arm of the Y-tube, whereas the extract continues into the other arm. The course taken by an insect placed at the origin at the bottom of the Y is then observed. It either moves into one of the arms of the tube (i.e. a positive result) or it does not move (i.e. a negative result). Accumulation of data from many such observations indicates whether the insects can follow an active trail or indifferently choose both branches (Vander Meer et al., 1988; Kohl et al., 2003). This method has the advantage of showing a clear preference between two competing extracts or compounds, and is useful for studying ageing of trails by comparing older and newer trails. The circular trail, first described by Pasteels & Verhaeghe (1974), requires the drawing of a circle, with a radius of 5 cm, on paper with pencil and marking off 1-cm divisions on the circumference (Evershed et al., 1983; Billen et al., 1992; see also Sonnet & Moser, 1973). A solution of the extract to be studied is then evenly spread on the circumference with a special pen or a pipette. Hand application has been found sufficiently accurate but a mechanical device for even application has been described (Gerardy & Verhaeghe, 1988). Ants are allowed one at a time onto the paper, placed in their foraging area and when they contact the circumference of the circle, the number of 1-cm arcs they follow before they leave the circumference (and presumably can no longer detect the odour) is counted and analysed statistically. In this test, usually an amount equal to one-tenth of the amount of that compound found in the gland gives the maximum trail-following. More or less than that amount gives poorer following of the trail. It is therefore important to test compounds at the correct physiological concentration. This method has the advantage of providing a quantitative answer for the activity of each extract or compound. Somewhere between these latter two methods is the use of a circle or ellipse, with the test substance applied to the circumference on one side and the control on the circumference of the other. This can be extended to have two ellipses touching, with the sides to which the test substance is applied reversed at the point of contact (Bestmann et al., 1999; Blatrix et al., 2002).

For a long time, the analytical methods available to chemists were insufficiently sensitive to detect the minute amounts of chemicals deposited on trails, until the introduction of the technique of gas chromatography (GC) (for separation of components) linked to mass spectrometry (MS) (for identification of those components) approximately 40 years ago. This coincided with the growth of the subject of insect pheromones. In 1959, the identification of the first insect pheromone was announced with the isolation of bombykol, the sexual attractant of the female silk moth Bombyx mori (Butenandt & Karlson, 1954; Butenandt et al., 1959). This was soon followed by other examples and the word ‘pheromone’ was devise to describe chemicals that carry information between individuals of the same species (Karlson & Butenandt, 1959), by analogy with the word hormone, which is a chemical messenger within an individual. Linked GC-MS was the best tool for pheromone study, and it was soon applied to examining chemical trails. Even with that technique, the first identification of chemicals from trails required large quantities of ants for extraction. A method of solvent-free injection of the whole gland was evolved for the analysis of small samples that permits the quantification of nanogram amounts of pheromone in the gland of a single worker (Morgan & Wadhams, 1972). Although GC-MS is the essential technique, other chromatographic methods are useful (Morgan, 1990) and the final clinching achievement is the synthesis of a proposed structure and proving its activity in a bioassay.

Venom gland

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

The first ant trail pheromone chemically identified was that of Atta texana (Tumlinson et al., 1971, 1972). Its identification required 3.7 kg of dried ants. The compound was identified as methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate (1; Fig. 3) found in the venom gland, although there were other compounds contributing to the trail that were not identified. Compound 1 had a detection threshold of 80 fg cm–1 of trail (8 × 10−14 g cm−1), which illustrates the extreme sensitivity of detection of this kind of pheromone. The same compound was identified in Atta cephalotes (Riley et al., 1974), and Acromyrmex octospinosus (Cross et al., 1982). These were quickly followed by identifications in some other leaf-cutting ants, where the compound 3-ethyl-2,5,-dimethylpyrazine 2 (Fig. 3) was identified in Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Cross et al., 1979) and Atta sexdens sexdens (Evershed & Morgan, 1983). There was some confusion caused by cross-species trail testing in early work. For example it was found that Atta sexdens, A. cephalotes and A. octospinosus could all follow trails made from A. texana venom glands, which led to the mistaken conclusion that all leaf-cutting species used the same compound (Riley et al., 1974). We later showed that there were very small amounts of compound 1, accompanying 2 in the venom reservoirs of A. sexdens sexdens, A. s. rubropilosa and A. cephalotes (Evershed & Morgan, 1983), which explained the cross activity between some species. We also found that, for A. s. sexdens, the pheromone consisted of both compounds, 2 and 1, in an optimal ratio of 14 : 1 (Billen et al., 1992).

image

Figure 3. Compounds from venom reservoirs of ants found to be components of trail pheromones.

Download figure to PowerPoint

In 13 species of Myrmica examined, just the one substance 2 was found to provide the trail pheromone (Evershed et al., 1983; Morgan, 1990). From measurement of the amount in individual workers of Myrmica rubra, an average of 5.8 ± 1.7 ng of 2 was found in the venom reservoirs of workers (Evershed et al., 1981).

The first clear example of a mixture of two substances comprising the pheromone was Tetramorium caespitum from the U.K., which has a 7 : 3 mixture of 2 and 2,5-dimethylpyrazine 3 in its venom reservoir, and this 7 : 3 mixture of the synthetic compounds also gave the optimum trail-following (Attygalle & Morgan, 1983). Unlike the simple case of Myrmica species, which share one compound and one pheromone between several species, of three species of Tetramorium examined, all had quite different active compounds. Methyl 6-methylsalicylate 4 (approximately 1 ng per gland) a compound already and later found in other glands of ants with other functions, was the pheromone of Tetramorium c.f. impurum, (Morgan & Ollett, 1987), a species morphologically very close to Tetramorium caepitum. It now appears that what was then though to be a single species may now be a complex of several, so it is difficult to give correct species names. Using the most sensitive MS techniques then available, no trace of 2 or 3 could be found in T. impurum. In T. meridionale yet another mixture was found. The major substance was indole 5 (approximately 1 ng per gland), but it alone had little activity. Further examination showed the presence of smaller amounts (approximately 100 pg gland−1) of methylpyrazine 6, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine 3, trimethylpyrazine 7 and 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine 2. A mixture of 1 ng 5 and 0.1 ng of each of the four pyrazines gave activity comparable to a single venom reservoir (Jackson et al., 1990). This was the first example where the mixture, rather than any one compound comprised the pheromone. By contrast, both 2 and 3 are present in the glands of Manica rubida but only 2 (mean of 7 ng per gland) is active as the trail pheromone (Attygalle et al., 1985). The seed-collecting ant Messor bouvieri also uses compound 2 in its trails, but it appears that the full pheromone consists of 2 from the venom gland and some unidentified compound from the Dufour gland (Jackson et al., 1989).

The subject of cross-activity between related species was of much interest in early work on trails, reviewed by Attygalle & Morgan (1985). Blum & Portocarrero (1966) failed to find trail-following in Daceton armigerum (Myrmicinae) but found that S. invicta would follow a trail of its Dufour gland extract; and its venom glands were followed by Trachymyrmex septentrionalis, A. texana, A. cephalotes, A. sexdens and A. octospinosus (Blum & Portocarrero, 1966). Later Hölldobler et al. (1990) demonstrated that workers of D. armigerum were recruited to foraging trails when termite food was provided, and they observed workers extending their sting at irregular intervals. They showed that the trail-following response came from the venom gland and to a lesser extent from a sternal gland. In a chemical examination of the Dufour gland, venom gland and pygidial gland, the now familiar mixture of 2,5-dimethylpyrazine 3, trimethylpyrazine 7 and 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine 2 were found in small (approximately 1 ng) and variable quantities in the venom gland (Morgan et al., 1992). This explains the cross-activity with several species. The pygidial gland contained no detectable volatile compounds and the Dufour gland contained large amounts of hydrocarbons, and small quantities of compounds called tetramorines, related to farnesal, but nothing that had been related to trail pheromones of Solenopsis; therefore, the cross-activity with Solenopsis remains unexplained (Morgan et al., 1992).

