SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bardsley SJ, Ngugi HK, 2012. Reliability and accuracy of visual methods to quantify severity of foliar bacterial spot symptoms on peach and nectarine. Plant Pathology; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02651.x.
  • Belasque J Jr, Bassanezi RB, Spósito MB, Ribeiro LM, de Jesus Junior WC, Amorim L, 2005. Escalas diagramáticas para avaliação da severidade do cancro cítrico. Fitopatologia Brasileira30, 38793.
  • Bertrand PF, Brenneman TB, Stevenson KC, 1999. Disease assessment and uniformity in rating methods. In: McCraw B, Dean EH, Wood BW, eds. Pecan Industry: Current Situation and Future Challenges, Third National Pecan Workshop Proceedings. USDA, Agriculture Research Service, ARS-1998-04, 1248.
  • Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Gottwald TR, 2008. Characteristics of the perception of different severity measures of citrus canker and the relations between the various symptom types. Plant Disease92, 92739.
  • Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Riley T, Gottwald TR, 2009a. Comparison of assessment of citrus canker foliar symptoms by experienced and inexperienced raters. Plant Disease93, 41224.
  • Bock CH, Parker PE, Cook AZ, Gottwald TR, 2009b. Automated image analysis of the severity of foliar citrus canker symptoms. Plant Disease93, 6605.
  • Bock CH, Poole G, Parker PE, Gottwald TR, 2010a. Plant disease severity estimated visually, by digital photography and image analysis, and by hyperspectral imaging. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences29, 59107.
  • Bock CH, Gottwald TR, Parker PE et al. , 2010b. Some consequences of using the Horsfall–Barratt scale for hypothesis testing. Phytopathology100, 103141.
  • Correa FM, Bueno Filho JSS, Carmo MGF, 2009. Comparison of three diagrammatic keys for the quantification of late blight in tomato leaves. Plant Pathology58, 112833.
  • Dixon GR, Dodson JK, 1971. Assessment keys for some diseases of vegetable, fodder and forage crops. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany (GB)23, 299307.
  • Everitt BS, 1998. The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forbes GA, Jeger MJ, 1987. Factors affecting the estimation of disease intensity in simulated plant structures. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz94, 11320.
  • Godoy CV, Carneiro SMTPG, Iamauti MT et al. , 1997. Diagrammatic scales for bean disease: development and validation. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten, Pflanzenpathologie, und Pflanzenschutz104, 33645.
  • Godoy CV, Koga LJ, Canteri MG, 2006. Diagrammatic scale for assessment of soybean rust severity. Fitopatologia Brasileira31, 638.
  • Gomes AMA, Michereff SJ, Mariano RLR, 2004. Elaboração e validação de escala diagramática para cercosporiose da alface. Summa Phytopathologica30, 3943.
  • Gottwald TR, Bertrand PF, 1983. Effect of time of inoculation with Cladosporium caryigenum on pecan scab development and nut quality. Phytopathology73, 7148.
  • Hock J, Kranz J, Renfro BL, 1992. Tests of standard diagrams for field use in assessing the tarspot disease complex of maize. Tropical Pest Management38, 3148.
  • Hunter RE, Roberts DD, 1978. A disease grading system for pecan scab. Pecan Quarterly12, 36.
  • James WC, 1971. An illustrated series of assessment keys for plant diseases, their preparation and usage. Canadian Plant Disease Survey51, 3965.
  • Kranz J, 1977. A study on maximum severity in plant disease. Travaux dédiés à G. Viennot-Bourgin, 16, 973.
  • Lamari L, 2008. ASSESS 2.0: Image Analysis Software for Plant Disease Quantification. St Paul, MN, USA: APS Press.
  • Leite RMVBC, Amorin L, 2002. Development and validation of a diagrammatic scale for Alternaria leaf spot of sunflower. Summa Phytopathologia28, 149.
  • Lin LI, 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics45, 25568.
  • Lin B-H, Frazao E, Allshouse J, 2001. Consumption patterns of tree nuts. Food Review24, 548.
