Present address: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, S7N 0X2, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
UV protectants for Candida oleophila (strain O), a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases
Article first published online: 8 OCT 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Plant Pathology © 2010 BSPP
Volume 60, Issue 2, pages 288–295, April 2011
How to Cite
Lahlali, R., Raffaele, B. and Jijakli, M. H. (2011), UV protectants for Candida oleophila (strain O), a biocontrol agent of postharvest fruit diseases. Plant Pathology, 60: 288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02368.x
- Issue published online: 1 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 8 OCT 2010
- Published online 8 October 2010
- Candida oleophila (strain O);
- Penicillium expansum;
- UV-B protectants
This study investigated the influence of UV-B radiation (280–320 nm) on survival of Candida oleophila strain O, an antagonist yeast that prevents postharvest diseases caused by Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum on apple and pear fruits. Lethal doses (LD50 and LD90) were, respectively, 0·89 and 1·45 Kj m−2 for in vitro exposure and 3·06 and 5·5 Kj m−2 for in vivo exposure. A screening test of UV-B protectants for strain O was also evaluated under in vitro and in vivo conditions. The in vitro results showed that sodium ascorbate (0·1% and 0·01%), riboflavin (0·1%) and uric acid (0·1% and 0·01%) were the most effective and most suitable protectants. However, only riboflavin (0·1%) and uric acid (0·1%) were effective under in vivo conditions. The efficacy obtained with strain O against P. expansum, when subjected to UV-B radiation, was 75·0% and 49·2% for pathogen concentrations of 105 and 106 spores mL−1, respectively. Adding riboflavin to strain O gave a similar efficacy (64·2%). Applying strain O together with uric acid (0·1%) was less active (47·7%). Nonetheless, its efficacy when applied with the antioxidants sodium ascorbate (71·1%) or ascorbic acid (82·5%) was the greatest. Riboflavin and uric acid were the most cost-effective protectants, and could be included in the final formulation of strain O when applied preharvest.
Postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables caused by microbial pathogens account for enormous losses of agricultural products worldwide (Janisiewicz & Korsten, 2002). These losses have been estimated to exceed several billion dollars every year (Wilson & Wisniewski, 1989). Moreover, with increasing consumer demand for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables free of microbial pathogens and pesticide residues, there is an urgent need for alternative protective control methods (Droby et al., 1991).
Generally, postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables are managed using synthetic fungicides either before or after harvesting (Lahlali et al., 2009; Sharma et al., 2009). Thiabendazole (TBZ) and imazalil are the most commonly used chemicals for preventing and controlling postharvest infections caused by Penicillium spp. on apples and citrus fruits (Jijakli et al., 1993). Unlike preharvest treatments, these products are applied after harvesting by dipping or drenching (Lahlali et al., 2009). However, this practice attracts criticism because of the possibility of fungicide resistance development and other environmental effects. Biological control of fruit diseases appears to be an alternative to chemical treatments because the environments of storage rooms (temperature and relative humidity) are stable and defined over time. Furthermore, fruits could command a higher market price, which could outweigh the higher cost of biological treatment (Fokkema, 1991; Jijakli et al., 1993; Wilson & Wisniewski, 1994; Droby et al., 1996).
The antagonistic potential of biocontrol agents (BCAs) in preharvest conditions is undoubtedly dependent on environmental conditions. Survival and biological activity are highly influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, relative humidity, rainfall, UV radiation, pH and nutritional status (availability of sugars and amino acids) (Ippolito & Nigro, 2000; Magan, 2001). Therefore, the study of the response of BCAs to various environmental stresses under laboratory and natural conditions is a crucial step in identifying antagonistic activity and the factors limiting BCA survival when applied as preharvest treatments (Teixido et al., 1999). This ecological study will directly improve the formulation or lead to improvement of the performance of the BCA and ensure a more reliable efficacy (Wisniewski & Wilson, 1992).
