Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox
Article first published online: 28 APR 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01521.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
MOTT, K. A. and PARKHURST, D. F. (1991), Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell & Environment, 14: 509–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01521.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 28 APR 2006
- Article first published online: 28 APR 2006
- Received 17 July 1990; received in revised form 17 January 1991; accepted for publication 31 January 1991
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- stomata;
- humidity;
- helox;
- transpiration;
- palchiness.
Abstract. Stomatal responses to humidity were studied in several species using normal air and a helium: oxygen mixture (79:21 v/v, with CO2 and water vapour added), which we termed ‘helox’. Since water vapour diffuses 2.33 times faster in helox than in air, it was possible to vary the water-vapour concentration difference between the leaf and the air at the leaf surface independently of the transpiration rate and vice versa. The CO2 concentration at the evaporating surfaces (ci), leaf temperature and photon flux density were kept constant throughout the experiments. The results of these experiments were consistent with a mechanism for Stomatal responses to humidity that is based on the rate of water loss from the leaf. Stomata apparently did not directly sense and respond to either the water vapour concentration at the leaf surface or the difference in water vapour concentration between the leaf interior and the leaf surface. In addition, stomatal responses that caused reductions in transpiration rate at low humidities were accompanied by decreases in photosynthesis at constant ci, suggesting heterogeneous (patchy) stomatal closure.

1365-3040/asset/pce_left.gif?v=1&s=1e3e2b353a68869d51a65b1c65b42fc3a73eb616)
1365-3040/asset/pce_right.gif?v=1&s=e17fe7967a8aad6c5e1e29f86a3bd9a1dd6bc0fc)
1365-3040/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=3900d1be241b1bcca5ef5c127adce5e06b3266bb)