  • Madden LV, Hughes G, van den Bosch F, 2007. The Study of Plant Disease Epidemics. St Paul, MN, USA: APS Press.
  • Martin DP, Rybicki EP, 1998. Microcomputer-based quantification maize streak symptoms in Zea mays. Phytopathology88, 4227.
  • Michereff SJ, de Araújo Noronha M, Guimarães DE et al. , 2006. Development and validation of a diagrammatic key for Cercospora leaf spot of sweet pepper. Summa Phytopathologica32, 2606.
  • Newton AC, Hackett CA, 1994. Subjective components of mildew assessment on spring barley. European Journal of Plant Pathology100, 395412.
  • Nilsson H-E, 1995. Remote sensing and image analysis in plant pathology. Annual Review of Phytopathology15, 489527.
  • Nita M, Ellis MA, Madden LV, 2003. Reliability and accuracy of visual estimation of Phomopsis leaf blight of strawberry. Phytopathology93, 9951005.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Esker PD, 2006. The role of psychophysics in phytopathology. European Journal of Plant Pathology114, 199213.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Litwiller D, 1998. A computer program to generate standard area diagrams to aid raters in assessing disease severity. Phytopathology88, S117.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Schultz PM, 1995. Improving the accuracy and precision of disease assessments: selection of methods and use of computer-aided training programs. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology17, 17485.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Teng PS, Shokes FM, 1991. Disease assessment terms and concepts. Plant Disease75, 11878.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Gleason ML, Jenco JH, Christians NL, 1993. Accuracy, intra-rater repeatability, and inter-rater reliability of disease assessment systems. Phytopathology83, 80612.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Miller DL, Wegulo SN, 1998. Do standard diagrams improve the accuracy and precision of disease assessment? In: 7th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Edinburgh. 2, 2.1.16. [http://www.bspp.org.uk/icpp98/]. accessed 21 October 2011.
  • Nutter FW Jr, Esker PD, Coelho Netto RA, 2006. Disease assessment concepts and the advancements made in improving the accuracy and precision of plant disease data. European Journal of Plant Pathology115, 95103.
  • O’Neil CE, Keast DR, Fulgoni VL, Nicklas TA, 2010. Tree nut consumption improves nutrient intake and diet quality in US adults: an analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey (NHAMES) 1999–2004. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition19, 14250.
  • Parker SR, Shaw MW, Royle DJ, 1995. Reliable measurement of disease severity. Aspects of Applied Biology43, 20514.
  • Pethybridge SJ, Hay FS, Wilson CR, 2004. Pathogenicity of fungi commonly isolated from foliar disease in Tasmanian pyrethrum crops. Australasian Plant Pathology33, 4414.
  • Sherwood RT, Berg CC, Hoover MR, Zeiders KE, 1983. Illusions in visual assessment of Stagonospora leaf spot of orchardgrass. Phytopathology73, 1737.
  • Spolti P, Schneider L, Sanhueza RMV, Batzer JC, Gleason ML, Medeiros Del Ponte E, 2011. Improving sooty blotch and flyspeck severity estimation on apple fruit with the aid of standard area diagrams. European Journal of Plant Pathology129, 219.
  • Stevenson KL, Bertrand PF, 2001. Within-season dynamics of yield loss due to pecan scab fruit infections. Phytopathology91, S85.
  • Stonehouse J, 1994. Assessment of Andean bean diseases using visual keys. Plant Pathology43, 51927.
  • Vereijssen J, Schneider JHM, Termorshuizen AJ, Jeger MJ, 2003. Comparison of two disease assessment methods for assessing Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet. Crop Protection22, 2019.
  • Wood BW, 2001. Production unit trends and price characteristics within the United States pecan industry. HortTechnology11, 1108.
  • Wood BW, 2003. Pecan production in North America. Southwestern Entomologist Suppl. 27, 119.
  • Yi Q, Wang PP, He Y, 2008. Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: equivalence test for agreement. Statistics in Medicine27, 281625.