Although methyl 6-methylsalicylate 4 is found with various functions in mandibular glands and pygidial glands (Morgan, 2008), only the second species to use the compound as trail pheromone is Mayreilla overbecki from Australia. Colonies of this tiny ant were found to migrate by well-defined trails, or bud off new colonies when their nest chamber becomes too small. The venom gland was identified as the source (Kohl et al., 2000). A trace of methyl 6-methylsalicylate 4 was identified as the only active compound. Large amounts of farnesenes in the gland had no activity (Kohl et al., 2000).

Aphenogaster albisetosus uses a mixture of (S)- and (R)-4-methyl-3-heptanone 8, 9 from their venom glands, as pheromone in the ratio of 8 : 2 (Hölldobler et al., 1995). The mixture attracts workers of A. albisetosus and orients them along the trail. The venom glands of Aphenogaster cockerelli contain a mixture of (R)-1-phenylethanol 10 and (S)-4-methyl-3-heptanone 8 in the proportions of 88 : 11. Synthetic (R)-1-phenylethanol induces trail-following in A. cockerelli workers even at 0.01 equivalents of a venom gland but the 4-methyl-3-heptanone does not have any following effect but it attracts the workers and induces them to leave the nest (Hölldobler et al., 1995). The mixture in A. cockerelli explains why A. albisetosus can follow the trails of A. cockerelli, but A. cockerelli cannot follow those of A. albisetosus. A quite different mixture has been found in Aphenogaster rudis. Its venom glands contain four volatile compounds, N-isopentylphenylethylamine 11, anabasine (also known as neonicotine) 12, anabaseine 13 (also known as nornicotine), and 2,3¢-bipyridyl 14. The last three are well-known alkaloids in tobacco and other plants. None of the four compounds singly show much activity in trail-following. Mixtures of 11 and 12, or 11 and 13 show activity of about 80% of that of a venom gland, whereas a mixture of 11 and 14 has little activity. A mixture of all four compounds is almost equal to that of a venom gland, but the 2,3¢-bipyridyl 14 does not appear to contribute much to the effect (Attygalle et al., 1998b). Anabasine 12, anabaseine 13 and 2,3¢-bipyridyl 14 are also found in the venom gland of M. bouvieri (see above) but there have no recognized pheromone function (Jackson et al., 1989). Anabasine, alone among this group of compounds is chiral. It has been shown to be (2¢S)-anabasine 15 in Messor sanctus, and this form in excess over (2¢R)-anabasine in Aphaenogaster subterraneana and Aphaenogaster miamiana (Leclercq et al., 2001) but its chirality has not been demonstrated for any species in which it acts as pheromone or part of the pheromone.

Eutetramorium mocquerysi (Myrmicinae) from Madagascar lays trails for recruitment and nest migration. Three more complex alkylpyrazines were identified in the venom gland, 5-isobutyl-2,3-dimethylpyrazine 16, 5-isopentyl-2,3-dimethylpyrazine 17 and 2,3-dimethyl-5-(2¢-pentyl)pyrazine 18 (Tentschert et al., 2000). Only 16 was found to be active, and the investigators were unable to explore whether the other compounds had any synergistic function. After the initial identification of methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate 1 in Atta and Acromyrmex species, there were no further reports of this compound as pheromone until recently. It has now been identified in two termite-hunting species of Metapone (Myrmicinae), Metapone madagascarica and Metapone new species (Hölldobler et al., 2002). It is the only active compound in the venom glands of both species.

The poneromorph ant Leptogenys diminuta uses (3R,4S)-4-methyl-3-heptanol 19 (Fig. 4) as the trail pheromone from the venom gland (Attygalle et al., 1988), although it requires the stimulation of the pygidial gland secretion to search for the trail (Attygalle et al., 1991). Synthetic methylheptanol 19 completely reproduced the effect of the gland extract. It is the only volatile compound detected in worker glands (Maile et al., 2000). Queens have more of the same compound and some 4-methyl-3-heptanone in their venom glands. It is noted that old virgin ergatoid queens perform similar tasks to workers in this species, and foraging by virgin ergatoid queens is occasionally observed in the field (Maile et al., 2000). Both workers and mated and virgin queens also contain, in the same gland, long-chain esters of 4-methyl-3-heptanol, which will have the effect of reducing the volatility of 4-methyl-3-heptanol (Maile et al., 2000). The same compound 19 has been identified in the venom gland of another species, at present identified as Leptogenys species 5 (Janssen et al., 1997b). However, in another species, Leptogenys peuqueti, a quite different situation was encountered. This species has the most complex trail pheromone mixture yet encountered. Fourteen low-molecular-mass alcohols and acetates 20 to 33 were identified in the venom gland (Janssen et al., 1997a). Each compound was synthesized and tested in a trail-following test at 0.1 equivalents of the average amount of that compound found in the gland. All compounds showed significantly higher activity than controls and a mixture of all the compounds was equal to 90% of the activity of a venom gland extract, suggesting that all compounds are necessary to stimulate trail-following (Janssen et al., 1997a). Each of the compounds in this species has two or three chiral centres, but only the (4R, 10R) and the (4S,10S) chiral forms of 4,10-dimethyl-7-tridecanol and their acetates, 34 and 35, could be tested. The workers preferred to follow trails of (4R, 10R)-isomers 34 over those of the (4S, 10S)-isomers 35 or the racemic mixture of all possible chiral forms (Janssen et al., 1997a). It should be noted that both 34 and 35 are symmetrical about the OH and OAc groups, but that other enantiomers exist that were not tested. All these compounds belong to the same biosynthetic group containing simple branched alkyl chains.

image

Figure 4. Structures of further trail pheromones from venom reservoirs of ants.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Pachycondyla analis (=Megaponera foetens), an African termite-raiding species is an example where secretions from two glands are used together. It was first demonstrated that, of the possible abdominal glands, the venom gland had a weaker but longer-lasting trail effect, whereas the pygidial gland has a stronger but less persistent effect (Hölldobler et al., 1994). Through the work of Bestmann’s group, the true trail pheromone was identified as N,N-dimethyluracil 36 (a less volatile compound) present in the venom gland, whereas the more volatile actinidine 37 from the pygidial gland stimulates the ants to forage (Janssen et al., 1995).

Guest ants are social parasites, with their nests located on the periphery of their host colonies. Formicoxenus provancheri is a guest in the colonies of Myrmica incompleta (both myrmicines). The pheromone of M. incompleta has been confirmed to be 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine 2 (Barbazanges, 1989), conforming to the pattern already noted for Myrmica. The parasite F. provancheri followed the trails of M. incompleta as well as the hosts did themselves, down to 0.1 venom gland equivalents, and lower. The F. provancheri were not found to reinforce the trails, and as far as is known do not lay trails themselves (Lenoir et al., 1992).

It had been claimed earlier that the pheromone of Pristomyrmex pungens was a mixture of C14 to C20 saturated and unsaturated acids (Hayashi & Komae, 1977) but, because of the ubiquity of these acids, this was doubtful. The Bestmann group showed that the venom gland contains 6-pentyl-2-pyrone 38, and a number of monoterpenes (α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, myrcene, α-phellandrine, α-terpinene and limonene). In trail-following tests, and electroantennography (EAG) tests, 38 is the pheromone. The monoterpenes were inactive and, when added to 38, had little additional effect (Janssen et al., 1997b).

Workers of Solenopsis species forage along well-established trunk routes but they are recruited to foraging or directed from one trunk route to another by emission of the familiar three pyrazines 2, 3 and 7 from the venom glands, with compound 2 being the main recruitment pheromone (Hölldobler et al., 2001). The routes are marked with colony-specific hydrocarbons from the Dufour glands (Hölldobler et al., 2004). There is a further refinement in P. barbatus where patrolling workers direct foraging to particular routes by laying Dufour gland secretion on approximately the first 20 cm of those routes to be used that day (Greene & Gordon, 2007).