The antagonistic yeast Candida oleophila is considered to be a BCA model and has been studied worldwide for the control of postharvest fruit diseases (Jijakli et al., 1993; Droby et al., 1998; Lahlali et al., 2004). Candida oleophila strain O was isolated from the surface of apple fruits and all steps necessary for biofungicide development (mode of action, monitoring, formulation and large-scale application) were studied (Jijakli et al., 1993). Recently, Lahlali & Jijakli (2009) studied its response to water stress as well as low relative humidity and proposed a formulation based on skimmed milk to control the low availability of water contents. However, the use of UV protectants to protect antagonistic yeast, applied preharvest, has not been previously investigated. Few studies have been performed on the influence of UV sunlight on the survival of BCAs. Nevertheless, it has been reported that UV radiation could be a factor limiting the BCA effectiveness when applied preharvest. Consequently, different sunscreens have been selected and added to BCA formulations in order to protect them against the harmful effects of sunlight. The most used among them are zinc oxide, titanium oxide, silicate, talc, inositol, folic acid, p-amino benzoic acid (PABA), riboflavin, tyrosine, tryptophan, ascorbic acid, tinpol LPW and congo red (Dunkle & Shasha, 1989; Burges, 1998). Current research work on the influence of sunlight on antagonistic yeasts is rare. The aims of the present work were to determine the in vitro and in vivo effects of UV-B radiation on C. oleophila survival, and to screen and compare the ability of the most successful compounds used in previous work to promote the survival and effectiveness of strain O.
Materials and methods
Candida oleophila (strain O) was isolated from apple (cv. Golden Delicious) fruits and stored at −80°C in glycerol 25% (Jijakli et al., 1993). Before use, the yeast was successively subcultured onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, Merck) medium and incubated with a 16-h photoperiod for 24 h at 25°C. It was harvested with 0·85% NaCl solution by flooding a Petri dish and the cell concentration adjusted according to optical density (OD) measurements using a UltrospecII spectrophotometer (LKB Biochron Ltd) at 595 nm using the following equation: 106 CFU mL−1 = (OD − 0·015)/0·014 (Jijakli & Lepoivre, 1998).
Penicillium expansum (strain vs2) was isolated from decayed apple fruits. For long-term storage, the spore suspension was maintained at −80°C in tubes containing 25% glycerol. During experiments, the initial conidial inoculum was taken from Petri-dish cultures on PDA medium, preserved at 4°C for no more than 6 months. Conidial suspension was prepared from a 10 ± 1-day-old colony culture in sterile distilled water (SDW) containing 0·05% Tween 20, filtered through cheesecloth and adjusted to the desired concentration using a haemocytometer.
UV-B experimental design
To assess the effect of UV-B (280–320 nm) radiation on growth of C. oleophila, four UV-B Philips lamps (TL UV-B 40 W/12 RS) were used. These lamps were positioned 25 cm from the target (Petri dish or apple). In in vitro tests, the lids of Petri dishes were substituted by diacetate cellulose Clarifoil Standard filters (75 μm thick) (Clarifoil-France). Before use, these filters were presolarized for at least 100 h under the UV lamps in order to remove wavelengths below approximately 292 nm. Once presolarized, filters retain their properties for approximately 15 days. When tested in vivo, these filters were placed under UV-B lamps. Table 1 summarizes UV-B exposure time (h) and corresponding UV-B doses (Kj m−2), and natural sunlight around the summer solstice (h).
|Exposure time (h)||UV-B dose (Kj m−2)||Natural sunlight (h)a|
In vitro effect of UV-B radiation on survival of C. oleophila
Petri dishes containing 20 mL suspension of C. oleophila at a concentration of 107 CFU mL−1 in triplicate, were subjected to different exposure times of UV-B [(0, 0·5 h (0·46 Kj m−2), 1 h (0·93 Kj m−2), 2 h (1·87 Kj m−2), 2·5 h (2·33 Kj m−2), 3 h (2·79 Kj m−2) and 4 h (3·74 Kj m−2)]. For each exposure time, a control dish was kept at 25°C in the dark. The whole 20 mL of suspension were harvested after each exposure time and serially diluted to four 10-fold and 100-μL aliquots for each dilution, including stock, in four replicates for incubation on PDA in Petri plates at 25°C for 72 h (16-h photoperiod). There were four replicates for each plating serial dilution (20 plates per exposure time). This experiment was repeated twice and the results were expressed as percentage mortality rate (MR) using the formula MR(%) = [(UT−ET)/(UT)] × 100; where UT = average number of colonies not exposed to UV-B, and ET = number of colonies exposed to UV-B.
