SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • drought;
  • hormones;
  • pathogens;
  • stomata.

ABSTRACT

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT
  3. ABSCISIC ACID IN DROUGHT AND PATHOGEN RESPONSES
  4. ABA SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
  5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  6. REFERENCES

Abscisic acid (ABA) regulates key processes relevant to seed germination, plant development, and biotic and abiotic stress responses. Abiotic stress conditions such as drought induce ABA biosynthesis initiating the signalling pathways that lead to a number of molecular and cellular responses, among which the best known are the expression of stress-related genes and stomatal closure. Stomatal closure also serves as a mechanism for pathogen defence, thereby acting as a platform for crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses involving ABA action. Significant advances in our understanding of ABA signal transduction have been made with combination of approaches including genetics, biochemistry, electrophysiology and chemical genetics. Molecular components associated with the ABA signalling have been identified, and their relationship in the complex network of interactions is being dissected. We focused on the recent progress in ABA signal transduction, especially those studies related to identification of ABA receptors and downstream components that lead ABA signal to cellular response. In particular, we will describe a pathway model that starts with ABA binding to the PYR/PYL/RCAR family of receptors, followed by inactivation of 2C-type protein phosphatases and activation of SnRK2-type kinases, and eventually lead to activation of ion channels in guard cells and stomatal closure.


ABSCISIC ACID IN DROUGHT AND PATHOGEN RESPONSES

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT
  3. ABSCISIC ACID IN DROUGHT AND PATHOGEN RESPONSES
  4. ABA SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
  5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  6. REFERENCES

In the natural environment, plants are constantly challenged with biotic and abotic stresses, such as various pathogens, drought and high salinity. Plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) serves as a chemical signal in response to these environmental factors and triggers changes in a number of plant physiological and developmental processes, leading to adaptation to the stress conditions (Finkelstein, Gampala & Rock 2002; Robert-Seilaniantz et al. 2007; Ton, Flors & Mauch-Mani 2009). As many review articles cover the topic of ABA action in abiotic stress responses (Chinnusamy, Gong & Zhu 2008; Popko et al. 2010; Sirichandra et al. 2010; Wilkinson & Davies 2010; Joshi-Saha, Valon & Leung 2011), we focus on recent studies on ABA action in the crosstalk of biotic and abiotic responses through regulation of stomatal movements.

ABA-regulated stomatal closure in drought responses

Drought adversely affects plant growth and causes severe losses in crop production in agriculture. Plants lose water primarily through the stomata on the leaves. ABA is a key hormone that controls water status and stomatal function. Upon drought conditions, plants produce and accumulate more ABA that induces stomatal closure, thus conserving water. The cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying ABA-induced stomatal closure have been extensively studied and reviewed previously (Luan 2002; Assmann 2003; Wasilewska et al. 2008; Cutler et al. 2010; Hubbard et al. 2010; Popko et al. 2010; Wilkinson & Davies 2010). Typically, ABA level is modulated by the balance between ABA biosynthesis and ABA catabolism (Nambara & Marion-Poll 2005; Nilson & Assmann 2007). The 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) genes encode key enzymes for ABA biosynthesis. Under drought stress condition, the AtNCED3 gene is strongly induced and disruption of AtNCED3 results in a decreased ABA level leading to higher transpiration rate in the mutant Arabidopsis plants (Iuchi et al. 2001). In contrast, overexpression of an NCED gene leads to higher levels of ABA accumulation and decrease in transpiration (Schwartz et al. 1997; Tan et al. 1997; Thompson et al. 2000; Iuchi et al. 2001; Schwartz, Qin & Zeevaart 2003). For catabolism, CYP707A1 to A4 genes encoding 8′-hydroxylase play a key role in ABA oxidation (Kushiro et al. 2004; Umezawa et al. 2006). Genetics analysis showed that cyp707a3-1 mutant contained higher ABA levels, showed decreased transpiration rate, leading to drought-tolerant phenotype (Umezawa et al. 2006).

For stomatal control, guard cell turgor is a major parameter that is regulated by ionic fluxes across the cell membranes through K+ and anion channels. These ion channels in guard cells thus become the major targets for regulation by a number of environmental factors such as light/dark, drought, CO2 levels and so on. In the case of drought, ABA serves as a primary chemical signal that induces stomatal closure through second messengers such as reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, Ca2+, followed by activation and inactivation of protein kinases/phosphatases that further target the ion channels (Schroeder & Hagiwara 1989; Grabov & Blatt 1998, 1999; Hamilton et al. 2000; Pei et al. 2000; Garcia-Mata & Lamattina 2001; Garcia-Mata et al. 2003; Sokolovski et al. 2005; Negi et al. 2008; Vahisalu et al. 2008, 2010; Ward, Maser & Schroeder 2008; Lee et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2010; ). The most recent model that depicts signalling pathway from ABA to stomatal closure will be discussed in the later sections.

ABA-regulated stomatal closure in pathogen response

The stomatal closure not only leads to water conservation during drought but also serves as a defence mechanism in preventing pathogen invasions. Recently, studies have demonstrated that ABA also plays an important role in pathogen response, and the signalling pathways overlap significantly between pathogen resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. In addition to ABA action in stomatal closure that limits pathogen access, this hormone affects pathogen responses by interacting with other hormones associated with plant defence mechanisms (Anderson et al. 2004; Melotto et al. 2006; Asselbergh, De Vleesschauwer & Hofte 2008; Melotto, Underwood & He 2008; Mosher et al. 2010).