Dufour gland

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

Monomorium pharaonis or pharaoh’s ant is a tramp species that has become an important pest in permanently warm buildings, such as hospitals. It was an early target for identification of its trail pheromone to be possibly used in control measures. After initial mis-identification of two compounds in its venom gland, called monomorines I and II, the true trail pheromone, faranal 39 (Fig. 5) was identified in its Dufour gland (Ritter et al., 1977). Faranal is classed as a sesquiterpene with two extra carbon atoms, typical of many terpenoid compounds made by insects using homomevalonic acid instead of mevalonic acid (Morgan, 2004). The juvenile hormone compounds are other examples of this type.

image

Figure 5. Compounds from Dufour glands and the hind gut, which serve as trail pheromones. The (R)-enantiomer of mellein, as shown, has been found to be the correct form of the pheromone in all cases. The (R)-enantiomer of 46 and 51 have been shown to be the active isomer in some, but not all, species where the compound is the pheromone.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Wilson (1959) showed clearly that the pheromone of S. saevissima was present in the ‘sting accessory gland’ (Dufour gland). Also in S. invicta, the imported fire ant of the U.S.A., the pheromone was in the Dufour gland. It was identified first as (Z,Z,Z)-allofarnesene 40 (Fig. 5) by Williams et al. (1981), with optimal activity at 100–500 fg cm−1 of trail, but this was synthesized and found not to have activity by Vander Meer et al. (1981). The latter group found that the pheromone had two components, both in the Dufour gland. The recruitment part of the pheromone consisted of (Z,E)-α-farnesene 41 (approximately 6 ng gland−1), acting as a trail-following stimulant, and a still incompletely identified homosesquiterpene containing three rings and one double bond (75 pg gland−1) (Vander Meer et al., 1988). The final structure of this compound remains unsolved. However, this mixture alone would not induce trail-following. It was necessary to put Dufour gland extract on the first few centimetres of trail to induce workers to begin following. It is possible that it requires approximately 250-fold more pheromone to begin the arrractant and inducer part of the process than is required once trail-following has begun (Vander Meer et al., 1990). The trail pheromones of Solenopsis richteri, Solenopsis xyloni and Solenopsis geminata appear to be closely-related terpene compounds (Barlin et al., 1976) but their structures have not yet been solved.

Ectatomma ruidum was the first poneromorph ant found to have its trail pheromone in the Dufour gland. The major volatile compound in the gland is all-trans-geranylgeranyl acetate 42 (approximately 140 ng per gland) accompanied by a trace of geranylgeraniol 43 (approximately 1–10 pg per gland) (Bestmann et al., 1995a). Both compounds showed activity in trail-following bioassay and EAG experiments, and the acetate was more active in both. It is noted that, for E. ruidum, drawing a trail from the nest with Dufour secretion does not induce massive recruitment to the trail but, if a successful scout ant having fed on a sugar solution enters the nest and a trail is then laid, there is a much greater response with many workers leaving the nest and following the trail (Pratt, 1989).

The poneromorph ant Gnamptogenys striatula employs a mixture of 4-methylgeranyl esters of fatty acids 44, found in the Dufour gland (Blatrix et al., 2002). Bishomogeranyl esters are also present in the gland but display little or no activity. A mixture of octanoate, decanoate and dodecanoate esters of 4-methylgeraniol gave activity comparable to a gland. These three compounds comprise approximately 85% of the total secretion (Blatrix et al., 2002). Compounds 42, 43 and 44 all have larger molecules and are less volatile than compounds encountered up to now. It is also interesting that all the compounds so far identified as pheromones in the Dufour gland belong to the class of terpenoids.

Hind gut

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

At present, all the trail pheromomes found in formicine species originate in the hindgut (sometimes called the rectal sac). At first, they proved very difficult to identify until the very careful chemical work of Bestmann and his group. With the experience of many years working on insect substances, using the solid injection method, skill in organic synthesis, and the collaboration and field experience of Bert Hölldobler, they made great strides in the advancement of the subject, and all our knowledge of trail pheromones of formicine species is due to them. Their first successes were in identifying the pheromones of Formica rufa and Lasius niger (Bestmann et al., 1992). The compound in F. rufa was (R)-3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3-methylisocoumarin, commonly called mellein, 45 (Fig. 5), a compound found widely in nature, not only in ants but other insects and micro-organisms. The pheromone of L. niger was identified as the related compound 3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3,5,7-trimethylisocoumarin 46. This compound was active at 500 pg per trail. Both in trail assays and in EAG tests, there was a stronger response to (R)-3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3,5,7-trimethylisocoumarin 46 than to the (S)-enantiomer (Kern & Bestmann, 1994). Other compounds accompanying it in L. niger in comparable quantities were dodecyl acetate, palmitic and oleic acids but these were not active. There was too little of the material available from the rectal sac to make a complete identification so they had to synthesize a number of compounds and compare their chromatographic retentions and mass spectra with the isolated substances. They were then able to confirm their identifications with bioassays and EAG experiments with the synthetic compounds (Bestmann et al., 1992).

The possession of synthetic samples of several related compounds enabled them then to go on to identify these and other isocoumarins in other formicine species. It had earlier been claimed that the trail pheromone of Lasius fuliginosus was a mixture of C6-C10 and C12 fatty acids (Huwyler et al., 1975) but this always seemed doubtful. It was now shown to be (R)-mellein 45, present at only 50–100 pg per gland (Kern et al., 1997). 2,3-Dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4H-pyranone 47 is also present in the hindgut (0.6–1.1 ng) and shows some slight activity. Apparently other components, not yet identified, are present in the hindgut of L. fuliginosus because 45 and 47, individually or in combination, do not equal the activity of a hindgut extract (Kern et al., 1997). These ants feed on honeydew produced by aphids and the pyranone 47 is present in the honeydew. It is possible that the pyranone 47 is sequestered by the ants from their food, as happens in other cases with insects feeding on certain plants (Morgan, 2004).

In two Formica species, no identification was achieved. Mellein 45 and 3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3,5,7-trimethylisocoumarin 46 were identified in Formica fusca, but neither compound showed any trail-following activity for this species, although they gave positive responses in the EAG using F. fusca antennae; also the (R)-3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3,5,7-trimethylisocoumarin 46 gave a greater response than the (S)-enantiomer (Bestmann et al., 1992; Kern & Bestmann, 1994). In Formica sanguinea, they found two isocoumarins they had synthesized, 3,4-dihydro-7-hydroxy-3,7-dimethylisocoumarin 48 and 3-ethyl-3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-7-methylisocoumarin 49, but again, though EAG-active, neither compound was active in trail-following (Bestmann et al., 1992).

They were able to show that the trimethylisocoumarin 46 was the main component of the pheromone for Camponotus silvicola from Peru. Compounds 45, 50, 51 and 52 were all present and EAG-active but only 46 gave trail-following (Übler et al., 1995). Compound 46 was also the principal pheromone component of Camponotus inaequalis (Bestmann et al., 1997). The dimethylisocoumarin 48 was the main pheromone component for Camponotus rufipes from Brazil (Übler et al., 1995). Compounds 45, 46 and 49 were all present in C. rufipes and EAG-active but only 48 was active in bioassay.

A different group of compounds, δ-lactones, was first discovered in Camponotus herculeanus. Two trail pheromone components were identified; 2,4-dimethyl-5-hexanolide 53 was the principal one, but there was a less strong contribution from 3,5-dimethyl-6-(2′-pentyl)-2H-pyran-2-one 54 (Bestmann et al., 1995b). Dimethylhexanolide 53 can exist in eight possible isomeric forms (four enantiomeric pairs). Without synthesizing all possible forms but, by a clever combination of synthesis, EAG tests and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Bestmann et al. (1999) eliminated down to two possible isomers, one of which in a trail bioassay with C. herculeanus workers showed no activity, the other, (2S, 4R, 5S)-2,4-dimethyl-5-hexanolide 53 showed strong activity, confirming that it was the pheromone. It is interesting to chemists that nature uses the thermodynamically most stable isomer for the pheromone. The second compound 54 is known as invictolide because it was discovered earlier as a queen recognition substance in the venom glands of queens of S. invicta (Rocca et al., 1983). 2,4-Dimethyl-5-hexanolide 53 was also found to be the principal trail pheromone component of several more Camponotus species; Camponotus pennsylvanicus, Camponotus socius and Camponotus vagus (Haak, 1995; Bestmann et al., 1997; Kohl et al., 2001). Following their success with C. herculeanus,Bestmann et al. (1999) were then able to show that the same isomer of dimethylhexanolide 53 was also the pheromone of Camponotus ligniperda, C. pennsylvanicus, C. socius and C. vagus.