In vivo effect of UV-B radiation on survival of C. oleophila
Apple fruits were disinfected by soaking for 4 min in sodium hypochlorite solution (v/v 10%) and then rinsed twice in SDW. After drying for 1 h at ambient temperature, apples were dipped in 400 mL of strain-O suspension (108 CFU mL−1) for 2 min. Upon drying for 1 h, apples were subjected to different exposure times of UV-B radiation [(0, 1 h (0·93 Kj m−2), 2 h (1·87 Kj m−2), 3 h (2·79 Kj m−2), 4 h (3·74 Kj m−2) and 5 h (4·68 Kj m−2)], with a control treatment in darkness for each exposure time. At half exposure time, the apples were inverted in order to expose their entire surface to UV-B radiation. At the end of each exposure time, the apples were placed in freezer bags containing 1 L KPBT washing buffer [KH2PO4 (0·05 m), K2HPO4 (0·05 m) and 0·05% (w/v) Tween 80, pH 6·5] on a rotary shaker for 20 min at 120 r.p.m. for yeast recovery. Four serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared from 1 mL apple washing buffer and 100 μL plated in triplicate onto selective media (HST-PDA) consisting of PDA supplemented with two fungicides [Sumico (S) at 2·5 mg mL−1 and tetramethyl thiuram disulfide (T) 0·25 mg mL−1] and one antibiotic [hygromycin (H) 416 mg mL−1]. Four dishes were used for each exposure time and were incubated at 25°C for 72–96 h. This experiment was repeated twice and the results were recorded as mortality rate (%) versus UV-B dose (Kj m−2) as described above.
In vitro screening of UV-B protectants
Based on an initial screening to determine any impact on the loss of viability together with cost (Table 2), four UV-B protectants: sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, uric acid and riboflavin, were selected for further studies. As described earlier for in vitro screening without protectants, Petri dishes containing 20 mL suspension of strain O adjusted to 107 CFU mL−1 at three concentrations (0·1%, 0·01% or 0·001% w/v) of each UV protectant were subjected to different UV-B exposure times (0, 0·5, 1, 2, 3 or 4 h). Strain O and each protectant were prepared separately at twice the desired concentration in SDW and then mixed together at the ratio of 10:10 (v/v). The concentrations of selected compounds were chosen based on their cost for practical feasibility and their impact on viability of strain O (Table 2). For each exposure time, 100 μL were incubated on PDA for 72 h at 25°C. Four dishes were used for each exposure-time–concentration combination. The number of colony forming units (CFU mL−1) was determined for each protectant concentration and the log (CFU mL−1) was plotted against exposure time. This assay was carried out twice and viability of strain O was recorded after 2 h of exposure using the formula: percentage viability = [(colony number in the presence of UV-B protectant)/(colony number in unexposed medium without protectant)] × 100.
|UV protectant||Concentration (%)||Price/concentrationa (U) (w/w)||Viabilityb|
In vivo screening of UV-B protectants
The concentration of C. oleophila strain O was adjusted to 108 CFU mL−1 for each UV-B protectant concentration (0·1%, 0·01% and 0·001% w/v). Disinfected apples were treated with each protectant concentration and then exposed to UV-B radiation for 2 h in the same way as described for the in vivo assay without protectant. At the end of the experiment, yeasts were recovered from the apple surface as described earlier. Four dishes were used per treatment and were incubated at 25°C for 72–96 h for colony counts. This experiment was repeated twice and viability of strain O was calculated using the same formula as above.
Efficacy test of formulated strain O against P. expansum
Disinfected apple fruits were wounded at two equidistant points on the equatorial zone (4 mm in diameter and 2 mm deep) using a cork borer and placed in plastic bags. Each wound was treated with 50 μL strain O suspension with or without protectant substances and was exposed to UV-B radiation for 2 h. One batch of apples was used as an exposed UV-B control and another batch as an unexposed control. For both these treatments, wounds were treated with 50 μL SDW. Four apples were used per treatment. Following UV-B exposure, wounds were inoculated with 50 μL pathogen suspension at 105 or 106 spores mL−1. Each plastic bag was moistened with 3 mL SDW. Apple fruits were incubated at 24°C for 5 days and the experiment conducted twice. Lesion diameters were then recorded for each treatment.