Plants have innate physical and biochemical barriers that effectively protect them from a variety of pathogens. However, most pathogens have mechanisms that allow them to overcome or circumvent plant mechanical barriers, including the cell wall, leading to successful infection in plants. A pathogen entrance to plant interior is the first step in the effective establishment of infection. Some fungal pathogens can directly penetrate plant tissue by applying mechanical force or utilizing cell-wall degrading enzymes, but bacterial pathogens require passage to enter plant tissue (Mendgen, Hahn & Deising 1996; van Kan 2006; Ton et al. 2009). Generally, bacterial pathogens employ natural openings to enter into plant tissues, such as stomata, hydathodes and lenticels (Melotto et al. 2008). Among these, the stomata are a major entry point for bacterial pathogens. In addition to earlier studies, Melotto et al. (2006) also showed that stomatal closure directly restricts bacterial pathogenic invasion of plants. The pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) is recognized by plants and triggers plant innate immunity (Jones & Dangl 2006). Among the responses triggered by PAMPs is stomatal closure that restricts pathogen entrance (Melotto et al. 2006). By using ost1 mutant that fails to respond to ABA (Mustilli et al. 2002) and ABA-deficient aba3-1 mutant (Leon-Kloosterziel et al. 1996), studies showed that stomatal closure is not induced by PAMPs in these mutants (Melotto et al. 2006). It is thus proposed that PAMP-induced stomatal closure requires active ABA signal transduction pathway in guard cells. Therefore, ABA has a positive effect on disease resistance through induction of stomatal closure.

ABA regulation of pathogen response through interplay with other hormones

A number of plant hormones, including salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene, function in pathogen defence mechanisms. Typically, SA is associated with systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and resistance to biotrophic pathogens, whereas JA and ethylene are associated with induced systemic resistance (ISR) and resistance to necrotrophic pathogens (Alvarez et al. 1998; Glazebrook 2005; Pieterse et al. 2009). ABA is connected to the SA, JA and ethylene signalling pathways, and acts either synergistically or antagonistically with these hormones (Anderson et al. 2004; Mosher et al. 2010).

Studies suggest that ABA negatively regulate SA-mediated pathogen responses. For instance, overexpression of NCED genes, including NCED2, NCED3 and NCED5, strongly induced accumulation of ABA and conferred a significant increase of bacterial growth (Fan et al. 2009). In addition, the Arabidopsis mutant aba3-1, which is impaired in ABA biosynthesis, showed a resistant phenotype to Pseudomonas syringae infection, whereas exogenous treatments with ABA led to increased susceptibility to virulent bacteria (Fan et al. 2009). ABA also suppressed the induction of SAR by inhibition of SA-induced gene expression (Yasuda et al. 2008). Collectively, the available results suggest that ABA appears to suppress SA-dependent defence mechanisms.

The negative effect of ABA on JA- and ethylene-dependent pathogen resistance has been previously assessed at gene transcription level (Anderson et al. 2004). The typical JA and ethylene marker genes, including PDF1.2 and CHI, were induced more strongly in ABA-deficient mutants than in wild-type Arabidopsis, whereas these genes were down-regulated by exogenous ABA treatment (Anderson et al. 2004). Additionally, ABA suppressed ethylene response in rice (Xiong & Yang 2003). The OsMPK5 gene encoding mitogen-activated protein kinase is induced by ABA and biotic and abiotic stresses (Xiong & Yang 2003). Its overexpression enhances ABA accumulation, but reduces ethylene levels, and renders plants more susceptible to the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae and the bacterial pathogen Burkholderia glumae (Xiong & Yang 2003; Asselbergh et al. 2008).

ABA SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT
  3. ABSCISIC ACID IN DROUGHT AND PATHOGEN RESPONSES
  4. ABA SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
  5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  6. REFERENCES

ABA receptor

Earlier studies showed that ABA-binding proteins are present in several locations in the cell, such as plasma membrane and cytosol, suggesting that more than one ABA receptor may exist (Pedron et al. 1998; Zhang et al. 2001; Kitahata et al. 2005). Indeed, several ABA receptors have been identified so far, although the function of some receptors remains to be further demonstrated (Shen et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2007; Christmann & Grill 2009; Ma et al. 2009; Pandey, Nelson & Assmann 2009; Park et al. 2009). Here we focus on the pyrabactin resistance (PYR)-like (PYL)/regulatory component of ABA receptor (RCAR) family ABA receptors that have been shown to functionally connect with the other known ABA regulators such as the PP2C-type protein phosphatases and the SnRK2-type protein kinases.

PYR/PYL or RCAR belongs to the family of the star-related lipid-transfer (START) protein and is homologous to the Bet v onefold protein (Ma et al. 2009; Park et al. 2009; Santiago et al. 2009b). We refer to this family of proteins as PYL/RCAR in this review. In the chemical genetics approach, pyrabactin was used as an ABA analogue to screen for mutants that were insensitive to this compound and genes encoding PYR/PYL proteins were isolated (Park et al. 2009). In a different approach, Ma et al. (2009) identified RCARs as direct interactors of ABI2. In both cases, ABA was shown to directly bind PYL/RCAR proteins, thus suggesting that they function as ABA receptors. Using triple (pyr1:pyl1:pyl4) and quadruple (pyr1:pyl1:pyl2:pyl4) mutants, genetic analysis demonstrated that these mutants displayed ABA insensitivity in germination, root growth and stomatal closure. However, ABA sensitivity was unaltered in a pyr1 single mutant due to genetic redundancy, because the PYR/RCAR protein family includes 14 members (Park et al. 2009; Nishimura et al. 2010). Earlier genetic analysis provides crucial information for connecting PYL/RCAR function to the downstream components in the signalling process. Because ABI-like protein phosphatases, i.e. A-type PP2Cs, are negative regulators of ABA response (Gosti et al. 1999; Merlot et al. 2001; Schweighofer, Hirt & Meskiene 2004; Wasilewska et al. 2008) and PYL/RCAR proteins directly inhibit phosphatase activity of PP2Cs in vitro (Ma et al. 2009; Szostkiewicz et al. 2010), it is concluded that these PP2Cs are direct target of ABA receptors in the signalling pathway.

