Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?
Article first published online: 14 MAR 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
LONG, S. P., ZHU, X.-G., NAIDU, S. L. and ORT, D. R. (2006), Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?. Plant, Cell & Environment, 29: 315–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 MAR 2006
- Article first published online: 14 MAR 2006
- Received 8 December 2005; received in revised form 10 December 2005; accepted for publication 10 December 2005
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Photorespiration;
- Harvest index;
- Global change;
- Global food supply;
- Rubisco;
- Plant canopy architecture;
- Genetic transformation;
- Plant breeding;
- Crop improvement;
- Yield potential
ABSTRACT
The yield potential (Yp) of a grain crop is the seed mass per unit ground area obtained under optimum growing conditions without weeds, pests and diseases. It is determined by the product of the available light energy and by the genetically determined properties: efficiency of light capture (ɛi), the efficiency of conversion of the intercepted light into biomass (ɛc) and the proportion of biomass partitioned into grain (η). Plant breeding brings η and ɛi close to their theoretical maxima, leaving ɛc, primarily determined by photosynthesis, as the only remaining major prospect for improving Yp. Leaf photosynthetic rate, however, is poorly correlated with yield when different genotypes of a crop species are compared. This led to the viewpoint that improvement of leaf photosynthesis has little value for improving Yp. By contrast, the many recent experiments that compare the growth of a genotype in current and future projected elevated [CO2] environments show that increase in leaf photosynthesis is closely associated with similar increases in yield. Are there opportunities to achieve similar increases by genetic manipulation? Six potential routes of increasing ɛc by improving photosynthetic efficiency were explored, ranging from altered canopy architecture to improved regeneration of the acceptor molecule for CO2. Collectively, these changes could improve ɛc and, therefore, Yp by c. 50%. Because some changes could be achieved by transgenic technology, the time of the development of commercial cultivars could be considerably less than by conventional breeding and potentially, within 10–15 years.

1365-3040/asset/pce_left.gif?v=1&s=1e3e2b353a68869d51a65b1c65b42fc3a73eb616)
1365-3040/asset/pce_right.gif?v=1&s=e17fe7967a8aad6c5e1e29f86a3bd9a1dd6bc0fc)