Camponotus atriceps (=Camponotus abdominalis) uses 3,5-dimethyl-6-(2¢-butyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (also called 2,4,6-trimethyl-5-octanolide) 55, another of this group (Haak et al., 1996). Camponotus floridanus is very close to C. atriceps, indeed, it was once considered a synonym for C. atriceps but it uses a quite different substance. It uses nerolic acid 56, the only example of a free carboxylic acid that is a trail pheromone (Haak et al., 1996). This species and pheromone are the subject of a recent study of olfactory reception in the ant brain (Zube et al., 2008). The pheromone of C. ligniperdus consists of at least three compounds: 53, 54 and 55 (Bestmann et al., 1997).

Three further species of Camponotus proved difficult problems because of the tiny amount of pheromones present. The active compounds were found by trapping fractions from the gas chromatograph and testing each fraction in a bioassay. In that way, the part of the chromatogram to be examined carefully was located and examined by MS. In Camponotus castaneus, the identified pheromone compound was a tiny amount of 3,5-dimethyl-6-(2¢-butyl)-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one 55 (Kohl et al., 2003). The major compound in the rectal sac, eicosanol, was inactive. From trapping and testing of fractions from chromatography of hindgut extracts of Camponotus balzani, it was revealed that only one short section of the chromatogram was active. This was identified by comparison with the synthetic compound as 3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3,5,7-trimethylisocoumarin 46 (Kohl et al., 2003). The main compound in the secretion, octyl hexanoate, was inactive. There was a tiny amount of mellein present but it too was inactive. The same trimethylisocoumarin 46 was the only active pheromone component identified in Camponotus sericeiventris (Kohl et al., 2003). The authors point out that the major recruitment signal in all of these last three species appears to be the formic acid of the venom gland (Kohl et al., 2001, 2003). The first, and as yet, only study on the biosynthesis of trail pheromones was conducted by deuterium labelling of acetic acid on a number of species of Formica, Lasius and Camponotus (Bestmann et al., 1997). It showed that all the compounds 45 to 55 are built up from acetate and propionate units linked together in a chain, with modification and cyclization to the final products, probably by a polyketide pathway (Morgan, 2004).

Pygidial gland

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

We have already seen that trail-following in the termite-raiding P. analis (=M. foetens) requires a following component N,N-dimethyluracil 36 from the venom gland, and actinidine from the pygidial gland (Janssen et al., 1995). A similar situation is found with L. diminuta. The trail-following component (3R, 4S)-4-methyl-3-heptanol from the venom gland requires cis-isogeraniol 57 (Fig. 6) from the pygidial gland, released inside the nest, for recruitment to the trail (Attygalle et al., 1991). Another termite-raiding poneromorph, Pachycondyla (=Termitopone) marginata has a trail pheromone in the pygidial gland. The pheromone is used both in raiding and in nest migration. The active compound is citronellal 58, a very common monoterpene aldehyde found in insects and in plants (Hölldobler et al., 1996). The related compound isopulegol 59 elicits an increase in locomotory activity and may function synergistically in recruitment. The recruiting ant also gives a shaking display to encourage recruitment (Hölldobler et al., 1996). The myrmicinae Ocymyrmex laticeps uses 2-(3¢-indolyl)-ethanol 60 from its pygidial gland to lay trails (Morgan et al., 2006).

image

Figure 6. Compounds from the trail pheromones of ants found in the pygidial gland, Pavan gland, postpygidial gland and tibial gland.

Download figure to PowerPoint

The pygidial glands of dolichoderine ants usually contain mixtures of monoterpenes called iridoids. These act as alarm and defense substances, and are effective against other insects. The pygidial gland of Tapinoma simrothii, which contains iridodials 61 and iridomyrmecin 62, has a double function. At high emission rates from a point source, these compounds cause alarm. Workers rush to the source with open mandibles and raised abdomens. When a lower concentration was drawn along a line, workers followed the secretion calmly. These trails are long-lasting (Simon & Hefetz, 1990).

Pavan gland

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

The first substance reported as a trail pheromone of a dolichoderine ant was (Z)-9-hexadecenal 63 (Fig. 6) (Cavill et al., 1979) from the Pavan gland of Linepithema (Iridomyrmex) humilis, although the compound was reported to be inferior in test to a glandular extract (Van Vorhis Key & Baker, 1982). For the arboreal east Asian ant Dolichoderus thoracicus, only the Pavan gland was found active. Analysis showed the gland contained many compounds, including a number of aldehydes (Attygalle et al., 1998a). By concentrating on the aldehydes, (Z)-9-octadecenal 64 (approximately 10–20 ng per gland) and (Z)-13-docosenal 65 (approximately 2–4 ng) were identified as the major compounds. In all, 18 aldehydes from C16 to C24 were identified. In trail tests at 1 ng cm−1, (Z)-9-hexadecenal 63, (Z)-9-octadecenal 64, (Z)-11-eicosenal 66 and (Z)-13-docosenal 65 all showed some activity (63 and 64 were most active, 65 and 66 were less so). However, when pairs of compounds were tested together (63 and 64, 64 and 65, 64 and 66), they showed greater activity and a mixture of all four had activity almost equal to that of a single gland (Attygalle et al., 1998a). In a preliminary examination, the authors found that several other Dolichoderus species also contained aldehydes and suggested that their trail pheromones may not be highly species-specific.

Postpygidial gland

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

Army ants are difficult to maintain in the laboratory in the ways required for pheromone studies, so little is known of that aspect of them. In the one example known from the subfamily Aneuretinae, an unidentified species of Aenictus, the trail pheromone has been found in a postpygidial gland (Oldham et al., 1994a). The ants were taken from a raiding column in Hong Kong, and the work carried out swiftly when it was still possible to keep them in good condition. On an artifical trail made from a 100-fold dilution of an extract of one gland of a worker, most of the workers (> 90%) followed a trail on reaching it and continued following it for several hours, making quantification impossible. The simple compound methyl anthranilate 67 was identified at approximately 100 ng per gland. However, when trails made of synthetic 67 were tried, they induced little activity, unless the ants were transferred from an trail made from glandular extract, whereupon they followed very well. There could even be a lapse of several hours between contact with the natural and synthetic trails. This led to the discovery of a second component in the gland at much smaller concentration (1% of the total secretion). The second compound was identified as methyl nicotinate 68. Artificial trails made with methyl nicotinate induce no trail-following but, when combined with methyl anthranilate in the ratio 1 : 100 and even when only 10 pg 68 and 1 ng 67 were used per trail, the workers ran persistently on the trail. Methyl nicotinate can be considered a primer pheromone because, if given to the ants even 6 h before the methyl anthranilate, it primes them to follow the anthranilate trail (Oldham et al., 1994a). Methyl anthranilate 67 was also found in the postpygidial gland of Aenictus rotundatus, but the fragment of the colony could not be maintained in good condition long enough to perform trail bioassays (Oldham et al., 1994b).

Tibial glands

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

In the genus Crematogaster, workers raise their gasters forward over the thorax when alarmed and use their spatulate stings to spread defensive secretions on attackers. As a consequence, they are unable to bring the tip of the gaster into contact with the ground. Yet they lay foraging trails. Leuthold (1968) showed that, in Crematogaster ashmeadi, they laid a secretion with their feet from glands in their hind tibia, connected to their tarsi by a tubular duct. Fletcher & Brand (1968) independently, by extracting different body parts of Crematogaster peringueyi, showed that the pheromone was located in the hind legs. They also found that, when laying a trail, the worker walked with a curious gait with their hind legs held closer together. The morphology of the gland and the duct to the tarsi were described by Billen (1984). A number of 2-alkanols and methyl ketones from C11 to C15 have been identified in the tibial glands of several species (Ollett, 1989) but, at present, the pheromone of only one species, Crematogaster castanea, has been fully identified as (R)-2-dodecanol 69 (Morgan et al., 2004). Both (R)- and (S)-2-dodecanol showed strong activity, too great to measure accurately down to 0.1 ng per trail of 32 cm but, below that, the (R)-enantiomer was approximately 100-fold more active than the (S)-enantiomer, and the activity of the latter can be accounted for by the small amount of the (R)-enantiomer it contained. It has proven difficult to obtain reproducible results with other species. The major pheromone component of Crematogaster scutellaris and Crematogaster liengmei is 2-tridecanone 70 (J. M. Brand & E. D. Morgan, unpublished results). There appears to be some cross-activity of trails within groups of species of Crematogaster (Espadeler & Martí, 1994).