In addition, structural analyses (Melcher et al. 2009; Miyazono et al. 2009; Nishimura et al. 2009; Yin et al. 2009; Santiago et al. 2009a) show that PYL/RCAR proteins harbour a ligand-binding pocket that may play a role as an ABA binding site. In the yeast two-hybrid assays, some interactions between PYL/RCARs and their target PP2Cs are enhanced by ABA; whereas other interactions are independent of ABA (Ma et al. 2009; Santiago et al. 2009b). These results suggest that two potential models can account for the function of ABA in the PYL/RCAR complexes. One explanation is that ABA binding induces structural changes in PYR/PYLs and ABA-bound PYR/PYL can interact tightly with PP2Cs. The other explanation is that ABA did not affect the structure of any proteins, and binds only to the PYR/PYL-PP2C complex. The structural analysis of PYR1, PYL1 and PYL2 demonstrated that PYR/PYLs bind to ABA and create a surface that recognizes PP2Cs and forms a complex with PP2Cs (Melcher et al. 2009; Miyazono et al. 2009; Yin et al. 2009). In this complex, ABA-bound PYR/PYLs interact with a phosphatase domain of PP2Cs and inhibit PP2C activity by covering the active sites of PP2Cs. Additionally, the tryptophan residue of PP2C stabilizes this ABA-PYR/PYLs-PP2C complex and makes contact with ABA (Melcher et al. 2009; Miyazono et al. 2009; Yin et al. 2009). These results suggest that PYR/PYLs inactivation of PP2Cs is mediated by ABA (Ma et al. 2009; Park et al. 2009; Santiago et al. 2009b; Szostkiewicz et al. 2010), consistent with a study showing that the binding affinity between RCAR1 (PYL9) and ABA was enhanced approximately 10-fold by the presence of ABI2 (Ma et al. 2009). Collectively, the genetic, physiological and structural analyses strongly support the hypothesis that PYR/PYLs/RCARs are bona fide ABA receptors.

SnRK2 kinases and PP2C A-type phosphatases

Protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events in ABA signalling involve several protein kinases and phosphatases in plants (Lee et al. 2009; Vlad et al. 2009; Geiger et al. 2009). The first reported SnRK2-type kinase was PKABA1, which was isolated from wheat (Anderberg & Walker-Simmons 1992). The activity of PKABA1 is induced by ABA and is involved in the phosphorylation of the transcription factor TaABF1 (Anderberg & Walker-Simmons 1992; Johnson et al. 2002). Studies indicate that TaABF1suppresses ABA-induced gene expression in wheat and barley (Gomez-Cadenas et al. 1999; Johnson, Shin & Shen 2008). In a subsequent work, an ABA-activated serine-threonine protein kinase (AAPK) was identified in Vicia faba, using gel kinase assays (Li et al. 2000). AAPK is also an SnRK2-type kinase and is involved in stomatal closure via the regulation of plasma membrane slow anion channels (Li et al. 2000). An orthologue of AAPK in Arabidopsis was identified as Open Stomata 1 (OST1) by a genetics approach (Mustilli et al. 2002). The kinase activity of OST1 is prompted by ABA, but its expression is not regulated by ABA (Mustilli et al. 2002; Yoshida et al. 2002). The ost1 mutant exhibits an ABA-insensitive phenotype and increases leaf water loss by keeping the stomata open, even under drought conditions (Mustilli et al. 2002; Yoshida et al. 2002). The OST1 also interacts with and phosphorylates ABF2 and ABF3, which bind to ABA-responsive elements (ABRE) and control ABA-regulated gene expression (Furihata et al. 2006; Fujii et al. 2009; Fujita et al. 2009; Sirichandra et al. 2010). In addition to OST1, two other SnRK2-type kinases, SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3, are induced by ABA (Boudsocq, Barbier-Brygoo & Lauriere 2004). A snrk2.2/snrk2.3 double mutant shows ABA-insensitive phenotypes in seed germination and root growth, whereas each of the single mutants has no distinguishable phenotype, due to functional redundancy (Fujii, Verslues & Zhu 2007). Each of these SnRK2-type kinases is involved in ABA signalling and is activated by ABA. A triple mutant, lacking SnRK2.2, SnRK2.3 and OST1, shows severe phenotypes indicative of defects in ABA signalling and water stress responses (Fujii & Zhu 2009; Fujita et al. 2009; Nakashima et al. 2009). The SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3, as well as OST1, thus function as positive regulators of ABA signalling.

Genetic evidence revealed that A-type PP2Cs, such as ABI1 and ABI2, are negative regulators of ABA signalling in Arabidopsis (Gosti et al. 1999; Merlot et al. 2001; Wasilewska et al. 2008; Rubio et al. 2009). Additionally, mutants in HAB1, HAB2, AHG1 and PP2CA were identified in seed germination screen as hypersensitive to ABA (Nishimura et al. 2004; Saez et al. 2004, 2006; Kuhn et al. 2006; Robert et al. 2006; Yoshida et al. 2006b; Rubio et al. 2009). The PP2C functions related to ABA were initially suggested by the dominant mutants abi1-1 and abi2-1, which were associated with an ABA-insensitive phenotype in seed germination, seedling growth and stomatal closure (Koornneef, Reuling & Karssen 1984; Finkelstein & Somerville 1990; Leung, Merlot & Giraudat 1997; Allen et al. 1999). These dominant mutants appear to have a gain of function effect to make the protein phosphatases constitutively active, thereby leading to ABA insensitivity, a phenotype opposite to the loss-of-function mutants. The A-type PP2Cs function with certain degree of specificity and redundancy. While each mutant displays detectable ABA hypersensitivity, some double mutants show a more profound hypersensitive phenotype to ABA as compared with single mutants (Merlot et al. 2001; Rubio et al. 2009).