The efficacy of treatments compared to control was calculated as percentage reduction in lesion diameter using the equation 100 × (Dt − Dy)/Dt, where Dt and Dy are mean diameters of lesions on apples in the control group, and in the presence of the UV-B protectant, respectively.
Mortality rates (%) of in vitro UV-B doses (0·46, 0·93, 1·87 and 2·33 Kj m−2) and in vivo UV-B doses (0·93, 1·87, 2·79, 3·74 and 4·68 Kj m−2) were transformed to probit values as described by Bliss (1934) and then plotted against UV-B dose in order to estimate lethal doses (LD50 and LD90). The equation of a linear line (y = ax + b, in which y = probit mortality, x = dosage of UV-B radiation, a = the increase of y per unit increase of x, and b = intercept) was used for determining the lethal doses LD50 and LD90, which corresponded respectively to the probit values of 5 and 6·28. The anova proc of sas software (SAS Institute), was performed on strain O viability (%) and lesion diameter (mm). When significant effects were observed, the Newman–Keuls test was used for the mean separation (P ≤ 0·05).
In vitro effect of UV-B radiation on survival of strain O
The impact of UV-B radiation exposure time on C. oleophila strain O was evaluated under in vitro conditions (Fig. 1a). The mortality rate was 54·2% after 1 h and reached 100% after 2 h. There was a positive correlation between probit mortality and UV-B dose (r = 0·99). The lethal doses, LD50 and LD90, were 0·89 and 1·45 Kj m−2, respectively, corresponding, respectively, to 0·39 and 0·62 h of natural sunlight around the summer solstice.
In vivo effect of UV-B radiation on survival of strain O
This trial was conducted under the same conditions as the in vitro experiment, but with apples. Mortality of strain O was plotted against exposure time (Fig. 1b). Mortality reached 20·4%, 26·2% and 45·3% after 1, 2 and 3 h of UV-B exposure, respectively. A mortality rate of 80·9% was observed after 5 h of UV-B exposure. Again, a positive correlation was observed between probit mortality and UV-B dose (r = 0·97). LD50 and LD90 were 3·06 and 5·5 Kj m−2, respectively, corresponding to 1·31 and 2·52 h of natural sunlight around the summer solstice (data not shown).
In vitro screening of UV-B protectants
Table 2 shows the results of the preliminary screening test used to assess the effectiveness of UV-B protectants for C. oleophila strain O under in vitro conditions. The compounds tested gave varying responses to UV-B radiation and the best results were obtained with higher percentages of UV-B protectant (1% and 10% v/v), except for inositol and tryptophan. Consequently, of the 16 UV-B protectants, sodium ascorbate, riboflavin, ascorbic acid and uric acid were selected and retained for further tests based on their higher degree of protection and lower cost. Their effectiveness was evaluated at lower concentrations (0·001%, 0·01% and 0·1% v/v) in suspensions of strain O.
Numbers of strain O cells (log CFU mL−1) were plotted against UV-B radiation exposure time for each protectant concentration (Fig. 2). A fast decline in the strain O population was evident when exposed to UV-B in the absence of a UV-B protectant, with final cell viability varying from 0% to 50% of the initial population. However, the addition of UV-B protectants reduced population decline and resulted in significantly higher numbers of strain O cells compared with the unformulated strain O. This increase in strain O density remained statistically dependent on UV-B protectant level and was slightly lower than that of the unexposed strain O without protectant. Variance analysis demonstrated a significant effect (P ≤ 0·0001) of UV-B protectants on survival of strain O compared with the unformulated strain O (data not shown). The viabilities recorded at both protectant concentrations (0·1% and 0·01%) were not significantly different for ascorbic acid and riboflavin. However, for sodium ascorbate and uric acid, 0·01% did not significantly improve survival. Regardless of the UV-B protectant used, its lowest concentration (0·001%) was not effective in protecting strain O from the adverse effect of UV-B radiation (data not shown).