Perception and stereobiology

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

We do not understand how the olfactory system perceives odours, although the subject is advancing rapidly and there are some clues available that help. Using individual mouse olfactory receptors and a group of simple aliphatic compounds of related structures, Malnic et al. (1999) were able to show that any one receptor can recognize a number of chemically related odorant compounds, and any odorant can be recognized by multiple receptors. Therefore, different odorants are recognized by different combinations of receptors. Moreover, a receptor can respond with different affinities to different compounds. For example, a receptor might bind most strongly to pentanol but it might also bind to butanol, hexanol and heptanol with lower affinities. A slight change in the structure of a compound or a change in its concentration can change the pattern of which receptors respond, and also change the intensity. According to Malnic et al. (1999), there are approximately 1000 odorant receptor genes in mammals. If each odorant were detected by only three receptors, theoretically, the system would be able to discriminate almost 1012 odours. Insects have far fewer odorant receptor genes; approximately 60 in Drosophila (Nozawa & Nei, 2007), more in the honeybee, approximately 170 (Robertson & Wanner, 2006), and still more in ants. The number of genes corresponds closely to the number of olfactory glomeruli, and C. floridanus has approximately 460 glomeruli (Zube et al., 2008) and therefore approximately also the same number of olfactory genes. The number of receptors corresponding to each gene is probably small but variable with the sensitivity for a given compound. Each axon extends from the receptor through the antennal nerve to the antennal lobe of the brain. Antennal lobes are particularly large in ants because: (i) ants rely strongly on olfaction (other insects use visual clues more) and (ii) pheromone communication is more advanced and elaborate in ants compared with other social insects (Gronenberg, 2008). It is particularly interesting that the response of C. floridanus glomeruli to the trail pheromone nerolic acid 56 was stable over a wide range of concentrations, seven to eight powers of ten, and the intensity of response was measured in the duration of the response (Zube et al., 2008).

Without knowledge of the structure of any odorant receptors, we presume that they have three-dimensional surfaces onto which odour molecules of specific shape can be attached, rather as a substrate is attached to the active site of an enzyme. This means that the three-dimensional shape of a molecule, and hence the absolute configuration of a chiral molecule, affects which, if any, receptors accept that molecule. This helps to explain the importance of chirality, or handedness, of perceived molecules. Insects may respond in a variety of ways to pure enantiomers or mixtures of them. From the discussion above, it can be seen that frequently one enantiomer of a chiral structure is used as a trail pheromone by an ant species, whereas the other enantiomer is not present. Frequently, the presence of the unnatural isomer in a synthetic mixture does not affect the detection of the natural isomer. Mori (2007), in a review on chirality in pheromones, discusses examples where the presence of the unnatural isomer can inhibit the detection of the natural isomer, or the pheromone may consist of a specific blend of the isomers, and response is greatest to that blend, whereas others are less effective. Examples exist where the pheromone consists of both isomers, and the insect does not respond to either alone. In all, Mori (2007) lists ten ways in which insects may respond to enantiomeric pheromones.

Stereobiology refers to the shape of the receptors on the antenna that detect the volatile compounds. They can be very precise in the shape of the molecules that they accept, or they can be more accommodating, in binding a range of molecules of similar shape and polarity. There have been a few studies to see how specific the chemical structure must be for a compound to show activity as a trail pheromone. When the first trail pheromone (methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate 1, Fig. 7) was isolated, considerable effort was given to examining similar structures that might show activity. The molecule of 1 is planar and rather rigid, and lends itself well to study. Over 30 compounds were synthesized and tested, but only two compounds, 71 and 72, where the methyl group on the ring was replaced by a chlorine or bromine atom, showed comparable activity (Sonnet & Moser, 1972, 1973). For the pheromone of T. caespitum, consisting of the two pyrazine compounds 2 and 3, the position and size of the alkyl groups is critical. When either 2,3-dimethylpyrazine 73, or 2,6-dimethylpyrazine 74 replaced 2,5-dimethylpyrazine 3, the pheromone mixture was inactive but, if trimethylpyrazine 7 replaced 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethyl pyrazine in the mixture, there was some activity (Attygalle & Morgan, 1984). The structure of methyl 6-methylsalicylate 4 is also largely rigid and is useful for examining the effects of small alterations in the structure or position of atoms. Thirty eight compounds of similar structure to 4 were examined in trail bioassays with Tetramorium impurum (Morgan et al., 1990). Removal of the methyl ester group to give 6-methylsalicylic acid 75 totally removed activity, but m-cresol 76 (i.e. removal of the whole ester group) showed some activity. Addition of an extra methyl group to the benzene ring at position 5 (compound 77) destroyed activity, but addition of an extra methyl group at positions 4 or 3 (compounds 78 and 79) had no effect, and gave activity similar to the natural compound 4. In the case of faranal 39 (Fig. 5), the 3-epimer (3R, 4R)-faranal 80 shows weak activity and does not interfere with the activity of the natural (3S, 4R)-enantiomer 39 if a trail is made of the mixture, and the C-10 double bond can be cis or trans without affecting activity (Kobayashi et al., 1980; Koyama et al., 1983). Efforts to predict the effects of a change of structure on pheromone activity remain ineffective at present.

image

Figure 7. Some examples of compounds studied in attempts to understand the specificity of olfactory receptors.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Other insects

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

The ability to exploit a food source co-operatively or to organize the move of a whole colony to a new home are characteristics of social organization. In many respects, ants have attained the highest level of social organization and, consequently, have developed this use of scent trails to a high degree, although the habit of trail-following is not confined to ants. A number of trail pheromones, different in structure from those of ants, and tending to be less volatile, have been identified in termites (Morgan, 1990; Sillam-Dusses et al., 2007). The aerial marking of foraging routes by some bees by intermittant deposits of odour marks on plants along their routes or at the flowers is also well known (Jarau et al, 2004). Bumblebees release pheromones in the nest to recruit to foraging (Granero et al., 2005). Sub-social tent caterpillars of Malacosoma (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) lay trails of 5β-cholestan-3-one 81, a relatively involatile substance (Fitzgerald & Webster, 1993; Colasurdo & Despland, 2005). Caterpillars of Eriogaster lanestris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) also follow trails of compound 81 (Ruf et al., 2001). Recently, it was reported that a female shield bug Parastrachia japonensis (Hemiptera: Parastrachiidae) orients towards its burrow by odour when bringing back food for its young (Hironaka et al., 2007).

Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References

The investigation of trail pheromones has lagged after the active period in the 1990s when many formicine pheromones were identified. Subsequrent to the first trail pheromone discoveries, MS has advanced steadily, and its sensitivity has increased at least 100-fold. That should provide some encouragement. Further progress will depend upon the co-operation and dedication of chemists but will also require even more the acute observation and design of bioassays by entomologists. It is probable that yet more complex forms of recruitment and trail use will emerge for their work.

The importance of efficiency of foraging through recruitment to trails is illustrated by the story of the crazy ant Paratrechina longicornis (Formicinae), which infested the Biosphere 2 Center in Oracle, Arizona, shortly after it was built. It excluded virtually every animal that was not a mutualist or which was not protected in some way (Wetterer et al., 1999). Its dominance inside the Biosphere appears to be related to its excellent exploitative ability rather than to any physical aggressiveness or defensive strategies (Witte et al., 2007). It was simply faster to recruitment than competing species. The Dufour gland has an attracting and exciting effect (Witte et al., 2007). It contains chiefly undecane and 2-tridecanone, and small amounts of ethyl phenylacetate and other compounds (Morgan et al., 2005), but the trail pheromone, located in the hindgut as expected (Blum & Wilson, 1964), has not yet been identified (Witte et al., 2007).