The PP2C–SnRK2 relationship

Several studies demonstrate functional and physical interactions between PP2C A-type phosphatases and SnRK2-type kinases. Earliest indication of such interactions came from a study by Yoshida et al. (2006a) who identified a physical interaction between the ABI1 and ABI2 proteins and SnRK2.6/OST1. More recent studies have established several SnRK2–PP2C interactions that clearly function in ABA signalling (Yoshida et al. 2006a; Fujii et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2009; Umezawa et al. 2009; Vlad et al. 2009). For example, the interaction of A-type PP2Cs with OST1 plays a role in ABA-induced stomatal closure through the control of phosphorylation status and activity of the SLAC1 anion channel in guard cells (Lee et al. 2009; Geiger et al. 2009). The physical interaction between the PP2Cs and OST1 renders inactivation of OST1 kinase and down-regulation of the SLAC1 channel required for stomatal closure. The same interactions between PP2Cs and SnRK2s also function in ABA-induced gene expression (Yoshida et al. 2006a; Nishimura et al. 2010). In this context, studies have established that PP2Cs, including ABI1 and PP2CA, inactivate OST1 by physical interaction as well as dephosphorlyation (Fujii et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2009; Umezawa et al. 2009).

The triple mutant abi1-2/hab1-1/pp2ca-1 exhibits constitutive activation of SnR2.2, SnRK2.3 and OST1 (Fujii et al. 2009), indicating that the ABA-dependent activation of SnRK2-type kinases results from removal of the inhibitory effect of PP2Cs. Hubbard et al. (2010) suggests that the earliest processes occurring in the ABA signal transduction pathway comprise the interaction among PYL/RCARs, PP2Cs and SnRK2s. The interaction between PP2C (negative regulator) and SnRK2 (positive regulator) causes inactivation of SnRK2 and suppression of the signalling pathway. The ABA-dependent (and sometimes ABA-independent) binding of PYL/RCARs with the PP2Cs breaks the physical interaction and inhibition of SnRK2s by PP2Cs, leading to activation of SnRKs and de-repression of the signalling pathway (Fujii et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2009; Ma et al. 2009; Park et al. 2009; Umezawa et al. 2009).

ABA signalling to ion channel regulation and stomatal closure

ABA-induced stomatal closure involves regulation of several ion channels at the plasma membrane and tonoplast (Schroeder, Kwak & Allen 2001a). Typically the S-type anion channels and outward K-channels are activated by ABA, whereas inward K+ channels are inactivated, leading to net ionic efflux and decrease in guard cell turgor (Schroeder et al. 2001b; Nilson & Assmann 2007; Ward et al. 2008; Wasilewska et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2010). When ABA levels increase upon drought or other stress conditions, anion efflux via the anion channels induces depolarization and activation of outward K-channels (Ward et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2010). Reduced ionic concentration in the cell causes water efflux and reduces guard cell volume, thereby leading to stomatal closure (Ward, Pei & Schroeder 1995; Wasilewska et al. 2008).

The ABA signalling components ABI1 and ABI2 and OST1/AAPK have long been implicated in the regulation of guard cell ion channels (e.g. Pei et al. 1997; Li et al. 2000). In the context of current understanding of ABA signalling described previously, a model is proposed to connect ABA signal to ion channel regulation and stomatal closure (Fig. 1). Normally, the levels of ABA and PYL/RCAR proteins are low. The A-type PP2C phosphatases bind to the SnRK2-type kinases and inhibit their activity. The SLAC1 and other anion channels may be dephosphorylated and their activity remains low. In response to drought or pathogen or other stress factors, ABA levels are up-regulated to reach certain threshold that bind to PYL/RCAR-type receptors and enhances the interaction between PYL/RCAR with PP2Cs, thereby activating SnRK2s that in turn interact with and phosphorylate SLAC1 and other channels resulting in activation of the channels and efflux of the anions. Depolarization of guard cell membrane activates outward K-channels leading to drop in guard cell turgor and stomatal closure (Pei et al. 1997; Lee et al. 2009; Geiger et al. 2009, 2010). Through stomatal closure, the ABA-induced signalling pathway intersects with both abiotic stress factors (e.g. drought) and biotic stress factors (such as pathogen).

image

Figure 1. Summary of abscisic acid (ABA) signalling pathway. This model focuses on regulation of stomatal closure by ABA signal transduction. The ion channels are regulated by protein–protein interaction relay involving PYR/PYL/RCAR-PP2Cs-SnRK2s-Channels. In the presence of ABA, PYR/PYL/RCARs bind to PP2Cs and inhibit phosphatase activity, leading to activation of SnRK2s. Active SnRK2s interact with and phosphorylate ion channels (such as SLAC1) and lead to stomatal closure. In the absence of ABA, PP2Cs bind to SnRKs and inhibit kinase activity, which prevents subsequent phosphorylation and activation of ion channels, and stomata keep open. PYL, PYR-like; PYR, pyrabactin resistance; RCAR, regulatory component of ABA receptor.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Concluding remarks

The plant hormone ABA activates a complex signalling network that regulates numerous physiological processes including seed dormancy, development, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. We discuss recent literature and attempt to place ABA signalling in the crossroads of biotic and abiotic stress responses. Although the crosstalk between the signalling pathways may be too complex to dissect at this point, it is certain that ABA-induced stomatal closure serves as a centre stage for such crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress signals. On one hand, stomatal closure functions to conserve water in response to abiotic stress such as drought; on the other hand, closed stomata act as a barrier for pathogen invasion. In both cases, ABA signalling pathway is critical for integrating signals to cellular responses. In this regard, recent work on the signalling mechanism in response to ABA is particularly relevant to agriculture as it provides insights into molecular events that function in both pathogen resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. The molecular components in ABA signalling, including PYR/PYL/RCAR, PP2Cs, SnRKs and SLAC1 channel, will be tentative targets for genetic engineering of stress-tolerant crops. They also provide a starting point for further dissecting the complexity of the signalling events. For instance, there are 14 members of PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors, 6–9 members of the A-type PP2Cs and at least 3 members of the SnRK2s involved in ABA signalling. Therefore, more than 200 possible combinations exist to form different PYL/RCAR-PP2C-SnRK2 complexes; each combination may regulate the same or different downstream targets depending on factors such as cell type, ABA concentrations and subcellular locations of the targets, resulting in enormous complexity in fine-tuning of the regulation. Future research on this fine-tuning of signalling pathways will help us further understand crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT
  3. ABSCISIC ACID IN DROUGHT AND PATHOGEN RESPONSES
  4. ABA SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
  5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  6. REFERENCES