In vivo screening of UV-B protectants
There was a statistically significant effect of protectant concentration on the viability of strain O following UV-B exposure (Table 3). Strain O showed the highest viability with 0·1% UV-B protectants. For sodium ascorbate, the viabilities recorded at concentrations of 0·1% and 0·01% were not significantly different (30·9% and 33·6%). They did, however, differ significantly between the 0·001% treatment and the unformulated strain O (21·5% and 9·1%, respectively). Again, in the case of ascorbic acid, cell viability was statistically similar for concentrations of 0·1% and 0·01% (35·8% and 30·9%, respectively) and significantly different from that obtained at a concentration of 0·001% (20·0%). However, in the case of riboflavin and uric acid, the highest viability (87·1% and 98·3%, respectively) was reached at the 0·1% concentration. This viability was significantly higher than that obtained at a concentration of 0·01% (56·0% and 39·8%, respectively) or 0·001% (49·2% and 36·9%, respectively).
|Protectant||Concentration (w/v)||Viability (%)|
Efficacy test of formulated strain O against P. expansum
The biocontrol efficacy of strain O applied in mixture with different UV-B protectants at 0·1% was evaluated against P. expansum. There was a significant effect of UV protectants and unformulated strain O on P. expansum lesion diameter compared with untreated controls (Fig. 3). Regardless of pathogen concentration, strain O combinations with UV-B protectants followed the same trends and no significant difference was observed between both control treatments. At a pathogen concentration of 105 spores mL−1, ascorbic acid, sodium ascorbate and unformulated strain O were more effective than uric acid and riboflavin. The highest efficacy was observed for ascorbic acid (82·5%), followed by sodium ascorbate (71·5%), unformulated strain O (75%), riboflavin (64·2%) and uric acid (47·7%). However, at 106 spores mL−1, no significant difference was observed between ascorbic acid, sodium ascorbate and unformulated strain O. Again, the best control was obtained when strain O was applied together with ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate.
It is known that the BCAs used for controlling postharvest fruit disease are highly effective in postharvest conditions and become sensitive to environmental conditions when applied prior to harvesting. Therefore, the abiotic factors that most significantly limit BCA survival under field conditions are temperature, components of sunlight [mainly UV-A (320–400 nm) and UV-B (280–320 nm)], pH, relative humidity and water availability (Teixido et al., 1999; Ippolito & Nigro, 2000; Magan, 2001). Various wavelengths of sunlight have been reported to be responsible for photodegradation and inactivation of various microbial fungicides (Hadapad et al., 2009). UV-B is responsible for direct and indirect DNA damage. The direct damage induces the formation of cyclobutane pyrimide dimers in DNA that cause mutation or the failure of transcription (Griffiths et al., 1998). Indirect DNA damage results from photo-oxidative processes and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Griffiths et al., 1998). It is known that the detrimental effect of UV-B radiation on microorganisms is mediated by ROS (Wang et al., 2008). To quench ROS, organisms develop efficient antioxidant systems to scavenge them, including antioxidant molecules and antioxidant enzymes. This study is the first investigation conducted to evaluate the effect of sunlight on the antagonistic yeast C. oleophila (strain O).
The results show that the antagonistic yeast here was more sensitive to UV-B radiation under in vitro conditions than in vivo conditions. In vitro exposure to UV-B radiation for 3 h resulted in complete loss of cell viability. Braga et al. (2002) studied the impact of four UV-B exposure times on the viability and germination of two species of entomopathogenic fungus, Verticillium lecanii and Aphanocladium album, and reported that viability was reduced to zero after 4 h. Lethal doses which halved each strain population were, respectively, 86 and 120 min, corresponding to 4·1 and 5·8 Kj m−2. For strain O, doses which halved populations were 0·89 (24 min) and 3·06 Kj m−2 (1·3 h) under in vitro and in vivo conditions, respectively. Riesenman & Nicholson (2000) reported that the LD90 for a Bacillus subtilis mutant ranged from 31·3 to 28·0 Kj m−2 and explained that the greatest resistance was afforded by a particular bacterial cell wall structure. Hadapad et al. (2008) underlined that the exposure of B. sphaericus ISPC-8 and 1593 spores to UV-B radiation for 6 h resulted in complete loss of spore viability and 50% reduction in larvicidal activity. Therefore, the BCA in the present study appeared to be more sensitive to sunlight than V. lecanii, A. album and bacteria.