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Glandular sources
  5. Bioassays
  6. Venom gland
  7. Dufour gland
  8. Hind gut
  9. Pygidial gland
  10. Pavan gland
  11. Postpygidial gland
  12. Tibial glands
  13. Perception and stereobiology
  14. Other insects
  15. Conclusions
  16. Acknowledgement
  17. References
  • Ali, M.F. & Morgan, E.D. (1990) Chemical communication in insect communities. Biological Reviews, 65, 227247.
  • Attygalle, A.B. & Morgan, E.D. (1983) Trail pheromone of the ant Tetramorium caespitum L. Naturwissenschaften, 70, 364365.
  • Attygalle, A.B. & Morgan, E.D. (1984) Identification of the trail pheromone of the ant Tetramorium caespitum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 10, 14531468.
  • Attygalle, A.B. & Morgan, E.D. (1985) Ant trail pheromones. Advances in Insect Physiology, 18, 130.
  • Attygalle, A.B., Lancaster, V.K. & Morgan, E.D. (1985) The trail pheromone of the ant Manica rubida (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Actes des Colloques Insectes Sociaux, 2, 159166.
  • Attygalle, A.B., Vostrowsky, O., Bestmann, H-J. et al. (1988) (3R, 4S)-4-methyl-3-heptanol, the trail pheromone of the ant Leptogenys diminuta. Naturwissenschaften, 75, 315317.
  • Attygalle, A.B., Steghaus-Kovac, S., Ahmad, V.U. et al. (1991) cis-Isogeraniol, a recruitment pheromone of the ant Leptogenys diminuta. Naturwissenschaften, 78, 9092.
  • Attygalle, A.B., Mutti, A., Rohe, W. et al. (1998a) Trail pheromone from the Pavan gland of the ant Dolichoderus thoracicus (Smith). Naturwissenschaften, 85, 275277.
  • Attygalle, A.B., Kern, F., Huang, Q. & Meinwald, J. (1998b) Trail pheromone of the myrmicinae ant Aphaenogaster rudis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften, 785, 3841.
  • Barbazanges, N. (1989) Diplôme d’études approfondies, Université Paris Nord, France.
  • Barlin, M.R., Blum, M.S. & Brand, J.M. (1976) Fire ant trail pheromones: analysis of species specificity after gas chromatographic fractionation. Journal of Insect Physiology, 22, 839844.
  • Beckers, R., Goss, S., Deneubourg, J.L. & Pasteels, J.M. (1989) Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy. Psyche, 96, 239256.
  • Beckers, R., Deneubourg, J.L. & Goss, S. (1992) Trail-laying behavior during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L). Insectes Sociaux, 39, 5972.
  • Bestmann, H.-J., Kern, F., Schäfer, D. & Witschel, M.C. (1992) (R)-3,4-Dihydroisocoumarins, a new class of ant trail phromone. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition in English, 31, 795796.
  • Bestmann, H.-J., Janssen, E., Kern, F. et al. (1995a) All-trans-geranylgeranyl acetate and geranylgeraniol, recruitment pheromone components in the Dufour gland of the poneromorph ant Ectatomma ruidum. Naturwissenschaften, 82, 334336.
  • Bestmann, H.-J., Haak, U., Kern, F. & Hölldobler, B. (1995b) 2,4-Dimethyl-5-hexanolide, a trail pheromone component of the carpenter ant Camponotus herculeanus: pheromones 96. Naturwissenschaften, 82, 142144.
  • Bestmann, H.-J., Übler, E. & Hölldobler, B. (1997) First biosynthetic studies on ant trail pheromones. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition in English, 36, 395397.
  • Bestmann, H.-J., Liepold, B., Kress, A. & Hofmann, A. (1999) (2S, 4R, 5S)-2,4-Dimethyl-5-hexanolide: ants of different species of Camponotus can distinguish the absolute configuration of their trail pheromone. Chemistry, A European Journal, 5, 29842989.
  • Billen, J. (1984) Morphology of the tibial gland in the ant Crematogaster scutellaris. Naturwissenschaften, 71, 324325.
  • Billen, J. (2006) Signal variety and communication in social insects. Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meetings, 17, 925.
  • Billen, J. & Morgan, E.D. (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects: sources and secretions. Pheromone Communication in Social Insects (ed. by R. K.Vander Meer, M. D.Breed, K. E.Espelie and M. L.Winston), pp. 333. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
  • Billen, J., Beeckman, W. & Morgan, E.D. (1992) Active trail pheromone compounds and trail following in the ant Atta sexdens sexdens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 4, 197202.
  • Billen, J., Thys, B., Ito, F. & Gobin, B. (2005) The pretarsal gland of the ant Amblyopone reclinate (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) and its role in nestmate recruitment. Arthropod Structure and Development, 34, 111116.
  • Blatrix, R., Schulz, C., Jaisson, P. et al. (2002) Trail pheromone of ponerine ant Gnamptogenys striatula: 4-methylgeranylesters from Dufour’s gland. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28, 25572567.
  • Blum, M.S. & Portocarrero, C.A. (1966) Chemical releasers of social behavior. X. An attine trail substance in the venom of a non-trail laying myrmicinae Daceton armigerum (Latreille). Psyche, 73, 150155.
  • Blum, M.S. & Wilson, E.O. (1964) The anatomical source of trail substance in formicine ants. Psyche, 71, 2831.
  • Bonnet, C. (1779) Observation LXIII. Sur un procédé des Fourmis. Œuvres d’Histoire Naturelle et de Philosophie, Vol. 1, pp. 535536. Imprimerie de Samuel Fauche, France.
  • Brian, M.V. (1983) Social Insects. Chapter 4. Chapman and Hall, U.K.
  • Butenandt, A. & Karlson, P. (1954) Über die Isolierung eines Metamorphose-Hormons der Insekten in kristallisierter Form. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 9B, 389391.
  • Butenandt, A., Beckmann, R., Stamm, D. & Hecker, E. (1959) Über den Sexuallockstoff den Seidenspinners Bombyx mori. Reindarstellung und Konstitution. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 14B, 283284.
  • Carthy, J.D. (1951) The orientation of two allied species of British. ant II. Odour trail laying and following in Acanthomyops (Lasius) fuliginosus. Behaviour, 3, 304318.
  • Cavill, G.W.K., Robertson, P.L. & Davies, N.W. (1979) Argentine ant aggregation factor. Experientia, 35, 989990.
  • Cavill, G.W.K., Davies, N.W. & McDonald, F.J. (1980) Characterization of aggregation factors and associated compounds from the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 6, 371384.
  • Colasurdo, N. & Despland, E. (2005) Social cues and following behavior in the forest tent caterpillar. Journal of insect Behavior, 18, 7787.
  • Cross, J.H., Byler, R.C., Ravid, U. et al. (1979) The major component of the trail pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant, Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel: 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 5, 187203.
  • Cross, J.H., West, J.R., Silverstein, R.M. et al. (1982) Trail pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus (reich), (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 8, 11191124.
  • Darwin, C.R. (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection Relative to Sex. Murray, U.K.
  • Dussutour, A., Nicolis, S.C., Deneubourg, J.L. & Fourcassie, V. (2006) Collective decisions in ants when fouraging under crowded conditions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 1730.
  • Eidmann, H. (1927) Die Sprache der Ameisen. Revue Zoologique Russe, 7, 3947.
  • Espadaler, X. & Martí, S. (1994) La feromona de pista de Crematogaster Lund (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): vàlida per a tot el gènere? Sessiones Emtomologica ICHN-SCL (Barcelona), VIII, 8186.
  • Evershed, R.P. & Morgan, E.D. (1983) The amounts of trail pheromone substances in the venom of workers of four species of attine ants. Insect Biochemistry, 13, 469474.
  • Evershed, R.P., Morgan, E.D. & Cammaerts, M.-C. (1981) Identification of the trail pheromone of the ant Myrmica rubra L., and related species. Naturwissenschaften, 67, 374375.
  • Evershed, R.P., Morgan, E.D. & Cammaerts, M.-C. (1983) 3-Ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine, the trail pheromone from the venom glands of eight species of Myrmica ants. Insect Biochemistry, 12, 383391.
  • Fitzgerald, T.D. & Webster, F.X. (1993) Identification and behavioural assays of the trail pheromone of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hübner (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, Revue Canadienne de Zoologie, 71, 15111515.
  • Forel, A. (1886) Études myrmecologiques en 1886. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 30, 131215.