The work in authors' laboratories was supported by a grant from the Biogreen21 Program (PJ008222) Korean Rural Development Administration (to S.C.L.) and the US National Science Foundation and Korean WCU Program of National Research Foundation (to S.L.).

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. ABSTRACT
  3. ABSCISIC ACID IN DROUGHT AND PATHOGEN RESPONSES
  4. ABA SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
  5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  6. REFERENCES
  • Allen G.J., Kuchitsu K., Chu S.P., Murata Y. & Schroeder J.I. (1999) Arabidopsis abi1-1 and abi2-1 phosphatase mutations reduce abscisic acid-induced cytoplasmic calcium rises in guard cells. The Plant Cell 11, 17851798.
  • Alvarez M.E., Pennell R.I., Meijer P.J., Ishikawa A., Dixon R.A. & Lamb C. (1998) Reactive oxygen intermediates mediate a systemic signal network in the establishment of plant immunity. Cell 92, 773784.
  • Anderberg R.J. & Walker-Simmons M.K. (1992) Isolation of a wheat cDNA clone for an abscisic acid-inducible transcript with homology to protein kinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 1018310187.
  • Anderson J.P., Badruzsaufari E., Schenk P.M., Manners J.M., Desmond O.J., Ehlert C., Maclean D.J., Ebert P.R. & Kazan K. (2004) Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16, 34603479.
  • Asselbergh B., De Vleesschauwer D. & Hofte M. (2008) Global switches and fine-tuning-ABA modulates plant pathogen defense. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 21, 709719.
  • Assmann S.M. (2003) OPEN STOMATA1 opens the door to ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells. Trends in Plant Science 8, 151153.
  • Boudsocq M., Barbier-Brygoo H. & Lauriere C. (2004) Identification of nine sucrose nonfermenting 1-related protein kinases 2 activated by hyperosmotic and saline stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 4175841766.
  • Chen Z.H., Hills A., Lim C.K. & Blatt M.R. (2010) Dynamic regulation of guard cell anion channels by cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration and protein phosphorylation. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 61, 816825.
  • Chinnusamy V., Gong Z. & Zhu J.K. (2008) Abscisic acid-mediated epigenetic processes in plant development and stress responses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50, 11871195.
  • Christmann A. & Grill E. (2009) Are GTGs ABA's biggest fans? Cell 136, 2123.
  • Cutler S.R., Rodriguez P.L., Finkelstein R.R. & Abrams S.R. (2010) Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 651679.
  • Fan J., Hill L., Crooks C., Doerner P. & Lamb C. (2009) Abscisic acid has a key role in modulating diverse plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiology 150, 17501761.
  • Finkelstein R.R. & Somerville C.R. (1990) Three classes of abscisic acid (ABA)-insensitive mutations of Arabidopsis define genes that control overlapping subsets of ABA responses. Plant Physiology 94, 11721179.
  • Finkelstein R.R., Gampala S.S. & Rock C.D. (2002) Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. The Plant Cell 14 Suppl , S15S45.
  • Fujii H. & Zhu J.K. (2009) Arabidopsis mutant deficient in 3 abscisic acid-activated protein kinases reveals critical roles in growth, reproduction, and stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 83808385.
  • Fujii H., Verslues P.E. & Zhu J.K. (2007) Identification of two protein kinases required for abscisic acid regulation of seed germination, root growth, and gene expression in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19, 485494.
  • Fujii H., Chinnusamy V., Rodrigues A., Rubio S., Antoni R., Park S.Y., Cutler S.R., Sheen J., Rodriguez P.L. & Zhu J.K. (2009) In vitro reconstitution of an abscisic acid signalling pathway. Nature 462, 660664.
  • Fujita Y., Nakashima K., Yoshida T., et al. (2009) Three SnRK2 protein kinases are the main positive regulators of abscisic acid signaling in response to water stress in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 50, 21232132.
  • Furihata T., Maruyama K., Fujita Y., Umezawa T., Yoshida R., Shinozaki K. & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. (2006) Abscisic acid-dependent multisite phosphorylation regulates the activity of a transcription activator AREB1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 19881993.
  • Garcia-Mata C. & Lamattina L. (2001) Nitric oxide induces stomatal closure and enhances the adaptive plant responses against drought stress. Plant Physiology 126, 11961204.
  • Garcia-Mata C., Gay R., Sokolovski S., Hills A., Lamattina L. & Blatt M.R. (2003) Nitric oxide regulates K+ and Cl- channels in guard cells through a subset of abscisic acid-evoked signaling pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 1111611121.
  • Geiger D., Scherzer S., Mumm P., et al. (2009) Activity of guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is controlled by drought-stress signaling kinase-phosphatase pair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 2142521430.
  • Geiger D., Scherzer S., Mumm P., et al. (2010) Guard cell anion channel SLAC1 is regulated by CDPK protein kinases with distinct Ca2+ affinities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 80238028.
  • Glazebrook J. (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43, 205227.
  • Gomez-Cadenas A., Verhey S.D., Holappa L.D., Shen Q., Ho T.H. & Walker-Simmons M.K. (1999) An abscisic acid-induced protein kinase, PKABA1, mediates abscisic acid-suppressed gene expression in barley aleurone layers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 17671772.