Several reports describe the ways in which various agents protect against UV-B damage (Dunkle & Shasha, 1989; Cohen et al., 1991; Hadapad et al., 2009). Different synthetic compounds such as congo red, uric acid, p-aminbenzoic acid (PABA), benzaldehyde, melanin and malachite, casein, gelatine sodium alginate starch, carboxymethycellulose have been evaluated as suitable UV protectants for various entomopathogens and bacteriophages (Dunkle & Shasha, 1989; Cohen et al., 1991). The present study selected and tested different synthetic compounds as UV-B protectants. A slight difference was observed between them when compared for survival of strain O (Table 2). Consequently, four compounds were screened and evaluated at low concentrations based on their effectiveness and their lower cost (Table 3). These compounds improved survival of strain O under in vivo and in vitro conditions following UV-B exposure. This result is in agreement with that of Hadapad et al. (2009). Also, it was noticed that some protectants lost their efficacy when applied to the apple’s surface. This may have been the result of their oxidative protective action against UV-B radiation (i.e. ascorbic acid and sodium ascorbate act as antioxidants). Thus, when they were tested in vitro, their exposure to oxygen was lower, resulting in higher efficacy. Sodium ascorbate was less sensitive to oxidation than ascorbic acid. Evidently, sodium ascorbate and ascorbic acid would not be useful for strain O formulations at the tested concentrations. They have not been proven effective in protecting strain O against sunlight. Ghajar et al. (2006) also concluded that the use of ascorbic acid or sodium ascorbate would not be economically feasible.
Uric acid and riboflavin gave the best results and appeared to be promising products for strain O formulation because of their high performance and low cost. Ignoffo & Garcia (1995) reported that UV-B protectants should also be cost effective to use as a spray-tank additive. Riboflavin did not act as an antioxidant but as a UV absorber. This mode of action would then be less susceptible to possible oxidation. Hadapad et al. (2009) also reported that riboflavin gave better protection (73·2%) than ascorbic acid (47·8%), as did Ghajar et al. (2006), who reported that riboflavin at 1% gave better protection to conidia of Plectosporium alismatis than ascorbic acid and sodium ascorbate at 5%.
In the biocontrol experiment, it appeared that all UV-B protectants tested, with the exception of uric acid, did not significantly influence the effectiveness of strain O. The obtained results showed that sodium ascorbate (71·5% and 66·7%) and ascorbic acid (82·5% and 71·8%) provided the best efficacy against this pathogenic fungus, followed by riboflavin and uric acid. The results also demonstrated that the efficacy of strain O was influenced by the time interval between its application and pathogen inoculation. It also significantly decreased with increasing pathogen pressure. These results are in agreement with those reported by Jijakli et al. (1993) and Lahlali et al. (2004).
Undoubtedly, the four UV-B protectants evaluated in the present work greatly improved the survival and effectiveness of strain O. Nonetheless, some of them cannot be used in the final formulation of the strain because of their restricted market as additives (uric acid), their mode of action against UV-B radiation as antioxidants or their high cost (ascorbic acid and sodium ascorbate). Therefore, future studies will assess the effectiveness of strain O in combination with riboflavin, uric acid (at low concentrations) and skimmed milk (1%) under field conditions prior to harvesting.
The authors are grateful to Estelle Pouillard for technical assistance and colleagues Terry Tran, Jehn Fransisco (University of Manitoba, Canada) and Dr Singh Ravinder (AAFC-Canada) for English editing. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their relevant contribution in improvement of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Plant Pathology Unit of Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (University of Liege).