  • Forel, A. (1908) The Senses of Insects. Methuen, U.K.
  • Fourcassie, V. & Deneubourg, J.L. (1994) The dynamics of collective exploration and trail-formation in Monomorium pharaonis; experiments and model. Physiological Entomology, 19, 291300.
  • Fletcher, D.J.C. & Brand, J.M. (1968) Source of the trail pheromone and method of trail laying in the ant Crematogaster peringueyi. Journal of Insect Physiology, 14, 783788.
  • Gerardy, S. & Verhaeghe, J.C. (1988) L’orientation le long de la piste chez Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Actes des Colloques Insects Sociaux, 4, 235242.
  • Goetsch, W. (1934) Untersuchungen über die Zusammenarbeit im Ameisenstaat. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 28, 319401.
  • Granero, A.M., Sanz, J.M.G., Gonzalez, F.J.E. et al. (2005) Chemical compounds of the foraging recruitment pheromone in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften, 92, 371374.
  • Greene, M.J. & Gordon, D.M. (2007) How patrollers set foraging direction in harvester ants. American Naturalist, 170, 943948.
  • Gronenberg, W. (2008) Structure and function of ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) brains: strength in numbers. Myrmecological News, 11, 2536.
  • Haak, U. (1995) Strukturaufklärung und Synthese von Spurpheromonen bei Ameisen der Gattung Camponotus. Dissertation, University Erlangen-Nürnberg.
  • Haak, U., Hölldobler, B., Bestmann, H.-J. & Kern, F. (1996) Species-specificity in trail pheromones and Dufour gland contents of Camponotus atriceps and C. floridanus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology, 7, 8593.
  • Hayashi, N. & Komae, H. (1977) The trail and alarm pheromones of the ant Pristomyrmex pungens Mayr. Experientia, 33, 424425.
  • Hironaka, M., Fillipi, L., Nomakuchi, S. et al. (2007) Heirarchial use of chemical marking and path integration in the homing trip of a sub-social shield bug. Animal Behaviour, 73, 739745.
  • Hölldobler, B. (1978) Ethological aspects of chemical communication in ants. Advances in the study of behavior, 8, 75115.
  • Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants. Springer, Germany.
  • Hölldobler, B., Palmer, J.M. & Moffett, M.W. (1990) Chemical communication in the dacetine ant Daceton armigerum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16, 12071219.
  • Hölldobler, B., Braun, U., Gronenberg, W. et al. (1994) Trail communication in the ant Megaponera foetens (Fabr.) (Formicidae, Ponerinae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 40, 585593.
  • Hölldobler, B., Oldham, N.J., Morgan, E.D. & König, W.A. (1995) Recruitment pheromones in the ants Aphaenogaster albisetosus and A. cockerelli (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 41, 739744.
  • Hölldobler, B., Janssen, E., Bestmann, H.-J. et al. (1996) Communication in the migratory termite-hunting ant Pachycondyla (=Termitopone) marginata (Formicidae, Ponerinae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 178, 4753.
  • Hölldobler, B., Morgan, E.D., Oldham, N.J. & Liebig, J. (2001) Recruitment pheromone in the harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47, 369374.
  • Hölldobler, B., Oldham, N.J., Alpert, G.D. & Liebig, J. (2002) Predatory behaviour and chemical communication in two Metapone species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology, 12, 147151.
  • Hölldobler, B., Morgan, E.D., Oldham, N.J. et al. (2004) Dufour gland secretion in the harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex. Chemoecology, 14, 101106.
  • Huwyler, S., Grob, K. & Viscontini, M. (1975) The trail pheromone of the ant Lasius fuliginosus: identification of six components. Journal of Insect Physiology, 21, 299304.
  • Jackson, D.E. & Chaline, N. (2007) Modulation of pheromone trail strength with food quality in Pharoah’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Animal Behaviour 74, 463470.
  • Jackson, B.D., Wright, P.J. & Morgan, E.D. (1989) 3-Ethyl-2,5-dimethylpyrazine, a component of the trail pheromone of the ant Messor bouvieri. Experientia, 45, 487489.
  • Jackson, B.D., Keegans, S.J., Morgan, E.D. et al. (1990) Trail pheromone of the ant Tetramorium meridionale. Naturwissenschaften, 77, 294296 and 452.
  • Janssen, E., Bestmann, H.J., Hölldobler, B. & Kern, F. (1995) N, N-dimethyluracil and actinidine, two pheromones of the ponerine ant Megaponera foetens (Fab) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21, 19471955.
  • Janssen, E., Übler, E., Bauriegel, L. et al. (1997a) Trail pheromone of the ponerine ant Leptogenys peuqueti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a multicomponent mixture of related compounds. Naturwissenschaften, 84, 122125.
  • Janssen, E., Hölldobler, B., Kern, F. et al. (1997b) Trail pheromone of myrmicinae ant Pristomyrmex pungens. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23, 10251034.
  • Jarau, S., Hrncir, M., Ayasse, M. et al. (2004) A stingless bee (Melipona seminigra) marks food sources with a pheromone from its claw retractor tendons Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30, 793804.
  • Jeanson, R., Ratnieks, F.L.W. & Deneubourg, J.L. (2003) Pheromone decay rates on different substrates in the Pharaoh’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Physiological Entomology, 28, 192198.
  • Karlson, P. & Butenandt, A. (1959) Pheromones (ectohormones) in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 4, 3958.
  • Kern, F. & Bestmann, H.-J. (1994) Pheromones 98. Olfactory electroantennogram responses of the formicine ants Lasius niger and Formica species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to 3,4-dihydroisocoumarins. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 49C, 865870.
  • Kern, F., Klein, R.W., Janssen, E. et al. (1997) Mellein, a trail pheromone component of the ant Lasius fuliginosus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23, 779792.
  • Kobayashi, M., Koyama, T., Ogura, K. et al. (1980) Bio-organic synthesis and absolute configuration of faranal. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 102, 66026604.
  • Kohl, E., Hölldobler, B. & Bestmann, H.-J. (2000) Trail pheromone component in the ant Mayriella overbecki Vietmeyer (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Naturwissenschaften, 87, 320322.
  • Kohl, E., Hölldobler, B. & Bestmann, H.-J. (2001) Trail recruitment pheromone in Camponotus socius (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology, 11, 6773.
  • Kohl, E., Hölldobler, B. & Bestmann, H.-J. (2003) Trail pheromones and Dufour gland contents of three Camponotus species (C. castaneus, C. balzani, C. serviceiventris: (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Chemoecology, 13, 113122.
  • Koyama, T., Matsubara, M., Ogura, K. et al. (1983) Congeners of faranal and their trail pheromone activity. Naturwissenschaften, 70, 469470.
  • Leclercq, S., Charles, S., Daloze, D. et al. (2001) Absolute configuration of anabasine from Messor and Aphaenogaster ants. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 945952.
  • Lenoir, A., Detrain, C. & Barbazanges, N. (1992) Host trail following by the guest ant Formicoxenus provancheri. Experientia, 48, 9497.
  • Leuthold, R.H. (1968) A tibial gland scent-trail and trail-laying behavior in the ant Crematogaster ashmeadi Mayr. Psyche, 75, 233248.
  • Maile, R., Jungnickel, H., Morgan, E.D. et al. (2000) Secretions of venom and Dufour gland in the ant Leptogenys diminuta. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 26, 24972506.
  • Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. & Buck, L.B. (1999) Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell, 96, 713723.
  • Möglich, M., Maschwitz, U. & Hölldobler, B. (1974) Tandem calling: a new kind of signal in ant communication. Science, 186, 10461047.
  • Montgomery, J., Randall, M. & Hendtlass, T. (2008) Solution bias in ant colony optimisation: lessons for selecting pheromone models. Computers and Operational Research, 35, 27282749.
  • Morgan, E.D. (1990) Insect trail pheromones: a perspective of progress. Isolation and Chromatography of Insect Hormones and Pheromones (ed. by A. R.McCaffery and I. D.Wilson), pp. 259270. Plenum Press, U.K.