  • Gosti F., Beaudoin N., Serizet C., Webb A.A., Vartanian N. & Giraudat J. (1999) ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. The Plant Cell 11, 18971910.
  • Grabov A. & Blatt M.R. (1998) Membrane voltage initiates Ca2+ waves and potentiates Ca2+ increases with abscisic acid in stomatal guard cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 47784783.
  • Grabov A. & Blatt M.R. (1999) A steep dependence of inward-rectifying potassium channels on cytosolic free calcium concentration increase evoked by hyperpolarization in guard cells. Plant Physiology 119, 277288.
  • Hamilton D.W., Hills A., Kohler B. & Blatt M.R. (2000) Ca2+ channels at the plasma membrane of stomatal guard cells are activated by hyperpolarization and abscisic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 49674972.
  • Hubbard K.E., Nishimura N., Hitomi K., Getzoff E.D. & Schroeder J.I. (2010) Early abscisic acid signal transduction mechanisms: newly discovered components and newly emerging questions. Genes and Development 24, 16951708.
  • Iuchi S., Kobayashi M., Taji T., Naramoto M., Seki M., Kato T., Tabata S., Kakubari Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. & Shinozaki K. (2001) Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 27, 325333.
  • Johnson R.R., Wagner R.L., Verhey S.D. & Walker-Simmons M.K. (2002) The abscisic acid-responsive kinase PKABA1 interacts with a seed-specific abscisic acid response element-binding factor, TaABF, and phosphorylates TaABF peptide sequences. Plant Physiology 130, 837846.
  • Johnson R.R., Shin M. & Shen J.Q. (2008) The wheat PKABA1-interacting factor TaABF1 mediates both abscisic acid-suppressed and abscisic acid-induced gene expression in bombarded aleurone cells. Plant Molecular Biology 68, 93103.
  • Jones J.D. & Dangl J.L. (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323329.
  • Joshi-Saha A., Valon C. & Leung J. (2011) Abscisic acid signal off the STARTing block. Molecular Plant 4, 562580.
  • van Kan J.A. (2006) Licensed to kill: the lifestyle of a necrotrophic plant pathogen. Trends in Plant Science 11, 247253.
  • Kim T.H., Bohmer M., Hu H., Nishimura N. & Schroeder J.I. (2010) Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 561591.
  • Kitahata N., Nakano T., Kuchitsu K., Yoshida S. & Asami T. (2005) Biotin-labeled abscisic acid as a probe for investigating abscisic acid binding sites on plasma membranes of barley aleurone protoplasts. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 13, 33513358.
  • Koornneef M., Reuling G. & Karssen C.M. (1984) The isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-insensitive mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiologia Plantarum 61, 377383.
  • Kuhn J.M., Boisson-Dernier A., Dizon M.B., Maktabi M.H. & Schroeder J.I. (2006) The protein phosphatase AtPP2CA negatively regulates abscisic acid signal transduction in Arabidopsis, and effects of abh1 on AtPP2CA mRNA. Plant Physiology 140, 127139.
  • Kushiro T., Okamoto M., Nakabayashi K., Yamagishi K., Kitamura S., Asami T., Hirai N., Koshiba T., Kamiya Y. & Nambara E. (2004) The Arabidopsis cytochrome P450 CYP707A encodes ABA 8′-hydroxylases: key enzymes in ABA catabolism. EMBO Journal 23, 16471656.
  • Lee S.C., Lan W., Buchanan B.B. & Luan S. (2009) A protein kinase-phosphatase pair interacts with an ion channel to regulate ABA signaling in plant guard cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 2141921424.
  • Leon-Kloosterziel K.M., Gil M.A., Ruijs G.J., Jacobsen S.E., Olszewski N.E., Schwartz S.H., Zeevaart J.A. & Koornneef M. (1996) Isolation and characterization of abscisic acid-deficient Arabidopsis mutants at two new loci. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 10, 655661.
  • Leung J., Merlot S. & Giraudat J. (1997) The Arabidopsis ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE2 (ABI2) and ABI1 genes encode homologous protein phosphatases 2C involved in abscisic acid signal transduction. The Plant Cell 9, 759771.
  • Li J., Wang X.Q., Watson M.B. & Assmann S.M. (2000) Regulation of abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure and anion channels by guard cell AAPK kinase. Science 287, 300303.
  • Liu X., Yue Y., Li B., Nie Y., Li W., Wu W.H. & Ma L. (2007) A G protein-coupled receptor is a plasma membrane receptor for the plant hormone abscisic acid. Science 315, 17121716.
  • Luan S. (2002) Signalling drought in guard cell. Plants Cell Environment 25, 229237.
  • Ma Y., Szostkiewicz I., Korte A., Moes D., Yang Y., Christmann A. & Grill E. (2009) Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 324, 10641068.
  • Melcher K., Ng L.M., Zhou X.E., et al. (2009) A gate-latch-lock mechanism for hormone signalling by abscisic acid receptors. Nature 462, 602608.
  • Melotto M., Underwood W., Koczan J., Nomura K. & He S.Y. (2006) Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 126, 969980.
  • Melotto M., Underwood W. & He S.Y. (2008) Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology 46, 101122.
  • Mendgen K., Hahn M. & Deising H. (1996) Morphogenesis and mechanisms of penetration by plant pathogenic fungi. Annual Review of Phytopathology 34, 367386.
  • Merlot S., Gosti F., Guerrier D., Vavasseur A. & Giraudat J. (2001) The ABI1 and ABI2 protein phosphatases 2C act in a negative feedback regulatory loop of the abscisic acid signalling pathway. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 25, 295303.
  • Miyazono K., Miyakawa T., Sawano Y., et al. (2009) Structural basis of abscisic acid signalling. Nature 462, 609614.
