Modelling forest response to increasing CO2 concentration under nutrient-limited conditions
Article first published online: 28 APR 2006
Plant, Cell & Environment
Volume 17, Issue 10, pages 1081–1099, October 1994
How to Cite
KIRSCHBAUM, M. U. F., KING, D. A., COMINS, H. N., MCMURTRIE, R. E., MEDLYN, B. E., PONGRACIC, S., MURTY, D., KEITH, H., RAISON, R. J., KHANNA, P. K. and SHERIFF, D. W. (1994), Modelling forest response to increasing CO2 concentration under nutrient-limited conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 17: 1081–1099. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb02007.x
- Issue published online: 28 APR 2006
- Article first published online: 28 APR 2006
- Received 5 August 1993; received in revised form 1 March 1994; accepted for publication 14 March 1994
The growth rates of woody plants depend on both the rate of photosynthetic carbon gain and the availability of essential nutrients. Instantaneous carbon gain is known to increase in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration, but it is uncertain whether this will translate into increased growth in the longer term under nutrient-limited conditions. An analytical model to address this question was developed by Comins & McMurtrie (1993, Ecological Applications 3, 666–681). Their model was further tested and analysed. Manipulation of various assumptions in the model revealed its key assumptions and allowed a more confident prediction of expected growth responses to CO2 enrichment under nutrient-limited conditions.
The analysis indicated that conclusions about the CO2 sensitivity of production were strongly influenced by assumptions about the relationship between foliar and heartwood nitrogen concentrations. With heartwood nitrogen concentration proportional to foliar nitrogen concentration, the model predicted a strong response of plant productivity to increasing CO2 concentration, whereas with heartwood nitrogen concentration set constant, the model predicted only a very slight growth response to changing CO2 concentration. On the other hand, predictions were only slightly affected by: (1) assumptions about the extent of nitrogen retranslocation out of senescing roots and foliage or wood during heartwood formation; (2) the effects of nitrogen status on specific leaf area or (3) leaf longevity; (4) carbon allocation between different plant parts; or (5) changes in the N:C ratio of organic matter sequestered in the passive pool of soil organic matter. Modification of the effect of foliar nitrogen concentration on the light utilization coefficient had only a small effect on the CO2 sensitivity for pines. However, this conclusion was strongly dependent on the chosen relationship between single-leaf photosynthesis and leaf nitrogen concentration. Overall, the analysis suggested that trees growing under nitrogen-limited conditions can respond to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration with considerable increases in growth.