  • Morgan, E.D. (2004) Biosynthesis in Insects. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
  • Morgan, E.D. (2008) Chemical sorcery for sociality: exocrine gland secretions of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 11, 7990.
  • Morgan, E.D. & Ollett, D.G. (1987) Methyl 6-methylsalicylate, trail pheromone of the ant Tetramorium impurum. Naturwissenschaften, 74, 596597.
  • Morgan, E.D. & Wadhams, L.J. (1972) Gas chromatography of volatile compounds in small samples of biological materials. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 10, 528529.
  • Morgan, E.D., Jackson, B.D., Ollett, D.G. & Sales, G.W. (1990) Trail pheromone of the ant Tetramorium impurum and model compounds: structure-activity comparisons. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16, 34933510.
  • Morgan, E.D., Hölldobler, B., Vaisar, T. & Jackson, B.D. (1992) Contents of poison apparatus and their relation to trail-following in the ant Daceton armigeum. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 18, 21612168.
  • Morgan, E.D., Brand, J.M., Mori, K. & Keegans, S.J. (2004) The trail pheromone of the ant Crematogaster castanea. Chemoecology, 14, 119120.
  • Morgan, E.D., Jackson, B.D. & Billen, J. (2005) Chemical secretions of the ‘crazy ant’Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formcidae). Sociobiology, 46, 299304.
  • Morgan, E.D., do Nascimento, R.R. & Billen, J. (2006) Glandular secretions of the myrmicinae ant Ocymyrmex laticeps (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). African Entomology, 14, 289292.
  • Mori, K. (2007) Significance of chirality in pheromone science. Bio-organic and Medicinal Chemistry, 15, 75057523.
  • do Nascimento, R.R. & Morgan, E.D. (1996) Chemicals involved in the communication system of social insects: their source and methods of isolation and identification, with special emphasis on ants. Quimica Nova, 19, 156165.
  • Nozawa, M. & Nei, M. (2007) Evolutionary dynamics of olfactory receptor genes in Drosophila species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 71227127.
  • Ollett, D.G. (1989) Development and usage of micro-chemical methods for the investigation of ant pheromone. Doctoral thesis, Keele University.
  • Oldham, N.J., Morgan, E.D., Gobin, B. & Billen, J. (1994a) First identification of a trail pheromone of an army ant (Aenictus species). Naturwissenschaften, 81, 313316.
  • Oldham, N.J., Morgan, E.D., Gobin, B. et al. (1994b) Volatile secretions of the old world army ant Aenictus rotundatus and the chemotaxonomic implications of army ant Dufour gland chemistry. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20, 32973305.
  • Parry, K. & Morgan, E.D. (1979) Pheromones of ants: a review. Physiological Entomology, 4, 161189.
  • Pasteels, J.M. & Verhaeghe, J.C. (1974) Dosage biologique de la phèromone de piste chez les fourrageures et les reines de Myrmica rubra. Insectes Sociaux, 21, 167180.
  • Pratt, S.C. (1989) Recruitment and other communication behavior in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum. Ethology, 81, 313331.
  • Richardson, T.O., Houston, A.I. & Franks, N.R. (2007) Teaching with evaluation in ants. Current Biology, 17, 15201526.
  • Riley, R.G., Silverstein, R.M., Carroll, B. & Carroll, R. (1974) Methyl 4-methylpyrrole-2-carboxylate: a volatile trail pheromone from the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Journal of Insect Physiology, 20, 651654.
  • Ritter, F.J., Brüggemann-Rotgans, I.M.E., Verweil, P.E.J. et al. (1977) Trail pheromone of the Pharoah’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis: isolation and identification of faranal, a terpenoid related to juvenile hormone II. Tetrahedron Letters, 30, 26172618.
  • Robertson, H.M. & Wanner, K.W. (2006) The chemoreceptor superfamily in the honeybee, Apis mellifera expansion of the odorant, but not gustatory, receptor family. Genome Research, 16, 13951403.
  • Rocca, J.R., Tumlinson, J.H., Glancey, B.M. & Lofgren, C.S. (1983) The queen recognition pheromone of Solenopsis invicta, preparation of (E)-6-(1-pentenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one. Tetrahedron Letters, 24, 18891892.
  • Ruf, C., Costa, J.T. & Fiedler, K. (2001) Trail-based communication in social caterpillars of Eriogaster lanestris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 14, 231245.
  • Santschi, F. (1911) Observations et remarques critiques sur le mecanisme de l’orientation chez les fourmis. Revue Suisse Zoologique, 19, 303338.
  • Santschi, F. (1930) Nouvelles experiences sur l’orientation des Tapinoma par sécrétions dromographiques. Archives Psychologiques, 22, 348351.
  • Sillam-Dusses, D., Semon, E., Lacey, M.J. et al. (2007) Trail-following pheromones in basal termites, with special reference to Mastotermes darwiniensis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33, 19601977.
  • Simon, T. & Hefetz, A. (1990) Trail-following responses of Tapinoma simrothi (Formicidae: Dolochoderinae) to pygidial gland extracts. Insectes Sociaux, 38, 1725.
  • Sonnet, P.E. & Moser, J.C. (1972) Synthetic analogs of the trail pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant Atta texana (Buckley). Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 20, 11911194.
  • Sonnet, P.E. & Moser, J.C. (1973) Trail pheromone: response of the Texas leaf-cutting ant, Atta texana, to selected halo- and cyanopyrrole-2-aldehyde, ketones and esters. Environmental Entomology, 2, 851854.
  • Sudd, J.H. (1959) Interction between ants on a scent trail. Nature, 183, 1588.
  • Sumpter, D.J.T. & Beekman, M. (2003) From nonlinearity to optimality:pheromone trail foraging by ants. Animal Behaviour, 66, 273280.
  • Tentschert, J., Bestmann, H.-J., Hölldobler, B. & Heinze, J. (2000) 2,3-Dimethyl-5-(2’-propyl)pyrazine, a trail pheromone component of Eutetramorium mocquerysi Emery (1899) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften, 87, 377380.
  • Tumlinson, J.H., Silverstein, R.M., Moser, J.C. et al. (1971) Identification of the trail pheromone of a leaf-cutting ant, Atta texana. Nature, 234, 348349.
  • Tumlinson, J.H., Moser, J.C., Silverstein, R.M.et al. (1972) A volatile pheromone of the leaf-cutting ant Atta texana. Journal of Insect Physiology, 18, 809814.
  • Übler, E., Kern, F., Bestmann, H.J. et al. (1995) Trail pheromones of two formicine ants, Camponotus silvicola and C. rufipes (Hymenoptea: Formicidae). Naturwissenschaften, 82, 523525.
  • Vander Meer, R.K., Williams, F.D. & Lofgren, C.S. (1981) Hydrocarbon components of the trail pheromone of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Tetrahedron Letters, 22, 16511654.
  • Vander Meer, R.K., Alvarez, F.M. & Lofgren, C.S. (1988) Isolation of the trail recruitment pheromone of Solenopsis invicta. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14, 825838.
  • Vander Meer, R.K., Lofgren, C.S. & Alvarez, F.M. (1990) The orientation inducer pheromone of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Physiological Entomology, 15, 483488.
  • Van Vorhis Key, S.E. & Baker, T.C. (1982) Specificity of laboratory trail following by the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr), to (Z)-9-hexadecenal, analogs, and gaster extract. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 8, 10571063.
  • Wetterer, J.K., Miller, S.E., Wheeler, D.E. et al. (1999) Ecological dominance by Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an invasive tramp ant in Biosphere 2. Florida Entomologist, 82, 381388.
  • Williams, H.J., Strand, M.R. & Vinson, S.B. (1981) Trail pheromone of the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Buren). Experientia, 37, 11591160.
  • Wilson, E.O. (1959) Source and possible nature of the odor trail of fire ants. Science, 129, 643644.
  • Wilson, E.O. (1971) The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Witte, V., Attygalle, A.B. & Meinwald, J. (2007) Complex chemical communication in the crazy ant Paratrechina longicornis Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Chemoecology, 17, 5762.
  • Zube, C., Kleineidam, C.J., Kirschner, S. et al. (2008) Organization of the olfactory pathway and odor processing in the antennal lobe of the ant Camponotus floridanus. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 506, 425441.