  • Mosher S., Moeder W., Nishimura N., Jikumaru Y., Joo S.H., Urquhart W., Klessig D.F., Kim S.K., Nambara E. & Yoshioka K. (2010) The lesion-mimic mutant cpr22 shows alterations in abscisic acid signaling and abscisic acid insensitivity in a salicylic acid-dependent manner. Plant Physiology 152, 19011913.
  • Mustilli A.C., Merlot S., Vavasseur A., Fenzi F. & Giraudat J. (2002) Arabidopsis OST1 protein kinase mediates the regulation of stomatal aperture by abscisic acid and acts upstream of reactive oxygen species production. The Plant Cell 14, 30893099.
  • Nakashima K., Fujita Y., Kanamori N., et al. (2009) Three Arabidopsis SnRK2 protein kinases, SRK2D/SnRK2.2, SRK2E/SnRK2.6/OST1 and SRK2I/SnRK2.3, involved in ABA signaling are essential for the control of seed development and dormancy. Plant and Cell Physiology 50, 13451363.
  • Nambara E. & Marion-Poll A. (2005) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual review of plant biology 56, 165185.
  • Negi J., Matsuda O., Nagasawa T., Oba Y., Takahashi H., Kawai-Yamada M., Uchimiya H., Hashimoto M. & Iba K. (2008) CO2 regulator SLAC1 and its homologues are essential for anion homeostasis in plant cells. Nature 452, 483486.
  • Nilson S.E. & Assmann S.M. (2007) The control of transpiration. Insights from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 143, 1927.
  • Nishimura N., Yoshida T., Murayama M., Asami T., Shinozaki K. & Hirayama T. (2004) Isolation and characterization of novel mutants affecting the abscisic acid sensitivity of Arabidopsis germination and seedling growth. Plant and Cell Physiology 45, 14851499.
  • Nishimura N., Hitomi K., Arvai A.S., Rambo R.P., Hitomi C., Cutler S.R., Schroeder J.I. & Getzoff E.D. (2009) Structural mechanism of abscisic acid binding and signaling by dimeric PYR1. Science 326, 13731379.
  • Nishimura N., Sarkeshik A., Nito K., et al. (2010) PYR/PYL/RCAR family members are major in-vivo ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C-interacting proteins in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 61, 290299.
  • Pandey S., Nelson D.C. & Assmann S.M. (2009) Two novel GPCR-type G proteins are abscisic acid receptors in Arabidopsis. Cell 136, 136148.
  • Park S.Y., Fung P., Nishimura N., et al. (2009) Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 324, 10681071.
  • Pedron J., Brault M., Nake C. & Miginiac E. (1998) Detection of abscisic-acid-binding proteins in the microsomal protein fraction of Arabidopsis thaliana with abscisic-acid-protein conjugates used as affinity probes. European Journal of Biochemistry 252, 385390.
  • Pei Z.M., Kuchitsu K., Ward J.M., Schwarz M. & Schroeder J.I. (1997) Differential abscisic acid regulation of guard cell slow anion channels in Arabidopsis wild-type and abi1 and abi2 mutants. The Plant Cell 9, 409423.
  • Pei Z.M., Murata Y., Benning G., Thomine S., Klusener B., Allen G.J., Grill E. & Schroeder J.I. (2000) Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature 406, 731734.
  • Pieterse C.M., Leon-Reyes A., Van der Ent S. & Van Wees S.C. (2009) Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nature Chemical Biology 5, 308316.
  • Popko J., Hansch R., Mendel R.R., Polle A. & Teichmann T. (2010) The role of abscisic acid and auxin in the response of poplar to abiotic stress. Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) 12, 242258.
  • Robert N., Merlot S., N'Guyen V., Boisson-Dernier A. & Schroeder J.I. (2006) A hypermorphic mutation in the protein phosphatase 2C HAB1 strongly affects ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. FEBS Letters 580, 46914696.
  • Robert-Seilaniantz A., Navarro L., Bari R. & Jones J.D. (2007) Pathological hormone imbalances. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10, 372379.
  • Rubio S., Rodrigues A., Saez A., Dizon M.B., Galle A., Kim T.H., Santiago J., Flexas J., Schroeder J.I. & Rodriguez P.L. (2009) Triple loss of function of protein phosphatases type 2C leads to partial constitutive response to endogenous abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 150, 13451355.
  • Saez A., Apostolova N., Gonzalez-Guzman M., Gonzalez-Garcia M.P., Nicolas C., Lorenzo O. & Rodriguez P.L. (2004) Gain-of-function and loss-of-function phenotypes of the protein phosphatase 2C HAB1 reveal its role as a negative regulator of abscisic acid signalling. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 37, 354369.
  • Saez A., Robert N., Maktabi M.H., Schroeder J.I., Serrano R. & Rodriguez P.L. (2006) Enhancement of abscisic acid sensitivity and reduction of water consumption in Arabidopsis by combined inactivation of the protein phosphatases type 2C ABI1 and HAB1. Plant Physiology 141, 13891399.
  • Santiago J., Dupeux F., Round A., Antoni R., Park S.Y., Jamin M., Cutler S.R., Rodriguez P.L. & Marquez J.A. (2009a) The abscisic acid receptor PYR1 in complex with abscisic acid. Nature 462, 665668.
  • Santiago J., Rodrigues A., Saez A., Rubio S., Antoni R., Dupeux F., Park S.Y., Marquez J.A., Cutler S.R. & Rodriguez P.L. (2009b) Modulation of drought resistance by the abscisic acid receptor PYL5 through inhibition of clade A PP2Cs. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 60, 575588.
  • Schroeder J.I. & Hagiwara S. (1989) Cytosolic calcium regulates ion channels in the plasma membrane of Vicia faba guard cells. Nature 338, 427430.
  • Schroeder J.I., Kwak J.M. & Allen G.J. (2001a) Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature 410, 327330.
  • Schroeder J.I., Allen G.J., Hugouvieux V., Kwak J.M. & Waner D. (2001b) Guard cell signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52, 627658.