- 1934. The method of probits. Science 79, 38–9. ,
- 2002. Damage and recovery from UV-B exposure in conidia of the entomopathogens Verticillium lecanii and Aphanocladium album. Mycologia 94, 912–20. , , , , , ,
- 1998. Formulation of Microbial Biopesticides: Beneficial Microorganisms, Nematodes and Seed Treatments. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ,
- 1991. Photoprotection of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstakii from ultraviolet irradiation. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 57, 343–51. , , , , ,
- 1991. Antagonistic microorganisms as biocontrol agents of postharvest diseases of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest News and Information 2, 169–73. , , ,
- 1996. Are biological antagonists an alternative to synthetic fungicides for preventing postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables? Reviews on Environmental Health 11, 71–7. , , , , ,
- 1998. Commercial testing of aspire: a yeast preparation for the biological control of postharvest decay of citrus. Biological Control 12, 97–101. , , et al. ,
- 1989. Response of starch-encapsulated Bacillus thuringiensis containing ultraviolet screens to sunlight. Environmental Entomology 18, 1035–41. , ,
- 1991. The phyllosphere as ecologically neglected milieu: a plant pathologist’s point of view. In: AndrewsJH, HiranoSS, eds. Microbial Ecology of Leaves. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 3–18. ,
- 2006. Enhancing survival and subsequent infectivity of conidia of potential mycoherbistats using UV protectants. Biocontrol Science and Technology 16, 825–39. , , , ,
- 1998. Molecular and cellular effects of ultraviolet light-induced genotoxicity. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences 35, 189–237. , , , ,
- 2008. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on spore viability and mosquitocidal activity of an indigenous ISPC-8 Bacillus sphaericus Neide strain. Acta Tropica 107, 113–6. , , , ,
- 2009. UV protectants for the biopesticide based on Bacillus sphaericus Neide and their role in protecting the binary toxins from UV radiation. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 100, 147–52. , , , ,
- 1995. Aromatic/heterocyclic amino acids and the simulated sunlight-ultraviolet inactivation of the Heliothis/Helicoverpa baculovirus. Environmental Entomology 24, 480–92. , ,
- 2000. Impact of preharvest application of biological control agents on postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables. Crop Protection 19, 610–9. , ,
- 2002. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40, 411–41. , ,
- 1998. Characterization of an exo-beta-1,3-glucanase produced by Pichia anomala strain K, antagonist of Botrytis cinerea on apples. Phytopathology 88, 335–43. , ,
- 1993. Biological control of Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum on post-harvest apples by two antagonistic yeasts. Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen) 58, 1349–58. , , , ,
- 2009. Enhancement of the biocontrol agent Candida oleophila (strain O) survival and control efficiency under extreme conditions of water activity and relative humidity. Biological Control 51, 403–8. , ,
- 2004. Efficacy assessment of Candida oleophila (strain O) and Pichia anomala (strain K) against major postharvest diseases of citrus fruits in Morocco. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences 69, 601–9. , , ,
- 2009. Assessment of Pichia anomala (strain K) efficacy against blue mould of apples when applied pre- or post-harvest under laboratory conditions and in orchard trials. European Journal of Plant Pathology 123, 37–45. , , , , , ,
- 2001. Physiological approaches to improving the ecological fitness of fungal biocontrol agents. In: ButtTM, JacksonC, MaganN, eds. Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress, Problems and Potential. Wallingford, Bristol, UK: CABI Publishing, 390. ,
- 2002. Etudes des Facteurs Ecologiques et Physiologiques Influençant le Niveau de Protection Biologique Apporté par Deux Souches de Levures sur Pommes vis-à-vis de Botrytis cinerea et Penicillium sp. Mémoire de Fin d’Etudes. Gembloux, Belgium: FUSAGx, MSc thesis. ,
- 2000. Role of the spore coat layers in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to hydrogen peroxide, artificial UV-C, UV-B, and solar UV radiation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 620–6. , ,
- 2009. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: a review. Biological Control 50, 205–21. , , ,
- 1999. Efficacy of preharvest and postharvest Candida sake biocontrol treatments to prevent blue mould on apples during cold storage. International Journal of Food Microbiology 50, 203–10. , , ,
- 2008. The involvement of the antioxidant system in protection of desert cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. against UV-B radiation and the effects of exogenous antioxidants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 69, 150–7. , , , , , ,
- 1989. Biological control of postharvest diseases of vegetables and fruits: an emerging technology. Annual Review of Phytopathology 27, 425–41. , ,
- 1994. Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases: Theory and Practice. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. , ,
- 1992. Biological control of post-harvest disease of fruit and vegetables: recent advances. HortScience 27, 94–8. , ,