  • Schwartz S.H., Tan B.C., Gage D.A., Zeevaart J.A. & McCarty D.R. (1997) Specific oxidative cleavage of carotenoids by VP14 of maize. Science 276, 18721874.
  • Schwartz S.H., Qin X. & Zeevaart J.A. (2003) Elucidation of the indirect pathway of abscisic acid biosynthesis by mutants, genes, and enzymes. Plant Physiology 131, 15911601.
  • Schweighofer A., Hirt H. & Meskiene I. (2004) Plant PP2C phosphatases: emerging functions in stress signaling. Trends in Plant Science 9, 236243.
  • Shen Y.Y., Wang X.F., Wu F.Q., et al. (2006) The Mg-chelatase H subunit is an abscisic acid receptor. Nature 443, 823826.
  • Sirichandra C., Davanture M., Turk B.E., Zivy M., Valot B., Leung J. & Merlot S. (2010) The Arabidopsis ABA-activated kinase OST1 phosphorylates the bZIP transcription factor ABF3 and creates a 14-3-3 binding site involved in its turnover. PLoS One 5, e13935.
  • Sokolovski S., Hills A., Gay R., Garcia-Mata C., Lamattina L. & Blatt M.R. (2005) Protein phosphorylation is a prerequisite for intracellular Ca2+ release and ion channel control by nitric oxide and abscisic acid in guard cells. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 43, 520529.
  • Szostkiewicz I., Richter K., Kepka M., Demmel S., Ma Y., Korte A., Assaad F.F., Christmann A. & Grill E. (2010) Closely related receptor complexes differ in their ABA selectivity and sensitivity. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 61, 2535.
  • Tan B.C., Schwartz S.H., Zeevaart J.A. & McCarty D.R. (1997) Genetic control of abscisic acid biosynthesis in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 1223512240.
  • Thompson A.J., Jackson A.C., Symonds R.C., Mulholland B.J., Dadswell A.R., Blake P.S., Burbidge A. & Taylor I.B. (2000) Ectopic expression of a tomato 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene causes over-production of abscisic acid. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 23, 363374.
  • Ton J., Flors V. & Mauch-Mani B. (2009) The multifaceted role of ABA in disease resistance. Trends in Plant Science 14, 310317.
  • Umezawa T., Okamoto M., Kushiro T., Nambara E., Oono Y., Seki M., Kobayashi M., Koshiba T., Kamiya Y. & Shinozaki K. (2006) CYP707A3, a major ABA 8′-hydroxylase involved in dehydration and rehydration response in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 46, 171182.
  • Umezawa T., Sugiyama N., Mizoguchi M., Hayashi S., Myouga F., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Ishihama Y., Hirayama T. & Shinozaki K. (2009) Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 1758817593.
  • Vahisalu T., Kollist H., Wang Y.F., et al. (2008) SLAC1 is required for plant guard cell S-type anion channel function in stomatal signalling. Nature 452, 487491.
  • Vahisalu T., Puzorjova I., Brosche M., et al. (2010) Ozone-triggered rapid stomatal response involves the production of reactive oxygen species, and is controlled by SLAC1 and OST1. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 62, 442453.
  • Vlad F., Rubio S., Rodrigues A., Sirichandra C., Belin C., Robert N., Leung J., Rodriguez P.L., Lauriere C. & Merlot S. (2009) Protein phosphatases 2C regulate the activation of the Snf1-related kinase OST1 by abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 21, 31703184.
  • Ward J.M., Pei Z.M. & Schroeder J.I. (1995) Roles of ion channels in initiation of signal transduction in higher plants. The Plant Cell 7, 833844.
  • Ward J.M., Maser P. & Schroeder J.I. (2008) Plant ion channels: gene families, physiology, and functional genomics analysis. Annual Review of Physiology 71, 5982.
  • Wasilewska A., Vlad F., Sirichandra C., Redko Y., Jammes F., Valon C., Frey N.F. & Leung J. (2008) An update on abscisic acid signaling in plants and more. Molecular Plant 1, 198217.
  • Wilkinson S. & Davies W.J. (2010) Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant to community. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 510525.
  • Xiong L. & Yang Y. (2003) Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. The Plant Cell 15, 745759.
  • Yasuda M., Ishikawa A., Jikumaru Y., et al. (2008) Antagonistic interaction between systemic acquired resistance and the abscisic acid-mediated abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20, 16781692.
  • Yin P., Fan H., Hao Q., Yuan X., Wu D., Pang Y., Yan C., Li W., Wang J. & Yan N. (2009) Structural insights into the mechanism of abscisic acid signaling by PYL proteins. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 16, 12301236.
  • Yoshida R., Hobo T., Ichimura K., Mizoguchi T., Takahashi F., Aronso J., Ecker J.R. & Shinozaki K. (2002) ABA-activated SnRK2 protein kinase is required for dehydration stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 43, 14731483.
  • Yoshida R., Umezawa T., Mizoguchi T., Takahashi S., Takahashi F. & Shinozaki K. (2006a) The regulatory domain of SRK2E/OST1/SnRK2.6 interacts with ABI1 and integrates abscisic acid (ABA) and osmotic stress signals controlling stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 53105318.
  • Yoshida T., Nishimura N., Kitahata N., Kuromori T., Ito T., Asami T., Shinozaki K. & Hirayama T. (2006b) ABA-hypersensitive germination3 encodes a protein phosphatase 2C (AtPP2CA) that strongly regulates abscisic acid signaling during germination among Arabidopsis protein phosphatase 2Cs. Plant Physiology 140, 115126.
  • Zhang D.P., Chen S.W., Peng Y.B. & Shen Y.Y. (2001) Abscisic acid-specific binding sites in the flesh of developing apple fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 20972103.